Saturday, November 17, 2012

Beware Agenda 21: Global government up rise ascends as American freedoms fade (+Video)

By Jodi Fowler / Conservative Nexus Editor

Note: Several months ago I wrote a three-part series on the threat America faces with the growing powers of the United Nations and now its “Forward” push by Barack Obama, under the guise of environmental protection, resulting on changes affecting the entire world global population. For the sake of informative education, I have decided to repost my articles with the goal of bringing Agenda 21’s dire consequences, if successful, back to the forefront.

My focus is how  Agenda 21 will affect The United States of America.

This visage uses harmlessly seeming phrases such as “the redistribution of wealth,” “social justice,” “climate protection,” “green growth,” and “sustainable rural communities.” In actuality, Agenda 21 is hardly concerned with protecting the Earth and its population, but rather global governmental CONTROL of the masses.

With the recent and allegedly fraudulent reelection of Barack Hussein Obama, who supports this threat of global government, we are now moving “FORWARD,” the main theme of his 2012 election ‘commitment.’
FORWARD,” is not only a dangerous word, it is a cover-up term with a lengthy and costly kinship with European Marxism), built on Obama’s first campaign promise of “HOPE and CHANGE?” 

Yes, CHANGE indeed. Obama did transpire CHANGE with the result of:
  • Nearly 50 million American citizens now on some form of government subsistence.
  • A $16+ trillion dollar debt.
  • The attack on our religious freedoms.
  • Millions of illegal immigrants entering our borders (Obama’s Dream Act via Executive Order).
  • ObamaCare mandated against the majority of ‘We the People’s’ will.
  • Unprecedented bankruptcies.
  • The housing bubble forcing never-before-seen housing foreclosures.
  • Rising fuel and food costs.
  • Loss of small businesses.
  • Job loss.
  • Dismantling coal resources.
  • Quashing the Keystone XL oil pipeline.
  • The rebirth of racial hostilities.
And the list goes on…and on…and on, ad nauseum. Yes, the first-term of Barack Obama has indeed wreaked havoc on our America. And, it’s all in his UN-American plan.

According to the Heritage Foundation, “During the three years of the Obama Administration, a total of 106 new major regulations have been imposed at a cost of more than $46 billion annually.” And, now we have more Obama usurpations with the threat of Agenda 21 rules and regulations woven into our America. 

Our America is entering into the second term of the most despicable, despotic and nontransparent U.S. presidency since the Founding Fathers penned our United States Constitution.  And, he has started off with quite a steroidal overdose endpoint by wanting to give control of our waters to the United Nations, the impending UN control (Arms Treaty) of our gun laws which will destroy our Second Amendment rights, and looming just around the corner, ‘cyber security’ laws will have the UN in control…further attacking our Constitutional rights via quelling our First Amendment right to freedom of speech.

Barack Obama is hell bent on the complete dismantlement of our beloved Nation.

In the following video Glenn Beck sizes up exactly how Agenda 21 via the International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI), has infiltrated into state and local governments within ourUnited States’ borders.

See and hear the Glenn Beck video here:  http://conservativenexus.com/article/beware-agenda-21-global-government-up-rise-ascends-as-american-freedoms-fade-video/

In my articles I have expanded on the history and formative dangers of the United Nations promotion of Agenda 21 and the advent of ICLEI infiltration. By clicking on the provided links below you will learn more about the push of past presidents and now the current US President’s goals to invoke Agenda 21 into our government system by very surreptitious means.

Since Barack Obama’s reelection, I read time and again on social media outlets (Face Book, Twitter, and etc.), “America is dead,” “We’re doomed,” “We must revolt.”America is NOT dead! Yes, she is in trouble, and ‘We the People’ are the fix.

How do we fix our America? First, educate yourself, and second, get involved in your state and local governments.

Our goal here on Conservative Nexus is to inform and educate. Your goal is getting involved to educate your local and state representatives because they need to be informed and educated.
Stand tall Americans. Stand tall. And, by doing your partAmerica will again rise…and, Barack Obama will fail.

Selling out America: Destroying U.S. sovereignty via Agenda 21, Part I
In defense of the United States Constitution and the Alabama State Constitution, Governor Robert Bentley recently signed into law Senate Bill (SB) 477, boldly becoming the first state leader to sidestep invasive international law by protecting private property ownership rights and the right to due process. Governor Bentley’s eye-opening move, although receiving little, if any, attention from establishment media, prohibits any government convolution from the United Nation’s intent of establishing a one-world government via Agenda 21, or when rhetorically toned down, “Sustainable Development.” A portion of the Bill’s text reads:

Link: http://conservativenexus.com/article/selling-out-america-destroying-u-s-sovereignty-via-agenda-21-part-i/

Part Two: George H.W. Bush (1989 – 1993)
This is an historic moment…we have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a new world order— a world where the rule of law, not the law of the jungle, governs the conduct of nations. When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.”
~ President George H.W. Bush, 1991.
Endorsed by then President George H.W. Bush, and signed along with another 178 U.N. nations, the environmental initiative presented at the Agenda 21 Earth Summit has instilled every United States federal department with “sustainable development” initiatives known as “soft laws” agreements. Not actual treaties requiring ratification, but, which may later result in a “hard law,” the first step toward a treaty-making process resulting in a binding law. Eventually, leading to socialist control?

Link: http://conservativenexus.com/article/selling-out-america-destroying-u-s-sovereignty-via-agenda-21-part-2/

Part Three: In Part 1 of “Selling out America: Destroying U.S. sovereignty via Agenda 21,” the discussion began with the recent gritty move of an Alabama governor to pass into state law rejection of the encroaching threat of the United Nations Agenda 21 and the covert expansion of goals used to impose invasive enactment towards citizens of a global world order. Protecting the property ownership rights of its citizens from U.N. subjugation,Alabama is the first state in theUnion to enact this legislation.

Other state leaders from Kansas, Arizona, Tennessee, and New Hampshire are now questioning Agenda 21 and have enacted resolutions or are considering similar legislation condemning the underhanded U.N. techniques to adopt the expropriation of its agenda.

History of how U.N. global control enforcement has maintained a far reach since its radical ideological inceptions, global order advocates have used misleading soft language or code words such as “sustainable development,” “social justice,” “climate protection,” “green growth,” “sustainable rural communities,” the “redistribution of wealth,” and now “communitarianism,” to implement the governing philosophy of Agenda 21.

Link: http://conservativenexus.com/article/selling-out-america-destroying-u-s-sovereignty-via-agenda-21-part-3/
Petraeus testifies that CIA reported al-Qaeda involvement in Benghazi attack, but that line was removed

From Jihad Watch / Posted by Robert Spencer

If Obama were a Republican, Congress would be making a serious investigation of this coverup and all his lies to cover his support for jihadists in Libya. Instead, the truth dribbles out here and there, with ample time given for the administration to formulate new...talking points.

"Petraeus testifies CIA's Libya talking points were changed, lawmaker says," from
FoxNews.com, November 16 (thanks to Kenneth):
Former CIA Director David Petraeus testified in a closed-door hearing Friday morning that his agency determined immediately after the Sept. 11 Libya attack that "Al Qaeda involvement" was suspected -- but the line was taken out in the final version circulated to administration officials, according to a top lawmaker who was briefed. 
Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who spoke to reporters after Petraeus testified before the House Intelligence Committee, indicated he and other lawmakers still have plenty of questions about the aftermath of the attack.
"No one knows yet exactly who came up with the final version of the talking points," he said.
Petraeus was heading next to the Senate Intelligence Committee to testify. At the same time, lawmakers unexpectedly convened a briefing with top members of various committees to examine a Sept. 25 letter to President Obama that asked a series of classified questions on Benghazi.
Petraeus' testimony both challenges the Obama administration's repeated claims that the attack was a "spontaneous" protest over an anti-Islam video, and according to King conflicts with his own briefing to lawmakers on Sept. 14. Sources have said Petraeus, in that briefing, also described the attack as a protest that spun out of control.
"His testimony today was that from the start, he had told us that this was a terrorist attack," King said, adding that he told Petraeus he had a "different recollection."...

Iran admits pulling strings on Gaza crisis

Source says Islamic regime has 'armed' terrorist groups with chemicals

by Reza Kahlili / WND
As the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Hamas faction is escalating and rockets are hitting Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, Iran announced Friday that its missiles were being used against the Jewish state.

Rockets hit Tel Aviv Thursday for the first time since the 1991 Persian Gulf War when Iraqi scuds threatened the city. On Friday, Jerusalem also came under rocket fire from Hamas militants in the Gaza Strip.

According to a source in the Revolutionary Guards intelligence division, Iran has large stockpiles of chemical and microbial weapons and it has armed the Lebanese terrorist group Hezbollah with them. It also has Quds Forces in Gaza and other Palestinian territories to help Hamas and Islamic Jihad in setting up underground rocket facilities while training and supervising the Palestinians in launching attacks on Israel.

The escalation of the Gaza conflict was ordered by the highest authority in Iran, the source added, and rockets targeting Tel Aviv and Jerusalem are in fact a warning to Israel that its Iron Dome missile defense system cannot thwart Iran’s ballistic missiles and tens of thousands of rockets and missiles in the hands of Hezbollah.

On the day that the International Atomic Energy Agency announced that Iran is set to sharply expand its uranium enrichment in an underground site after installing all the centrifuges it was built for, the message was clear: An attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities will have destructive consequences for Israel.

The missiles fired by the Islamic Jihad that hit Tel Aviv were Iranian Fajr 5 missiles, according to the Islamic regime’s media outlet Nimrooz, which is close to Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf, the mayor of Tehran and a possible candidate for president.

The outlet cited a recent quote by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the supreme leader of the Islamic regime: “From now onward, we will support and help any nation, any groups fighting against the Zionist regime across the world, and we are not afraid of declaring this.”

The outlet said targeting the capital of the “Zionist regime” with this advanced technology is a big victory for the Palestinians and the resistance front — Iran, Syria and Hezbollah.

It quoted anonymous military analysts that the Fajr 5 has the longest range compared to other missiles launched from Gaza and then warned that Israel should expect bigger surprises. And the Fars news agency, the media outlet for the Revolutionary Guards, said Friday that 20,000 Basij forces are prepared to fight alongside the Hamas militants, even as Israel called up thousands of reserves for a possible ground operation.

Last month an Iranian drone launched by Hezbollah was shot down over Israel. The Islamic regime claimed that the drone flew hundreds of kilometers into Israeli airspace and got very close to the Dimona nuclear plant. It also claimed that the regime now possesses images of Israel’s sensitive sites.

As reported in August, an alarming commentary by Mashregh, a media outlet for Iran’s Revolutionary Guards, claimed that Iran not only has WMDs but has armed its terrorist proxies with them.

The commentary recalled the doctrine of the founder of the Islamic revolution, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini: “If they stand against our religion, we will stand against their world. … If all this bloodshed is to provide a better future for Israel, we will destroy their world.”

Mashregh said that in an all-out confrontation with Israel, “groups armed with weapons of mass destruction will surely target Tel Aviv.”

Iranian analysts believe America does not wish a confrontation with Iran and that Israel is on its own.

President Obama in his press conference on Wednesday stated that there is still time for a diplomatic solution on Iran’s nuclear program and again reiterated that Iran can enjoy “peaceful nuclear power.”

But Friday’s IAEA quarterly report demonstrates that the Islamic regime is continuing its headlong approach to building nuclear weapons.

The Republican Party Needs A Reset On Immigration 

By: Jerry Bowyer  / Townhall Columnist

Since the Romney/Ryan ticket’s loss last Tuesday, the Republican Party has been going through a period of soul searching.  Much of that is useless propaganda about how the party needs to move to the ‘center’ (whatever that is) on its tax-cutting growth agenda.

But some of it is a genuinely helpful re-examination of the GOP’s relationship with immigrants and immigrant voter groups. This is a helpful but small step in the right direction. Liberalization of immigration laws was a theme of this column before the election (and a theme of this columnist for many years before). In order to foster more discussion of this issue, we reproduce below an article which appeared in the print edition of Forbes in September of this year.

For those who believe that we are a Johnny-come-lately on this issue, only interested in promoting immigration in light of last week’s electoral defeat, you can find links to columns which I’ve written on this subject going back to 2006 after participating in a radio debate with Pat Buchanan on the issue and a follow up here.

Finally, I add this exhortation to my GOP brethren: If you see your problem with immigrants as merely one of marketing, then you will not succeed. The nativist wing of the party is not just politically inconvenient, it is morally and economically wrong. The point is not to capitulate to political necessity; the point is to have the right policy. The right policy is a growing economy, non-burdensome immigration laws, a welfare system which promotes work, not dependency, and a culture of assimilation, not isolation.

Latinos are religious, morally conservative and tend disproportionately to join the military and start businesses. They are natural members of the conservative coalition.

Nevertheless, some of the loudest voices in the conservative movement are advocating that Latinos here illegally be forced from the country. Big-government skeptics are oddly clamoring for something that only big government could accomplish.

Expelling 15 million people against their will would constitute the largest forced migration in American history. No one has ever forcibly moved that many people without concentration camps and mass death through plague.

If there’s another way to do it, please show me a historical example. What I hear is slogans like “What part of ‘illegal’ don’t you understand?” Slogans move callers to dial in to talk radio, but they don’t move millions voluntarily back into poverty and squalor. That is done by unhappy soldiers manning “hell ships” like the Mercurio , which was used to deport masses of Mexicans during “Operation Wetback,” our last and much smaller deportation attempt, which ended with the soldiers committing mutiny. In the end, you either let the bulk of them stay or herd them out. If you want to call the former amnesty, go ahead.

After all, amnesty has a well-worn legal tradition. It means forgiveness. After the Civil War Abraham Lincoln offered amnesty to Rebel soldiers. Runaway slaves received it after emancipation. Vietnam draft dodgers, too. Conservatives often argue for tax amnesties.

Immigration laws are no different. If we liberalize them, should we still punish the people who violated the laws that we later deemed too harsh?

Conservatives have rightly argued that widespread tax cheating shows that taxes are too high, and widespread violation of the national 55mph speed limit was a sign that the law was too restrictive. Americans concluded that widespread violation of prohibition laws demonstrated that too much restrictiveness can also undermine the rule of law.

Ronald Reagan signed amnesty into law in 1986, inviting 3 million “illegals” to become “legals.” Would the man who didn’t want to deport 3 million now deport 15 million? Reagan had a completely different idea about immigration and the border than the wall/moat/electrocution/drone model. His diaries show an emotional discomfort with militarized borders with Mexico. He met with the president of Mexico to try to discuss ways to do something better with the border than to turn it into a fence.

Milton Friedman believed that even illegal immigration was good for freedom. Ludwig von Mises believed that human capital should be free to cross borders just like financial capital. Forcible interventions into immigration were really just forcible interventions into the labor market designed to restrict wage competition, just like compulsory unionism. Von Mises saw that “there cannot be the slightest doubt that migration barriers diminish the productivity of human labor.” Both Friedman and Von Mises had concerns about immigration driven by the welfare system, but the solution for both was to shrink the welfare state, not to freeze wage migration.

Immigration was one of the causes for the American Revolution. Jefferson complained King George wasn’t letting us get enough of it: “He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither.”

Healthy and growing nations talk this way, and Malthusianism be damned. It was taken as a given by the founders that population growth is good. Anything else has just too much of the death rattle of empire to it.

The Constitution puts immigration law in the hands of Congress, which can loosen and tighten the standards at will, with one exception: Children born here are citizens. So what are the family-values conservatives going to do, send the parents packing, while the kids stay here?

We need a reset on this issue. If the Republican Party gets tagged as the nostalgic, static, anti-Latino party, it’s dead. And we will have brought it on ourselves.
Op-ed:
Israel...'We the People' stand with you
By: Diane Sori 
As breaking news came in yesterday that Israel was shutting down roads leading into Gaza as 75,000 reservists, tanks, and artillery amass along the border for a ground assault into the belly of the beast, the U(seless) N(ations) is of course condemning them. 
Never mind that rockets from Gaza reign down on parts of Israel almost daily; never mind that suicide bombers blow themselves up in crowded Israeli shopping districts; never mind that most Israelis never venture very far from a bomb shelter; never mind that Iran pulls Hamas' strings...never mind all that because our president (still gagging on that one) Barack HUSSEIN Obama sides with Israel's enemies every chance he gets, and that American help and support has NOT even been offered by this miserable excuse of a president.
And as hospitals across Israel are placed on emergency status as they wait for what will surely be incoming wounded, the signs of war increase with each passing hour.  Hamas has fired 550+ rockets into the heart of Israel over the past three days, including into Tel-Aviv and yesterday into Jerusalem, and Obama still remains silent except for some minor perfunctory statement given two days ago.

An American president should be shouting our support for Israel from the rooftops but NOT this president for he sides with Israel's enemies because he is one of Israel's enemies.

So now we have the powerful force of modern day Israeli warriors going up against those who are led by madmen who want to wipe them off the map, and our president says nothing and does nothing. 
 
As much as he is a traitor to America, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is also a traitor to Israel, our closest ally and friend.

And as the rockets continue to reign down on Israel, Egypt’s prime minister, Hesham Qandil, is visiting Gaza NOT to try to quell the violence but is there in a show of support for Hamas, making the circle of hate surrounding Israel almost complete.

And while war looms on the horizon, Palestinian Authority President Mahmoud Abbas has the gaul to accuse Israel of wanting to launch this attack just to undermine his efforts to secure a diplomatic upgrade at the United Nations. 
 
"Everything that is happening is in order to block our endeavors to reach the United Nations," Abbas told reporters and anyone else who would listen to his bloviations. 
 
Can you believe the arrogance of this man...the Mid-East is on the verge of all-out war and Abbas has the audacity to whine about his efforts to secure a state for a people who don't even technically exist.

This man's arrogance is on the same lines of Barack HUSSEIN Obama's and his 'it's all about me' attitude in everything he does.

Or in this case Obama's attitude in everything he has NOT done to help America's ally and friend, Israel.

And while I am not a religious person per se, as I write this I ask God, I pray to God...NO...I beg God to protect Israel and her people for she is in a battle NOT just against those in Gaza, but is in a battle for her very survival...and it seems she must sadly go it alone.