Monday, March 4, 2013

It sure bothers me...


Income Tax: That Evil And Immoral Monster
by / Personal Liberty Digest
 
Income Tax: That Evil And Immoral Monster
PHOTOS.COM
Modern states all have paper currencies, a debt money system. All forms of government money represent debt. Modern governments would not and could not exist without both the power to create debt money and the income tax system.

The purpose of modern paper currencies (all forms, including computer symbols) is to transfer wealth to the government without payment by the government.

The Federal government creates modern “money” out of nothing and “pays” it into circulation for something. In other words, the government gets money (any amount of it) and passes it into the “economy” for goods and services. This is the same as saying that the government actually pays for nothing. It transfers wealth and production to itself for free. It pays not one penny.

Why then the income tax? The purpose of the income tax is to conceal the fraud that massive wealth is being transferred to the government without payment. This cover-up conceals the fact that since the Civil War and Abraham Lincoln’s “greenbacks,” paper money is the means of financing all wars and all means and methods of suppressing human liberty.

The vast wealth of governments comes from the creation of money, not from income tax. Why would governments need our income tax if they can create any amount of “money”?

The answer is, of course, they don’t need our income tax, but they have to have the income tax system to cover their money creation fraud. In other words, the people must believe that their income taxes are necessary to support government. All must pay their “fair share.”

So important is the income tax system as a cover-up that it is regulated by threat, coercion, mass brainwashing and a whole system of witchcraft called the tax code. Remember, governments have to conceal their greatest secret, their money machine.

The income tax is not a Constitutional issue. It is a system of Phariseeism promoting general and widespread social depravity and spiritual immorality. It is indeed a spiritual deception.
That governments print money is no state secret. Then why do so few question the meaning of the income tax?

Little children are taught in school to pay income tax. All the propaganda says “pay your fair share.” It is a complete and absolute brainwashing and so big as to defy inquiry. The system is inbred.

Though the income tax is not necessary as a source of government funds in a paper economy, it is very important as a system of regulation. It promotes class warfare and privilege. The government and its politicians can discriminate or favor with the income tax system.

The American people are victims of a massive entrapment scheme that has conned them out of billions of dollars, as well as millions of hours of recordkeeping and loss of freedom. Federal judges and U.S. attorneys have all conspired against human rights by failing to inform the people of the nature of income tax entrapment.

This is a financial holocaust that is nothing less than organized crime against the people. What a masterpiece of cynicism and deceit. This conspiracy by the government against the American people is equal to and greater than any tyrant in the history of the world. Please do not forget the duplicity of your “elected representatives.” They have betrayed you.

One final word for those who mimic the “fair share” clich√© as well as the misnomer that the Federal government needs your income taxes as government revenue: You do not understand monetary realism nor history of government finance.

For a true education on monetary realism you should read Money, The Greatest Hoax on Earth by the great monetary genius Merrill Jenkins Sr., if you can get your hands on a copy. It is no longer in print, but is sometimes available at Amazon.com. There is also our reproduction of Jenkins’ lectures in Money: The Single Greatest Lie in American History.

How can the Internal Revenue Service trap millions of Americans into an enforceable contract and yet claim that it is “voluntary”?

The point is that the income tax has to be understood before you sign a 1040. People sign 1040 income tax forms believing that they are “tax payers.” The government wants very much for you to think of yourself as a “taxpayer.” Has the propaganda succeeded?

One very important fact: The U.S. monetary system as well as the world monetary system is a credit debt system. In other words, all U.S. “money” is credit money, which is debt. Is it possible to pay a tax debt (assuming you owed one) with debt? Not according to the U.S. Supreme Court in Don E. Williams v. Commissioner of the Internal Revenue.

Federal Reserve notes (paper dollars) do not promise anything and are not redeemable in anything. The system works on confidence.

Why then do we play this April game if it is not about paying income taxes?
Remember that all modern “money” is debt. You do not “pay” your debts. You swap debt money for
debt.

So when you write a check to the IRS, you think that you are paying taxes simply because this
process reduces the numbers in your bank account. Consequently, you have less “money” to spend.

The “payment of income taxes” is not payment of anything, nor is it intended to be. It is a process of regulation to continually reduce the amount of your “money” in circulation. Your check to the IRS reduces your “money” numbers so that you have less to “spend.” Without this regulation (paying income taxes to reduce the volume of money):
  1. Our “money” would become (be perceived as) worthless.
  1. The system would be revealed as the fraud that it is. People must believe that they are “taxpayers” and that their “fair share” goes to support government. They must never know that government creates its “money” for the purpose of transferring wealth to itself without payment.
The so-called income tax system is a regulatory process that is absolutely essential with a debt money system. One cannot exist without the other. Lincoln started the first income tax along with his Lincoln greenback paper money. Lincoln did not free the slaves (a pretense). He made slaves of us all to the money machine. All modern wars were made possible with Lincoln’s paper (debt) “money.”

But we do write symbols on checks “payable” to the IRS. What is happening?

What we are actually doing is conforming to the regulation process by reducing the numbers in our “bank account.” We are limiting our consumption. This process reduces our bidding against government for what we produced. If we were permitted to spend all of the “money” that we get, prices would go to the moon, the system would collapse as the worthless “money” became useless “money” and the fraud of modern money would be revealed, as John Maynard Keynes warned.

So to slow the collapse, every means possible must be found to restrict the supply of spendable money in the hands of the people. Income tax is the big one. But individual retirement accounts, 401(k)s, buying government debt (Treasury bills, T. notes or T. bonds) and even population control are directly related to the control or regulation of the volume of money.

Government gets services, production, materials and our labor with their created money for free. By all definitions, we are slaves to the money creators.

Why should Americans fear terrorism? The money creators created terrorism and all other wars and conflicts.

Obama’s 2-Percent Flip Flops

Obama’s 2-Percent Flip Flops
If you’re reading this, it means you survived the sequester. Of course, as President Obama reminded us last Friday, “this is not going to be an apocalypse as some people have said.”
 
Some people?

Just ten days earlier, the President said, “And that’s why it’s so troubling that just 10 days from now, Congress might allow a series of automatic, severe budget cuts to take place that will do the exact opposite. It won't help the economy, won't create jobs, will visit hardship on a whole lot of people.”

He went on to warn that “if Congress allows this meat-cleaver approach to take place,” it would “eviscerate job-creating investments” and cut “vital service[s] that Americans depend on every single day.”

The President’s backtrack – also known as a flip-flop – began after major media outlets began asking whether he was overplaying his hand. If Americans woke up Friday morning and failed to see any impact of the dreaded sequester, they may no longer dread the miniscule reductions, which amount to just 2.4% of the total federal budget.

Take Obama’s warning that “Air traffic controllers and airport security will see cutbacks, which means more delays at airports across the country.” It was a line repeated ad nauseum by outgoing Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood. But despite the daily fear mongering, Heritage Action’s Katherine Rosario reveals, “The [Federal Aviation Administration] FAA is getting more than they need – more than they asked for – even after sequester cuts.”

It gets worse.

Of the 112 airports around the country that are subsidized by the Essential Air Service program, only 19 made it on Ray LaHood’s list of towers that “could be closed.” Instead of closing, or threatening to close, low-traffic airports, the Obama administration released a list of 233 airports designed to inflict maximum panic.

To be sure, implementing the sequester is cumbersome and the indiscriminate cuts to the military will only serve to lock in years of neglect under Obama. However, it took the sequester to make agencies realize they shouldn’t be holding glitzy conferences. Similarly, lawmakers realized there are more budget friendly ways to travel than commandeering a military.

Of course, Obama was taking a calculated risk touting the detrimental impacts of the sequester. When and if the economy turns negative, he wants the blame to fall squarely on the sequester, not his other policies. Heritage Foundation president-elect Jim DeMint explained:

“But our struggling economy is the President’s own creation. His tax hikes—in income taxes, payroll taxes, and Obamacare taxes—will take $150 billion out of the economy this year alone. The $150 billion doesn’t magically appear in Washington’s bank account without real consequences. It comes out of your paycheck. It means less money for your boss to give you a raise. Small businesses won’t have the money to hire new employees. You’ll have less money to save for your retirement or your child’s college fund.”

As DeMint mentioned, the expiration of the 2-percentage point payroll tax cut took a chunk of money out of the pockets of hardworking American families.

In a display of willful omission, Obama told shipyard workers that Washington couldn’t keep asking “working families like yours to shoulder the entire burden of deficit reduction.” Every single one of those workers saw the government take a bigger chunk of their paychecks this year when the 2-percentage point reduction in the payroll tax expired.

Obama never fought to extend the tax cut in the fiscal cliff deal. Just one year earlier though, he called the extension of the payroll tax holiday “the right thing to do to strengthen our families, grow our economy, and create new jobs. This is real money that will make a real difference in people’s lives.”
Americans need real leadership, not a presidential flip-flopper.
Kerry says US releasing millions in jizya to Egypt

From Jihad Watch / Posted by Robert Spencer

Hey, somebody has to pay for cracking down on opposition protestors, oppressing Christians, and unleashing Sharia morality police on the populace. All that doesn't come cheap. "Kerry says US releasing millions in aid to Egypt," by Matthew Lee for the Associated Press, March 3 (thanks to Benedict):
CAIRO (AP) — U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry on Sunday rewarded Egypt for President Mohammed Morsi's pledges of political and economic reforms by releasing $250 million in American aid to support the country's "future as a debt."
Yet Kerry also served notice that the Obama administration will keep close watch on how Morsi, who came to power in June as Egypt's first freely elected president, honors his commitment and that additional U.S. assistance would depend on it.
"The path to that future has clearly been difficult and much work remains," Kerry said in a statement after wrapping up two days of meetings in Egypt, a deeply divided country in the wake of the revolution that ousted longtime President Hosni Mubarak.
Egypt is trying to meet conditions to close on a $4.8 billion loan package from the International Monetary Fund. An agreement would unlock more of the $1 billion in U.S. assistance promised by President Barack Obama last year and set to begin flowing with Kerry's announcement.
"The United States can and wants to do more," Kerry said. "Reaching an agreement with the IMF will require further effort on the part of the Egyptian government and broad support for reform by all Egyptians. When Egypt takes the difficult steps to strengthen its economy and build political unity and justice, we will work with our Congress at home on additional support."
Kerry cited Egypt's "extreme needs" and Morsi's "assurances that he plans to complete the IMF process" when he told the president that the U.S. would provide $190 million of a long-term $450 million pledge "in a good-faith effort to spur reform and help the Egyptian people at this difficult time." The release of the rest of the $450 million and the other $550 million tranche of the $1 billion that Obama announced will be tied to successful reforms, officials said.
Separately, the top U.S. diplomat announced $60 million for a new fund for "direct support of key engines of democratic change," including Egypt's entrepreneurs and its young people. Kerry held out the prospect of U.S. assistance to this fund climbing to $300 million over time.
Recapping his meetings with political figures, business leaders and representatives of outside groups, Kerry said he heard of their "deep concern about the political course of their country, the need to strengthen human rights protections, justice and the rule of law, and their fundamental anxiety about the economic future of Egypt."
Those issues came up in "a very candid and constructive manner" during Kerry's talks with Morsi.
"It is clear that more hard work and compromise will be required to restore unity, political stability and economic health to Egypt," Kerry said....
Commandant: Sequester Will "Cut Into Bone"

Now that the deadline has passed, sequestration is set to take effect and Marine Commandant General Jim Amos said today that those cuts will put severe strain on the   Marine Corps, including tens of thousands of Marines still serving in Afghanistan.

Amos: With sequester, USMC will 'cut into bone'


By Andrew deGrandpré
March 3, 2013


Severe budget cuts are coming and will require the Marine Corps to "cut into bone" as officials are forced to make painful decisions in the months and years ahead, the service's top general warned troops and their families in a letter distributed throughout the force this weekend.

With sequestration in effect, the Marine Corps faces a shortfall of about $1.4 billion through the remainder of the current fiscal year, which ends Sept. 30, and approximately $2 billion annually through 2022, according to Gen. Jim Amos, the commandant.


Though thin on specifics, his letter indicates deep concern about the effect these cutbacks will have on the Corps' active-duty and Reserve personnel, their families and the 20,000 civilians whom the service employs throughout the U.S. and around the world.

"We are already a lean and frugal service," Amos wrote, "thus every reduction that we make from this point forward will cut into bone - we are beyond muscle."

We can't let the politics back home effect our troops on the front lines! These Marines are sacrificing 9-12 months of their lives, fighting on the front lines in Afghanistan, to protect their country from the Taliban and Al Qaeda. During that time they cannot see their families or friends back home, putting themselves in harm's way to fight a war we asked them to fight. We can't just send troops off to a foreign war and not support them!
Op-ed:
17 pardons...hypocrisy in action
By: Diane Sori

Barack HUSSEIN Obama issued Presidential Pardons for 17 people last week for what he said were 'minor offenses'...offenses that included falsely altering a money order, unauthorized acquisition of food stamps, drug violations, and possession of an unregistered firearm.

Uh...hold on a minute here...Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Mr. Gun Control himself, considers possession of an unregistered firearm a minor offense as he takes his gun control 'dog and pony show' on the road...oh really...

Can you say Hypocrisy 101 for this very man said and I quote, “If you want to buy a gun...whether it’s from a licensed dealer or a private seller...you should at least have to show you are not a felon or somebody legally prohibited from buying one” now suddenly considers possession of an unregistered firearm a 'minor offense'...something is very wrong with this picture.

The very man who wants to disarm 'We the People,' and corrupt if NOT outright do away with our Constitutionally given Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms...this man who is emphasizing as part of his gun control agenda the need to know who exactly is buying firearms...this very man has now pardoned a Georgia individual who was facing four years probation for possessing NOT only an unregistered firearm but a firearm without a serial number...a visibly noticeable filed off serial number in fact...something NO law abiding citizen would do or have in their possession.

Something stinks here folks and stinks BIG time.

All I can say is 'yikes'...amazing huh...for this particular individual gets a Presidential Pardon for committing one of the very crimes Obama is trying to push gun control down our throats for. Oh really, then how about answering a few question for me Mr. President (gag...so hard to call this usurper that). First, how did a person with an unregistered, number filed off firearm only get four years probation and NO jail time in the first place? Second, was this person a registered Democrat or a campaign contributor perhaps...I mean if one of us Conservatives were arrested and convicted of such an offense we'd probably be locked away for years yet this man gets probation, which is tantamount to a slap on the wrist, and then an official pardon to boot...something smells here don't you think.

Bad guns, very bad guns, claims Obama and his liberal cohorts as they preach their 'gun control for the American people' sermon over and over ad nauseum forgetting either deliberately or just through sheer stupidity that criminals will always find a way to get guns...NO laws will ever stop that...I repeat...NO laws will ever stop that, capeesh. So my point here is Obama's hypocrisy of saying how evil guns are, how a background check needs to be done for everyone buying one, then pardoning someone who committed the very offense that he is preaching against stinks...and I use the word preaching in the same context as the old time snake oil salesman who would talk a good talk to try and sell his wares to a gullible unsuspecting public.

And if there ever was a snake oil salesman trying to sell useless gun control legislation to a gullible unsuspecting public it is Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

“We should get tougher on people who buy guns with the express purpose of turning around and selling them to criminals. And we should severely punish anybody who helps them do this.” And Obama bloviates on and on and on...yet he is pardoning a man who knowingly bought an unregistered, serial number filed off firearm...why would he do that unless he was going to use it for some nefarious purpose but thankfully got caught before he could.

And this individual is who Obama pardons, a man who was only getting probation and NOT for instance pardoning US Soldier Michael Behenna who was sent to prison for killing an al-Qaeda operative (as in the enemy) or Sgt. Robert Richards, a sniper team leader with the 3rd Battalion, 2nd Marines, one of the eight Marines who've faced punishment over the July 2011 incident where he and his teammates urinated on Taliban (again the enemy) corpses in Afghanistan, which by the way disallows them entrance to supposed paradise...payback's a b*tch ain't it.

And yes before anyone gets all WTF, the president can indeed pardon someone charged with a military offense thus releasing them from punishment, but that pardon will not change the character of the military discharge itself, meaning a dishonorable discharge for instance would stand, but at least they would be free.

So pardoning an individual for one of the very offenses on the gun control agenda instead of a person truly wrongly convicted of a crime, should indeed come under scrutiny for the granting of a pardon to a person who has committed a crime or who has been convicted of a crime is an act of clemency, which forgives the wrongdoer and restores the person's civil rights...as in the right to vote...and rest assured these 17 people will be voting Democrat or they wouldn't have been pardoned.

Everything Barack HUSSEIN Obama does is political, not principled, done for political gain, posturing, and to give his narcissistic self a pat on the back. And if he thinks pardoning someone for a firearm offense as he jockeys for gun control (translation: gun confiscation) is going to raise his status amongst us LEGAL firearm owners he is in for a rude awakening, because we can see right through him and all his phony maneuvers.

17 pardons with one of those pardons for a firearms offense...17 future Democrats...17 voters who will follow blindly along in a kool-ade induced haze as a thank you for their pardons. Only in Obamanation folks...only in Obamanation...