Wednesday, November 20, 2013

Billy & Karen Vaughn: 
A Family's Search for Truth

On Monday, November 25th, Lady Patriots Radio host Dr. Sharon Schuetz and co-host Diane Sori will interview special guests Karen and Billy Vaughn. The Vaughns lost their Navy SEAL son Aaron in the take down of Extortion 17 and are leading the charge to demand answers from this administration as to the whys of these 30 reckless American deaths.

Hope you all will join us at 8pm CT...9pm EST...Monday, 11/25

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/lady-patriots/2013/11/26/billy-karen-vaughn-a-familys-search-for-truth



 
Call in to speak with the host
(347) 237-5087

Before BENGHAZI, There was EXTORTION 17.... August 06, 2011, 2:20 a.m.—Operation Lefty Grove is underway, a highly dangerous mission to take out another high-level Taliban operative, three months after the takeout of Osama Bin Laden. Twenty-five US Special Ops Forces (including 17 members of SEAL Team 6) and a five-man flight crew board Extortion 17, a CH-47 Chinook helicopter. Seven Afghan also board but they have been switched out at the last minute from the original seven listed on the manifest. 

Extortion 17’s specially trained warriors drop into the Hot Landing Zone to help their fellow warriors. But there’s a problem: the standard chopper escorts have all been directed elsewhere...Betrayed is a heart rending account in America’s history, an engaging novel of faith, patriotism, honor, duty and loss. 

Betrayed is not just the biography of an American military family, it is a crucial, true-life narrative that every American must read and understand about their government and the danger America’s military strategy currently poses to all families. Betrayed is a book Billy Vaughn wishes he didn’t have to write. But his son is gone and there are still unanswered questions. He needs to know if finding the truth may prevent another father from standing in his shoes.

Billy & Karen Vaughn are seeking answers and finding them. Join us to see what these amazing parents have discovered in their quest for the truth.

www.forourson.us
www.operation300.com

Boston Globe comes out for restrictions on the freedom of speech, approves censorship of AFDI ads

From Jihad Watch / Posted by Robert Spencer

george-iii-sm.jpgThomas Jefferson called this man a demeaning, disparaging name

"A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people." -- The Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence called King George III a "Tyrant." Was that not "demeaning or disparaging"? "Name-calling"? Even "an unnecessary incitement"? But the Globe has, of course, long since abandoned the desire for freedom that was the impetus for the Declaration.

The suicide of the free press gallops on. The ad refers to Islamic jihadists as "savage," and this is too much for the Globe. As Pamela Geller notes, the Globe states that "calling anyone a 'savage' is an unnecessary incitement. Were the slaughters of the Fogel family savage? Was the homicide bomber on the bus of Jewish women and children savage? Were the Muslim terrorists on 9/11, 3/11, 11/26, etc. savage? Is truth an 'unnecessary incitement'? And who is being 'unnecessarily incited'? The jihadists? They don't need an excuse. They slaughter based on their religious teachings."

What's more, calling for restrictions on free speech because we might say something that would make Islamic jihadists angry is to surrender to them pre-emptively. If Muslims or anyone else is angry about something, it doesn't give them any excuse to riot or kill. And if we engage in self-censorship to keep them from rioting and killing, we are validating their rage, hatred and violence, instead of calling on them to act responsibility and learn to deal more rationally with things they dislike.

The standard that the Globe recommends in this editorial would ultimately destroy any possibility of speaking out against any kind of tyranny or injustice, for we would not be able to call it what it was -- that would be "name-calling."

"MBTA’s advertising dispute: Speech without name-calling," an unsigned Boston Globe editorial, November 17:
The anti-Islamist group that’s suing the MBTA for rejecting its ad raises an important point: Guidelines for political advertising on the T must be enforced consistently. It’s a sensitive task for T managers, and their pledge to judge all submissions equally is admirable. There is no evidence the T violated its policy in rejecting the ad from a nonprofit group called the American Freedom Defense Initiative. 
The T says it bars any ad that is “demeaning or disparaging” — a sensible standard, if applied fairly. The ad in question declares, “In any war between the civilized man and the savage, support the civilized man.” It adds, “Support Israel. Defeat jihad.” Lawyers for the AFDI said in a press release that the ad “is supportive of Israel in the debate over the Israeli/Palestinian conflict.” But the text, derived from a quote by writer Ayn Rand, is clearly demeaning: Calling anyone a “savage” is an unnecessary incitement, whether directed at Palestinians, Jews, Christians, Muslims, Republicans, or Democrats. The AFDI can easily make a forceful case for Israel without calling anyone “savages.” Indeed, the T has invited the group to modify the ad.
No, it hasn't. No one from the MBTA ever contacted us.
The basis for the lawsuit is the T’s decision, earlier this year, to accept a pro-Palestinian ad that showed a series of maps allegedly documenting “Palestinian loss of land” to Israel. That claim may be hotly disputed, but it isn’t “demeaning or disparaging.” The AFDI’s lawyers say that by stating that the United Nations classifies 4.7 million Palestinians as refugees, the ad is “claiming that Israel is in effect engaging in war crimes.” But that’s nowhere in the text. The AFDI should work with the MBTA on an ad that expresses the group’s strong pro-Israel views but can’t be so obviously categorized as demeaning.


Apparently we just can’t trust government statistics. But, then again, what else is new? According to a new report, released by John Crudele with the NY Post, the jobs reports leading up to the 2012 Presidential Election were “faked.” Remember when the unemployment rate magically dropped from 8.1 percent to 7.8 percent (coincidently helping Obama keep his previous promise of lowering the unemployment rate before the end of his first term)? Yeah, that’s just one of the jobs reports in question.

More than simply being manipulated, the Census Bureau was aware of the tampered numbers. Never did the bureau deem it necessary to share with the Markets, Press, or American People that there was some question about the accuracy or dependability of their numbers leading up to the Election. Heck, they didn’t even bother to disclose the data tampering to the Labor Department.

But let’s not stop there. According to the NY Post:

A knowledgeable source says the deception went beyond that one employee — that it escalated at the time President Obama was seeking reelection in 2012 and continues today.
 
Well. . . I imagine making up data for the most closely watched metric of economic health in the US is kinda addicting. You couldn’t possibly expect the Bureau to suddenly raise the unemployment rate back up to 8.1 percent after Obama was re-elected. Right?

Investigations (ya know. . . The press refers to them as “witch-hunts” when Darrell Issa calls for one) are likely to crop up in the coming weeks. While it is admittedly early to accuse our incredibly transparent and honest Obama Administration of “cooking the books” in the run up to his showdown with Mitt Romney, it’s not really out of the picture either. (I’m sure they’d just tell us that Americans can keep their current jobs numbers if they like their current jobs numbers.)

The revelations are likely to further erode the government’s already decaying credibility. Regardless of the scandal’s size (or deliberate nature) it continues to feed the American Public’s perception that the Federal government is about as trustworthy as Jerry Lundegaard from Fargo. Especially when these revelations are put in the context of recent Obama Administration scandals. The most unnerving of which is clearly the IRS’s willingness to target the President’s political opponents.

Earlier this year we learned the big scandal of the summer when it came to light that the Internal Revenue Service had intentionally targeted “tea-party” nonprofits for harassment and extra scrutiny leading up to the 2012 election. Prophetically, that scandal also began with the narrative that a couple of “rogue” employees had acted “inappropriately”. Of course we now know that the harassment of right-wing political organizations was wide-spread and organized from the higher echelons of Washington DC.

In fact, when compared to the revelations of IRS misconduct, the NY Post report looks potentially damning for the Department of Labor and the credibility of the US Census. The IRS scandal demonstrated a deliberate and willful manipulation of government resources to consolidate and strengthen the Administration’s power. It illustrated a willingness to coerce a win through the power of government. The politically convenient timing of these “fake” jobs reports (coinciding with a troubled Obama reelection effort) certainly should raise an eyebrow. If not by themselves, they should merit inquisitiveness when put in context with the Obama Administration’s habit of manipulation, coercion, and outright lies.

On the other hand, does it really matter? It’s not as if the reports – before or after the 2012 election – are reflective of America’s true economic health. As individual data points, many of the traditional metrics we utilize to measure the “health” of the economy are growing increasingly irrelevant.

Our labor force is at a 35 year low, with more Americans on public assistant programs than ever before. Seven point something percent “unemployment” is a laughably useless number when placed within the broader economic picture. When the headline unemployment rate fails to take into account the massive amount of jobs reduced to part time, the millions of Americans who have dropped from the labor force, and the low quality nature of created jobs, the report is little more than a curiosity.
 
(Well, I guess it does tell the market whether or not the Fed is going to turn off the QE spigot.) Investors, economists, journalists (eye-roll) and politicos should look forward to more information from the Bureau regarding Crudele’s revelations. Soon a flood of excuses, deflections, and reports will be submitted to explain away the actions of “a rogue employee” in the Census Bureau. Of course, all official reports will be stashed away in my home library next to Obama’s speeches and Bill Clinton’s explanations: Filed under “fiction”.
 
PS:
(Click here for Crudele’s full report.)
Rick Santelli reacted to the news yesterday on CNBC:


In Britain to promote her film "The Butler," Oprah Winfrey gave an interview to the BBC last week. Not surprisingly, she promoted her movie about race relations in the White House with comments about race relations and the White House.

The BBC's Will Gompertz asked: "Has it ever crossed your mind that some of the treatment of Obama and the challenges he's faced and some of the reporting he's received is because he's an African-American?"

Now there's a fresh take.

Either Gompertz has been handcuffed to a radiator in someone's windowless basement for the last five years or, more likely, he was riffing off the suggested questions Winfrey's PR team handed out to interviewers. Neither explanation would lift the stench of staleness from the question -- or the answer.

Winfrey responded: "Has it ever crossed my mind? ... Probably it's crossed my mind more times than it's crossed your mind. Just the level of disrespect. When the senator yelled out, 'You're a liar' -- remember that? Yeah, I think that there is a level of disrespect for the office that occurs, and that occurs in some cases and maybe even many cases because he's African-American."

Now it's true that Rep. Joe Wilson (R-S.C.) should not have shouted "You lie!" (whether or not it was a lie) at the president during his health-care address to Congress. But the evidence that Wilson was motivated by racism is simply nonexistent.

However, a lack of evidence hasn't stopped countless liberals, editorial boards, pundits and stand-up comics, not to mention administration officials, from propagating the idea that Obama's problems boil down to the irrational bigotry of his opponents.

Looking for examples of this relentless smear is like hunting for sand at the beach. In July, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told the NAACP that the same people who opposed the Civil Rights Act and anti-lynching laws were opposing Obamacare. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) made similar arguments. And from what I can tell, so has virtually every host on MSNBC (except for Joe Scarborough). In one way or another they subscribe to Chris Matthews' view that opposition to Obama and Obamacare is driven by faith in white supremacy.

It's all very stupid and lazy. When President Clinton tried to transform health care in the 1990s, conservatives opposed the effort hammer and tongs. But when they mount the same battle with an even more liberal president who happens to be black, the only logical conclusion is that racism is afoot. George W. Bush is pretty white, and he was shown ample disrespect. You can look it up.

This is not to say there aren't racists -- even in the GOP -- who don't like the president and his agenda.

It's just that you don't need to leap to racism to understand the criticisms of Obama and his agenda. If the man were white, the argument about Obamacare wouldn't change one iota, at least not for conservatives.

For liberals, it's not so clear. Since Democrats steamrolled the Affordable Care Act into law, its defenders have acted as if any opposition to the law is irrational, extremist, absurd and, of course, racist. They gave themselves license to dismiss all inconvenient facts simply by impugning the motives of those who point them out.

Just days before HealthCare.gov crashed on takeoff, Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who has often suggested that the president's opponents are bigots, railed on the Senate floor: "Obamacare has been the law for four years. Why don't they get a life and talk about something else?"

"We are going to accept nothing that relates to Obamacare," he added. "Let them find something else to be weird about."

In recent polls, 58 percent of Americans have a negative view of the health-care law, 54 percent disapprove of Obama and 50 percent think he isn't honest or trustworthy. Are they all racists and weirdos?

Winfrey, a billionaire twice over thanks in no small part to her popularity among whites, told the BBC that the older generation of bigots may "just have to die" before America can get past racism. In 2012, 60 percent of voters under 30 voted for Obama. Now more than half view him negatiope Winfrey doesn't think they need to die too.
 
  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
WASHINGTON – A retired Army general is calling for the “forced resignations” of President Obama, other administration officials and the leadership of Congress for the direction they’re taking the nation, his list of grievances including the systematic political purge of hundreds of senior military officers in the U.S. military.
Retired Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely told WND he is calling for nationwide rallies and protests to demand the resignations and added that a peaceful “civil uprising is still not out of question.”
In his capacity as chairman of the organization Stand Up America, Vallely issued what he termed a “National Call to Action” to force the resignations of Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Vallely, formerly the deputy commanding general of Pacific Command, said the current crop of leaders must be forced to resign by the “demand resignation” process, which he explained requires massive grass-roots protests and social networking. As an example, he cited the public and media pressure that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.
Impeachment, Vallely said, is not a viable option because of “partisan politics.”
“Our federal government continues down the path of destroying America,” he said. “Americans must now stand up and put America back on the right track.”
In issuing his national call to action, Vallely said the federal government has not subsided in “sucking the oxygen” out of America.
“And we call to action all branches of government to do your constitutional duties and not be led astray in the cultural and moral decay of America. We have witnessed far too many lies,” he said, as well as “deception and the corruption of the republic.”
Vallely reminds Americans that the Declaration of Independence itself states that whenever “any Form of Government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem more likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”
Vallely said the nation he long defended is self-destructing “before our very eyes,” because of “our inept and incompetent leadership in Washington.”
“The battle is on,” he added, “and we shall not retreat.”
Vallely, who has also served as a Fox News military analyst, claimed the Obama administration and leadership of Congress have been leading the nation down a road of “progressive socialism.”
The retired general said the U.S. faces a battle that is unknown to generations of Americans, and that the fate of the nation is “now in our hands” to enforce the Constitution and “severely limit the federal government and its out-of-control spending.”
He said conditions today are approaching those of the time of the inaugural address of President Abraham Lincoln, who said at the time that people have a “right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one.”
“Shake off,” said Vallely, “means replacing government leaders.” He argued America today bears “many similarities to the fall of Rome.” America, he added, is not immune to collapse or even revolution, which he notes “has happened many times in history. … External and internal threats could precipitate this as well as any financial collapse.”
Vallely added that “politics as usual will not be effective or sufficient enough to turn the country around.”
“We are in a war for America,” he told WND, adding that Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Dr. Ben Carson, the noted brain surgeon and author of “America the Beautiful” and other bestselling books have made similar observations.
Americans have had enough, he said, and the Obama White House and identifiable members of Congress “must now depart from a progressive socialist and treasonous death march and bankrupting the country beyond expectations.”
“A civil uprising is still not out of the question as ‘pain’ grips the country more each day,” Vallely said, adding that there is time to change the country in a peaceful way.
“This means raising your voice now to your neighbors, family, co-workers and friends,” he said. “Be the captains of your souls. I pray for another George Washington to appear within the year and lead us.”
One of the issues that alarms Vallely is the high number of senior officers in the U.S. military who have been fired under the Obama administration, a toll estimated at one officer per week. Indeed, Vallely has been very outspoken to what he calls a “purge” of the U.S. military by the Obama administration — with a stunning nine generals and flag officers relieved of duty this year alone.
WND has been reporting on the surge of firings, suspensions and dismissals, for which Vallely has assigned a good portion of the blame to Obama’s close adviser, Valerie Jarrett. Rampant “political correctness” due to her influence, Vallely tells WND, is now permeating the military and negatively affecting everyone from top generals to the ranks of the enlisted.
According to Vallely, Obama is “intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing the U.S. as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
Vallely equated the current treatment of U.S. senior military officers watching over what is said and done among mid-level officers and enlisted ranks to that of the “political commissars from the Communist era.”
He also told WND that the White House won’t investigate its own officials, but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their lives for their country.”
“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
He’s far from alone in his concerns about the military purge, as J.D. Gordon, a retired Navy commander and a former Pentagon spokesman in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, says the Obama administration is rushing to unload senior officers whom he believes have become “political pawns” dismissed for questionable reasons.
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady, a recipient of the U.S. military’s highest decoration, the Medal of Honor, similarly has told WND that Obama needs to apply the same standards to his political appointees as he does to the military.
“Just when you thought the leadership of this government could not get any worse, it does,” Brady said. “Never in history has an administration spawned another scandal to cover the current one.”
This was a reference to the recent firing of a number of generals to mask “Obama’s serial scandals, all prefaced by lies – Fast and Furious, Benghazi, NSA, IRS,” among others, said Brady, former president of the Congressional Medal of Honor Society.
Retired Army Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin, who was a founding member of Delta Force and later deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence under President George W. Bush, tells WND it is worrying that four-star generals are being retired at the rate that has occurred under Obama.
“Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause,” Boykin said. “I believe there is a purging of the military. The problem is worse than we have ever seen.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/general-lets-make-obama-resign/#qx9kHhQE3g48MR7v.99
  • Text smaller
  • Text bigger
WASHINGTON – A retired Army general is calling for the “forced resignations” of President Obama, other administration officials and the leadership of Congress for the direction they’re taking the nation, his list of grievances including the systematic political purge of hundreds of senior military officers in the U.S. military.
Retired Maj. Gen. Paul E. Vallely told WND he is calling for nationwide rallies and protests to demand the resignations and added that a peaceful “civil uprising is still not out of question.”
In his capacity as chairman of the organization Stand Up America, Vallely issued what he termed a “National Call to Action” to force the resignations of Obama, Vice President Joe Biden, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., House Speaker John Boehner, R-Ohio, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.
Vallely, formerly the deputy commanding general of Pacific Command, said the current crop of leaders must be forced to resign by the “demand resignation” process, which he explained requires massive grass-roots protests and social networking. As an example, he cited the public and media pressure that led to the resignation of President Richard Nixon.
Impeachment, Vallely said, is not a viable option because of “partisan politics.”
“Our federal government continues down the path of destroying America,” he said. “Americans must now stand up and put America back on the right track.”
In issuing his national call to action, Vallely said the federal government has not subsided in “sucking the oxygen” out of America.
“And we call to action all branches of government to do your constitutional duties and not be led astray in the cultural and moral decay of America. We have witnessed far too many lies,” he said, as well as “deception and the corruption of the republic.”
Vallely reminds Americans that the Declaration of Independence itself states that whenever “any Form of Government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem more likely to affect their Safety and Happiness.”
Vallely said the nation he long defended is self-destructing “before our very eyes,” because of “our inept and incompetent leadership in Washington.”
“The battle is on,” he added, “and we shall not retreat.”
Vallely, who has also served as a Fox News military analyst, claimed the Obama administration and leadership of Congress have been leading the nation down a road of “progressive socialism.”
The retired general said the U.S. faces a battle that is unknown to generations of Americans, and that the fate of the nation is “now in our hands” to enforce the Constitution and “severely limit the federal government and its out-of-control spending.”
He said conditions today are approaching those of the time of the inaugural address of President Abraham Lincoln, who said at the time that people have a “right to rise up and shake off the existing government and form a new one.”
“Shake off,” said Vallely, “means replacing government leaders.” He argued America today bears “many similarities to the fall of Rome.” America, he added, is not immune to collapse or even revolution, which he notes “has happened many times in history. … External and internal threats could precipitate this as well as any financial collapse.”
Vallely added that “politics as usual will not be effective or sufficient enough to turn the country around.”
“We are in a war for America,” he told WND, adding that Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, and Dr. Ben Carson, the noted brain surgeon and author of “America the Beautiful” and other bestselling books have made similar observations.
Americans have had enough, he said, and the Obama White House and identifiable members of Congress “must now depart from a progressive socialist and treasonous death march and bankrupting the country beyond expectations.”
“A civil uprising is still not out of the question as ‘pain’ grips the country more each day,” Vallely said, adding that there is time to change the country in a peaceful way.
“This means raising your voice now to your neighbors, family, co-workers and friends,” he said. “Be the captains of your souls. I pray for another George Washington to appear within the year and lead us.”
One of the issues that alarms Vallely is the high number of senior officers in the U.S. military who have been fired under the Obama administration, a toll estimated at one officer per week. Indeed, Vallely has been very outspoken to what he calls a “purge” of the U.S. military by the Obama administration — with a stunning nine generals and flag officers relieved of duty this year alone.
WND has been reporting on the surge of firings, suspensions and dismissals, for which Vallely has assigned a good portion of the blame to Obama’s close adviser, Valerie Jarrett. Rampant “political correctness” due to her influence, Vallely tells WND, is now permeating the military and negatively affecting everyone from top generals to the ranks of the enlisted.
According to Vallely, Obama is “intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing the U.S. as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
Vallely equated the current treatment of U.S. senior military officers watching over what is said and done among mid-level officers and enlisted ranks to that of the “political commissars from the Communist era.”
He also told WND that the White House won’t investigate its own officials, but finds it easy to fire military commanders “who have given their lives for their country.”
“Obama will not purge a civilian or political appointee because they have bought into Obama’s ideology,” Vallely said. “The White House protects their own. That’s why they stalled on the investigation into Fast and Furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He’s intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged.”
He’s far from alone in his concerns about the military purge, as J.D. Gordon, a retired Navy commander and a former Pentagon spokesman in the Office of the Secretary of Defense, says the Obama administration is rushing to unload senior officers whom he believes have become “political pawns” dismissed for questionable reasons.
Retired Army Maj. Gen. Patrick Brady, a recipient of the U.S. military’s highest decoration, the Medal of Honor, similarly has told WND that Obama needs to apply the same standards to his political appointees as he does to the military.
“Just when you thought the leadership of this government could not get any worse, it does,” Brady said. “Never in history has an administration spawned another scandal to cover the current one.”
This was a reference to the recent firing of a number of generals to mask “Obama’s serial scandals, all prefaced by lies – Fast and Furious, Benghazi, NSA, IRS,” among others, said Brady, former president of the Congressional Medal of Honor Society.
Retired Army Lt. Gen. William G. “Jerry” Boykin, who was a founding member of Delta Force and later deputy undersecretary of defense for intelligence under President George W. Bush, tells WND it is worrying that four-star generals are being retired at the rate that has occurred under Obama.
“Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause,” Boykin said. “I believe there is a purging of the military. The problem is worse than we have ever seen.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/11/general-lets-make-obama-resign/#qx9kHhQE3g48MR7v.99

In Florida's 
23 Congressional District 
the Republican candidates are 
RINO Richard DiNappoli 
and true Conservative 
Juan Garcia...
guess who I'm supporting!

More Obama Fraud

by   / Personal Liberty Digest

More Obama Fraud
PHOTOS.COM

There is yet more fraud surrounding the undocumented usurper currently occupying the people’s house. Given that Barack Obama’s entire existence is based on a fraud, how can it surprise that his re-election was based on yet another?

From his birth narrative to his life in Indonesia to his youth spent in Hawaii to his Social Security numbers to his Selective Service application to his noms de guerre to his college life to his authorship to his “Hope and Change” to his “If you like your healthcare, you can keep it”: Everything about the man is a fraud.

For four years, he perpetuated the lie that people who had health insurance they were happy with could keep it. He knew every time he said it that it was a lie. Now we know that the unemployment numbers that came out in the September before the election were lies as well. And the lies were made based on orders from above.

The employment numbers were manipulated. But they were manipulated far and away more than the normal, “acceptable” manipulation that occurs month to month. And what’s worse, the Census Bureau knew they were manipulated and did nothing about it; and the orders for the manipulation came from the upper echelons of the Bureau.

As I and others have said many times, the Bureau of Labor Statistics’ employment numbers are cooked. The Bureau doesn’t count all the unemployed as being unemployed. They only count the unemployed seeking work. Once a worker drops out of the workforce, he is no longer considered unemployed.

The Census Bureau is under contract with the Labor Department to conduct household surveys to help determine the “official” unemployment rate. Given that Federal Reserve money printing is ostensibly based on what Helicopter Ben Bernanke determines is an acceptable or unacceptable level of employment, the unemployment numbers are crucial to U.S. financial policy. They were also crucial to Obama’s election, apparently.

According to The New York Post, as the November 2012 election drew near, Census employees were deliberately fabricating employment surveys. That accounts for the drop in unemployment from 8.1 percent in August 2012 to 7.8 percent in September — a number that most pundits thought at the time was unrealistic. Turns out it was.
Op-ed:
ObamaCare…and lies are spewed yet again
By: Diane Sori
 
Obama knew…Kathleen Sebelius knew…they all knew as far back as last March that the ObamaCare website…Healthcare.gov…had problems…major problems…yet they kept moving forward and promoting a site that simply did NOT work while telling ‘We the People’ that all was well and on schedule.

Incompetence…subterfuge…LIES…Barack HUSSEIN
Obama runs the gamut of all three as a law the majority of the American people do NOT want, (57+% do NOT want ObamaCare in any form and 71% at least want it delayed) need, or can afford, is being shoved down our throats…shoved down our throats as we’re told we must go shopping for health insurance on a site that is broken beyond repair...or else we'll be hit with a penalty even though we have NOTHING to do with the site's problems.

And so the broken record spins on and on and on...ad nauseum

“I was NOT informed directly that the website does NOT work,” so said Barack HUSSEIN Obama during his anything but an 'apology tour' while he made the media rounds. Now read those words again and pay close attention to the context of the way the word ‘directly’ is used. Directly…Obama said he was NOT told ‘directly’ but he was indeed told for ‘directly’ only means that Sebelius herself did NOT tell him…it does NOT mean that someone else involved with the site did NOT tell him.

But the truth is that according to documents released yesterday by the House Energy and Commerce Committee, Obama and those in his administration were indeed told last March that there were potential risks with the implementation of the Healthcare.gov site and this in turn forced Obama mouthpiece Jay Carney to allude to the fact that Obama might indeed have been briefed back in March.

So now it’s time for Obama and his minion to devise yet another LIE to cover for the LIE that he did NOT know the site was such a mess…which in turn was devised to cover for his LIE about the cancellation notices…which covers for his BIG LIE about the fact that ObamaCare was actually designed to fail so he could get what he’s wanted all along…a single-payer system of health care…a single-payer system so he could further tighten the grip on ‘We the People.’

But thankfully, Obama’s web of LIES is starting to unravel. In fact, McKinsey & Co…the independent consulting firm that waded through 200+ documents and interviewed HHS staff to identify problems that might rise before the official October 1st rollout…told in a report of giving administration and HHS officials briefings last March in relation to issues that could affect ObamaCare’s debut…issues including insufficient testing, evolving requirements, and that ObamaCare relied too heavily on outside contractors.

But in spite of all the problems with the website’s official rollout…paramount of which is that the website simply does NOT work…problems that the site is ‘hacker-friendly’ causing people to be subjected to identity theft and fraud…problems with proposed monthly rates so high that it scares most who peruse the site to run away…the first enrollment deadline of December 15th for those who want insurance coverage beginning January 1, 2014, is fast approaching and Obama still will NOT agree to a delay.

So when December 15th does arrive with enrollment numbers NOT met what happens then…I’ll tell you what…Obama has another happy little surprise in store to screw ‘We the People’ yet again.

And that happy little surprise is that to assure that his namesake law works, Obama had a clause buried within its 2000+ pages of nonsense that says the government can bailout insurance companies who do NOT make enough money because of all law’s mandatory coverage requirements. In a provision called ‘risk corridors’ that’s used to mitigate an insurer’s pricing risk...basically protecting insurance companies from unexpected monetary changes in the marketplace…a safety net for insurers during the first three years of ObamaCare’s implementation designed to protect the marketplace if more expensive patients (meaning older sicker Americans) sign up than the so-wanted younger healthier sign-ups. This means if costs end up being higher, the government pays part of the difference and if costs are lower the insurance company pays the government…translating to its ‘We the People’s’ taxpayer dollars that will be forced to bail out the insurance companies.

So while Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL) yesterday introduced a bill to remove this clause, Obama and crew continue to squawk that the risk corridors provision is important for avoiding the so-called ‘death-spiral’ of high costs and low participation that could jeopardize…if NOT outright kill the law. A lack of risk protection could cause insurers NOT to participate in the exchanges, or raise their premium rates even higher than they’ve already been raised…meaning more people will simply choose to pay the penalty than to buy insurance they simply cannot afford to buy let alone to maintain.

And the nightmare that is ObamaCare continues to wreak havoc on our economy…our business communities…and on each and every American NOT only cancelled from carriers and policies they were happy with but on ALL taxpaying Americans who are now being forced to pay and carry the burden for the mere 5% of Americans who currently are uninsured…Americans who can walk into any emergency room in this country and NOT get turned away.

And while the ObamaCare nightmare continues on there is a way to wake up from it…REPEAL the whole damn thing and be done with it...and then vote out each and every Democrat who voted this monstrosity in BEFORE they even bothered to read it...period.