Today, Wednesday July
30th, on RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…We will welcome back to the show, Jake
Danishevsky…an American who grew up in Ukraine, to bring us up to date
on what’s happening right now in his country of birth!!!
We will also be talking about the situation in Israel as the war against Hamas in Gaza continues.
We’ve got a LOT to cover on today’s show, from the border and amnesty to John Kerry’s epic fail in negotiating a cease fire.
Join us for RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS…TODAY…WEDNESDAY JULY 30TH FROM 2-4pm EST on CPR Worldwide Media!!!
LISTEN LIVE at http://cprworldwidemedia.com/live-radio/
And chat with live shows at https://www.facebook.com/groups/cprworldwidemedia/
Wednesday, July 30, 2014
In Heller, one of the most important rulings for liberty in recent American history, attorney Alan Gura successfully sued the D.C. government; in the process overturning its blatantly unconstitutional, 1970s-era ban on firearms. Heller clearly affirmed the individual right to keep and bear arms guaranteed by the Second Amendment; as contrasted to the mushy, collective right interpretation long-favored by gun-grabbers like Michael Bloomberg and Rahm Emmanuel. Gura then successfully sued the city of Chicago, which resulted in the High Court’s 2010 McDonald decision, thus extending Heller’s ruling to local governments across the country.
Following these two landmark Supreme Court rulings, other lawsuits picked apart the anti-gun apparatus in federal court. Yet, as stubborn as a corpse can be, anti-gun state and local government officials immediately began fashioning new ways to undermine the restoration of gun rights in their jurisdictions. Officials in Washington, D.C. -- ground zero for the modern day resurgence of the Second Amendment – refused to comply with the letter and intent of those Supreme Court decisions.
For example, the District forces its residents to obtain a permit to carry a firearm outside of the home; but the City steadfastly has refused to institute a process enabling citizens seeking to so defend themselves, to obtain permits. In essence, the city created a de facto ban on carrying firearms in public, all the while claiming to comply with the intent of the Heller decision. One can see why Gura has been so busy.
Fortunately, half a decade worth of post-Heller litigation paid off last week, when federal district court Judge Frederick Scullin ruled D.C.’s permitting scheme to be unconstitutional. “In light of Heller, McDonald, and their progeny,” wrote Scullin, “there is no longer any basis on which this Court can conclude that the District of Columbia's total ban on the public carrying of ready-to-use handguns outside the home is constitutional under any level of scrutiny.”
Scullin’s refreshingly clear ruling follows one in December 2012 by federal Court of Appeals Judge for the Seventh Circuit, Richard Posner. In that ruling Posner noted that “to confine the right to be armed to the home” -- as Illinois’ then-blanket ban on the private carry of firearms did -- “is to divorce the Second Amendment from the right of self-defense described in Heller and McDonald.”
Posner noted pointedly that residents of Chicago, a notoriously dangerous city despite years of aggressive gun control laws, had a far greater claim to self-defense outside the home than in it.
As Scullin and Posner’s rulings suggest, it is only logical that law-abiding citizens protecting themselves from violence outside the home is a natural and logical focus of the Second Amendment, especially given the legal clarity on the issue from two recent Supreme Court battles. Unfortunately, logic is not an attribute favored by gun-control zealots such as those controlling the levers of power in the District of Columbia; which is precisely why the fight for the Second Amendment continues long after a majority of Supreme Court justices might have thought they resolved the issue in 2008 and 2010.
And, the anti-gun grandstanding in the courts is not without financial costs to taxpayers, who are forced to pay the legal fees of both parties after each government defeat. The six years D.C. officials dragged Dick Heller through the legal system, only to be told what the language of and history behind the Second Amendments clearly proclaims to the world (that “the right of the people to keep and bear [a]rms shall not be infringed”), cost taxpayers more than one million dollars in attorney fees, just for Heller’s team.
That is why some members of Congress are starting to use the power of the purse strings to rein in D.C. officials who continue to violate the clear directive of the Supreme Court. Earlier this month, for example, Rep. Thomas Massie (R-KY) successfully passed an appropriations amendment that prohibits the District of Columbia from using federal tax dollars to enforce its unconstitutional gun control laws. While the fate of such a common-sense measure remains unclear in the Senate, the fact that many Democratic incumbents facing reelection in November hail from states whose voters are strong Second Amendment supporters, raises the legislation’s odds considerably.
Message: They care! Reality: They fake. The cognitive dissonance on Capitol Hill is so thick you need a V8-powered chainsaw to slice it.
While cynical politicians prattle on about protecting the American Dream, they're working together to destroy it. If these elected officials care so much about reducing poverty, why are they working so hard to import more of it from around the world? Leaders in both political parties have thrown struggling Americans under the bus to feed the cheap illegal alien labor machine.
The working poor are the biggest losers in D.C.'s amnesty game. U.S. Civil Rights Commissioner Peter Kirsanow has been a lonely voice warning about the impact of mass illegal immigration and perpetual amnesty on low-income black Americans. "The country's economic woes have disproportionately harmed African-Americans, especially those with little education," he warned this spring. "The economy has a glut of low-skilled workers, not a shortage," which is driving wages down.
Stagnant wages and depressed economic growth affect working poor Americans of all colors, while illegal alien amnesty beneficiaries cash in. Steve Camarota and Karen Ziegler of the Center for Immigration Studies reported last month that "since 2000, all of the net gain in the number of working-age (16 to 65) people holding a job has gone to immigrants (legal and illegal). This is remarkable given that native-born Americans accounted for two-thirds of the growth in the total working-age population. Though there has been some recovery from the Great Recession, there were still fewer working-age natives holding a job in the first quarter of 2014 than in 2000, while the number of immigrants with a job was 5.7 million above the 2000 level."
President Obama has already granted administrative amnesty to an estimated two million illegal aliens and renewed "temporary" work permits for 520,000. The administration is planning an expansion that would grant amnesties to at least six million more lawbreakers.
Where is the opposition? Appeasement Republicans refuse to support Texas GOP Sen. Ted Cruz's on-target proposal to repeal Obama's "DREAM" magnet and Alabama GOP Sen. Jeff Sessions' clarion call to block any more executive amnesties as a precondition to border bill negotiations.
According to my sources on the Hill, the staffs of Sens. McCain, Flake and Murkowski met privately and opposed any changes to Obama's DREAM passes for illegals -- which makes them willing and suicidal accomplices in the perpetual Democratic voter recruitment drive. On the House side, GOP House Speaker John Boehner is also openly opposed to stopping the DREAM nightmare.
There are no longer two separate parties in Washington. There's just one big Amnesty Inc. conglomerate addicted to Big Business donations and Big Government grievance politics. The Obama White House needs to buy off Hispanic voters, keep immigration lawyers employed and secure a left-wing permanent ruling majority. Establishment Republicans need to pay off the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, pander to minority lobbyists and curry favor with open-borders CEOS led by Facebook billionaire Mark Zuckerberg.
The real crisis is not at the border. It's being fomented inside our nation's capital. The "border crisis" is a bipartisan D.C. catastrophe of craven politicians abandoning their constitutional duties to defend our sovereignty and put American workers first.
Robert Spencer / Jihad Watch
There needs to be an investigation of the UNRWA over this. Could it really keep happening without any UN officials knowing what was going on? The problem is, who can investigate the United Nations? Not Obama’s investigative or intelligence apparatus.
In any case, if we had a President who had America and its allies’ best interests at heart, that President could announce that no U.S. funds would go to the United Nations if any more jihad rockets were found in its schools — and the schools would thenceforth be clear of the rockets.
“THIRD Rocket Arsenal Found At UN School In Gaza,” by Jordan Schachtel, Breitbart News, July 29, 2014:
The United Nations Relief & Works Agency For Palestine Refugees (UNRWA) announced Tuesday that another rocket stockpile has been found at one of its schools in Gaza. This instance marks the third time since the beginning of Operation Protective Edge that a weapons arsenal has been found at an UNRWA school in Gaza.
UNRWA has yet to place blame on any individuals or organizations for placing the weapons stockpile within a children’s school. The UN body refused to do so on the past two previous occasions as well.
The UN body, after both previous findings, has handed the rockets it had found back into the possession of “the local police,” otherwise known as the terrorist group Hamas.
This week, UNRWA supplies and building materials had been found in Hamas’s tunnel infrastructure, which has been used to smuggle weapons and carry out attacks on the State of Israel.
The UN agency has a well-documented history of using their US taxpayer-funded facilities to promote anti-Israel and anti-Semitic propaganda. It has in the past been accused of aiding and abetting radical Islamists in Gaza and elsewhere.
UNRWA was created in 1949 to provide relief and public works programs for displaced Arab refugees that had formerly inhabited the British mandate of Palestine. UNRWA is currently the largest agency-subdivision of the entire UN, employing over 30,000 staff.
UNRWA has objectively failed in its primary goal of finding homes for those it has deemed “refugees”. From 1949 to present day, refugees recognized by UNRWA has grown from 750,000 to 5,000,000 people.
Pamela Geller / Atlas Shrugs
Publicly, both sides are denying this. But Obama is a liar, an unabashed, pathological unconscionable liar (“You can keep your doctor,” “Not a smidgen of corruption” at the IRS, “Benghazi was a spontaneous attack because of a youtube video”). And Bibi is in no position to upset the jihadophile in the White House.
But if true — it gives us a glimpse at the monster running the country.
There are so many alarmingly wrong things that jump out from this short transcript, it is like the US was hijacked by a MB agent…
Channel 1 reporter says PM-POTUS transcript legit: Despite rejections by American and Israeli officials, Channel 1′s Or Nahari insists that the transcript leaked to him by a “senior American official” is authentic, but acknowledges that the quotes he published were merely an except from a long conversation. (TOI)
The State Department is running for cover. They can leak Israel intel that jeopardizes their national security (here and here too) but don’t reveal what Obama is actually doing.
Shocking and disappointing someone would sink to misrepresenting a pvt convo between POTUS and PM in fabrications to Israeli press 2/2
— @NSCPress (@NSCPress) July 29, 2014
It certainly hurts Israel to alienate Obama but maybe Israel wants the world to know what a savage Obama really is.
“Leaked Phone Conversation between Obama and Bibi,” J Space
Below is a transcript that was reported on the IBA...
IRANIAN official says “Iran will arm the West Bank with missiles”
Bare Naked Israel
Former Iranian defense adviser says Tehran would seek to arm Palestinians in the West Bank with “strategic weapons” including missiles to target Tel Aviv and Haifa, which will be much easier to hit from Judea and Samaria than from Gaza.
Times of Israel Iranian researcher Amir Mousavi told Lebanon’s Mayadeen TV channel that “a major reshuffle awaits the region” as “new and significant fronts will be opened all of a sudden, to support the Palestinian cause in the West Bank and Gaza.”
Mousavi added that Gaza would also receive increased military support from Iran. As for the Palestinian Authority which controls the West Bank and has in recent years cooperated closely with Israel on security issues, Mousavi remarked: “We hope that the brothers in the Palestinian Authority will help rather than impede this.”
On Tuesday Iran’s supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei urged the Islamic world to arm Palestinians to allow them to counter what he called Israel’s “genocide” in the Gaza Strip. In a speech marking the Muslim festival of Eid al-Fitr, Khamenei said Israel was acting like a “rabid dog” and “a wild wolf,” causing a human catastrophe that must be resisted.
Click on link to see video:
Report: Administration Likely Knew Some Obamacare Subsidies Illegal
By Melanie Batley / Newsmax
The recent ruling by the D.C. Circuit that the implementation of Obamacare is illegal has uncovered the possibility that the Obama administration was aware of this all along, Politico Magazine reported.
The Halbig v. Burwell lawsuit ruled that the Affordable Care Act does not allow for Obamacare to provide subsidized health insurance for the 5 million Americans living in the 36 states using the federal healthcare website, HealthCare.gov.
Instead, the legislation stipulated that subsidies would be extended only to those who enroll through an exchange "established by the State."
The administration, including Jonathan Gruber, who helped craft the ACA legislation, has insisted since the ruling that Congress never intended to withhold subsidies from residents of states that did not choose to set up their own exchanges.
Gruber, an MIT economist, described the ruling as "implausible," "screwy," "nutty," and "stupid."
But a 2012 video has since surfaced indicating that Gruber told an audience, "If you're a state and you don't set up an exchange, that means your citizens don't get their tax credits."
Another 2012 recording has also emerged of Gruber making similar comments, both of which may have been an attempt to try to "squeeze" the states into establishing their own exchanges, according to Politico.
Politico said Gruber's 2012 comments "demolish" the administration's case against Halbig.
"When the chief architect of the [Affordable Care Act] admits it withholds tax credits in uncooperative states, that establishes that the plaintiffs' interpretation of the statute in Halbig was not only plausible but that it had currency among the law's authors," Politico said.
Gruber has since tried to play down his 2012 comments, calling them a "speak-o," but Politico argues his explanation doesn't stand up.
"It is precisely because of Gruber's intellect and profound familiarity with the PPACA that his attempts to explain away his past statements are not credible," Politico added.
"Back in January 2012, before anyone knew 36 states would refuse to establish an exchange, Gruber understood and had no problem with what the law says. When it became apparent that two-thirds of the states would not establish exchanges, and that this language therefore threatened the PPACA's survival, Gruber changed his tune," Politico said.
"To claim Gruber didn't know what he was saying is as absurd as saying a conductor might fail to notice that the brass section suddenly stopped playing."
Politico added, "Gruber's comments raise questions about whether this (correct) interpretation of the law was also understood by the members of Congress and administration officials Gruber advised. They also corroborate other evidence showing that the administration was aware it was breaking the law all along."
The publication also noted that last year, seven career Treasury and IRS officials told congressional investigators they knew that the healthcare law did not authorize them to issue tax credits in federal exchanges and that their regulations only pertained to exchanges "established by the state."
"At the direction of their political-appointee superiors, however, they dropped that language and announced that tax credits would be available through exchanges established by the federal government, as well," Politico said. "Further investigation is in order and should proceed with all deliberate speed so as to inform the courts that will consider the appeals of these rulings."
Thanks To War On Terror, Islamic Extremists Have Everything They Need To Kill Americans
by Sam Rolley / Personal Liberty Digest
A top military official who heads the Defense Intelligence Agency told journalists at the Aspen Security Forum last week that the United States is no safer than it was before the World Trade Center attacks that set the Nation’s perpetual war machine into motion. In fact, the Nation is likely far less safe than it was in 2001.
“We have a whole gang of new actors out there that are far more extreme than al-Qaida,” Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn said, according to the Christian Science Monitor.
Of course, Flynn’s remarks certainly don’t come as a surprise to anyone paying attention to the current state of global affairs.
Hawks intent on keeping U.S. military action alive in the Mideast have commonly argued that the U.S. must fight them (whoever they are) over there (wherever that is) to prevent bloodshed in the homeland. Other times, those hawks have warned Americans of depraved despots in possession of dangerous weapons.
As a result, many Americans gladly and patriotically supported U.S. invasions in the Mideast — most importantly those to pursue extremists in the deserts of Afghanistan and its neighboring countries and to cripple Saddam Hussein’s regime and bring Democracy to Iraq. In the past 13 years, the United States has spent trillions of dollars and lost thousands of American soldiers as the world’s leading self-appointed crusader against terror, an enemy with no concrete face or nation, and purveyor of democracy, a form of government best served self-earned.
So how have we done?
In October 2001, U.S. forces invaded Afghanistan in pursuit of Osama bin Laden who claimed responsibility for the Trade Center attacks. The war was sold to an emotional American public as a straightforward operation to cut off al-Qaida’s head and install a government that would, unlike the Taliban that seized control in 1996, prevent extremists from ever again using Afghanistan as a terror staging ground.
The Taliban were eventually replaced by a farcical sham of a democratic government in Afghanistan. And elections, rife with predictable corruption, have taken place in the country from time to time. After repeated U.S. troop surges and withdrawals over the course of several years, the U.S. military eventually settled into a routine of training Afghan forces (who routinely turned to be infiltrated by extremists intent on killing U.S. soldiers) to defend themselves without American support.
If you squint really hard, it almost looks like the U.S. achieved its goal in Afghanistan. With eyes wide open, however, one would be able to see all the way back to the 1970s — when the U.S. first attempted Afghan regime change — and realize that history is on repeat.
The New York Times reported last week:
The Taliban have found success beyond their traditional strongholds in the rural south and are now dominating territory near crucial highways and cities that surround Kabul, the capital, in strategic provinces like Kapisa and Nangarhar.
Their advance has gone unreported because most American forces have left the field and officials in Kabul have largely refused to talk about it.So extremists are taking over larger swaths of land than they had previously influenced in Afghanistan. That’s not so bad. At least we won Iraq, right?
In March 2003, President George W. Bush ordered an invasion of Iraq to eliminate the country’s weapons of mass destruction.
“They’re in the area around Tikrit and Baghdad and east, west, south and north somewhat,” Bush said at the time.
They weren’t. Actually, we never found them.
The U.S. invasion did manage to take Saddam and his Baath Party out of power and install a new, more democratic government. Unfortunately, good ole apple pie democracy evidently was not enough to calm the tensions of nearly 1,500 years of tribal conflict between Sunni and Shiite Islam in the region.
Under the Baath Party’s rule, Iraq was led by its Sunni minority, as it had been since the Ottoman Empire. That, of course, wasn’t pleasant for many members of the majority Shiite population. So when Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki, a Shiite at the helm of a largely Shiite government, took control in Iraq after Saddam’s ouster, things got predictably nasty for the Nation’s Sunnis.
The Islamic State terror group (aka ISIS/ISIL), mostly consisting of violent extremists intent on turning the whole Arab world into a jihad training camp, has profoundly benefited from the tribal tensions that were inflamed by the U.S. invasion. And with the help of wealthy Sunni donors the group is quickly taking control of much of Iraq.
“The speed that [ISIS] came into this northern city of Iraq, into Mosul, and they were able to, you know, kind of [cut through Iraqi security force defenses] like a hot knife through butter through really about four [Iraqi Army] divisions,” Flynn said of the current situation, “I would say that, yeah, that caught us — that level of speed that they were able to do that — caught us by surprise.”
With Iraq’s democratic government likely a stone’s throw (pun intended) from collapsing and Afghanistan having never really managed to have a legitimate governing structure following the U.S. invasions, the situation in the Mideast looks about as bad as it possibly could. But thanks to the United States’ decision to aid rebels overthrow relatively stable — though sometimes despicable — regimes in places like Libya and Syria, the situation is actually much more volatile that the Pentagon would like to admit.
Syria’s civil war has given the Islamic State group an opportunity to take over large portions of the country for the borderless Islamic state it is bent on creating. Libya, meanwhile, is in a state of chaos and largely under the control of al-Qaida militants.
The United States’ war on terror has expanded al-Qaida’s reign and created the opportunity for more extreme extremists under the Islamic State group flag to gain a firm foothold throughout the Mideast. How is that possible?
Flynn contends that it’s because it’s hard to attack an idea with a military.
“I, you know, have been going against these guys for a long time. The core is the core belief that these individuals have — and it’s not on the run,” he said. “That ideology is actually, sadly, it feels like it’s exponentially growing.”
Meanwhile, the United States’ southern border is too poorly defended to stop illegal immigrants, most of them people with no ill-intent toward the Nation and no fanatical religious drive to murder, from making it into the country. When you consider how a highly organized and opportunistic group of jihadists like those who make up the Islamic State group might exploit the border weaknesses, it becomes pretty obvious where those trillions of taxpayer dollars would have been better spent.
Disease...illness...epidemic...words that make most people cringe and rightly so for NO one enjoys being sick. Thankfully, in America most major communicable diseases have been if NOT eradicated at least held down to a minimum with isolated pockets popping-up sporadically here and there thanks to childhood vaccines and adult booster shots. And I am NOT talking about the usual garden variety of winter and summer illnesses...the common cold, simple uncomplicated flu, food poisoning, and such...but I mean the hardcore stuff...diseases that can send people to the hospitals en masse...or worse...to the morgue.
I am however talking about diseases that are endemic to other countries that are now being brought back into our country by this newest ILLEGAL influx of children causing an entire generation of America's children having NO immunities to them facing exposure and being infected by them. Remember, as certain childhood diseases became for the most part eradicated...diseases like measles, mumps, chicken pox, polio, whooping cough, etc...parents started to become lax about immunizing their children, especially with all the misinformation out there that this shot causes autism...that shot causes something else...without even thinking through the reality about how many lives have been saved because of immunizations. These parents forget that every immunization, every medicine... even something as simple as aspirin...can cause devastating effects...even death...in those allergic to them. But the numbers hurt by vaccines and meds are small compared to the overwhelming numbers of those helped.
And these children now entering our country are NOT just bringing the usual childhood diseases with them but are bringing the 'nasty' ones...the ones that can indeed cause epidemics or worse... pandemics...diseases like tuberculosis, leprosy, cholera, smallpox, and even bubonic plague. And let's NOT forget the older ones bring herpes, gonorrhea, and other sorts of sexually transmitted diseases with them too...strains of these diseases resistant to the current generation of antibiotics in use in this country today.
And the bottom line in this latest influx of children...and the adults currently crossing as well...is that for all intents and purposes a potential public health crisis has now been amassing along our southern border. Two cases in point...drug-resistant TB is spreading rapidly with several counties in southern Texas reporting twice the usual average number of cases, and Dengue fever has been detected this year in southern Texas for the first time since 2005. And while Dengue fever can be deadly even when treated, it's especially deadly when left untreated...when left ignored to spread.
All that I have stated above is a medical observation on my part, now here is an observation that is even more scary...as these sick children are crowded into cramped makeshift detention centers...centers conducive to spreading infectious diseases...they do indeed spread the diseases they carry amongst those who were NOT previously sick, thus increasing the number of children now sick who in turn will spread these diseases even further...as in via the number of sick and contagious children that are being sent to cities all over our country increases.
And so a vicious cycle has been set-up all courtesy of our borders NOT being secured...all courtesy of the lax enforcement of the immigration laws currently on the books...all courtesy of Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
And the Obama sanctioned dispersing of these sick children is the key element here...an element NOT seen before in regards to those entering our country either LEGALLY or ILLEGALLY. Remember, in the past when immigrants arrived sick they were immediately turned away and sent back home or they were sent to sanatoriums until they were well enough to enter the general population. But now under Obama's new rules regarding ILLEGALS...who are treated better than those LEGALLY entering our country I might add...the sick are being dispersed across our country to spread their diseases to a now susceptible American population...and of course to increase the Democratic voting base for children, as we know, do grow up to vote.
And let's be honest here...when LEGAL immigrants enter our country they are required by law to receive a medical exam, and must show proof of vaccination for measles, mumps, rubella, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), and a host of other communicable diseases. But with the ILLEGALS now entering our country...who are given what amounts to two aspirin and a bus pass to a city within the 100-mile Constitutional Free zone where they cannot be deported...they have been set free to spread their assorted nasties to an unsuspecting and unprotected population who then will be forced to seek medical help, but who will most likely be turned down for treatment because they don't meet the ObamaCare rules governing who can receive medical treatment for what disease and who can't.
And even when ILLEGALS do receive medical exams at the border the screening they receive is NOT up to the same standard of what LEGALS are subjected to, making those doing the screening ineffective at controlling the spread of disease. And why...because there are just too damn many of 'them' coming...and NOT enough doctors and nurses to treat 'them' effectively. And let's NOT forget the simple fact that Obama and the Democrats do NOT under any circumstances want 'them' turned away and sent back...especially the children...because they dare NOT stem the tide of much needed future Democratic voters who will help ensure a Democratic voting bloc for many years to come.
So while YES I am being somewhat sarcastic, but even with sarcasm there is much truth in what I say. First, it's a fact that ICE isn’t screening for infectious diseases, relying instead on self-reporting...meaning relying on criminals...and YES the very way these people, including the unaccompanied children, enter our country ILLEGALLY does make them criminals...relying on them to voluntarily give up the information that they're sick. And know these people will NOT do that out of fear of then being detained and sent back to whence they came.
And know that it's a fact that these sick children are indeed being sent to major cities all across our country...cities like New York City, Los Angeles, Boston, and Miami amongst many others where they will again be living in close quarters, coughing, sneezing, and hacking on both each other and those attending to them who will leave these centers at the end of the day and spread the nasties they now carry out to those they come in contact with.
And the cycle of spread continues on growing by leaps and bounds on a daily basis.
And lest we forget another very important fact...the sheer number of ILLEGALS now entering our country. This cannot be stressed enough for their very number is what we should fear the most for there is and has always been strength in numbers. And if Obama has his way the sheer number of those entering ILLEGALLY...who he will in turn give LEGAL status to courtesy of his pen and his phone...could forever change the political complexion of America, and NOT for the better for these people now entering ILLEGALLY have their hands out to rape America's welfare and healthcare systems, and it will be 'We the People' who will end up paying for them...for their upkeep and medical care...for generations to come.
And it will be 'We the People' who will see our children and even us infected with diseases we long thought had been vanished from our shores a generation ago.
Thanks Obama...you've screwed America yet again.