Wednesday, August 13, 2014

Illinois Mayor Refuses To Take Down “Palestinian” Jihad Flag Raised Alongside The American Flag

Pamela Geller / Atlas Shrugs

A Palestinian boy holds a toy gun as supporters of Hamas and the Islamic Jihad movement cA “Palestinian” Muslim boy in Gaza holds a toy gun as supporters of Hamas and the Islamic Jihad movement chant slogans against the Israeli military action in Gaza.

Jihad in America.

Photo: A jihad flag that was the subject of heated debate on Monday in Illinois (Jessica Tezak, Chicago Tribune)

This is analogous to the flag of jihad being raised at the White House or in any American city or state.

The American elite, which is decidedly left and treasonous, is delivering America directly into the hands of Islamic supremacists. Freedom be damned.

The left must be defeated.

“Palestine” is not a nation, now or ever. It is the flag of jihad. Israel is Palestine, which jihadists wish to destroy — and that wish this Illinois town is supporting and sanctioning.
“Emotions spill over at Lincolnwood meeting about Palestinian flag,” Chicago Tribune, August 12, 2014
Monday night meeting over a Palestinian flag in north suburban Lincolnwood was intense but civil much of the way before emotions spilled over among some in attendance, with one man leaving after being chastised by the mayor.
The flag that was the subject of heated debate is part of a display of about 60 international flags along Lincoln Avenue that stretches from Devon to Touhy. Several residents have recently asked that the Palestinian flag be removed, but village officials say they have no plans to do so. Community members spoke in favor of and against the flag before the...
     

Feds to increase efforts to prevent threat of “homegrown terrorists”

/ Jihad Watch
 
al-awlakiThe only terrorists discussed in this article are U.S. Muslims who join Islamic jihad groups. But the belief system that leads these men to join such groups is never mentioned — it can be surmised by the reader from the fact that they join groups like “the Islamic State” and take on names like “Abu Omar al Amreeki,” but it is never directly mentioned exactly what kind of terrorists these are. That peculiar omission would never have been made in a news story about “right wing extremists” who are members of “patriot groups,” but it is required here by the politically correct straitjacket that stifles all mainstream media discussion of Islamic jihad. And this omission also ensures that the feds’ attempts to prevent “homegrown terrorists” will always been hamstrung by their inability to speak honestly or investigate in detail what these terrorists believe, and what motivates them to become terrorists in the first place.

“Law enforcement increase effort to prevent threat of homegrown terrorists,” by Christopher Snyder, FoxNews.com, August 12, 2014 (thanks to Kenneth):
In the past few months, federal agents arrested and filed terrorism charges against several Americans, experts say in an effort to prevent homegrown terrorists.
According to the NYPD, more than 100 Americans are possibly training within Al Qaeda-inspired groups like the Islamic State (IS), the militant group formerly known as ISIS operating in Syria and Iraq.

Tom Ruskin, former NYPD detective and president of security consulate firm the CMP Group told Foxnews.com that law enforcement officials are trying to track potential threats overseas before suspected terrorists come stateside.
“It’s a major concern in this country of people coming back or into our country or people who are already here,” Ruskin said.
The latest incident was the arrest of suspected terror supporter Donald Ray Morgan earlier this month in New York.
A spokesperson for prosecutors said the ex-convict was arrested in connection with a North Carolina indictment and charged with “being a felon in possession of firearms.”
Authorities also found the suspect had tweeted his loyalty to the leader of the Islamic State using the alias “Abu Omar al Amreeki.”
“We know he has been in possession of illegal guns in the past, very high [levels of] ammunition and the fact that he is tweeting his allegiance to ISIS is of concern to the U.S. government,” Ruskin said.
It might prove to be a tough task for prosecutors to build terror-related charges against Morgan just based on tweets.
“Obviously when came back through [John F.] Kennedy airport, the eastern district U.S. attorney felt that they had enough to prosecute and hold him for the time being,” Ruskin said.
This allows authorities, he points out to do an extensive background check on Morgan’s most recent movements abroad.
“What they are now doing is going through his phone records, computer files, texts, and who he has associated with,” Ruskin said. “They are trying to determine nexus between him and a terrorist group.”
In the August issue of Townhall Magazine, where this column originally appeared, BearingArms.com editor Bob Owens makes the case for having well-armed civilians help keep the peace. 
 
The National Rifle Association has made a significant investment in online media in recent years. One of the shows on their Life of Duty channel is a series called “Defending Our America.” The show is a roundtable discussion featuring eight men who serve in a variety of military and law enforcement roles, speaking from the heart about what it means to serve this nation and defend the citizenry from enemies, both foreign and domestic.

Perhaps the most chilling episode of the series so far is Episode 8, “We’re Not Ready.”
 
This episode deals with a kind of terrorist attack that counterterrorism experts have been dreading since before September 11, 2001. They are preparing against a carefully-planned and orchestrated attack by a team of well-trained, well-armed terrorists with carefully scouted “soft targets,” such as schools, malls, theaters, sporting events, hospitals, and other venues that have a large number of people in close proximity that are relatively undefended.
 
The attack they particularly fear is an incident where one of these soft targets is assaulted in an effort to draw law enforcement into a pre-planned ambush. Terrorists are well aware of law enforcement’s post-Columbine tactics whereby officers are told to rush toward a mass attack and engage as they can as they arrive. These tactics have been effective against individual shooters with a grudge, but are nearly suicidal against a trained and determined enemy force lurking in ambush.

Tom, one of the members of the roundtable panel, discussed a training scenario his company conducted that pointed out just how poorly law enforcement in the United States is pre- pared to confront this kind of soft target attack.

The scenario featured a team of five “terrorists” with military training taking over a school, with 150 state police officers responding as they have been trained. The officers, coming in individually or in small clusters, walked into a buzzsaw of trip-wires, IEDs, and rifle fire aimed down long school hallways. Fifty of the officers “died” attempting to retake the school.

It was a massacre. But unlike real life, the scenario ended there, once the point was made.

The result of a terrorist attack of this type in real life would have likely resulted in the decimation of the local law enforcement community at the hands of the small team of terrorists, which would then likely disengage and either hit another large target as a coordinated unit to create mass casualties, or scatter to attack individual targets and spread panic and mayhem.
 
Amid the confusion and horror the terrorists might rampage with relative impunity, the way they did in Mumbai, India in 2008 and in Nairobi, Kenya in 2013. Those terrorist attacks were multi-day affairs that left dozens dead and hundreds injured. The same can happen here, and sadly, a similar outcome is expected, especially in those states and cities where firearms are heavily regulated and rare.

Fortunately, the Second Amendment allows most Americans to have options—options the citizens of Kenya and India did not have. While it is unrealistic to think that an individual citizen would be able to take down an entire terror cell the way that fictional police officer John McClane did in the “Die Hard” movie franchise, a well-armed citizenry may prevent them from moving unopposed and unthreatened.

I suspect that we all know experienced hunters, target shooters, and military veterans who would give a good account of themselves when fighting on their own ground against terrorists, just as they would against foreign soldiers during wartime. It isn’t too far-fetched to expect the citizenry to self-organize into defensive units as they have during past natural and man- made disasters, such as the Korean merchants who stopped the rampaging mob during the 1992 Los Angeles riots.

While it is unlikely that such ad hoc units would eradicate attacking terrorists, they would likely hamper the attacks and force the terrorists to expend a very finite supply of time and ammunition, buying time for their fellow citizens to escape, and for more heavily armed and better trained military and police tactical teams to converge to end the threat.

The Founders never likely considered such a specific scenario when they wrote the Second Amendment, but they did know about Native American raiding parties and enemy scouts during times of war. Americans have always been expected to improvise, adapt, and overcome all threats to liberty, foreign and domestic. •
Obama and the Democrats are facing a disaster at the voting booth in November. His ratings have hit all-time lows. 70 percent of the public believes America is headed in the wrong direction. In fact, right now, polls are ranking Obama the worst president since WWII— lower than even Nixon or Carter.

And Obamacare also rates at all-time lows. Remarkably, it just experienced one of the biggest month-to-month opinion drops in the history of polling.

Yet Obama and his Kool-Aid drinking Democratic supporters are so ideological, delusional and out of touch with middle class America that they don’t understand why this is happening.

My new book, “The Murder of the Middle Class” is about how America is being destroyed by the “murder of the middle class.” It is important to note that this murder is not just due to misguided, inept, or amateurish policies. It is a deliberate, purposeful, and planned destruction. Every day, the middle class sees their jobs being destroyed and replaced by low wage part-time jobs and/or government checks. Every day, their bills for gasoline, electric, groceries, and health insurance goes up. Every day, their job prospects, income, and assets go down.

Little by little, the proud middle class is being forced to grovel for government checks or subsidies just to survive. It is not happening by accident, mistake, or coincidence. This is a purposeful plan and it is succeeding. How do I know? I was Obama’s college classmate at Columbia University, where we studied this exact plan that he has been implementing for the past six years.

It took a while, but middle class Americans are finally realizing—with friends like Obama, who needs enemies? They’re finally learning to watch what Obama does, not what he says. The middle class finally understands that when Obama says he wants to “save” the middle class, the proper reaction is to reach for our wallets.

Reagan famously said, “the government isn’t the solution, it’s the problem.” That applies to Obamacare, green energy, amnesty for illegal immigrants, taxes, regulations and debt. Obama’s policies are helping the super-rich, the corporate elite, and the poor. But those same policies are murdering middle class opportunity and mobility, raising costs, and destroying the livelihoods of middle class Americans.

What made the light bulb go off? What turned the middle class against Obama? In a word…Obamacare. The reason is simple. Obamacare is no longer a theory in a campaign speech. America’s middle class is now living and experiencing it firsthand.

Is Barack Obama Aiding And Abetting ISIS?

by / Personal Liberty Digest
Is Barack Obama Aiding And Abetting ISIS?
FILE
[The Muslim call to prayer is] “one of the prettiest sounds on Earth at sunset.” — Barack Obama

To borrow upon the famous quote from one of the world’s greatest leaders, Winston Churchill, during the Battle of Britain and apply it to President Barack Obama’s response to the Islamic threat that is ISIS: Never in the field of human conflict was so much harm done to so many by just one man.

Churchill and Obama: seldom have two names in one sentence been in such contrast. There stood Churchill, a patriot with a distinguished military record who wanted to take part in the invasion task force that hit the beaches of Normandy only to be ordered not to by the King of England. Churchill, was always at the ready to die for his country. Churchill was striving for world democracy and freedom.

Then there is Obama who is, at the very least, sympathetic to Islam and its goal of global domination.

The most damning evidence against Obama has been his mishandling of the Islamic State group: the most powerful jihad against Christians since the Middle Ages. ISIS stands at the cusp of overrunning and controlling the Mideast in a way that has not been seen since the Ottoman Empire ruled the region 400 years ago.

Does Anyone In Government Read History?

ISIS is unlike any threat the United States has faced. It is determined to build a united greater Arabia, and it may have the petro-wealth and determination to do it. The group’s violence knows no limits. Even al-Qaida has disavowed ISIS.

History is filled with revolutions upon which every cycle becomes more extreme, more violent.

During the French Revolution, Maximilien de Robespierre was a prominent leader who was both celebrated for the reforms he brought and despised for the terror that he helped instill — a terror so frightful his own head was taken by the guillotine.

It was the same during the Iranian Revolution 35 years ago. Sadegh Ghotbzadeh, who went on to become Ayatollah Khomeini’s foreign minister, was part of the group of radicals who overthrew the Shah of Iran. Two years later, Ghotbzadeh was executed, ostensibly for not being radical enough. The same fate almost happened to the first president of Iran, Abolhassan Bani-Sadr, who was also not seen as religious or righteous enough and had to flee for his life to France where he is living out his old age today.

Radical Islam is on the same path and the culmination of it to date has been ISIS, which is not a group of fundamentalists whose goal is to punish Westerners because of their presence in the Mideast but rather a religious, political and military powerhouse that has been growing unchecked since Obama’s withdrawal from Iraq at the end of 2011. Given that Obama announced this move when he ran for President in 2008, all ISIS has had to do was be patient. The result is a military force that is overrunning Iraq’s much larger army and now has some of the best U.S. military hardware. Its ultimate goal is not just to drive Westerners from the Mideast, but to have Islam as the dominant religion with sectarian systems of government around the world.

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS


Today, Wednesday, August 13th, at 2pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS, on CPR Worldwide Media, will welcome as their special guests both Tom Trento of The United West and Mudar Zahran the leader of the Palestinian People's Movement

We will be discussing all things Israel with Tom and with Mudar we will be discussing our proposed solution to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Mudar will also give us an update on the current situation as he will be reporting LIVE from the Occupied Territories.

Hope you will tune in because this will be one show you do NOT want to miss. http://cprworldwidemedia.com/live-radio/




  
Op-ed:
Israel's Allies and Enemies: The Truth Exposed...Part 3 of 3
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen

As we wrap up this 3-part series 'Israel’s Allies and Enemies: The Truth Exposed' with the benefits of what we believe to be the ONLY truly viable plan to establish a two-state solution in the Middle East, one very important thing bears repeating…while Israel IS in favor of a two state solution to achieve peace with the Palestinians, 'Palestine'...as in the Palestinian Authority with Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood being their in-house islamic army...is decidedly NOT as Hamas has it written into their charter that Israel is to be destroyed and all Jews, on a global scale, are to be killed. 'Palestine' is only in favor of a ONE state solution and Israel is NOT that state. While the solution we propose will be difficult to achieve...as King Abdullah II of Jordan is a primary roadblock to the 'Road Map to Peace' in the region...peace is NOT impossible and the solution we propose is viable, and should be given serious consideration.

In Part 1 http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/201... of this most important series, Diane Sori of The Patriot Factor and RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on CPR Worldwide Media, exposed the truth about the Jordanian monarchy's continuing ties to both Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood...ties the media will NOT tell you about...and ties that are in and of themselves stopping the peace process from moving forward. In Part 2 http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/0... of this series Craig Andresen, of The National Patriot and RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS, explained how King Abdullah II, playing both sides of the coin, in addition to the silence of the Arab nations... except for Egypt which clearly sides with Israel...has stood out. However, by the Arab nations NOT outwardly siding with either side really means that the islamic factions involved, Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood, do NOT have their support.

To understand why peace at this point in time cannot be achieved one must understand the dynamics of the Arab mindset. This mindset has been set in motion by the 1924 destruction of the Caliphate, subsequent western occupation of Arab lands, the establishment of Israel in 1948, the two Gulf wars, and the continuing of the west's 'War on Terror,' all contributed to how the Arab mind works. And with the Arab mindset totally controlled by the words of the Hadith...programmed if you will to hate all non-muslims...this translates into meaning we infidels. The Arab sense of right and wrong is the polar opposite of how we westerners think, just as they relish death...we relish life. Any western attempt to orchestrate political change in Arab countries is instantly rejected and thrown back at us through the call to jihad. This is why all proposals by the west have been rejected and is exactly why it will take an Arab country...like Egypt...to broker an actual peace treaty even though this will put an Arab leader expounding such a proposal in jeopardy. Remember, history records the fate of Anwar Sadat after signing the Egypt/Israel Peace Accord along with the same fate for Menachem Begin.

Having a 7th century mentality but with 21st century weaponry makes these people more dangerous than we ever expected. Remember, the Arabs lived as they did for centuries before a massive culture shock...the modern world...tried to introduce concepts foreign to them, causing them to perceive that their culture was being taken from them. Their culture was and still is the antithesis of western culture and some of their more extreme ideologies...such as sharia law...are concepts that do NOT fit in a 21st century civilized world. They have stagnated to a point where their mindset does NOT allow them to see reality nor to make peace with those they believe are their enemies but who in reality are anything but. Few in the Arab world understand this, and even fewer achieve positions in the world where they can affect the type of change necessary for peace, because they are then seen and perceived by their own people as enemies of islam.

While the more moderate Arab countries mentioned in Part 2 of this series still lag behind in the human rights ideals of the 21st century, they have started to shift away from their past barbaric practices used to solve their problems, and have reaped the benefits of a more peaceful existence in the region and in the world.

And Arab success stories do exist. The United Arab Emirates...with its modern landscape as a center of trade and commerce...and with Egypt at peace with Israel for decades and now outwardly siding with them in this current conflict...are two cases in point. Their leaders were smart enough to see that war is NOT always the answer to questions raised, and as with Egypt, if some attempt to set them back is made, the people will say NO.

As the current situation continues unchecked and unabated...and as Hamas breaks cease-fire after cease-fire...the time has come to realize that this fighting will NOT accomplish anything for either side. And the antiquated idea of a two-state solution lying solely at the feet of Israel is 7th century thinking and herein is where a new approach must be taken. And so we present a possibility that many have overlooked up until now but a possibility we believe can offer a viable and lasting peace for all parties concerned.

First, the State of Israel must be completely removed from the two-state solution equation, because Israel's post-'67 borders secured in a war for their very survival should belong to Israel alone. Also, the UN mandate that established Israel as a Jewish nation had the Arab nations in existence at that time both signing said mandate thus legally recognizing Israel's existence. However, as long as current Arab entities seek Israel's destruction and continue that quest as per the wording laid down in their documents and doctrines, there can NEVER be peace if they exist anywhere within Israel's current borders. Israel, being a 21st century nation...a nation wanting peace...a nation NEVER the aggressor yet always being blamed as one...understands that trading even more of her land for peace is NOT the answer to a lasting peace. Israel does NOT have a quarrel with the Palestinian people but must be allowed to defend herself against the 7th century mentality of the leaders that currently control those people.

This can be seen in the words of Mudar Zahran, a Jordanian-Palestinian and leader of the Palestinian People's Movement when he said, and we quote, "To be clear, yes I am 110% pro-Israel, because my people's interest is with Israel, and it's the only country that treats us as humans..."

Second, it must be understood that Jordan's King Abdullah II is NOT really a friend to Israel because he knows that Israel's giving up of land is NOT the answer to peace. He knows the Palestinians are in actuality Jordanians and he knows deep down he holds the key to a lasting peace, but like Obama his ego has gotten in the way. Abdullah has NOT yet realized that if he proposes what he knows to be the answer he will possibly become a serious and respected player on the world stage. And that realization does involve a two-state solution but a two-state solution between Jordan and the Palestinians NOT between Israel and the Palestinians.

The indisputable fact is that the 'Palestinians' are indeed Jordanian by blood and NOTHING will change that fact. Also, the Palestinians hold Jordanian citizenship and they would NOT hold that if their heritage was in question. Therefore, it is Jordan that must absorb the Palestinians NOT as a separate nation per se but as a state...a governate...within Jordan itself. Functioning as a state, the 'State of Palestine' would be able to govern itself while still answering to Amman...much like our 50 states fall under the blanket of Washington D.C .

Third, Egypt is a bigger player in the peace process than most believe. As we described earlier in this article an idea like this cannot be presented by any western entity if it is to gain acceptance in the Arab world. Egypt already having a four-decades old peace accord with Israel in combination with Egypt's strong military presence in the region makes them the only option to present and see this process though. To start, Egypt must act against Hamas in the West Bank and in Gaza because Hamas is a 7th century protagonist preventing a true peace from gaining a foothold. Then, Egypt must propose to the Arab world the true two-state solution of Palestine existing as a state within Jordan, the country that has already granted citizenship to the Palestinians.

Lastly, Egypt's promoting this concept removes the stigma of el-Sisi's government being solely in place because of a perceived military coup, and gives gravitas to his position as a leader on the world stage as he extends what Anwar Sadat started, and expands it throughout the Middle East region.

This true two-state solution mentioned above has benefits and ramifications that would be felt throughout the region and the world. To begin, the islamic nations NOT the Arab nations per se, would feel the now in place repercussions of their neighbors prospering while they stagnated, enveloped in their 7th century mentality of hate. The Arab nations, including the newly constituted state of Palestine within the country of Jordan, now free of the strong-arm control of Hamas would NOT only enter the 21st century but would see its people prospering, and doing so with the willing assistance of their perceived former enemy Israel...a nation that has wanted NOTHING but to live in peace with its neighbors.

The Middle East region as a whole would benefit from a growing coalition of Arab partners in peace that could contain the spread of radical islam, bring economic stability to the region, provide economic sanctions against those who would disrupt the peace, and would find willing partners in the West to support populist uprisings against terrorist entities. And the U.S. would benefit two-fold by keeping our taxpayer dollars here at home to help with our own defense needs, and by bringing economic stability to the region this would allow for the stabilization of prices in regards to oil exports from said region, which in turn benefits the American consumer and the American economy.

And what of Israel itself...Israel would be the biggest beneficiary of all for NOT only would they get to keep their borders intact but they would NO longer have to live with the threat of rockets raining down on them on a daily basis. This alone is truly all Israel asks for.

In summation, a true Middle East peace is indeed attainable but it does involve work, compromise, and putting egos and national pride aside for the betterment of all involved...egos like that of Jordan's King Abdullah II who thinks he does NOT have to give up land to people that are actually already citizens of his country...egos like that of Barack HUSSEIN Obama who continuously provides 21st century weapons to those with a 7th century mentality...and the egos of those who use war to line their own pockets.

And so friends we leave you with this thought...if we RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori can come up with a workable, viable and beneficial solution for a Middle East peace that is advantageous to all sides why can't those at the negotiating table do so...or is it that they simply don't want to...just a thought.

_____________________________________________________________

Today, Wednesday, August 13th, at 2pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS, on CPR Worldwide Media, will welcome as their special guests both Tom Trento of The United West and Mudar Zahran the leader of the Palestinian People's Movement

We will be discussing all things Israel with Tom and with Mudar we will be discussing our proposed solution to the Israeli/Palestinian conflict. Mudar will also give us an update on the current situation as he will be reporting LIVE from the Occupied Territories.

Hope you will tune in because this will be one show you do NOT want to miss. http://cprworldwidemedia.com/live-radio/


and chat LIVE with us at https://www.facebook.com/groups/cprworldwidemedia/?ref=ts&fref=ts