A Rogue Ruling From Hawaii
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
“This is an unprecedented judicial overreach.”
- President Trump on Judge Derrick Watson’s ruling halting his second temporary travel ban
It was a targeted, deviously calculated, and so scolding rebuke of President Trump’s newly revised executive order on travel and refugees...his second attempt at what was at first attempt a rightful and legal order. And once again a liberal judge had our nation’s security taking a back seat to both political correctness and the will of an ex-president and his ‘shadow government’ who will protect ‘the brethren’ at all costs.
First, the House of Representatives prepares the ‘articles of impeachment’ as per Article I, Section 2, Clause 5 of the Constitution which authorizes the "sole Power of Impeachment” to the House. Then said articles are sent to the Senate, which has the exclusive power to "try all Impeachments" by virtue of Article I, Section 3, Clause 6. From there the actual impeachment is a mere two-step process. The first step is taken by the House of Representatives who after ‘articles of impeachment’ have been officially filed...and know that the articles are quite similar to an indictment issued in a normal criminal prosecution...who then by a simple majority, cast their vote to impeach said official...which in this case would be to specifically remove Judge Derrick Watson from his federal judgeship. Then once the vote to impeach is passed, the Senate holds a trial to determine if the judge should be convicted, and if two-thirds of the Senate vote to convict, Watson would then be officially removed from office.
Also, a major caveat in trying to impeach Judge Watson involves the Senate vote itself for while the Republicans control the Senate it is not with a two-thirds majority.
“Good behavior”...and herein lies the crux of Judge Watson’s actions, both in his ruling and its aftermath, for “good behavior,” I believe, was breached time and again not only regarding how the ruling was made but in the actual process of making it as well.
Let me explain.
And how do we know these ties...because as per the official court records for Honolulu County, the mosque lists its deed holder as the ‘North American Islamic Trust’ (NAIT) which serves as the financial holding company for the Muslim Brotherhood in America...the very terrorist group that President Trump has made no secret of that he wants to add to the State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations.
And while Judge Derrick Watson’s biography and legal qualifications can easily be found online...the fact is that there were more qualified persons Obama could have appointed to the judgeship. But could Watson have been Obama's pick for this little known reason and this reason alone...Watson did pro-bono ‘wage and hour’ claims on behalf of ‘Mexican nationals’ in San Francisco. Mexican nationals...illegals perhaps...a much needed part of the Democratic voting base...making Watson someone Obama could use to his advantage if he needed a future ruling to go his way...just something to think about.
Writing that the original travel ban called for religious minorities (as in Christians) in muslim-majority countries to receive special treatment...no matter that this was removed in the second order...what Judge Watson actually did...as per what Hawaii's Attorney General Chin calls muslim ban 2.0...was basically rule on the already rescinded first executive order and not on the second order which was the one he was supposed to rule on.
Allowing his personal opinion to guide his judgment, Judge Watson also cited campaign rhetoric as a reason for his decision...in other words this judge did not follow the rule of law requiring strict impartiality concerning the law when interpreting the law.
Also, Judge Watson cited a March 2016 CNN interview in which Trump said, “I think Islam hates us,” and then went on to say that “there’s tremendous hatred” and that “we have to be very vigilant. We have to be very careful.” In other words, then candidate and still private citizen Trump could not say what he believed, but it is okay for this liberal judge to say what he believes and to do so while supposedly being an impartial interpreter of the law...when supposedly showing the Constitutionally required “good behavior” which clearly he did not.
“The illogic of the Government’s contentions is palpable,” Watson wrote in his opinion. “The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed.” But the only thing flawed is Watson’s opinion itself.
And how so...as per Mollie Ziegler Hemingway, a Senior Editor at The Federalist, “the idea that these courts are putting forth that restricting entry to a country with a majority religion suggests bias against that entire religion would make any and all immigration policy unconstitutional. Very few countries don’t have a majority religion, after all.” And this simply means that this judge is trying his best to stop President Trump from ever being able to set any immigration policy regarding muslim-majority countries...an overreach for sure as the Constitution itself affords the president and the executive branch the very power to do so.
Investigative Reports...Copyright © 2017 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Tonight, Tuesday, March 21st from 7 to 9 pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'A Rogue Ruling from Hawaii,' how to drain the swamp by employing the alligators, and other important news of the week.
Hope you can tune in at: http://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/