Op-ed:
America sold out...again By: Diane Sori
America sold out...again By: Diane Sori
In defiance of the US Senate and
thumbing his nose once again at the Constitution, today or within the
next few days, Barack HUSSEIN Obama is expected to sign the
ratification of the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty (ATT).
Although his ratification signature
is only symbolic because the Senate voted this treaty down, those
whose signatures appear on the treaty are still required to promote
within their home countries the keeping of records on the recipients
of imported arms and to introduce domestic legislation to support the
treaty’s content...content which includes giving the president
control over which guns do and do NOT come into this country. And
while the ATT currently only deals with international arms trade
between governments, opposition to signing from Second Amendment
proponents was so strong that written into the final ATT text were
words to the effect that 'no infringement will occur for
recreational, cultural, historical, and lawful ownership'.
Like the U(seless) N(ations) will
ever honor what the US wants added into any of their
treaties so they figure why NOT just add in the words if it gets us to sign the treaty...which is exactly what they did...and exactly what we did...in what amounts to nothing more than a step towards
disarming the American people.
And when on April 2, 2013, the
U(seless) N(ations) passed that treaty (added in placating language
and all) in a vote of 153 to 4, guess who led the push for our signing and whose very
signature appears on the dotted line...none other than Ms.'What does
it matter' herself, former Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton...Hillary Clinton who apparently also thinks the Second
Amendment be damned.
So in signing the treaty's
ratification (symbolic or NOT) Obama is in-your-face overriding the
Senate's recent NO vote against this treaty by citing Article 2,
Section 2, Clause 2 of the Constitution saying it gives him, as
president, the "Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of
the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two-thirds of the Senators
present concur” to do so.
While in a 53 to 46 vote the treaty failed to pass in the Senate, the numbers it failed by are being used by Obama to justify his ratifying the ATT treaty. Deliberately misusing the wording of the two-thirds number the Constitution cites, Obama is trying to say that two-thirds of the Senate wanted the treaty, clearly ignoring the fact that the wording means the treaty had to pass by a vote of two-thirds for him to legally ratify it NOT having the treaty fail NO matter the numbers.
Bottom line, the ATT failed in the Senate, meaning it failed NO matter if it failed by one vote or many votes, and Obama has NO business ratifying it and he knows it.
Also, Obama is twisting and distorting our Founders intended meaning of the words 'to make treaties' as our Founders wrote those words to mean treaties made with a given
county or countries NOT with an international organization, and as a 'supposed' Constitutional attorney Obama knows that damn well. So basically, Barack
HUSSEIN Obama is spitting the face of the Senate...dishonoring the
Constitution (yet again)...and saying 'screw you' to the wishes of 'We
the People'.
And by doing what amounts to a
willful and deliberate throwing out of the Senate vote, Barack
HUSSEIN Obama, in my opinion, is committing treason against the rules
of law that is our US Constitution...treason by way of subterfuge and
twisting the meaning of the words of the Constitution to suit his
nefarious purposes.
Nefarious purposes that follow
closely on the heels of his thankfully failed attempts to strengthen
domestic gun control laws and to get his oh so wanted gun-control registry.
Obama intends his presidential signature on the ATT
to mask his all out effort to do away with 'We the People's'
Constitutionally given Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms,
for by clearly siding with the U(seless) N(ations) effort to regulate
international arms sales (which includes the sale of tanks,
artillery, and small arms such as handguns), he is trying once again
to take our guns away for Obama knows very well that our guns are the
only thing that stands between 'We the People' and his
administration...an administration NOT only running amok but an
administration dangerously straddling Constitutional law in regards
to treason for aiding and abetting the enemy.
So our guns...our firearms...our last
line of defense against an administration hell bent on stripping away
our freedoms rendering us impotent to rise up against those out to
subjugate us to an existence of cow-towing to the media anointed
savior of us all...are trying to be taken away from us as Obama and
his minions use this U(seless) N(ations) treaty as his 'Plan B' to hopefully reach that goal.
And by signing the ratification of
the ATT Barack HUSSEIN Obama sees his signature doing internationally
what he couldn't do domestically...and if this wasn't so serious it
might almost be laughable.
Will the next president have to void all of this???
ReplyDeleteYES unless he's arrested and found guilty of treason...then all his policies and laws are null and void.
DeleteThat is an excellent question Weldon and one each leader should consider before ever taking any course of action which alters authority or power to anyone office especially a Republic like are own. Because even if Barry does not take advantage of the authorities he has usurped he has built an "Eagle's Nest" for the next person who holds that office. This is much like what occurred in Jules Caesar's reign and allowed him to cease the Rule of Rome from the people and much like a young Chancellor in 1938 Berlin. Hence the nesting comment.
ReplyDeleteI note one constant in politics people who manage to gain that sort of power, never relinquish it granted most are frauds and cowards with few exceptions. It is knowing the difference between appearance and substance and for now the majority is taken in by glamor. I do what I can psychologically but if folks won't read I can't get through. May the Lord have mercy on there souls cause I won't.
All true...I like the reference to ancient Rome.
DeleteSenate and Congress have both denied this treaty what makes him think he is above them and can just go ahead and sign, he needs his ass put in prison for treason.
DeleteEXACTLY!
DeleteI just called Sen. Rubio's office to ask about all this. They told me that the Pres. could sign it, but it would have to go to the Sen. again for ratification. Hopefully that is the case. We must therefore begin to bombard the Sens.' offices. I plan to point out to Sen. Nelson that he took an oath to uphold the Const. That would include the 2nd Amendment. Then by the Supr. Cty case of Reid v. Covert, the Const. is supreme over treaties.
ReplyDeleteIt failed in the first go-round and with the id-terms coming up and with those hoping to be re-elected it should fail again.
ReplyDeleteVery well written and informative.
ReplyDeleteRobg #CJN