Op-ed: Screwed By the Senate Yet Again By: Diane Sori
“It allows Republicans to show they are committed to ending Obama’s
amnesty once and for all in the next Congress. If we agree it is indeed
unconstitutional, we have no business funding it when the GOP controls
Congress.”
- Senator Ted Cruz (TX.) before the vote on the 'CRomnibus' spending bill
Ted Cruz (along with Mike Lee) tried...he really did...but the Senate
rejected his Constitutional proxy 'Point of Order' on Obama's
immigration executive action when he directly targeted the funding for
the Department of Homeland Security.
Rightfully using the spending bill as leverage to try and stop the
implementation of Obama's executive ordered immigration reform, Cruz
tried to defy RINO party leaders and their hanger-ons who cut deals with
Obama and Reid to try and assure smooth passage of the $1.1 trillion
spending bill. So in an attempt to force a Senate vote on said action as
a condition for approving this disastrous bill, Cruz presented the
argument that the bill violated the Constitution (and it surely does) because
it would fund Obama’s plan as it rewrites current on-the-books
immigration laws without any say whatsoever from Congress. And Cruz made
sure he presented this to the Senate chamber in such a way that it was
in keeping with long-standing Senate practices.
"If you believe President Obama's amnesty is unconstitutional, vote
yes...if you believe Obama's amnesty is consistent with the
Constitution, then vote no." Cruz had said in his trying to get his
fellow Republicans to understand the severity of what they were voting
on.
And yet the Senate rejected Cruz's arguments for NO other reason than
the Senate is still controlled by the Democrats and a large number of
turncoat RINOS until...and it can't come soon enough...January 6th when
the 114th Congress is sworn in at noon.
Had the Senate sided with Cruz, this "mess of a bill" as he called
it, would have been sent back to the House to have an amendment added to
it that would have stopped the funding for Obama's unilateral
immigration reform. But by a vote 22-74 against Cruz...and with less
than half of the Senate’s 45 Republicans voting with him*...this still
Harry Reid led Senate proved once again to be deaf to the wishes of 'We
the People'...wishes that we shouted loud and clear back on November
4th.
And for those Republicans that voted against him...those like Sen.
Bob Corker from Tennessee who had the audacity to call what Cruz did
“irresponsible”...RINO extraordinaire Sen. Lindsey Graham from South
Carolina who blamed Cruz's actions for causing the garnering of less votes than it
would have gotten without him butting in... and Senator Orrin Hatch from
Utah who said Cruz's antics irritated a lot of people... it will be
remembered by true Conservatives next time they are up for re-election.
And just know that payback will once again...as it was just some six or
so weeks ago...be a b*tch.
And with that, the 1,603-page $1.1 trillion spending
bill...reminiscent in length of the nightmare ObamaCare bill isn't
it...and the last major piece of legislation for this year...was passed
by the Senate late Saturday night thus avoiding another possible
government shutdown. But I say they should have shut the whole damn
Obama government down, especially since essential services by law would
continue to be funded. And as an added bonus by shutting the government
down Obama could go play golf and thus do NO more harm to this country
while he was doing so.
In a vote of 56 to 40** the so-called 'CRomnibus' bill (the combined
continuing resolution and omnibus funding bill) will now provide funding
for NOT only the dreaded ObamaCare, but for most government departments
and agencies through fiscal year September 2015, that is except for the
Department of Homeland Security which will only be funded through the
end of February. And the Republicans say they intend to use the time
between now and then to try and find ways to defund and halt
Obama's easing of deportation rules...ain't going to hold my breath for
that one...but with the new Republican controlled Congress being seated come January there is a possibility...albeit a remote one...that they can
pull it off...that is if the party unites and stops all the in-fighting.
But this very in-fighting between the RINOS versus the Conservatives
and TEA Party Republicans...in-fighting NOT of Cruz's doing in my
opinion...has now afforded 'Prince' Harry Reid the opportunity to move
ahead next week...before this lame-duck Congress goes on Christmas
break...with the 24 Obama nominees who most likely would NOT have been
approved come the new Congress...nominees like 13 district court
judges, 11 nominees to administration posts including customs
enforcement officials and Carolyn Colvin to head the Social Security
Administration along with the ubber liberal Vivek Murphy for Surgeon
General.
Just a bit more of anything but happiness thanks to the RINOS who would NOT support Cruz.
But what was even more surprising about this final vote is that six
Democrats actually sided with the Republicans against passage but NOT
because they saw Obama's actions as wrong but because of two provisions
in specific that they did NOT like...one a provision that weakens the
Dodd-Frank Act's restrictions on banks that allows the banks to back
their bets with taxpayer-backed insurance, and the other a provision
that allows for an increase in the amounts that wealthy donors can give
to major political parties. In fact, some Democrats claimed that these
two provisions would have allowed already wealthy Wall Street employees to
earn even more money, which they believe Republicans in turn would use to
'reward,' if you will, those who backed the spending deal.
Accusing the Republicans of kick-backs now aren't they.
But NO matter who voted which way, the bottom line is that 'We the
People' are screwed and stuck with a monstrosity of a spending bill. And
while the bill as passed does block funding of the 'risk corridors'
(insurer's cost projections that in reality could cause individual plans
to end up costing more than the insurers projections) that under
ObamaCare could lead to a government bailout of the insurance companies
at a huge cost to the American taxpayer, and does cut a bit more funding
to the EPA to a tune of $60 million as well as prohibiting the IRA from
targeting conservative organizations because of the way they chose to
exercise their First Amendment rights, this 'CRomnibus' bill very
unwisely caps spending for all-important national defense at $521 billion...very
dangerous in this ever-expanding violent day and age of the islamic
terrorist.
So as this sitting Congress soon retires for the holidays and as a
new Congress gets ready to be seated, at least we start 2015 knowing we
NO longer will have to deal with 'Prince' Harry Reid blocking every bill
that originates with Republicans. But sadly, we also know that at least
for now, work visas are still on the horizon for at least five million
Obama-made legal ILLEGALS and all because the RINOS amongst us did NOT
get that Ted Cruz was right...once again.
_____________________________________________________
* Republicans voting with Cruz were Senators Roy Blunt (Mo.), John
Boozman (Ark.), Richard Burr (N.C.), Mike Crapo (Idaho), Deb Fischer
(Neb.), Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), John Hoeven (N.D.), Johnny Isakson
(Ga.), Mike Johanns (Neb.), Mike Lee (Utah), Jerry Moran (Kan.), Rand
Paul (Ky.), Rob Portman (Ohio), James Risch (Idaho), Pat Roberts (Kan.),
Marco Rubio (Fla.), Tim Scott (S.C.), Jeff Sessions (Ala.), Richard
Shelby (Ala.), Jon Thune (S.D.) and David Vitter (La.).
** Democrats who voted against the 'CRomnibus' spending bill: Sherrod
Brown (OH.), Al Franken (MN.), Joe Manchin (WV.), Claire McCaskill
(MO.), Bernie Sanders (VT.), Elizabeth Warren (MA.). Republicans who
voted against the 'CRomnibus' spending bill: Mike Crapo (Idaho), Ted
Cruz (TX.), Dean Heller (NV.), Mike Lee (Utah), Jerry Moran (Kan.), Rand
Paul (KY.), Rob Portman (OH.), James Risch (WI.), Marco Rubio (FL.),
Tim Scott (S.C.), Jeff Sessions (Ala.), Richard Shelby (Ala.), David
Vitter (LA.).
I don't know how many people feel about this but January 6th should be the end of whatever honeymoon Obama and the Congress have. I keep waiting for Boehner to pull a rabbit out of a hand and screw Obama, but so far I am not impressed. If he continues to follow the path of a RINO, we need to get rid of him. At that point he is as much a danger to our country as Obama.
Some republicans support the bill in that once they get TOTAL control of the Congress, it is Congress who controls the purse strings. I heard on the radio a guy say that Congress did not necessarily have to fund the amnesty program although it said it would.
It will die like a plant without water. The same goes for Obamacare! No money means his pet projects will die.
The intentions Congress should materialize on January 6th.
I don't know how many people feel about this but January 6th should be the end of whatever honeymoon Obama and the Congress have. I keep waiting for Boehner to pull a rabbit out of a hand and screw Obama, but so far I am not impressed. If he continues to follow the path of a RINO, we need to get rid of him. At that point he is as much a danger to our country as Obama.
ReplyDeleteSome republicans support the bill in that once they get TOTAL control of the Congress, it is Congress who controls the purse strings. I heard on the radio a guy say that Congress did not necessarily have to fund the amnesty program although it said it would.
It will die like a plant without water. The same goes for Obamacare! No money means his pet projects will die.
The intentions Congress should materialize on January 6th.
Very true...January 6th will say it all.
ReplyDelete