Op-ed: 
On Trey Gowdy, Hillary, and Benghazi
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor Right Side Patriots on americanpbn.com

"The calendar is the calendar."
- Trey Gowdy, Chairman of the 'House Selective Committee on the Events Surrounding the 2012 Terrorist Attack in Benghazi, Libya,' on when the final report will be released

Very odd...very odd indeed...as first, the presumptive Republican nominee Donald J. Trump...a man who loves to bloviate so much about his "good brain" guiding him on all issues regarding foreign policy...completely fails to even mention in any of his interviews or speeches Trey Gowdy's ongoing investigation and soon to be released report into the nightmare known as Benghazi.

And second, Hillary 'What Difference Does It Make' Clinton, seems not to even care if Trump does or does not mention the Benghazi investigation as she knows that no matter the outcome of the investigation and corresponding report that in the end, if indicted, Obama will pardon her if for no other reason than out of fear of her 'spilling the beans' on him...beans that involve both his involvement in Benghazi itself and his entire unconstitutional sham of a presidency as well.

Remember, it was Hillary not Trump who started the entire birth certificate brouhaha back in 2008 when she first ran for the Democratic nomination against Obama...and it was she who was given the position of Secretary of State by Obama when he won the election as basically a way for him to keep an eye on her and to keep her on a short leash so that she didn't 'talk' if you will about both where he truly was born and any questionable dealings he was involved in..

But right now let's deal with Hillary's involvement in Benghazi as it applies to her quest for the White House and the soon to be released Benghazi report...after all Trump himself has spoken over the years that he has the proof of where Obama was born so let him put up or shut up in regards to Obama's legitimacy...or lack thereof...to be America's president.

Benghazi...you remember Benghazi...the anything but a YouTube video instigated attack on our American diplomatic compound in Libya where four brave Americans...U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty...were murdered as a direct result of both the inactions of then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and (I believe) possibly on the order of Barack Hussein Obama in order to silence Stevens from exposing his (and possibly Hillary's) illegal gun and weapons running operation to the anything but Syrian rebels, and the man who (I also believe) did indeed give the order to 'stand-down' whether or not help could have arrived in time to save those very four American lives.

But first it's important to touch upon the latest findings pertaining to the Select Committee's investigation...a committee created in May 2014 and a committee whose efforts have continually raised both new and ongoing questions concerning the lack of security in Benghazi; an inadequate military response during the attacks; and why administration officials continued to publicly push forward a sickly narrative of a public protest as the cause of the attack when numerous eye witnesses both knew and have testified to the fact that no such event occurred.

Also, know that it seems the media is once again trying to sweep the entire Benghazi affair under the rug...on Obama's or any of his puppet master's orders perhaps...or maybe because to release the findings now...before the conventions...would put the final nail in both Hillary's and their 'anointed one's' political coffin and send them packing for a nice long stay in Gitmo.

Let's start with committee chairman Trey Gowdy himself, who says the committee's findings contain "important revelations," and who rightfully claims "obstruction" by the Obama administration as the reason for the investigation seeming to drag on for so long. And Gowdy bases this upon the fact that not only were key emails subpoenaed by the House withheld for more than 19 months, but that the State Department, the CIA, the Pentagon, and currently the Department of Defense, have all contributed to his delay in being able to release the committee's findings, which he had hoped to release by last December at the latest.

Specifically, Gowdy cites this delay as being due to his committee’s obvious lack of access to much needed documents and witnesses important to the investigation along with their delay in access to needed interviews with the military drone pilots and camera operators who flew missions over Libya on the night of the attack; their delay in receiving interagency meeting records from the week after the attack; and to what Gowdy and his committee members say is the fact that the agency waited until the summer of 2015 to deliver a “critical” message that positively confirmed there was no protest in Benghazi on the night of the attack...a message in an email that claimed to show who knew that information and when. Also, according to Gowdy, other pertinent information they requested early last year was only just received this past April.

And Republican committee member Lynn Westmoreland agrees with Gowdy's blanket assessment of "obstruction" and says that "when you are waiting six, eight, 10 months on documents and they dump ’em 18, 20,000 at a time, it delays it.”

And how right she and Gowdy are for roadblocks have indeed been thrown into this investigation since the committee's inception as can be seen by the examples cited above, with the latest and currently ongoing roadblock being with General Carter F. Ham himself, the very man who commanded the United States Africa Command (ARFICOM) on the night of the Benghazi attack. General Ham, who has been interviewed at least nine times by investigators, including by the House Committee on Armed Services, has yet to testify before Gowdy's committee, and now has House Republicans...of all things...postponing his recently scheduled appearance before the committee until June 8th, claiming scheduling conflicts.

But I personally think this delay has more to do with pressure from Democrats who say the timing of the release is nothing but a political stunt...a "political witch-hunt" according to Democratic committee member Elijah Cummings that will be used solely, as Cummings claims, to "harm" Hillary's presidential campaign if said report is released either too close to the Democratic nominating convention or before the general election in November. But Gowdy has said that while the committee still has not received all of the information it requested, the report will be released “in the next month”...meaning June...before both nominating conventions, but that if witnesses come forward after the publication of the report that it must be known that he "absolutely wanted it done in ‘15" but that he had and still has no control over access to documents and/or witnesses.

But harming Hillary's campaign should not be of any concern whatsoever as important questions must be answered as to why there was such a lack of security in Benghazi to begin with; why there was such an inadequate (basically nonexistent) military response after the attack began and continued on for many hours; and why Obama and crew continued to spew a story of a public protest over a 'supposed' mohamed defaming video when eye witnesses have testified that no such protest occurred.

Harming Hillary's campaign...a campaign built upon lies and much blood lost...does not for one minute matter as many feel...me included...that Hillary must be held responsible and must be made to pay the price for her involvement in the nightmare that was Benghazi as it was Hillary herself who when asked for more security hired the well known terrorist group the 'February 17 Martyrs Brigade' to guard the compound instead of arming and using our own people. And it was Hillary herself who either denied or simply and maliciously ignored Ambassador Stevens' numerous pleas for help in the very months leading up to the Benghazi attack as can be witnessed by Stevens' many emails sent to both her personally and to the State Department after the attack on the British compound mere months prior to the attack on the Benghazi compound.

Hillary Clinton, a woman who thinks the presidency is 'owed' to her...that' it's 'her time'...simply does not understand or just chooses to ignore the fact that the blood on her hands regarding Benghazi trumps any and all presidential aspirations she has.

"But after 11 hours of testimony (before the committee), answering every single question, in public, which I have requested for many months, I think it's pretty clear they're grasping at straws," Hillary said last February during an interview on ABC's 'This Week with George Stephanopoulos' regarding Gowdy's investigation.

No, I don't think Gowdy is grasping at straws as Hillary still has much explaining to do regarding the fact that on the night of the attack, including while the attack was still ongoing, she released a statement at around 10:30 pm EST to the public stating that "inflammatory material posted on the Internet" might have had some role in the attack. But an hour later she emailed her daughter Chelsea...on servers that had multiple private email addresses hosted on a home-brew server and which the Select Committee is in possession of records with two separate and distinct email addresses...that two Americans had been killed in Benghazi by an al-Qaeda-like group.

Well you can't have it both ways Hillary...and in trying to do so this most vile of women showed herself to be both totally unqualified and undeserving to serve as President of these United States as well as Commander-in-Chief of our armed forces for the first role as said commander is to protect American lives overseas not to turn your back on them, and surely not to help to arrange for their demise.

Simply put, due to the inactions of Hillary Clinton during her tenure as Secretary of State, four innocent Americans died including a U.S. ambassador. Also, Hillary, with full knowledge of the events at Benghazi, out and out lied to both the American public and to the victims families as to the reason for the attack...as in that ridiculous YouTube video 'The Innocence of Muslims'...and in regards to the events surrounding both the prelude and the aftermath of the attack. And lest we forget that this is the very woman who helped topple the then pro-west governments in Libya and in Egypt, and who then thinking herself above the law had the audacity to deny security for Benghazi solely to cover up for the afore mentioned illegal gun and weapons running operation of her boss...Barack HUSSEIN Obama...which directly led to the deaths of the said four Americans.

So instead of Hillary seeking the presidency, charges of treason on the grounds of dereliction of duty, aiding and abetting the enemy, and complicity in the murder of U.S. government officials should be leveled against her. And charges such as those are the reason why the Obama administration is "obstructing"...as Trey Gowdy says...the investigation itself which in turn has led to the delay in releasing the committee's findings...after all Obama's head is on the chopping block...so to speak...as much if not more so than is Hillary Clinton's.

And now we sit and wait to see if within the next few weeks Trey Gowdy is indeed able to release the commission's findings and if he does, hopefully it will prove there is indeed blood on both Hillary's and Obama's hands. But we must also prepare ourselves for the possibility that political wheelings and dealings behind the scenes allows both Hillary and Obama to once again delay their fitting for an orange jumpsuit as they breathe a sigh of relief for having pulled the bloody wool over 'We the People's' eyes yet again...as Hillary Clinton now becomes assured to be Barack HUSSEIN Obama's third term in office...after all one bloodied hand does indeed wash the other.

*********************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! 

Today, Wednesday, May 25th, from 2 to 4pm EST, Right Side Patriots Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss the Benghazi investigation and soon to released report, Trump's screwing of our veterans, and facebook's selective enforcement against conservative bloggers.

Hope you can tune in at: americanpbn.com And visit our Platinum Player...it's amazing.

Investigative Report:
Email Scandals and Cover-Ups...Part 2 of 2
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on http://www.americanpbn.com/

In Part 1 of our two part investigative report (see Part 1 here: http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2016/02/investigative-report-email-scandals-and.html), we, the Right Side Patriots, laid the groundwork for the further melding together of what were two independent investigations...one an investigation into Hillary’s emails and the other into Benghazi.

In Part 1, we focused on one key email, one out of many sent between Hillary Clinton and a former Ambassador to Israel, one which outlined a proposal to engage in covert activity to force “protests” within Gaza that would lead to escalating violence and even more Israeli deaths in order to blackmail, for lack of a better word, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu into ceding even more land and security to Hamas.

We also reported that while the attacks in Benghazi were ongoing, Obama held a long phone conversation with Netanyahu (confirmed by the White House and others), and our belief is that at least a portion of that call revolved around Obama's attempt to try and pass off Ambassador Stevens as a scapegoat, making Steven's the 'bad guy' who masterminded the gun running operation between Libyan 'so-called' rebels and Syrian 'so-called' rebels, a ploy Netanyahu of course did not buy into. And why...because of knowledge already passed on to him by his own intel community...as in Mossad operatives already embedded in Benghazi.

But now is the time to name names and put the pieces of the puzzle together.

That email, the one authored on December 18, 2011...the one urging Hillary to engage in what mounted to covert actions as a way of starting “protests” in the West Bank... “protests” that could well lead to escalating violence as a way to blackmail Netanyahu and support Hamas was written by none other than former U.S. Ambassador to Israel...Thomas R. Pickering.

If that name sounds familiar...it should. Ambassador Pickering also headed up the Accountability Review Board investigation into Benghazi. And who choose Pickering for that job...none other than Hillary Clinton herself.

Imagine that...Pickering...who just 10-months prior to Benghazi had written an email to Hillary urging her to go covert and help initiate “protests” that could well turn violent...was then hired by Hillary to investigate Benghazi. Benghazi...the violent islamic terrorist attack against our Mission and its adjoining CIA annex that left four Americans dead just happened to occur in tandem with other protests breaking out all across the region...all of which were blamed on a YouTube video.

And lo and behold what did both Hillary and Obama blame for Benghazi...exactly...that very same YouTube video.

So, did Pickering look into Hillary’s emails to see what evidence might be there during his investigation? No...he already knew what he would find there and certainly did not want to shed the light of an investigation onto it. Did Pickering implicate Hillary in any covert activities such as having discussions regarding starting islamic protests that might turn violent? No. Did Pickering implicate Hillary in any way, shape, or form, in his investigation’s findings? Again, no, he did not.

We can now start to understand why Trey Gowdy, the man responsible for getting the ball rolling on the investigation of Hillary’s emails, made such a big deal of her emails in his investigation into Benghazi. And we suspect that this December 18th email from Pickering, with the results just 10-months later being Benghazi, may well have been discussed along with the YouTube video cover-up as part of the pack of 18-emails between Hillary and Obama that the public has no access to.

To be clear, we are speculating but it is educated speculation. We do not know what is contained in those emails because they contain, we are told, SAP or above 'top secret information' and the intel community will not even release the dates of those 18-emails due to what they and only they say is national security concerns.

However, there are some things we do know. We do know that Pickering sent the email we have drawn attention to on December 18, 2011...we do know what happened on September 11, 2012, in Benghazi...we do know that Obama disappeared from the Situation Room twice that night...we do know he had a long phone conversation with Netanyahu while the attacks in Benghazi were ongoing. Also, we do know that at one point Hillary spoke with Obama by phone and that Obama went to bed at 10:30pm for the night while the attacks were still ongoing, and that around that same time Hillary made her first announcement that it was all due to a YouTube video. And we also know that she and Obama both knew, even as that first announcement was made, that it was a lie and a cover story for what was really transpiring.

So, what else do we know now that would help put the pieces of this treasonous puzzle together?

We do know that there are now 150 FBI agents committed to the investigation of Hillary’s private email account and private server, and we do know that one of them is none other than, Charles H. Kable IV, a senior FBI agent responsible for counterintelligence matters. As though it wasn’t interesting enough that one of the FBI’s most seasoned counterintelligence agents is in on this investigation, it becomes even more interesting when one realizes that Charles H. Kable IV used to be the chief of the counterespionage section at FBI headquarters.

To fully understand the dire nature of having someone with the resume of Charles H. Kable IV involved in the investigation of Hillary Clinton, one must understand the nature of counterintelligence as it applies to the FBI in any investigation. The definition of counterintelligence is as follows: “Counterintelligence refers to information gathered and activities conducted to protect against espionage, other intelligence activities, sabotage, or assassinations conducted for or on behalf of foreign powers, organizations or persons or international terrorist activities, but not including personnel, physical, document or communications security programs.”

Now if one looks at the individual pieces of the puzzle when they are locked in place together, it produces what we believe to be a clear picture of treason.

What Pickering wrote in that December 18, 2011 email, what he was suggesting to Hillary, was indeed espionage and it was on behalf of an international terrorist organization...Hamas...to be carried out against one of America's greatest allies...Israel.

Remember, Hamas is a branch of the Muslim Brotherhood, in fact the Muslim Brotherhood actually gave birth to Hamas, the very terrorist organization Obama tried to install as the new leadership in Egypt, and that both Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood are proxies of Iran. And let’s not forget just to whom Hillary’s closest minion Huma Abedin is tied to...the Muslim Brotherhood...or exactly who Obama’s closest minion Valerie Jarret is tied to...Iran.

The protests carried out supposedly as a response to that YouTube cover-up story closely mirror exactly what Pickering was proposing in his email to Hillary and were, we believe, meant to lend some credence to what then transpired in Benghazi.

As for Benghazi itself...the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, along with Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods, were not simply the tragic outcome of a terrorist attack when one looks at the surrounding evidence. Hillary 'drew down' our security forces and replaced them with the February 17 Brigade...an arm of al-Qaeda and our enemy in a time of war (and still our enemy today) and that Hillary along with Obama were engaged in a gun running covert operation between 'supposed' rebels from Libya to 'supposed' rebels in Syria, and we now know that those 'supposed' rebels from both ends of the transactions were indeed al-Qaeda.

When that light is brought into focus the deaths of those four Americans goes from being tragic deaths due to islamic terrorism to a targeted hit...an assassination...as per the definition of counterintelligence.

Now, if we look at the definition of counterintelligence again, this time focusing strictly on the last portion of it...“but not including personnel, physical, document or communications security programs,” what can be surmised? While the FBI is now by their own admission investigating Hillary’s emails and the scandal surrounding them, as in her private server and her private email account, most likely with regard to violations of U.S. Code 18, Sec. 793...felonies punishable by fines and up to 10 years in prison...one agent...Charles H. Kable IV...is apparently heading up something quite different...which falls under the description of “not including personnel, physical, document or communications security programs,” or in other words...not her emails but her actions.

Hillary Clinton's actions we believe are paramount to treason as in 'aiding and abetting' the enemy as far as the Benghazi gun running is concerned in addition to being an accessory to murder as she willingly and knowing refused Christopher Stevens' pleas for help, and in fact positioned not U.S. personnel to guard the compound but she positioned the enemy...February 17 Brigade (an al-Qaeda offshoot) to do so in an effort to assure that when the protests broke out that Steven's would not escape and expose her part in the gun running operation. And how do we surmise this...because first, Hillary knew would be happening as, we believe, she was one of those who were disseminating that ridiculous video and second, because until her announcement about the video only a few hundred people worldwide had even bothered to see it... remember it only got major viewers after her announcement and that in and of itself means the protests has not a thing to do with this ridiculous video.

And as for her plotting against Israel, what Hillary was doing via her emails with now, we believe to be fellow traitor, former Israeli Ambassador Thomas R. Pickering, amounts to espionage as both were working with various terrorist organizations...Hamas and al-Qaeda included...against the better interests of the U.S. and our allies.

Also, now coming to light is the fact that at least a dozen accounts...possibly as many as 30...were involved in seeing and passing along SAP emails that they had no clearance to pass on let alone even read...a dozen+ accounts including not only Clinton’s but those of Cheryl Mills, Huma Abedin, Jake Sullivan, Philippe Reinesas and State Department Under Secretary for Management Patrick Kennedy.

And this shows how fast and loose Hillary was with our national security intelligence...especially intelligence passed along on unsecured servers. And unsecured servers means China, Russia, and anyone else can obtain those SAP...emails above 'top secret.'

And that's the thing about Hillary and even Obama, the very two who say they are the most transparent of all those in D.C...guess what they lie. And not only do they lie about what they are doing currently but they lie about what they did in the past no matter that proof exists as to their lies. And if they are not lying personally their minions are doing their lying for them...doing their lying and their 'dirty work' so to speak. And part of that dirty work is trying to stop the truth about their actions from reaching the public...and especially trying to stop people like Craig and Diane from doing just that.

And as we said from the very beginning, putting the pieces of this puzzle together would require a bit of speculation, educated speculation, and we believe we are spot on in our conclusions as during our research for 2-part of our investigative report, odd things were happening. As Diane attempted to send via email some info to Craig, his email service simply would not respond. At the same time Diane was unable to save anything on her computer and at that moment she received a phone call supposedly from Dell asking who, at her home, had reported internet issues. Diane told the woman (who sounded as though she were from India) several times that no one had reported any such issues to which the ‘tech” then stated that Diane was attempting to download things she was not supposed to be able to download.

And as Diane told her, one more time, that there were no issues, the woman at the other end of the call abruptly hung up. With that...Diane’s ability to save information suddenly returned and Craig’s email blockage cleared...all at the exact same time. And as Diane continued to do research for these articles she continued to receive several rather obtuse calls regarding computer issues whenever she tried to download information. However, when both Craig and Diane attempted to return those calls to the caller ID numbers shown, none of those numbers were in operation.

Obviously, we were being closely monitored while in the process of writing these articles... monitored to see from whom and where our information was coming from...just like we have been on off and on ever since our Benghazi series was first published.

It seems to us, that the proper time to have been closely monitoring possible mishandling of national security related classified, top secret, and SAP material, would have been throughout the reign of treason and espionage otherwise known as Hillary’s time at the Department of State, and the people to have been monitored would have been Hillary and her staff of minions and not us. Hillary’s world is closing in on her as more and more of the truth comes out. We also believe, at this point, that indictments are forthcoming not only because of what we have seen and know up to this point but because more and more is coming to the surface almost daily... things which even Hillary Clinton will not be able to lie her way out of.

Investigative Report:
Email Scandals and Cover-Ups...Part 1 of 2
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on http://www.americanpbn.com/

As the scandal regarding Hillary Clinton’s emails deepens, so too do the connections between her email scandal and the Benghazi scandal. This is why we, Craig Andresen from 'The National Patriot' and Diane Sori from 'The Patriot Factor,' have teamed up once again to delve into the matter and to expose even more connections between the two scandals and would should be dire implications for Hillary Clinton and Barack HUSSEIN Obama.

Last Thursday night the State Department released almost 3,000 more pages of Hillary’s emails with 66 of them now deemed classified, although those emails had not been marked 'classified' at the time they were sent. Amongst them and others previously released, we have found evidence that requires 'educated' speculation, because we are unable to view the emails themselves due to national security issues as these emails have been deemed 'Above Top Secret' meaning 'Special Access Programs' (SAP). Before we get into that, note that on January 13th of this year, Craig wrote an article, 'Hillary Clinton – When Scandals Collide' http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2016/01/13/hillary-clinton-when-scandals-collide/and where that article leaves off we now pick up with the latest information available.

One of the emails we have become aware of...an email which has now been oh so 'conveniently' removed from the internet...was from Anne Marie Slaughter, former State Department Director of Policy Planning, dated September 28, 2010, in which she advised Hillary Clinton to employ a 'Pledge for Palestine' campaign. Slaughter's campaign called for Clinton to propose a program by which wealthy people would donate to charitable causes... specifically Palestinian causes...with the hope that it would “shame” Israel...who was at that time building settlements in 'supposedly' disputed territory...into supporting and advancing Palestinian statehood. Slaughter, insisted in her email that by “tapping into the Clinton fund-raising network it should be possible to generate a substantial…amount quickly enough to capture the public imagination.” and to “serve as an expression of global solidarity with the Palestinians.”

Those cc'd in Slaughter's email were Cheryl Mills and Clinton sidekicks Huma Abedin and Jake Sullivan. And Hillary Clinton’s response to the idea of initiating a program that would “shame” one of America's most steadfast allies and closest friend, was a mind boggling, “I am very interested–pls flesh out. Thx."

The discovery of these newest sent to Hillary emails... emails containing ideas and proposals she was by all accounts just a bit too happy to entertain...emails in which she saw merit at initiating programs that were decidedly 'anti-Israel' is not surprising...and no one should really be surprised at her responses. But Slaughter’s was just one of many emails from various people within Hillary Clinton’s inner circle, but one in particular made us sit up and take notice. That email thread came from a former United States Ambassador to Israel, and one who would later become a key figure in the Benghazi investigations (more on that in part 2).

The particular email in question is bone chilling in retrospect as it was written and sent on December 18, 2011, and in it the author suggests a covert operation...a proposed Tahir Square/Arab Spring-style protest between Palestinian and Israeli women... female-only to keep the demonstrations from becoming too violent because, as stated by the email’s author, “If the Palestinians see men engaged they will jump in and the soldiers of the IDF will sooner or later use force.” The proposal also called for demonstrations within Israel itself, and for those to be exclusively women as well...in what the author claimed was the need to see “a game changer in the region”...a game-changer to force Israel to re-enter peace negotiations. And these negotiations would strive to have Israel giving up even more land and even more security directly to their enemies...and the author saw Benjamin Netanyahu alone as being the stumbling block to a two-state solution.

So taken was Hillary Clinton with this proposal that she didn't care that it would probably lead to escalating violence which in turn would morph into a third intifada leading directly to the deaths of more innocent Israelis in the process. And even with the knowledge that the proposal itself lacked tangible details as to how either Clinton herself or the State Department...on behalf of the Obama regime...could actually initiate said anti-Israeli protests, Hillary nonetheless forwarded this email to her aide Monica Hanley and asked her to “pls print” it out for further reference. This means that not only did Hillary want an electronic copy of this dire proposal...she wanted a hard copy of it as well.

So, does this particular email thread contained in Hillary's emails from her private email account and contained on her private server, emails discovered as part of the ongoing and growing investigation into her unlawful use of both, lead us to Benghazi? We most certainly believe it does and what follows is why we believe it to be so.

Now remember back to the night of Benghazi when at 10pm EST, Hillary and Obama met via a phone call to discuss the situation, and that at 10:30pm EST, Hillary, for the first time, publicly blamed "inflammatory material posted on the internet" for the violence... referring to the YouTube video 'The Innocence of Muslims.' Remember too, that at 10:30pm EST, Obama excused himself from the Situation Room to go to sleep as he had a fundraiser in Las Vegas the next day. Now, something of note that has been for the most part been kept hidden from the public is that when Obama first left the Situation Room at 5pm EST, leaving all things Benghazi in the hands of the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, he then went to make a very important phone call, and that phone call was to of all people Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

Here is what we believe might actually have transpired during that phone call. The White House wants us to believe via official statements they issued the very night of the attacks that the two world leaders discussed ways to heal Obama's snubbing of Netanyahu while both men were in New York as well as to discuss Iran and other incidentals...in other words a phone call for Obama's political expediency alone done while our embassy compound was under attack. The White House statement mentions nothing about Obama deliberately not telling Netanyahu about the happenings currently ongoing at the compound, however, there is no way that Netanyahu did not know as Mossad operatives had been embedded at the compound for quite sometime. And why...because Netanyahu had suspected for a long time that Obama and Hillary were smuggling weapons through Benghazi to Hamas and Hezbollah as well as to the Syrian anything-but rebels. That is why the Mossad was there...to get the proof needed to expose Obama and Hillary, but the time frame they needed to do so was now jeopardized by the attacks.

Another reason neither Obama nor Hillary came to Ambassador Stevens' aid during his many pleas for help is that he and Hillary had already concocted a story that it was Stevens who was working for the 'other side' and that it was Stevens who was the one smuggling said weapons. This is what we believe Obama tried to sell to Benjamin Netanyahu during their phone conversation that night, while unbeknownst to Obama was the fact that Netanyahu had Mossad operatives in-place at the compound...operatives in the process of gathering information about what was actually Obama's and Hillary's transferring not only arms but manpower to Hamas, to Hezzbolah, and to al-Qaeda...operatives who suddenly have gone 'missing' in the 30 witnesses unaccounted for...as in were they 'eliminated' or were they possibly pulled back into Israel.

This is what, we believe, is in those 18-emails classified 'Special Access Programs' (SAP)... and that is the correspondence between Obama and Hillary relating to what we believe to be the 'take-out,' if you will, of Ambassador Stevens and that all components were in place and ready to be launched... remember the three others were 'collateral damage'...and that Obama would try to get Netanyahu to see things his way...which we know did not succeed.

So while this is a good start in exposing more of the corruption of both Hillary Clinton and Barack Hussein Obama, it is far from a complete picture. Rest assured there is more...much more...and we will delve into the rest of it in the days to come as we continue to assemble the pieces of this puzzle, and show you how the once divergent investigations into Hillary’s email scandal and into Benghazi are now becoming one and the same investigation.

There can be no doubt that one leads directly into the other, and that will become quite clear as we proceed down this treasonous path.

Don’t miss 'Email Scandals and Cover-Ups...Part 2' on Friday as we reveal key names, key appointments, and how we, the Right Side Patriots, have been 'monitored' while researching and compiling the information we have presented in these articles.

*************************************************************
Today, Wednesday, February 10th from 2 to 4pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori will discuss Part 1 of our 2-part series 'Email Scandals and Cover-Ups,' which candidates have the substance and vision needed for the presidency, and the New Hampshire primary results and ramifications,

Hope you can tune in at: www.americanpbn.com
And chat with us live at: https://www.facebook.com/groups/cprworldwidemedia/?fref=ts

Op-ed:
Hillary...Emails, Lies, and Video Tape
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on http://cprworldwidemedia.net/

In room 1100 of the Longworth House Office Building in Washington D.C., Republican members of the 'House Select Committee on Benghazi' questioned former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton while Democratic committee members apologized to her for her even having to be there.

Working to build a case that Hillary Clinton had indeed been derelict in her duty to secure the Benghazi mission not only in the months before the 2012 terrorist attacks that resulted in the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy Seals Glen Doherty and Tyronne Woods, but to build a case that it was Clinton's very inactions and lies spewed in her attempt to cover-up the administration's illegal gun running operation to the anything but 'moderate' Syrian rebels that directly led to their deaths. And Hillary saying at the start of the hearing that, "We need leadership at home to match our leadership abroad...We should resist denigrating the patriotism or loyalty with whom we disagree. So I am here." is quite laughable as these were words from the very woman who said at the recent Democratic debate that “Republicans are the enemy.”

Leading off with his opening statement, Committee Chair Trey Gowdy stated that, "This investigation is about four people who were killed representing our country on foreign soil. It is about what happened before, after and during the attacks that killed them. It is about what this country owes to those who risk their lives to serve it. And it is about the fundamental obligation for the government to tell the truth”...adding that even though many previous committees have investigated these attacks this current committee “goes much deeper in scope” and is far more comprehensive because “we now have her emails from the State Department to peruse.”

But in a deliberate attempt to counter Gowdy and make light of the all-important emails now coming into question, the leading Democrat on the committee, party-line tower Elijah Cummings, used his opening statement to say that Republicans, "are squandering millions of taxpayer dollars on this abusive effort to derail Secretary Clinton’s presidential campaign,” never mind that this investigation began years before Clinton officially announced her presidential run back in April of this year. And as the Democrats on the committee chimed in to also condemn the spending of some $4.7 million dollars, to date, on their investigation into Benghazi*, shows the utter ridiculousness of that line of faux contempt, as one need only look at what Congress spent on a few other things last year. Things such as spending $387,000 of the taxpayers money to study the effects robot-provided Swedish massage has on the physical recovery of rabbits after exercise, and $171,000 to teach monkeys to gamble in order to determine if monkeys, like humans, believe in the concept of a 'hot hand.'

And those same liberals on that committee were part of the body that spent $80 million for the development of a real-life 'Iron Man' suit and $21 million for the Army Corps of Engineers to rebuild buildings that continue to burn down because of their shoddy construction, not to mention their spending some $1 billion of taxpayer dollars to destroy some $16 billion of military grade ammo that wasn't needed in the first place.

Those complaining endlessly, during the hearing that $4.7 million has been spent searching for the truth, including uncovering and looking at emails and documents no other committee so much as cared to see, and interviewing 41 witnesses, including 7 eye-witnesses to the actual attack in Benghazi, spent $120,000 in performance bonuses paid to an Environmental Protection Agency employee who admitted to viewing porn up to six hours a day on government computers. The shallowness of their argument, when contrasted to the lives of Ambassador Chris Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods was duly noted.

And body language in a hearing of this scope tells the story as well for you could not help but notice that when Hillary had to tell a lie to cover-up one of her many previous lies or got caught in a new lie by one of the committee members questioning her, that first she fidgeted, then she rested her chin in the palm of her hands and placed her elbows on the table as her eyes darted around refusing to focus on the committee panel...for she knew that she has just been outed. And by the way, the temporary face-lift tapes Hillary was obviously wearing do give way when one sweats, and Hillary's face 'dropped' with every lie she told...until a break was called and the tapes were pulled back up again.

And Hillary's body language came into play during what we call smoking gun number 1, when Rep. Susan Brooks (R-Ind.) focused on Hillary's email habits at the State Department, and placed a stack of papers on the desk...papers showing the 700 emails regarding Benghazi that were sent back-and-forth in 2011 before serious problems arose, but then placing next to them the miserly 67 emails that were exchanged between the mission and the State Department in 2012 when the situation was heating up. And Hillary's response after she wiped away the look of shock on her face, was that she did not receive any classified material or that the material may have been classified retroactively on her email server. Saying that "Most of my work was not done on emails," and that she "did not email during the day" except on rare occasions, because she was busy and did not have a computer in her office... became a statement that came back to haunt her later in her testimony.

Smoking gun number two involved the 684 email requests for additional security from Ambassador Stevens and others that Hillary claimed never reached her desk. Yet throughout the first round of questioning Hillary kept saying how close she and Ambassador Stevens were...how it was she who asked 'Chris'...as she called him...to take the position...the very position that got him killed. And yet when Rep. Mike Pompeo (R-KA) in trying to establish the 'supposedly' close relationship Hillary kept touting that she had with Ambassador Stevens asked, "Did he have your cell number? Your home address? Your fax?" Hillary's answer was a very subdued almost embarrassingly sounding “no.” And when Pompeo asked why then were the 150 emails from Sidney Blumenthal...a former journalist who worked in the Clinton White House as senior adviser from 1997 to 2001, and who works for Media Matters, a liberal 'watchdog' organization that counters conservative claims in the media...and whom Hillary stated she was not close to...why then were all his emails responded to from an office Hillary said had no computer in it at all.

Rep. Pompeo then held up a photo of two men... smoking gun number three...and Hillary went a ghostly shade of white when asked if she knew who they were to which she replied, “I do not.” Pompeo then told her that one of the men was al-Azawi, head of a jihadist group based in Benghazi and that the other was Ben Hamid, adding if she was aware that on the day he was killed Ambassador Stevens sent a cable about his meeting with Hamid. “Are you aware of that cable” Pompeo asked...to which Hillary again replied “No I am not.” Explaining that they, referring to Hamid, wanted an introductory meeting, that Hamid asked Stevens what we needed to bring security to Benghazi so your officials...to which Hillary abruptly interrupted and said, “I know nothing about this Congressman.” “I think that's deeply disturbing. I think the fact that your was meeting...” Pompeo said...again being interrupted with, “I'm sorry which team is that,” Hillary croaked, and it went downhill from there.

The Secretary of State...one of the most important positions in our government...does not have a computer in her office according to Hillary...yet Blumenthal's emails were responded to from that very office...from her iPad or iPhone perhaps...a game of word semantics as to what a computer is. And the Secretary of State had no idea about a critical meeting between her ambassador and the head of a terrorist group as they tried to temper down the escalating violence in Benghazi...we do not believe that for a minute.

And that brings us to smoking gun number four which came during Hillary's first Q&A with Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) where Hillary got caught like deer in the headlights when Jordan pointed to two emails...two important emails Hillary never turned over when asked if she had turned everything over...with the first being a note providing a readout of a call between Clinton and the Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Qandil sent on September 12, 2012, the day after the Benghazi attack. The email quotes Hillary as having said, “We know the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack -- not a protest."

This is of major importance because it is a key piece of evidence coming directly from Hillary Clinton herself that proves beyond a shadow of a doubt the Republican claim that both she and Obama knew damn well that the attack was planned well before Susan Rice went on the TV talk-show circuit a week after the attack and flat-out lied that said attack was solely motivated by the anti-islamic YouTube video 'The Innocence of Muslims.'

 
The second email sent on the very day of the attack from Hillary to Diane Reynolds, an alias for Chelsea Clinton, states “Two of our officers were killed in Benghazi by an al Qaeda-like group: The Ambassador, whom I handpicked and a young communications officer on temporary duty w/ a wife and two young children. Very hard day and I fear more of the same tomorrow”...a direct admission to her daughter that the attack on the Benghazi mission had absolutely nothing to do with a protest over a video but had everything to do with an al-Qaeda attack.

“When I was speaking to the Egyptian prime minister or in the other two examples you showed, we had been told by Ansar al-Sharia [a militia group] that they took credit for it. It wasn't until about 24 more hours later that they retracted taking credit for it," Hillary said when counter Jordan's question ignoring the fact...a fact she knew well...that Ansar al-Sharia is directly tied to al-Qaeda. Word semantics again won't cut it here not with four dead Americans who did not have to die.

And Hillary than arrogantly and ever so very snidely said to Rep. Jordan that she was sorry that her version of events didn’t "fit your narrative." Well one thing we can assure you is that this is not narrative...it is Hillary's lies coming back to haunt via emails showing that she willingly aided...if not helped to concoct...the cover-up story about a video to not only protect Obama but to help assure his reelection.

And in the eleven hours of testimony smoking gun number five was exposed via 'The Accountability Review Board Report' (ARB)...a report that was trumpeted by the liberals who cited it as the definitive report that had already been issued by two men they felt were above reproach...came into play. That report recommended 29 fixes in an attempt to prevent a future tragedy of the Benghazi nature and named several people whose actions leading up to Benghazi were suspect or derelict. The ARB report, according to the left, is where all investigations into Benghazi should have ended and there can be little wonder why they desperately want that to be the end of it as Ambassador Tom Pickering and Admiral Mike Mullin were the two men, named by Hillary Clinton, who headed up the ARB, and are the men the left claimed to have been above reproach, and who conducted the most comprehensive review possible.

But the simple fact is their report was neither comprehensive nor, it seems, were Pickering and Mullins above reproach. First, in regard to their thoroughness...they did not have at their disposal a full account of Hillary’s emails nor did they have any of Ambassador Stevens' emails. And while Pickering and Mullins did interview more than 100 people during their investigation, they managed to miss a critical few who were extremely relevant to the investigation, including 41 witnesses Gowdy’s committee interviewed that including seven eyewitness survivors of the Benghazi attacks itself. And most importantly, neither Pickering nor Mullins ever once interviewed or spoke with key-player Hillary Clinton herself.

And according to statements from Trey Gowdy, “The Select Committee is the first committee to interview relevant witnesses ranging from senior government officials to seven of the eyewitnesses to the attacks.”... “The Select Committee is the first and only committee to access over 50,000 documents from top officials in the State Department, the intelligence community and the White House.”... “The Select Committee is the first and only committee to access Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s e-mails.”...“The Select Committee is the first and only committee to access thousands of pages of Ambassador Stevens’ e-mails” and “How can you possibly conduct a thorough investigation without access to the e-mails of the person most knowledgeable about Libya?” 

Quite simply...you can't.

And as for Pickering and Mullins being above reproach and running a non-partisan investigation, Chairman Gowdy proved they were not when he asked Hillary if she knew why Admiral Mullins would have placed a call to one of Hillary's deputies urging that Charlene Lamb not be made available to a previous House Committee as a witness as, according to Mullins, she would present herself badly. However, Charlene Lamb did in fact testify in October of 2012, and in her testimony she not only admitted that Hillary’s State Department had hired supposed “local Libyan security” for Benghazi (who turned out to be part of the 'February 17 Brigade,' an arm of al-Qaeda) but that the budget cuts, so often cited by liberals as the root cause of security cutbacks in Benghazi, were not in any way responsible for the draw-downs of our own security forces in Benghazi.

It was also quite telling that during her 11-hours of testimony, Hillary Clinton, as well as the Democratic members on the committee, went to great lengths to defend not only the ARB but Pickering and Mullins as well even while knowing that the report generated by that investigation was incomplete, and that Pickering and Mullins had both tried to uphold the lies told by Clinton and Obama...lies contained in their talking points that they are all still trying to salvage.

And while some Democrats on the committee contended and still contend that “nothing new” came from this hearing they again were and are wrong as smoking gun number six was exposed by way of Hillary Clinton herself for as per her own words, she now owns Benghazi. During her testimony, Clinton never refuted that she took credit for Libya in 2012, in fact, a report issued by her own people at the State Department made it clear that it was Clinton who convinced Obama to 'lead from behind' and assist NATO and Arab partners in ousting Gaddafi; that it was Clinton who crowed of Gaddafi’s demise as in “We came, we saw and he died;” and it was Clinton who worked to install an interim government, anointed Christopher Stevens as our next Ambassador to Libya; and who masterminded the lie that the new Libya was a friendly place for Americans.

But when Libya went from being Clinton’s baby to becoming Rosemary’s Baby, as the violence and islamic terrorist presence filled the vacuum of power in Libya...as more than 200 terrorist attacks rocked that country with 77 of those attacks taking place in Benghazi itself in 2012...documents clearly show Hillary Clinton trying to distance herself from involvement in Libya, while at the same time Obama was out campaigning on the lie that al-Qaeda was on the run. Both Hillary and Obama knew Libya was a disaster, that it was no safe place for any American to be as it was rapidly falling under terrorist control, and that Benghazi was perhaps the most dangerous and unstable city in the entirety of that country. But as Obama had invested his 2012 campaign in the lie that terrorism was waning, Hillary had hopes of investing her 2016 campaign on the, in her eyes, 'supposed' success of her involvement there.

So while Obama rode out the lie for two months after the terrorist murders of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods, Hillary Clinton simply cannot escape her lies as they continue to hover over her even though three years have gone by. And one simply has to read between the lines and lies of Clinton’s testimony to see the truth about Benghazi...the truth that Christopher Stevens was Hillary's last ditch attempt at creating a political success out of Libya from the reality of the festering cesspool of terrorism that it had become. Remember, during her testimony, Clinton could not recall whether she had actually spoken to Stevens after the day she installed him as our Ambassador to Libya.

“Did you ever talk to Ambassador Stevens when all of this was going on in the hotbed of Libya?” That was one of the direct questions posed by Rep. Susan Brooks. “That is a yes or no question, Madam Secretary. Did you ever personally speak to [Ambassador Stevens] after you swore him in in May [2012]? Yes or no, please.” Clinton’s response...“Yes, I believe I did.” She “believes” she did but did not say...yes...I did. Brooks continued...“And when was that?” Clinton’s telling response to that was...“I don’t recall.”

Hillary Clinton, the woman who testified that she had done everything...everything she could think of to do to keep a close eye on the happenings in Libya and to monitor the deteriorating conditions there...the woman who made it a point to refer to Stevens as a close personal friend...the woman who lowered her voice in performance mode when she spoke of the moment she learned Stevens was missing and later was found dead...could not recall whether or not, after appointing him as our Ambassador in May 2012, that she had ever spoken with Christopher Stevens even once.

But we always remember to give credit where credit is due and we must say that party loyal Democrats who sat on the committee...Democrats like Rep. Adam Smith (D-UT) who wrongly said that "Right now this committee is not doing a service to the four people who died or their families."...as well as liberals in general...were 100% correct about one thing...nothing new came from Clinton’s 11-hours of testimony for when provided with the opportunity to tell the truth by Gowdy and the Republicans on the committee, Hillary Clinton instead chose to repeat the same old tired and proven lies that she has told about Benghazi since 10:08 pm on the night of September 11, 2012...once again proving the old adage that leopards never change their spots...that liars never admit their lies NOT even to save themselves.

*********************************************************
* To read our 3-part Investigative Report...'Benghazi: The Truth Exposed'...the one that the regime did NOT want you to see...click on the links below:

Bengahzi: The Truth Exposed...Part 1
http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/04/benghazi-truth-exposed-part-1-by-craig.html
Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 2
http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/04/op-ed-benghazi-truth-exposed.html
Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 3
http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/04/op-ed-benghazi-truth-exposed_9.html