Welcome to FOX News First. Not signed up yet? Click here.
Developing now, Friday, July 20, 2018
President Trump invites Russia’s Vladimir Putin to Washington for
a follow-up summit, as Secretary of State Mike Pompeo -- in an
exclusive FOX News interview – defends the president against ‘absurd’
criticism of the Helsinki summit
Democratic socialist congressional candidate Alexandria
Ocasio-Cortez may hit the campaign trail with Sen. Bernie Sanders,
fueling speculation about a Democratic Party rift
The NFL puts its new national anthem policy on hold while it continues to negotiate with the players association
At least 11 people, including children, drowned Thursday night when a duck boat capsized in Missouri, authorities say. Other passengers were reportedly missing
A salmonella outbreak has left at least 90 people sickened across 26 states
Today, Friday, July 20th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political
Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Special Investigative
Report: 'Peter Strzok...the Epitome of Arrogance and Bias'; and
important news of the day.
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
He lied, he smirked, and he smugly testified about certain “off the cuff”
texts he doesn't remember writing but still explained what the texts
meant. He denied that his personal anti-Trump bias affected his work
because he said the texts were sent out of his “deep sense of
patriotism” and nothing else.
And so F.B.I. Counter-Intelligence Agent Peter Strzok, who publicly
testified last Thursday before the House Oversight and Judiciary
Committees, tried to paint himself as the victim of a vast Republican
conspiracy that claimed his personal bias and texts against
then-candidate Donald Trump affected how he did his job in regards to
his involvement in both the F.B.I.'s Hillary Clinton email investigation
and Robert Mueller's investigation into possible Russian collusion and
election tampering. Going so far as to say that the hearing itself was
but a rehash of Hillary's emails and yet “another victory notch” for Vladimir Putin, Strzok insisted that his text messages regarding Hillary and Trump were nothing but “standard political opinions”
that he was entitled to hold under the First Amendment. And he did so
while insisting that his promise to former F.B.I. lawyer Lisa
Page...whom he was having an affair with...that “we'll find a way to stop Mr. Trump” did not mean he was biased in his approach to his job.
And we say that is simply not so for not only did he clearly show
bias but more importantly his words exposed one Mr. Peter Strzok for who
he really is...Obama's 'deep state' operative planted within the F.B.I.
itself. And how did we come to this conclusion...by putting the pieces
of the puzzle together so that when fully assembled a vastly different
picture of Strzok emerged then just the arrogant individual who tried to
downplay the seriousness of this hearing, but who in that arrogance
proved himself to be the one who at the very least helped or who
actually orchestrated this entire sorted mess.
Let's start putting the puzzle together with the one question that
never has been asked let alone answered...how did Peter Strzok ever
become part of either James Comey's email investigative team or Robert
Mueller's supposedly unbiased and supposedly nonpartisan investigation
into supposed Russian collusion when it had been known for years how
Strzok felt about both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump, after all he
texted back then as much if not more so than Trump does now.
The answer to that critical question is that for the most part Robert
Mueller's investigators were and still remain Democrat party loyalists and
donors to both Hillary Clinton and Barack HUSSEIN Obama with
non-partisanship never being a pre-requisite for being on his team.
And the same surely goes for those James Comey handpicked to investigate Hillary's
emails. In fact, party partisanship seems to have been the one critical thing
both Comey and Mueller demanded of all those on their teams as everything that
had been so carefully planned and very calculatingly crafted to make sure
Obama via Hillary Clinton got his third term in office, needed folks
willing to cover up both investigations and to made it to look like Trump
was guilty of collusion on the outside chance he won the election.
And Peter Strzok in his unabashed hatred of Donald Trump and love for Hillary Clinton fit both bills to a tee.
But the thing is Robert Mueller...a man who himself was not and is
not impartial no matter the R next to his name...no matter that he in a
'too little-too late' move did in 2017 remove Strzok from his
investigative team when he found out about the texts...and James
Comey...a Rino Obama puppet-on-a-string...were never the ones calling
the shots...Peter Strzok was and still is and certain of his text
messages prove just that.
But first Robert Mueller and James Comey. In Mueller's case, if this
man had been truly impartial and if he was truly dedicated to
ascertaining the truth about supposed Trump/Russian collusion and not
just focusing on the appearance of integrity, he would have disbanded
his team and called for the investigation to be closed when back in
March, Republicans on the House Intelligence Committee announced that
their in-depth investigation had found no evidence whatsoever of
collusion between Donald J. Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia's
wanting to sway the 2016 election. Yet Mueller's investigation continued
on with the grand climax reached last Friday night, when on the eve of
the Trump/Putin Helsinki Summit, Mueller's flunkie Rod Rosenstein...whom
the House Republicans now want impeached...announced that 12 Russians
were being indicted for hacking not into Trump's campaign computers but
those of the DNC...unsecured DNC computers in fact...computers the DNC
had never even turned over to the F.B.I...how convenient yet
questionable is that.
Talk about timing...talk about a diversion to deflect us away from
Peter Strzok's public testimony completed literally mere hours
before...for suddenly now just as the all-important meeting between the
leaders of the world's two superpowers is to take place, the Mueller
investigation is completed, the Russians are guilty, the Democrats
demand the summit be called off, and Hillary Clinton is now trying to
set the stage for her third presidential run.
Such orchestrated theatrics even a blind man could see as this reeks
of nothing but desperation and a need to hide secrets hidden within the
F.B.I. that as we suspected reach all the way back to the Obama White
House.
And those secrets lead back to then-F.B.I. Director James Comey's
investigation into Hillary's emails and raise serious questions about
the F.B.I.'s integrity during this period, including their handling of a
proven to be manufactured dossier and an intended scenario where
Hillary is to be the aggrieved one instead of the guilty party that she
was.
Comey already knew there was evidence of collusion not between Trump
and Russia but between senior bureau officials and Hillary when he was
told to change the wording of the F.B.I.'s findings from Hillary being
guilty of “gross negligence”...a serious chargeable
offense...to being just “extremely careless” regarding the emails sent
from her unsecured private email server. But the thing is it was not
James Comey who actually physically changed the wording of the
report...it was changed by Peter Strzok and done so on his F.B.I.
computer.
Secrets indeed for what appears on the surface is not always the case
for James Comey...the very man who exonerated Hillary even before
interviewing her...was but collateral damage easily thrown away with
Loretta Lynch just the courier of the much needed offense change. And Rod Rosenstein was actually Comey's handler not the other way around with Peter
Strzok being and remaining the 'deep state' direct conduit to Obama and
who on Obama's directions actually on the surface was the one calling
all the shots. And Strzok knew well that if he was caught Obama would
make sure he would walk away with but a slap on the wrist if even that.
And while you will say this is just supposition on our part, we say it
was Peter Strzok and his unabashed arrogance...an arrogance rivaling
that of Obama....who gave it all away with his back and forth text messages
to Lisa Page.
“[Trump’s] not ever going to become president, right? Right?!” Lisa Page texted Strzok.
“No. No he won’t. We’ll stop it,” was Peter Strzok's reply...leaving one to wonder just who “we” is and how exactly did “we” intend to “stop” Trump from becoming president.
“We” is a term used to encompass others besides oneself and “we” also alludes to someone being the leader of “we.”
And with Strzok's arrogance and self-assured smugness a sure sign of
someone trusted to be in command it can safely be assumed that he was
the front-man of that texted “we.” But while Strzok was the
front-man what with his job being to make sure Hillary became Obama's
third term in office, this means both Obama and Hillary were surely part
of that “we” with James Comey thrown in for good measure. And
why so...a weak and easily manipulated man was needed to assure that
Hillary was found not guilty of “gross negligence,” and with the always hovering threat of sudden “suicide” always hanging over one's head when one gets involved with the Clinton's, Comey fit that description to a tee.
As for Obama and Hillary being part of the “we”...it is a
fact that when someone has both the most to gain as well as the most to
lose that someone will do everything in their power to assure themselves
the win. Losing is not an option for losing can have serious
consequences, and losing the White House was a consequence both Obama
and Hillary had to avoid at all costs so as not to upset their
respective handlers and so on up the chain of the oh so dubious
command...or should we say cabal.
So while we've laid out the “we” aspect of Strzok's inflammatory text what about the word “stop”...a word just as inflammatory and maybe even more so for “stop” usually means put an end to something.
Could “stop” simply have meant “stop” Trump at the
ballot box, something Peter Strzok would like us to believe and
something we hope would be the case or could it have meant “stop”
as in Vince Foster, James McDougal, Mary Mahoney, Seth Rich, and so many
others...for when anything Clinton is involved one just never knows.
It's an unanswerable question at this point in time but a question that
simply cannot be dismissed for when hate and the quest for power
are the driving forces of one's actions no scenario should be taken off
the table.
So how did Strzok's testimony play out with both Republicans and
Democrats?
Republicans hit Strzok hard demanding answers they knew they
would not get from a man obviously on a divert and deflect everything
back to Trump mission, while Democrats were lined up in lockstep to
applaud and defend this “renegade F.B.I. agent” whom the agency itself now seems ready to distance themselves from.
Taking no nonsense from obviously scripted Peter Strzok whose pat answer to the questions he did not want to answer always being, "I
understand your question and would like to answer. As you know, the
counsel of the FBI have directed me not to answer any questions about
any questions about ongoing investigations," now saw House Oversight Committee Chairman Trey Gowdy nailing Strzok on his "self-serving definition of bias,"
the very word he had trouble defining during his previous deposition
behind closed doors. Saying that Strzok had Clinton winning the White
House even before the election took place, Gowdy added that once Trump
won and Mueller was tasked with an investigation that never should have
been, "Agent Strzok had Donald Trump impeached before he even
started investigating him. That is bias. Agent Strzok may not see it but
the rest of the country does, and it is not what we want, expect or
deserve from any law enforcement officer much less the FBI."
And bias is the crux of the matter for without bias there would have
been none of our hard-earned taxpayer dollars wasted on a cast of
characters we already knew were corrupted to their very core.
And
then there was House Judiciary Committee chairman Bob Goodlatte (R.,
Va.) who actually read off some of Strzok's biased text messages sent to
Lisa Page.
“To my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, please replace
President Trump’s name with your own name in a small sample of things
Mr. Strzok has said,” Goodlatte said. “Envision how you would
feel if you found out that the chief agent investigating you as a Member
of Congress was making these comments: ‘F Trump,’ ‘Trump is a
disaster,’ ‘Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the
Trump support’ — or, perhaps most alarmingly and revealingly, ‘We’ll
stop it’ — referring directly to Mr. Trump’s candidacy for President.”
If that's not bias we don't know what is...and we'll go into more detail on bias in a bit.
And the Democrats response...the one that stands out in our minds the
most is how Rep. Steve Cohen (TN.) had the audacity to tell Peter Strzok that he deserved a
Purple Heart for sitting through a public hearing that was "an
attack on you and a way to attack [Special Counsel Robert] Mueller and
the investigation that is to get at Russian collusion involved in our
elections, which is what this committee should be looking at." Amazing isn't it.
And to Rep. Cohen we say this never was an investigation into Russian
collusion, it was and remains a hearing regarding bias, lies, and
cover-ups being perpetrated by one Peter Strzok who still is trying to
make an innocent man...Donald J. Trump...the guilty party in an election
your side lost. And might we add how dare you defame our troops and
veterans by equating the giving of the Purple Heart to this scum when
the Purple Heart is given solely to whom while wearing our nation's
uniform gets injured or killed during times of war.
It's sad just how low the Democrats will sink when therapy puppies
and bottles of bubbles are simply not enough to soothe their bruised
egos.
And while the congressional hearings last week featuring Strozk
failed to reveal any information we didn’t already know, it did succeed
in shining the light of truth in the court of public opinion on Strzok
and the 'suits' at the F.B.I. Whether or not the IG found bias on the
part of Comey or McCabe, he did find bias in Strzok regardless of how
much Strzok protested in that ten-hour hearing. That bias was
two-fold...bias against Donald Trump and bias in favor of Hillary
Clinton.
According to Strzok, as per his under oath sworn testimony, "I did not think that bias was expressed in those text messages.” According to the Justice Department's Office of Inspector General report however, Strzok’s texts were evidence of a "biased state of mind."
It is hard if not impossible for anyone with even the most basic
amount of common sense to believe that Strzok, showing such a deep
desire to see Hillary win and stop Trump...as evidenced by his own
texts...could keep it personal without allowing it to directly affect
his work in both investigations.
Nobody who was going at those investigations with the open mind
Strozk claimed he had during his sworn testimony last week would have
written a text stating his “concern” that there wasn’t any “there, there”
with regard to collusion between Trump and the Russians. An open-minded
individual, one without bias, would have said if there’s no “there, there,” Trump didn’t do it and the case should be closed...but Strzok texted that he was very “concerned” there was no “there, there.” Concerned, as in if there wasn’t any “there, there,” they couldn’t stop Trump...couldn’t impeach Trump...couldn’t nail Trump...and Hillary could possibly lose the election.
Again, according to the official IG report, with regard to the aforementioned “...we’ll stop it” text, “It
is not only indicative of a biased state of mind but, even more
seriously, implies a willingness to take official action to impact the
presidential candidate’s electoral prospects. Strzok’s decision to
prioritize the Russia investigation over following up on the
midyear-related investigative lead discovered on the [Anthony] Weiner
laptop in October 2016, these text messages led us to conclude that we
did not have confidence that Strzok’s decision was free from bias.”
Allow us to be clear here, Strzok’s clear bias was exactly what the
F.B.I. 'suits' Comey and McCabe relied upon in both those
investigations...it is exactly what Hillary and her team, including the
DNC, relied upon and perhaps even more precisely it was what Obama
relied upon as an “insurance policy” if you will, yet but another
direct reference to yet another of Strzok’s texts, in order to secure
what we previously stated would have been his third term using Hillary
as a figurehead.
During his testimony last week Strzok stated, “Let me be
clear, unequivocally and under oath: not once in my 26 years of
defending my nation did my personal opinions impact any official action I
took.” Trey Gowdy had no trouble seeing through the flimsy facade and
stated that Strzok had a “self-serving definition of bias.”
The bias displayed either overtly by Peter Strzok or covertly by
F.B.I. 'suits' Comey and McCabe along with the smirking, arrogant
testimony provided by Strzok last week in that congressional hearing
have now become the public persona of the FBI thanks to Obama and
Hillary and has resulted in the American public having as little trust
in the Bureau as we do in the IRS.
The last thing America wants or needs is a sense of distrust in the
nation’s top law enforcement agency, the F.B.I. but thanks to the main
players...Obama, Hillary, Comey, McCabe, Page, and especially
Strzok...that is exactly what we now have.
At this point, we must differentiate between the F.B.I.’s 'boots' and
'suits.' While the 'boots' on the ground for the F.B.I. are not to be
blamed in all of this, it is exactly those everyday agents of the Bureau
who will ultimately pay the price for what the Bureau’s 'suits' have
done.
Like it or not the faces of the F.B.I. are now Strzok, his lover Lisa
Page, and the former top two 'suits' Comey and McCabe, but worse yet
than just being the now publicly disgraced and most recognizable names
and faces of the F.B.I., those four are what the public now views as the
standard.
Obama led this now public perception of the F.B.I. by orchestrating
the use of our nation’s primary law enforcement agency as a political
weapon to be used not only in the attempted smear of then candidate and
now President Donald Trump, but also for the purpose of covering up
Hillary’s own malfeasance.
Hillary’s role on the public perception downfall of the F.B.I. is
equally as deep and troubling as she and her campaign along with the DNC
provided a major part of the financing for the now completely
discredited Steele dossier that manufactured dirt against Trump and was
used to illegally garner FISA warrants.
Comey, although a useful puppet, also kept the manufacturing of the
Steele dossier going by using F.B.I. resources to continue financing it
even though he had no way of vetting whether or not any of the material
contained within it was credible...which it wasn’t.
McCabe knew exactly what was going on regarding the manufactured
dossier, as well as knowing the true purpose of both going after Trump
with it and the slow walking of evidence against Hillary Clinton. After
all, it was primarily McCabe who kept Obama up to speed as the duel
campaigns of smears against Trump and the covering up on Hillary’s
behalf went along.
Lisa Page was the F.B.I. attorney whose job could well have been to safeguard both ends of the “elect Hillary at any cost”
covert operation against being discovered, or if it was discovered, to
bury any strings that could be pulled in legalities. Make no mistake,
she was just as in on it as were the others.
That leaves us with Peter Strzok, the one we call the “evil genius”
of the operation. Obama knew and most likely related to McCabe and
Comey that the F.B.I. would need a point person for the operations...smearing Trump via an official F.B.I. investigation so as to ruin him in
the court of public opinion leading up to the 2016 election, and a
point man to slow walk any elements of the investigation into Hillary
such as the Weiner laptop issue, and exonerate Hillary ahead of the
election even if the investigation was still ongoing.
They needed someone brash, arrogant, dedicated to Hillary and just as
dedicated against Trump, and someone who would no doubt see such an
opportunity as a big step from being a 'boot' to becoming a 'suit.'
Strzok’s arrogance, combined with his ambition became not only his
downfall, but the F.B.I.’s downfall as well. Strzok’s texts between
himself and Page were arrogant, vile, vulgar and showed an overwhelming
bias not only on his part, but on the part of the F.B.I. 'suits' who
engineered the entire weaponization of the Bureau against a presidential
candidate and then against a sitting U.S. President.
With Comey and McCabe now gone from the F.B.I. and with both Lisa Page and
Strzok now investigative targets themselves, it has fallen to Robert
Mueller to try and keep the covert operation alive through the still ongoing
investigation into non-existent collusion between now President Trump
and the Russians.
Stopping Trump…that was Strzok’s goal as per his text to Lisa
Page...because that was the goal of the 'suits' at the FBI...Comey and McCabe
as directed by Hillary and Obama...to stop Trump, and if he...Peter
Strzok could be the one to stop Trump, and oversee the exoneration of
Hillary...from 'boot' to 'suit' he would go in a flash.
At one point Strzok texted his lover Lisa Page that he was, “concerned” that there was no “there, there” with regard to the manufactured Trump/Russian collusion investigation. Strzok’s “concern” was without a "there, there," he wouldn’t become the 'suit' his ambition and arrogance had led him to believe was his destiny.
Rightly or wrongly the perception of the F.B.I. is no longer that of
being above reproach, but now beneath contempt and Strzok’s arrogance in
last week’s hearing did even more harm than his texts. Liberals in that
hearing also made things worse...not only for the F.B.I. but for
themselves by defending Strzok and attempting to turn him into some sort
of a hero worthy of a Purple Heart, and in defending Strzok, liberals
were, by proxy, defending the 'suits' at the F.B.I.
At the heart of the now damaged reputation of the F.B.I. is Obama and
Hillary who weaponized our nation’s top law enforcement agency just as
Obama had weaponized the IRS...both being utilized as political weapons.
The ultimate irony might well be that to cook up a fictitious story
of collusion between then-candidate and now President Trump and the
Russians, Obama had to turn the F.B.I. into his and Hillary’s version of
the KGB.
Sadly, aside from a few firings, and we believe that Peter Strzok
will be fired from the F.B.I. shortly, the rest of the usual suspects
will get away with undermining what was once the most trusted law
enforcement agency in the United States, as congressional Republicans
simply do not have the guts to do what’s right.
It will take decades to reestablish the factor of trust lost to the
political weaponizing of the F.B.I., and we suspect that what we know
now of the situation may well be just the tip of the proverbial iceberg.
This goes well beyond the swamp and is deeply rooted on deep state
tactics, meaning there could well be much more to it with many more
operatives involved than we know of at this point.
The puzzle pieces have now all been assembled and the picture as you
can see is not a pretty one with liberals claiming as their heroes those
who have so tarnished our nation’s belief that the law would be evenly
applied with their sneering, smirking, astoundingly arrogant and
disdainful, vile and vulgar disrespect of not only our President but of
those who believe America can and will be great again.
Their attitudes
and actions will serve our conservative cause well in upcoming elections
as we will surely neither forget nor forgive.
Today, Friday, July 20th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political
Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Special Investigative Report: 'Peter Strzok...the Epitome of Arrogance and Bias'; and
important news of the day.
