Sunday, April 29, 2012

ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obama’s Fraud

obama birth certificate ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud
Many experts have weighed in on the analysis of Obama’s “certificate of live birth” and concluded that it is a forgery culminating in a probable cause finding of forgery and fraudulent document(s) by the Maricopa County Sheriff’s office on March 1st of this year.  All of these methods used complicated computer software and other forensic methods to establish that the document Obama’s Administration posted on the White House website on April 27, 2011 was a forgery.

Through all of this, we have not heard one peep out of Obama or his handlers and agents about this matter; they believe that if they ignore this issue, the media will bury the story along with yesterday’s garbage.

This is a serious Constitutional crisis and breach of federal law; however, all we get from the media, the press corps, attorney general, and legislators is a “let them eat cake” and the “devil may care” attitude. In the first instance, this cost Marie Antoinette her head, the other our very soul as a nation founded on the rule of law.

We have fallen so deeply that the politically connected and elite have become an oligarchy and can break the law with impunity while the common man is made to suffer for the slightest transgression and subject to being called before the Bar of Justice.  The citizens are treated as subjects and are made to answer through myriad rules, laws, and regulations made by an ever larger presence of these oligarchs by edict and not legislation as our president and his officers circumvent the Constitution, legislature, and the courts.

However, to face this challenge, many dedicated citizens and patriots have not turned their backs on this issue as the press has ignored the truth of this matter.  Nick Chase is one these individuals that came up with an elegant method to prove that Obama’s birth certificate document is a forgery that you can perform in your own living room.  His simply written method follows my introduction.

A Simple Method to Determine that Obama’s Long Form Birth Certificate is a Forgery

Nick Chase is a retired but still very active technical writer, technical editor, computer programmer, and stock market newsletter writer. During his career, he has produced documentation on computers, typewriters, typesetters, headline-makers, and other pieces of equipment most people never heard of, and he has programmed typesetting equipment. You can read more of his work at

Is Barack Obama’s long-form birth certificate a forgery? Definitely yes, for those of us who have spent a lifetime writing and producing technical documents, and who remember how they were produced in pre-computer days, and who have the technical expertise today to produce them using computers. For us, it’s been an “open secret” that the document image released by the White House on April 27, 2011 is a complete fake.

So, last summer I wondered if there would be some way to demonstrate that this “birth certificate” is indeed a fake, just by looking at the document itself and without resorting to computer software or to any knowledge about how computers produce documents.  And, after studying it for a while, I realized that the forgery fails the “pitch test.”

What do I mean by the “pitch test”? Simple.  Manual typewriters (and monospace electric-motor-powered typewriters) have a “pitch” — so many typed letters per inch.  There were many different manual typewriter type styles in the 1960s, but by far the most common were “Courier 10″ — ten characters per inch, including the space bar — and “Elite 12″ — twelve characters per inch — with “Courier 10″ predominant.

Thus, all of the typed characters in a row of text would, if placed over another typed row of text, be in perfect vertical alignment (including typed spaces) because each typed character occupies exactly the same horizontal space in its row.  That’s what “monospace” means.

So, suppose I took a line of typewritten text from the Obama document and positioned it just above another typewritten line from that same document, if the “birth certificate” were authentic, then the individual letters in the two rows should be in perfect vertical alignment — one letter directly above another — right?

Using computer software, I copied the text “6085 Kalanianaole Highway” in line 7d of the picture and pasted it above (and touching) the text “Maternity & Gynecological Hospital” in line 6c, in the process placing the “a” of “Highway” directly above the “a” of “Hospital — the next to last letter in each line.  The result is shown in Figure F (F is for forgery) below:

Chase 1 ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud  
Figure F.  In a real typewritten document the letters line up vertically.  In the Obama “birth certificate” forgery, they do not.

(Don’t worry that the pasted-in line chops off the tops of the letters of the line of text below it.  The purpose here is not readability, but to show that the letters do not line up vertically.)

As you scan your eyes to the left, you can see that by the time you reach the “6″ of “6085″ the vertical alignment is half-a-character off with the “y” of “Maternity.”  This is not possible on a manual typewriter.  It would appear that the alignment problems originate with the word “Highway,” whose letters are slightly narrower and in a different typeface than the text in line 6c.  The difference in typefaces is most noticeable in the letter “H”of “Highway” compared to the “H” of “Hospital.”

If you still don’t quite understand — look at Figure M (M is for monospace) below, which shows how the two lines of text would line up vertically (with the “6″ above the “y,” using two spaces following “6085″) if the “birth certificate” really had been typed on a typewriter instead of being digitally created.  (I have added the bleeding-heart background to make the copy-and-paste more visible.)

Chase 2 ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas Fraud 
Figure M.  In a true monospace (typewritten) document the letters are in vertical alignment.  (Courier typeface used here.)

I carry a copy of Figure F in my iPhone so I can show people why the “birth certificate” is a forgery.  If you happen to be near a copier when an Obama supporter wearing the T-shirt passes by, strip off the shirt (male supporters only!).  Place its backside on the copier glass — being careful not to wrinkle or stretch the fabric — and make two photocopies enlarged 200% or more.  With scissors cut out the words “6085 Kalanianaole Highway” on line 7d from one copy and position them above the words “Maternity & Gynecological Hospital” on line 6c on the uncut copy, doing the best you can given the limitations of T-shirt fabric to line them up as was done in Figure F.  You should see something similar to Figure T, below:

Chase 3 ForgeryGate: A Simple Guide To Obamas FraudFigure T.  The letters do not line up vertically in the digital version of the “birth certificate” printed on the Obama campaign T-shirt.

This alignment was much more difficult for me to achieve than the one shown in Figure F because the T-shirt fabric twists downward at the word “Hospital” in line 6c.  I lined up the two “a”s along the vertical threads they touch (which corrects for the twisting of the fabric).  When properly aligned, you can see the typewriter letters don’t line up vertically, just as they did not in Figure F.  This works even if the T-shirt has been worn and put through the wash several times, as was the T-shirt used for Figure T.

It is an issue of evidence — concrete proof the document is a forgery.  And it is only one of many (more technical) concrete proofs offered up by respected professionals who have debunked the “birth certificate.”

You can challenge your friends to go on the Internet and search for any reliable evidence that anybody has posted that disproves Figure F or any of the proofs offered by others dissecting the digital PDF “birth certificate” which was released at

They won’t find any, because there isn’t any.
Emotional issues...the crux of Obama’s campaign
By: Diane Sori

While Obama’s numbers are heading downward in the polls and Romney’s are heading up (yippee), Obama is trying to garner votes by appealing to emotions instead of presenting facts.  He is cleverly but underhandedly using immigration and women’s issues to try and get voters NOT to vote Republican.  Obama knows his record on the economy is dismal, if not an outright total failure, so what better way to throw a wrench into the mix of the Republican Party platform and its candidate, than to appeal to the emotions of women and Latinos, two very hot-button targets right now.

Case in point, Obama has put himself squarely in a battle with the Catholic Church over funding for both abortion and contraception.  While the abortion lines have always been drawn between the pro-lifers and those who are pro-abortion, the issue of contraception has, until now, remained in the background of political issues, if it’s even been there at all.  Contraception has always been a private matter between a woman, her partner, and her God...that is until Obama decided to use it for political campaign fodder.

By bringing contraception into the forefront, Obama has invaded our bedrooms, so to speak, and is dictating to us women what we must accept, because the government says so, even if it goes against our core religious beliefs.  And the sad thing is that some women are falling for this as Obama dangles their health insurance coverage as blackmail, yes blackmail, in front of their eyes.  

This man has sunk to new lows even for him but when one is desperate for votes one will do just about anything to get those votes, even if it means telling us he knows what’s best for us in relation to OUR bodies and OUR health.  And all this is from a man who I surmise actually hates women, because no one who likes women would dare to butt into so personal and private a matter.

As much as he hates women, Obama, I believe, hates Latinos even more.  While immigration reform has been a campaign issue for many presidential campaign cycles, when you now add to it the problems on our border with Mexico and the quandary over anchor babies, Obama has new items he can pull from, twist, and distort to serve his purpose...which is getting re-elected no matter who he has to use to do so.

Mitt Romney has always taken a hardline stance on ILLEGAL immigration much to his credit, Obama has not.  Obama encourages ILLEGAL immigration and anchor babies as he sees them not as people but only as potential votes.  By giving them all the handouts, freebies, and get out of jail free passes he can give them, he is actually allowing and wanting them to remain tied to the government teat instead of helping them to assimilate and get legal status, or showing them the door to go back home.  Obama has lost all concept of what it means to be a LEGAL American (after all there remains a serious question as to his own legality), as he uses these people for the votes they will give him because he knows that no one will bite the hand that feeds and takes care of them.

As for the issue of our unsecure border with Mexico, the ‘Fast and Furious’ scandal says it American agent is dispensable as long as the ILLEGALS  keep coming and Obama keeps getting their votes.  This is about as low as one can go because Obama is just encouraging the Latinos to remain stagnant and dependent on government handouts once they get here instead of helping them obtain the American dream of self-sufficiency and pride.

Obama’s strategists hope these two issues will help turn women and Latinos to his side come November.  Obama hopes to turn the contraceptive issue and the immigration issue into ‘wedge issues’ that he can insert into the Republican platform so he can further divide our nation along both class and racial lines.  Obama knows he cannot run on his economic record or on his war record, as he has continued many of the policies George Bush put in place, but he does know that if he can successfully appeal to the emotions he can up his chances of being re-elected.

Bottom line...we cannot let this happen.  Voting based on emotional issues must be put aside and cold, hard economic facts must take precedence when voting over everything, because if our economic problems are not reversed the emotional issues will be forever mute.

Can you believe the total, unmitigated audacity of Obama...traitor to the United States of America!!!

Obama lifts freeze on $192 million aid package to Palestinian Authority: "Important to the security interests of the United States"

It is? In what way? "Obama lifts freeze on $192 million aid package to Palestinian Authority," from the Times of Israel, April 27:
US President Barack Obama has lifted a ban on financial aid to the Palestinian Authority. 
Obama stated that the aid was “important to the security interests of the United States.”
The US Congress froze a $192 million aid package to the Palestinian Authority after its president, Mahmoud Abbas, defied US pressure and sought to attain UN endorsement of Palestinian statehood last September. The presidential waiver means that aid can now be delivered....
The AFP news agency quoted White House spokesman Tommy Vietor as saying the $192 million aid package would be devoted to “ensuring the continued viability of the moderate PA government under the leadership of [Palestinian Authority] President Mahmoud Abbas and Prime Minister Salam Fayyad.”
Vietor added that the PA had fulfilled its major obligations, such as recognizing Israel’s right to exist, renouncing violence and accepting the Road Map for Peace.
Oh really? They've done all that, and yet still retail genocidal rhetoric about destroying Israel? Quite a balancing act.


Israel keeping Iran off guard?

Statements about nuclear program in conflict

WASHINGTON – Comments made by Israeli military Chief of Staff Binyamin “Benny” Gantz in recent days that he doubts Iran has decided to build a nuclear bomb on the surface may appear to be at serious odds with the thinking of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, in which case the Israeli military chief would be expected to resign within a week, according to a report in Joseph Farah’s G2 Bulletin.
Unless Gantz planned for an early retirement, his comments had to be approved by political authorities, which suggests his public statement may be part of an Israeli strategy to keep Iran off guard on exact Israeli intentions of whether to attack its nuclear facilities – or not.

The public disagreement on its face may appear to show a serious difference between the military and political leaders, but sources believe it may be a calculated effort to keep Iran guessing what Israel will do.

Gantz suggested that as long as Israel threatens to attack Iran will decide not to develop nuclear weapons.

In a recent interview with the Israeli newspaper Haaretz, Gantz said that he did not believe that Iran had made a decision to build nuclear weapons, despite having a nuclear development program.

Iran is going “step by step to the place where it will be able to decide whether to manufacture a nuclear bomb,” Gantz said. “It hasn’t yet decided whether to go the extra mile.”

Gantz added that Iran would build a nuclear bomb if it thought there would not be a military consequence but had not made that final decision because of the prospect of a military attack on its facilities.

Gantz tempered that assessment by saying that the further Iran progresses with its nuclear program, the “worse the situation is. This is a critical year, but not necessarily ‘go, no-go,’” Gantz said. “The problem doesn’t necessarily stop on December 21, 2012.

“We’re in a period when something must happen – either Iran takes its nuclear program to a civilian footing only or the world, perhaps we too, will have to do something,” Gantz added. “We’re closer to the end of the discussions than the middle.”

The Israeli military chief’s comments mirror those of U.S. military officials who similarly have determined that Iran hasn’t decided yet to develop a nuclear weapon as part of its nuclear development efforts.

In the view of some regional observers, Gantz appears to be distancing himself from Netanyahu, who, sources say, gets his perspective from the ideology of the Islamic republic, “arguing that its religious foundations trump rational calculation,” according to the open intelligence company Stratfor.

In public statements, Netanyahu is of the belief that Iran is on a path to make nuclear weapons, using its nuclear development program as a cover for such an undertaking. He further believes that unless those nuclear facilities are destroyed, and soon, Iran will have reached the point of enriching weapons-grade uranium to construct a nuclear bomb.

For Israel, sources point out, any attack on Iran would be a major military undertaking. In addition, the element of surprise most likely would be gone, since the intelligence services of Iran and such friends as Russia and China are watching developments very closely and would provide militarily useful information.