Tim Scott, Activist Judges, and an Unconstitutional and Traitorous Ruling
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political
"...the liberal left that speaks and desires for all of us to be
tolerant does not want to be tolerant of anyone that disagrees with
where they are coming from.”
- South Carolina Senator Tim Scott
Finally Senator Jeff Sessions has been confirmed as Attorney
General in a vote of 52 to 47 and thanks of sorts must go to former Democratic Senator
Harry Reid and his foolishly pushed for and gotten ‘nuclear option’...an option that
rightfully backfired on the Democrats big time.
And while the delay in confirming this appointment shows the
Democrats as the true obstructionists that they are no matter that they preach
tolerance, unity, and peace...as long as it is on their terms that is....a special
calling to task must go out to black senators who chastised black Republican
Senator Tim Scott for casting his vote in favor of Jeff Sessions. And to
Senator Scott I say “thank you” ...thank
you for putting your country first and not the color of your skin, which is
exactly what the other black senators voting did.
Calling Senator Scott “a
disgrace to your black race,” “a white man in black clothing,” a ‘house
negro’,” “a big ‘Uncle Tom’ piece of
and even invoking the N-word against one of their own...those senators
‘supposedly’ elected to do the business of ‘We the People’ put on a shameful
display that proves what many of us have known for some time now...that being that
the majority of blacks in our halls of government are the epitome of racists... racists
who do indeed cast their Congressional votes based solely upon the color of
their skin...the first thing they think of in the morning and the last thing
they think of before going to bed.
And this is what certain ‘others’ do as well...dangerous
others...not in regards to their skin color but in regards to the rule of law that
is the Constitution...the document they swore to protect and defend...the
document they are now making a mockery of by their bending and twisting the law
to push forward the liberal agenda...an agenda not so dissimilar to the agenda
of black Congressional Democratic members.
And it’s three activist judges from the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals of whom I speak...Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge William Canby and Judge Michelle T. Friedland...
activist judges who succeeded in sidetracking President Trump’s executive order that placed a temporary ban on
those from seven muslim terrorist supporting countries from entering our country. Activist judges stopping
an order rightfully placed against those from the very countries that Obama himself
named less than a year ago that they had no problem with then but do now simply because Donald Trump is president and not Hillary Clinton. Activist judges having a problem with an executive order they know well does NOT violate the Constitution’s
Establishment Clause or any clause for that matter even as many on the left were using the Establishment Clause as their excuse for
the now negated order and doing so even though precedent had already been set on all accounts for such
an order being legal.
And whether the Establishment Clause has been deliberately and with malice
misinterpreted is yet to be seen as the judges instead ruled that the ban negatively impacted those students from muslim countries attending U.S. universities not their religion per se as their reason for doing what they unanimously did. But let’s take a look at the Establishment Clause...and do so to see just how wrong the
activist judges of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals were in even moving their judgment
forward for what they did was circumnavigate the clause by focusing instead on the age and reason for certain people being here at any given time.
Remember too, that no matter how loud the activist judges or the Democrats
yell, scream, and whine that Trump wanted to ban all muslim immigration into our
country, in no way is that so for Trump’s order never mentioned the
words ‘muslims’ or islam.’ But that important fact has been ignored and so has the fact that even if the order did contain those words it would still be legal as
once again precedent has already been set...meaning Trump's order should have stood and the liberal activist judges be damned.
Article VI...the Establishment Clause...states that, “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the members of
the several state legislatures, and all executive and judicial officers, both
of the United States and of the several states, shall be bound by oath or
affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious test shall ever be
required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United
Also remember, as per Constitutional scholars and
Constitutional attorneys, our Founders and Framers added the “no religious test”
words to clarify the
mandate of a solemn oath pledged before taking office, and did not in any way imply that those
elected must adherence to any particular religion or adhere to any religion
at all. This is also the intention in the First Amendment’s prohibition on the
establishment of a state religion.
And that means that no matter what the Democrats say...no
matter the ‘no-go’ ruling by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals...no matter that these judges legislated from the bench...the Constitution
guarantees there be “no religious test
for immigration.” But if truth be told truth itself dictates the telling that religion is indeed what this ruling is about...the condoning of the 'so-called' religion of those who demand we either subjugate ourselves into submission or we will be killed.
And that's why these liberal activist judges ruled based upon a lame excuse and their own self-perceived but unproven case of hardship that might be caused to muslim students attending U.S. universities... hardships supposedly in regards to their leaving and then freely re-entering the United States. Now ignoring the reality that in today’s world the followers of the political cult
that is islam...muslims...are indeed a danger to our country and
to our people if for no other reason than the simple fact is that almost all acts
of terrorism to date both in our country and abroad have been committed not only by
muslims in the name of allah...but that most of those acts are perpetrated by muslims of the very age group these judges ruled in favor of.
And these activist judges
knew this but just did not care for at their core they are nothing but Democrats pushing forward the
Democratic agenda initiated by America’s first (supposedly) black president that
in today’s world simply does not work...an agenda called ‘inclusion'...inclusion including of the very folks out to kill us all.
And while a few on the left are starting to see just that, their voices were ignored by those on the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals...voices including that of
uber liberal lawyer and Harvard Professor Alan Dershowitz who issued a
statement before the ruling came down that said that while President Trump will lose the
appeal on the nationwide ban, he will ultimately prevail before the Supreme
Court because, and I quote, "I do
not believe that this order constitutes a violation of the establishment clause
of the Constitution...the fact that they picked seven muslim states, those are
the states that have high levels of terrorism...we're talking about Islamic terrorism...when
you focus on real victims or real perpetrators — and the impact is heavily on
one particular religion, that doesn't create a constitutional problem.”
No...Trump's ban does not create a Constitutional crisis but the activist judges ruling does
create a crisis of another sort...a crisis called invasion...an invasion the
Obama administration started when during his first five years in office alone
saw being issued over 680,000 green cards to those from muslim countries...and it’s no
wonder that what was once Dearborn is now known as Dearbornastan, and that Detroit,
and other once red, white, and blue American cities are what they are today...muslim enclaves
helping to breed homegrown terrorists in the making...and now an influx of college age muslim students... mostly male college age students...will see to it just like they have seen to it in Europe.
And this ruling lies not only at the feet of the three liberal activist judges but also at the feet of the Democrats and their
nonsense called ‘inclusion’ for there is a huge difference between inclusion
and assimilation for once assimilation occurs amongst a group of people new to
this country those people realize they do not need to live by the government’s
teat...and there goes the Democrats voting block. And sadly this means to liberals that true assimilation
must not happen but that the inclusion of ways not compatible with the fabric
of our American society can. And it’s all courtesy of those still unable to
accept the fact that their side not only lost but that ‘We the People’ are no
longer buying what they’re selling... no longer buying it even as Democrats and liberal activists judges try to cram it down our collective throat.
And in this case it's three liberal activist judges who acted solely upon
their disagreeing with a decision made and an order given by a president they refuse to see as legitimate, coupled with their action now taken that poses a serious danger not only to our country but to the rule of law that is
How so...liberal activist judges whether they sit on the local bench, the
state bench, the circuit bench, or even the Supreme Court, must not be or even
appear to be partial and/or bias whether for or against any person or groups of
people, nor must they sympathize with any cause. They must be impartial in
their judgments based solely upon the letter of the law...based solely upon the
Constitution...not on how they personally would like to interpret, mold, or
socially engineer a ruling to their liking...as is the case with how they are interpreting
and now upheld the block on President Trump’s temporarily banning order.
They cannot and must not adjudicate their
version of what they believe is for the social good as that not only goes
against the true rule of law but also negatively effects how our system of
checks and balances works as laid out in the Constitution. But that is exactly what these three miscreant judges did.
"See you in court. The Security of our nation is at stake." - President Trump on learning of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling.
So the bottom line is this...the uber liberal activist judges of the
9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against Trump's temporary immigration ban, but the battle will go on for President Trump will rightfully not let this lie as he knows well the dangers muslims pose to our nation's security. And hopefully in the end the true rule of law will prevail because precedent is on Trump's side plus soon the High Court will once again lean right. And the fact that is the most grievous of all...a fact that cannot and must not be ignored is that now thanks to the three activist judges we Americans are indeed less safe than we were just one day ago.
So thank you Judge Richard R. Clifton, Judge William Canby and Judge Michelle T. Friedland for showing us that not only have you with malice adjudicated a ruling that not only endangers the lives of 'We the People,' but that you have shown yourselves to be traitors to the very rule of law that you swore to serve and protect...the U.S. Constitution...and that is something that will not soon be forgotten.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Friday, February 10th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Tim Scott, Judicial Judges, and an Unconstitutional and Traitorous Ruling'...cabinet picks and liberal vitriole...and Iran's continuing testing of banned ballistic missiles.
Hope you can tune in at: http://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/