Investigative Report:
A Presidential Advisor or Manipulator?
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots
Syria is a
country at war with itself now replete with chemical weapons being used on
civilians with each side blaming the other. A war that is not and must not be our
war but a war drawing us in via some calculatingly clever and evil men on both
sides of our political aisle...men working in tandem to force us into not just
that war...but men who actually relish in starting a war with Russia. A hoped
for war that will not only see the islamists being able to takeover Syria while
we are kept busy fighting an enemy we have been manipulated into believing is
such, but a war so that the Trump presidency will fail and fall as will our
country as well, thus allowing for the ‘One World Government’ sorts to move in
and take over.
A war of
politics actually both in Syria and here in these United States for while Syria
sees the physical bloodshed and horrors of war there is a man here within our
own ranks...within the Trump administration itself...who we Right Side Patriots
believe is giving our president tainted, misplaced, and partial at best
information leaving our president to make decisions that are truly not in
America’s best interests but done with a heart believing that they are.
And the
traitor of sorts is a man who is willfully both misguided and misinformed about
who and what is the true enemy we face, but a man who might or might not even
know or realize that he is being used to do the bidding of those wishing us all
dead.
But before
we tell you who, in our opinion, the traitor within President Trump’s
administration is you must understand the true dynamics of both the Middle East
itself and how neither we nor Russia can afford another Viet Nam or
Afghanistan respectively. So manipulation now becomes the key word of the day
as it is manipulation that sees us facing a possibility of World War III...a
war that will have no real winner...but a war that just might see civilization
as we know it changed forever and not necessarily for the better.
Briefly, the
Middle East has been in trouble ever since ancient times when God Our Father gave
His promised land to the Jewish people and not to the Arabs. But the modern-day
conflicts started at the turn of the 20th century when the Ottoman Empire fell,
and when on May 19,
1916 the Sykes-Picot Treaty carved up said now fallen Ottoman
Empire’s lands. Basically, this treaty created what we know as the modern
Middle East nations...new nations created not by taking into account local
identities and political preferences but nations simply created with a ruler
and a pen...created in such a way as to allow British and French spheres of
influence to take over these newly created nations at the expense of Arab
culture and nationalism.
And here
started the slow down slide to where we are today as this secret treaty went
against pledges already given by the British to the Hāshimite kingdom’s Ḥusayn
ibn ʿAlī, sharif of Mecca...a man who was ready to bring the Arabs of the Hejaz
into revolt against the Turks on the understanding that he would, when
victorious, receive a much more sizable share of the lands along with the right
to rule over said lands.
And while the
allied Conference of San Remo in April 1920 tried to appease Ḥusayn ibn ʿAlī and those
loyal to him with a slight redrawing of the borders, the stage had already been
set for mistrust between the Western and Arab nations with that mistrust
reaching a boiling point with the 1948 creation of the Jewish State of Israel.
And why...because the Arabs believed this land was rightfully theirs and theirs
alone, and the Biblical promises and the U.N. mandate be damned.
Now we also
need to understand and accept as fact the three main differences between our
two civilizations...Western and islamic...and that they are in play in this
whole sordid mess that is reaching a breaking point via the conflict in Syria. And
fact one is that our two cultures are diametrically opposite of each other with
we in the West cherishing life above all else while islam’s followers cherish
only death in the name of allah. Fact two is that Western rule of law...in our
case the Constitution...is not nor will it ever be compatible with islamic rule
of law...as in the sharia. And it is the sharia that the qur’an mandates its followers
not only live by and obey but that they accept it as the highest rule of law over
all other law.
And lastly
fact three, a fact totally overlooked by most but a fact that is actually at
the core of the whole mess and that is that the islamists...the terrorists...are
the true followers of islam for they are doing what the qur’an commands them to
do, as in “kill the infidels wherever you
may find them...” (Sura 9:5), which is but just one of at least 109 verses
that call muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of islamic rule...meaning
those who are not islamists are not true qur’anic followers of islam but who
are being both played and used by those who are.
Now with
that said let us go back to when President Trump appointed General Michael T. Flynn to
be his National Security Advisor. General Flynn ‘got it’...he understood who the
enemy was...as in islam itself...and he knew well that the followers of islam
could not exist in peace within our borders. General Flynn was in no way
islamaphobic but was and remains a pragmatist who refused to sugar coat the truth
for the sake of political correctness. He told the truth about islam and about
its followers...muslims...and do not let anyone fool you into thinking he was
‘let go’ because he had conversations with Russians, for General Mike Flynn, we
believe, was forced out because of his stance on islam and for no other reason
alone...forced out by those who either feared a backlash by muslims here in our
country if he remained in his position or who actually were islamic condoners
and sympathizers themselves.
Did
President Trump know this...we do not believe so for he, as would most
president’s, only acted upon information supplied to him by those he felt he
could trust. And who would ever think that the Democrats would raise such a
brouhaha over one of their own for General Flynn while a Democrat is a military
man first...a military man whose hard line stance against islam, his pro-Israel leanings, his criticism of Obama’s
personal relationship to and his condoning of islam, coupled with his approach to the Middle
East in general all led to his firing by Obama. But know that if General Flynn had remained as President
Trump’s National Security Advisor we would not be in the position we now see
ourselves facing in Syria today.
“The only way to win this war is to
“win the hearts and minds of the enemy”...these are the words of Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
Now who said
these words...”the term ‘radical Islamic
terrorism’ angers the Muslim world, stokes anti-American fires, and endangers
U.S. troops and national security.” And these words, “U.S. forces must understand the history and social dynamics of the
countries it is fighting in, and to have ‘empathy’ for the people among whom
these wars are fought.’” And who when asked about his words regarding “radical islamic terrorism” said that
the “terrorist threat America faces has
nothing to do with ‘true’ islam.”
Nothing to
do with ‘true’ islam...we so beg to differ and the 109 qur’anic verses above so
stated disagree with those words as well...words directly from the mouth of Lt.
General H.R. McMaster...a Democrat and President Trump’s replacement for
General Flynn and the very man who has called ISIS an “irreligious” problem, viewing its islamist ideology as a
perversion of islam.
And it is
this man who we believe is the traitor within the Trump administration...maybe
not willingly a traitor but a traitor nevertheless because of his foolishly not
understanding who the true enemy is...as in all of islam for islam is not a
religion of degrees. In fact, islam is not a religion at all but an all-encompassing
political system, therefore how can one who does not understand the true nature
of the enemy give the president the best possible advice on how to fight that
enemy...simply they cannot.
Also, when
one holds to Obama’s politically correct rhetoric that islam is a
religion of peace hijacked by those like ISIS who are using islam solely to push
forward their terrorist agenda...forgetting that they are actually doing the
qur’an’s bidding... they also simply cannot.
And know
this accusation we make against a highly decorated military man is one that we do
not take lightly for the facts...tangible realities coupled with an
indisputable timeline of sorts...all sadly point in this direction. And know that even the great can fall
from political grace, especially if they are fooled by a heart hardened by the
horrors of war...a heart misplaced in the enemy camp instead of with one’s own.
So now let’s
start with a brief timeline of sorts and the fact that since Lt. General
McMaster became President Trump’s National Security Advisor...the man who still
refuses to call the enemy ISIS preferring instead ISIL as in his shout-out to
the Levant...the situation not only in Syria but throughout the muslim world
and the West has gone from bad to worse what with terrorist attacks increasing by the day.
And McMaster’s timeline started even before he was appointed
to this position with his saying back in July 2016, that the war in Syria had
in fact strengthening “Russia’s
subversive efforts in Europe” while straining America’s European allies who
were already under pressure from the increased inflow of migrants. And here we
first see that General McMaster does not understand that it is not Russia’s
involvement in Europe that should raise a red flag, but that it is the leaders
of Europe themselves who opened their doors to the still ongoing muslim invasion.
And this
comes after a 2015 speech at the University of South Florida where General
McMaster said that “the
military-industrial complex may represent a greater threat to us than at any
time in history”...the very military-industrial complex that President Trump
is trying so hard to rebuild after the eight years of Obama’s cutting our
military expenditures to lows not seen in decades...and he said so knowing well
that our military-industrial complex is not the enemy...islam...or in his world
‘islamic terrorism’...is.
If one
cannot identify who the enemy is...if one cannot even say the enemy’s name...
how can one successfully fight said enemy or offer the best possible advice to the
president to do so...again simply they cannot.
And when one does give the president wrong information...whether deliberately or just
through their being misinformed...the outcome is the same...actions based upon
lies and misinformation
At this
point it is important to understand exactly what the duties of the president’s
National Security Advisor are.
The role of
any National Security Advisor is to accurately and without bias determine who
or what the enemy is, assess threats, and to advise the President regarding
appropriate actions to eliminate or deal with the aftermath of threats posed by
our enemies. The National Security Advisor must see things through the lens of
reality and not through the prism of either how things are presented by our
enemies, or through the clouded vision of political filters.
In these
terms, General McMaster simply is the wrong man for the position, and we will
point out two major issues that highlight our belief that General McMaster is
not seeing things clearly, or with a focus on reality.
Syria, as an
example, is a very complex case in point, and would take a good deal more time
and space to delve into than we have here, so with that in mind, we will
provide the nutshell version of it for you.
Syria is
involved in a civil war, but it is a good deal unlike most such wars in that
nearly every civil war has two clear sides. Syria, on the other hand, is
involved in what we will refer to as a triangular civil war with the first corner
of the triangle being al-Assad and his dictatorship. The second corner would be
the Free Syrian Army, which is opposed to the dictatorship and the brutality
that al-Assad has brought to bear against his own people in order to maintain
his dictatorship through the years.
The third
corner in this triangular civil war is where things get considerably more
murky, as that corner consists of numerous and various islamist factions of
which some have estimated to be in the hundreds, if not nearly a thousand. Some
of those factions are organic, some are splinters of major islamist
organizations such as ISIS or al-Qaeda, and yet others are splinters of the
splinter groups. Making things even more difficult to sort out is the fact that
some of the numerous and various factions are aligned with one another, while
others have agendas divergent of their origins, or divergent of the major group
affiliations.
The Free
Syrian Army opposes al-Assad and wishes to topple the al-Assad regime for a
secular, democratic form of government and are thusly engaged in war against
the government forces controlled by al-Assad.
The numerous
and various factions of islamists while also engaged against al-Assad, want
nothing to do with either a democratic nor a secular form of government, and
want instead total control of not only Syria but the entire Middle East as
a caliphate, in the name of islam. However, within those factions, within the
splinter groups and the splinters of the splinter groups, are those who are
vying for control of the caliphate, or in the bigger picture, vying to control
their desired Levant, which puts them at odds with and in combat against not
only al-Assad, but against the Free Syrian Army and other islamist factions and
groups.
While the
easy idea is to simply allow all of them to devour themselves and stay out of
it altogether, that, in reality, does not work as the threats posed effect not
only our own strategic interests in the region but the survival of our closest
allies in the Middle East as well. And the situation in Syria, allowed to
continue as it is, will only further destabilize the region to the point where
the only possible outcome, if left to their own devises, would be the Levant.
There are
three realities present in Syria. One being that al-Assad is a bad guy who has,
in the past, been as brutal as any dictator has been, and will continue as such
should he be allowed to remain in power. The second reality is that, aside from
the Free Syrian Army, the ‘rebel’ factions and splinter groups are, in fact, islamists,
hell-bent on both the caliphate and their end-game of the Levant which
includes, of course, the total elimination of Israel from the face of the
earth.
The third
reality, with regard to Syria and the entire Middle East as a region, is that islam
is the enemy of the civilized world.
So, politics
are most clearly in play within Syria in this triangular civil war, and it is
most assuredly more complex than our nutshell compressed explanation, but it is
not just the politics of Syria that has muddled General McMaster’s thinking
which, we believe, has led him to provide to President Trump some very bad
advice. There is also the fact that politics inside the beltway is decisively
clouding both the vision and the advice of General McMaster.
Unlike
General Flynn, who was fired by Barack Hussein Obama due to the fact that he
saw islam not only as a political ideology rather than as a religion but because
he saw islam as the true enemy, General McMaster was left in place by Obama
because McMaster's views regarding islam were an almost perfect match to those of his own, and because Obama also saw McMaster as one who shared his own liberal
political ideology.
McMaster, as
previously stated, views islam as a religion and as a religion of peace, while
viewing only a handful of bad actors as being the enemy. Those bad actors, in
the eyes of General McMaster, are rogues who have bastardized what is an
otherwise peaceful religion for their own barbaric ends. McMaster sees them as the
bad guys, individuals on a misguided mission, but not at all as following the
concepts, or precepts of islam as a whole, which are clearly defined by the qur’an.
As we have
outlined earlier via McMastar’s own quotes, he follows in lock-step with the
liberal ideology on islam that it is not only a religion, but that it should be
coddled, empathized with and embraced, and his words echo the words of Obama
right down the line…words of a liberal ideology that also pervades our public school
system, as children are being force-fed the propaganda of islam, rather than
being taught the reality that islam is not a religion, but a destructive
invasive force as a political ideology.
McMaster, as
a dyed-in-the-wool liberal, is much more apt, we believe, to excuse the
barbaric whole of islam, while holding to account only a handful of its
practitioners. And like most liberals, he would be quick to offer up examples
of other cultures, such as European cultures, who have accepted islam into
their own, but also like nearly all liberals, McMaster would stop short, as no
one can offer up examples of islam blending into the cultures of others, as such
examples simply do not exist.
This is
exactly why, we believe, President Trump has made a grave error in placing
General H.R. McMaster into the position of National Security Advisor. McMaster
is, at best, an apologist for islam, or at worst, an islamist sympathizer, but
either way he exhibits the exact same line of thinking and actions in his new
position as did Obama when he was president.
As islam
really is the enemy, not only our enemy but the enemy of our allies and of the
civilized world, having General McMaster as the National Security Advisor is no
different than having Barack Hussein Obama as our National Security Advisor…a
very dangerous concept indeed.
So, given
all of this, and with the complexities involved in providing solid and
actionable advice to the Commander in Chief, why would President Trump have
chosen someone like McMaster for the job to begin with?
Simply, he
did not. To begin with Trump chose General Michael Flynn. McMaster was his pick
after Flynn was forced to resign due to what we suspect was bogus innuendo
linking Flynn to supposedly illegal contact with Russia, of which no proof has
ever been brought forward, but this opens the conversation to a broader issue.
Why has
President Trump shown a preference for generals in this high-level advisory
post? We believe there are a few aspects to this question which bear
examination.
First, we
believe that President Trump is playing to his Conservative base in adding a
number of high ranking military people to his cabinet or to certain advisory
positions, because he is well aware that his base, those responsible for
elevating him to first, the nomination, and then to the White House, have a
deep, and genuine distrust of politicians. That was, after all, Trump’s primary
selling point during the campaign, that he was not a politician, and therefore,
in order not to appear as a business as usual president, Trump has chosen
military personnel...a general...as his National Security Advisor. And generals
also play a key role in appealing to the Conservative base, in that the
admiration of and for the military from Conservatives runs as deep as their
lack of admiration for politicians.
Second, in a
word...gravitas. President Trump, being a businessman rather than a politician,
knows well that his presidency, optically at least, was lacking in gravitas,
and therefore, we believe he either felt the need, or was perhaps advised to
add gravitas wherever he could, and generals are about as weighty as it gets in
that department.
Having a general
in charge of the military, as a Secretary of Defense or as the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff is one thing, but appointing generals to key advisory
positions may well be another thing altogether. Why...because regardless of how
good any given general is on the ground or inside the Pentagon, as either a
strategist or Commander, they are much better at taking advice, disseminating
it and developing a plan of action or attack based upon that advice than they
are at giving advice. Generals also follow directives coming from the Pentagon
or directly from the Commander-in-Chief via the Pentagon, usually without allowing
their personal feelings or political ideologies to get in the way of their
duty, but when you take them out of that role and turn them into advisors, it
seems inevitable that they revert directly to their innate base political
ideology.
It is,
simply put, the difference between giving military orders and providing
political advice, and to be perfectly blunt about it, the role of a National
Security Advisor is as innately political as General McMaster is innately
liberal.
The best
choice for President Trump to fill the position of National Security Advisor,
we believe, would have been former U.S.
Ambassador John Bolton, a man who both understands, in great detail, the
complexities of every political situation around the globe, has a clear vision
of exactly who and what the enemy is, and is as skilled at dealing with the
ever-changing worldwide chess game as anyone could be as he has spent a great
deal of time over several decades sparring with all of the various players.
And here we
bring you back to but one cause and effect of that chess game as it relates to
the most recent events in Syria...the April 4th ‘supposed’ sarin gas attack on
innocent civilians.
With our
belief that President Trump is now being misled by General McMaster, the Obama holdovers
in the Pentagon, and in the F.B.I. and C.I.A...holdovers that are anything but
his friends...now comes a shocking 9-page report by Massachusetts Institute of
Technology (MIT) Professor Emeritus of Science, Technology, and National
Security Policy, Theodore Postol, who not only challenged the latest obviously
false claims, but who had in 2013 exposed similar allegations against Bashir al-Assad
that also turned out to be false.
And when a
man with the credentials that Professor Postol has says that a main piece of
evidence actually cited in the White House report points to individuals on the
ground executing the attack and not from aircraft as we are being led to
believe...it must be noted that this type of erroneous information regarding something
as serious as an airdrop on civilians could only reach the president via his
National Security Advisor.
 |
| “If there were any sarin present at this location when this
photograph was taken everybody in the photograph would have received a
lethal or debilitating dose of sarin,” he wrote. “The fact that
these people were dressed so inadequately either suggests a complete
ignorance of the basic measures needed to protect an individual from
sarin poisoning, or that they knew that the site was not seriously
contaminated.” |
“What the country is now being told
by the White House cannot be true...and the fact that this information has been
provided in this format raises the most serious questions about the handling of
our national security.” And no one should doubt those words...not with the likes of James Comey and crew still a large part of our intelligence gathering community.
"Like in 2013, U.S. intelligence
reports were wrong...something is extremely problematic with U.S. intelligence
reports...an infrared launch of the rocket could be seen but no intelligence
could tell where a rocket landed because there was no flash from
impact...no intelligence expert who knows anything about this business would
argue this..." Professor Postol also stated and
when one puts two and two together along with the fact that this 2017 report "mimics" the 2013 report that
was proven false means a traitor exists in the administration...and again we believe it is National Security Advisor
General H.R. McMaster...one of the few generals Obama did not fire.
And Professor Postol's disclosures are based upon proven unquestionable scientific facts...something government reports in instances regarding the game of politics like to keep hidden...especially when that political game could involve sending American troops back into yet another theater of war.
See an interview with Professor Postol regarding his report here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqSHDJ2HpI8
And who does the president rely on
for this critical type of information...his National Security Advisor above all
else. And when that advisor’s vision has been tainted by the leftist agenda of
the party he belongs to you know decisions are being made unbeknownst to the
president that are based upon information not in America’s best interest given
to him by a man whose allegiances must be questioned.
With Syria
and the recent developments there as our example, it seems quite clear to us
that the advice given by General McMaster to President Trump was tainted and
bias based upon the political ideology...the liberal political ideology...shared by
McMaster and Barack HUSSEIN Obama. Political bias in a National Security
Advisor is dangerous, and as such a bias clearly exists in General McMaster for he is not a presidential advisor at all, rather, he is a manipulator.
And while we
know that some will be aghast as to who we believe the traitor in the Trump
White House is, know that we do not make this accusation against General H.R.
McMaster...a decorated and respected member of our military...without us
believing that his actions, beliefs, and his own words did not point us in this
very direction.
And in this
time of war...a war of clashing civilizations and ideologies...words said and
actions taken are paramount...whether said and done in the past or in the
present...and become the stuff of not only political fodder but of questions
asked that must be answered. And answer
them we did, and whether our supposition is correct or not the fact remains
that there are things that have been done since General Michael Flynn was
removed from his position in the Trump administration that simply do not add
up...bad things that the media is trying to get us to be believe as they push
forward their liberal agenda, our president believing another agenda, and with an MIT professor possibly being the very one to stop us from doing what is ever so
wrong for both our beloved America and for a country called Syria...a country
still at war with itself.
Investigative Reports...Copyright © 2017 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots
*********************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Tuesday, April 18th from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori reveal who they believe the traitor within the Trump administration is and why. Also being discussed will be important news of the week.
Hope you can tune in at: http://bit.ly/2cpXuRd
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
But before
we tell you who, in our opinion, the traitor within President Trump’s
administration is you must understand the true dynamics of both the Middle East
itself and how neither we nor Russia can afford another Viet Nam or
Afghanistan respectively. So manipulation now becomes the key word of the day
as it is manipulation that sees us facing a possibility of World War III...a
war that will have no real winner...but a war that just might see civilization
as we know it changed forever and not necessarily for the better.
Did
President Trump know this...we do not believe so for he, as would most
president’s, only acted upon information supplied to him by those he felt he
could trust. And who would ever think that the Democrats would raise such a
brouhaha over one of their own for General Flynn while a Democrat is a military
man first...a military man whose hard line stance against islam, his pro-Israel leanings, his criticism of Obama’s
personal relationship to and his condoning of islam, coupled with his approach to the Middle
East in general all led to his firing by Obama. But know that if General Flynn had remained as President
Trump’s National Security Advisor we would not be in the position we now see
ourselves facing in Syria today.
And when one does give the president wrong information...whether deliberately or just
through their being misinformed...the outcome is the same...actions based upon
lies and misinformation
The numerous
and various factions of islamists while also engaged against al-Assad, want
nothing to do with either a democratic nor a secular form of government, and
want instead total control of not only Syria but the entire Middle East as
a caliphate, in the name of islam. However, within those factions, within the
splinter groups and the splinters of the splinter groups, are those who are
vying for control of the caliphate, or in the bigger picture, vying to control
their desired Levant, which puts them at odds with and in combat against not
only al-Assad, but against the Free Syrian Army and other islamist factions and
groups. 
As we have
outlined earlier via McMastar’s own quotes, he follows in lock-step with the
liberal ideology on islam that it is not only a religion, but that it should be
coddled, empathized with and embraced, and his words echo the words of Obama
right down the line…words of a liberal ideology that also pervades our public school
system, as children are being force-fed the propaganda of islam, rather than
being taught the reality that islam is not a religion, but a destructive
invasive force as a political ideology.
As islam
really is the enemy, not only our enemy but the enemy of our allies and of the
civilized world, having General McMaster as the National Security Advisor is no
different than having Barack Hussein Obama as our National Security Advisor…a
very dangerous concept indeed.
First, we
believe that President Trump is playing to his Conservative base in adding a
number of high ranking military people to his cabinet or to certain advisory
positions, because he is well aware that his base, those responsible for
elevating him to first, the nomination, and then to the White House, have a
deep, and genuine distrust of politicians. That was, after all, Trump’s primary
selling point during the campaign, that he was not a politician, and therefore,
in order not to appear as a business as usual president, Trump has chosen
military personnel...a general...as his National Security Advisor. And generals
also play a key role in appealing to the Conservative base, in that the
admiration of and for the military from Conservatives runs as deep as their
lack of admiration for politicians. 
Having a general
in charge of the military, as a Secretary of Defense or as the Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff is one thing, but appointing generals to key advisory
positions may well be another thing altogether. Why...because regardless of how
good any given general is on the ground or inside the Pentagon, as either a
strategist or Commander, they are much better at taking advice, disseminating
it and developing a plan of action or attack based upon that advice than they
are at giving advice. Generals also follow directives coming from the Pentagon
or directly from the Commander-in-Chief via the Pentagon, usually without allowing
their personal feelings or political ideologies to get in the way of their
duty, but when you take them out of that role and turn them into advisors, it
seems inevitable that they revert directly to their innate base political
ideology.
Read the
professor’s full 9-page report and the 4-page White House report here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B_Vs2rjE9TdwR2F3NFFVWDExMnc/view
And while we
know that some will be aghast as to who we believe the traitor in the Trump
White House is, know that we do not make this accusation against General H.R.
McMaster...a decorated and respected member of our military...without us
believing that his actions, beliefs, and his own words did not point us in this
very direction.
