Thursday, September 12, 2019

(Almost) Daily Meme

Supreme Court Gives Green Light To Trump Administration's Asylum Rules
Supreme Court Gives Green Light To Trump Administration's Asylum Rules

The Supreme Court of the United States on Wednesday said the Trump administration is allowed to deny asylum to those who refused to seek refuge in another country first before coming to the United States, the Associated Press reported.

Justices Sonia Sotomayer and Ruth Bader Ginsburg dissented with the rest of their colleagues.

“Once again the Executive Branch has issued a rule that seeks to upend longstanding practices regarding refugees who seek shelter from persecution,” Sotomayer wrote in her dissenting opinion, the Washington Post reported.. “Although this Nation has long kept its doors open to refugees — and although the stakes for asylum seekers could not be higher — the Government implemented its rule without first providing the public notice and inviting the public input generally required by law.”
9/11 Commission top dogs say “terrorism needs to be prevented at the source,” ignore its source

By Robert Spencer Jihad Watch

9/11 Commission top dogs say “terrorism needs to be prevented at the source,” ignore its source
“Former New Jersey Gov. Thomas H. Kean and former Congressman Lee H. Hamilton of Indiana served as chairman and vice chairman, respectively, of the 9/11 Commission. Over the past year, they served as the chairs of the congressionally mandated Task Force on Extremism in Fragile States, which was convened by the United States Institute of […]

Read in browser »

share on Twitter Like 9/11 Commission top dogs say “terrorism needs to be prevented at the source,” ignore its source on Facebook Google Plus One Button 
Jihad-Rep slammed on 9/11 anniversary by victim’s son after ‘some people did something’ quote
Gd bless this brave soul for speaking out against the terror in Congress.
’Some people did something,’ said a freshman congresswoman from Minnesota. Today I am here to respond to you exactly who did what to whom. Madam, objectively speaking, we know who and what was done. There is no uncertainty about that. Why your confusion? On that day, 19 Islamic terrorist members of al Qaeda killed over 3,000 people and caused billions of dollars of economic damage. Is that clear? But as to whom…I was attacked, your relatives and friends were attacked, our constitutional freedoms were attacked and our nation’s founding on Judeo-Christian principles were attacked. That’s what some people did. Got that now?”
Nicholas Haros Jr, reading the names of the 9/11 victims, including his mother, at today’s commemoration of the Twin Towers attack.

Read entire article here:
Two Cases...Two Verdicts Overturned...Two Reasons To Clear Our Judicial House
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

"Justice will not be served until those who are unaffected are as outraged as those who are."
- Benjamin Franklin, American Founding Father

Two weeks or so ago while most of us here in Florida, me included, were rightfully focused on a hurricane named Dorian, two Obama appointed activist judges were busy overturning convictions of an illegal alien and a muslim jihadi with barely a word heard in the mainstream media. Well...that word will be now be heard...better late than never I say.

Let's start with Jose Inez Garcia Zarate...the five times deported illegal alien...a man now in our country illegally for time number six...who shot and killed Kate Steinle back in 2015 when she was leisurely strolling with her dad on San Francisco's waterfront Pier 14. Dying in her dad's arms after being shot in the chest, the Steinle family saw Zarate being acquitted of murder on November 30, 2017 after the court ruled the shooting an accident. However, he was found guilty of being a convicted felon illegally in possession of a firearm and ammunition.

An illegal alien convicted of illegally possessing a firearm who now thanks to his liberal miscreant lawyers and an Obama appointed liberal activist judge named Sandra L. Margulies, has seen the knife dug deeper into the Steinle family's back as California's First District Court of Appeals has overturned even that conviction saying that, “the original judge [Judge Samuel Feng] failed to instruct the jury on one of his defenses.”

Oh really...

And so the man who stole a beautiful young woman's life...the man who claimed that, “he unwittingly picked up the gun wrapped in a T-shirt and it fired accidentally”...the man who claimed that after the gun went off...a gun stolen from a federal agent’s car...that he threw said gun away to stop it from firing again...that very man is now basically not only getting away with murder but with culpability as well, all while the Steinle family is left to relive their grief and forever wonder why it sadly ended this way.

But these six simple words can tell you and the Steinle family why...San Francisco is a “sanctuary city”...a city whose police department and government officials blatantly refuse to comply with our federal on-the-book immigration laws...a city that allowed murdering scum like Zarate to freely walk its streets. The rights of illegals over the rights of American citizens is the law San Francisco now lives by, and it's this very attitude also embraced by California itself as it's a “sanctuary state” ...that is the direct cause of not only Kate's Steinle's death but the deaths of other folks in their state who've lost their lives at the hands of illegal aliens.

Remember, if California as a whole and San Francisco in specific had just complied with federal immigration laws, Kate Steinle and the others murdered by illegals in California would not be dead, because Jose Inez Garcia Zarate and the other criminal sorts like him would not have been in these United States in the first, second...or in Zarate's case all the way up to the sixth place.

So how did this newest travesty of justice unfold...simply on the infamous “technicality” rouse is how. While Zarate remained in federal prison on the illegal possession of a firearm and ammunition charge, his court appointed public defender, Matt Gonzales, was busy preparing his appeal on the grounds that while deliberating the case Judge Feng, even after being asked by the jury for added clarification about the definition of “possession,” did not inform the jury about what's called the “momentary possession of a firearm,” which legally it seems is not the same as the actual “possession” of a firearm. How so...“momentary possession” is when an individual has “brief possession” of an “item” in question...this being the gun...while being in the process of disposing or destroying that “item,” and that in no way is the individual trying to prevent law enforcement from seizing said “item.”

So with Zarate's having already fired the gun...guns don't pull their own triggers you know...and then after it “accidentally” kills Kate Steinle...Zarate throws the gun he knew had to be stolen into San Francisco Bay.

And with Zarate now having already built up enough credits for time served to cover his sentence on the state gun charge, Judge Margulies wrote in the 3-0 decision that, “During the deliberation, the jury asked for the definition of possession, whether there is a time requirement of possession and whether defendant’s possession of a firearm and knowledge he possessed it were sufficient to demonstrate wrongful intent,” and that “it is reasonably probable at least one juror may have reached a different conclusion if the jury had been instructed on the momentary possession charge,” thus allowing Kate Steinle to basically be de-facto murdered all over again.

And then to make matters even worse, Zarate's slime of an attorney, Matt Gonzales, had the audacity to call the appeal's court overturning the decision a “vindication”...a “vindication” because by Judge Feng not fully instructing the jury, Gonzales felt that Feng was in effect directing a guilty verdict be found. “He had an obligation to give this instruction whether or not we asked for it,” said Gonzalez as he seemed to relish in Kate Steinle's family having to relive once again the nightmare no parent should ever have to face.

I just wonder how people like Matt Gonzalez and Judge Sandra L. Margulies can look at themselves in the mirror let alone live with themselves knowing that they have further hurt the innocent while defending and overturning verdicts of those they know are guilty, and doing so on a “technicality” alone...what should, in my opinion, be a crime in and of itself.

So while Jose Inez Garcia Zarate remains in prison as the California state-court ruling has no legal bearing on federal prosecution, Zarate could still face up to ten years in prison if found guilty of federal "possession" charges. And yet even this, what seems like a last ditch attempt at justice, leaves me to wonder if Kate Steinle will ever be allowed to “Rest in Peace,” and will her family ever reach even a modicum of closure. Honestly, I just don't know especially when our current judicial system, and not just in California, seems to favor the perpetrator instead of the innocent victim.

Next on the list of Obama appointed liberal activist judges run amok involves the case of David Daoud Wright, the former ISIS operative and fame seeker who was found guilty of "conspiracy to commit acts of international terrorism" as well as being one of the ringleaders of the 2015 plot to behead political activist, blogger, and AFDI (American Freedom Defense Initiative) founder Pamela Geller...a woman I'm honored to call my friend. And why the focus on Pamela Geller...because she was the organizer of the “Draw Mohammed” art contest... a contest Wright and his ilk found offensive to mohammed and to mulsims...a contest that saw the two muslim gunmen who attacked said contest rightfully being shot dead by Garland, Texas police.

Thankfully, their plot fell apart after Wright’s uncle, one Usamaah Abdullah Rahim, said he wanted to kill Massachusetts police officers instead of Geller, but as fate would have it he was shot dead by the very officers he wanted to kill after pulling a knife on them in a parking lot when they simply wanted to question him. David Daoud Wright was now left alone to face charges, and in December 2017 he was found guilty on five counts in said terrorist plot against Pamela Geller. However, we recently witnessed one of those convictions being overturned by Federal Appeals Court Justice David J. Barron...with his decision being ludicrous at best, an outward catering to those out to kill us all at worst.

And why do I feel this way...because in his ruling this abomination of an Obama appointed islamic condoning judge had the audacity to mimic David Daoud Wright's lawyers whose sole defense was that their client, “could have simply been ‘role playing’ with respect to following ISIS’s direction,” against Pamela Geller. Ignoring that those on the jury in no way felt that Wright was “role playing” when reaching their verdict...Judge Barron also ignored that the five guilty verdicts were reached in under six hours...remarkable time in a case like this. And those guilty verdicts led Acting U.S. Attorney William Weinreb to state that, “Mr. Wright is a terrorist, an ISIS supporter and recruiter who intended to wage war against the United States by beheading people and killing Americans”...Pamela Geller sadly included.

The main case against Wright involved his contact and financing of American ISIS leader Zulfi Hoxha's trip to Syria to train with ISIS, and of all things video games being used as a way for someone to both train and ultimately join ISIS. In fact, Wright himself trained by using amongst others a video game called “Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare” to “virtually prepare” for jihad.

Judge Barron knew all this and yet apparently he did not take any of it into account. And what's even worse is that both David Daoud Wright's original 2017 conviction and sentence of 28 years in prison will now more than likely be reduced due to Barron's overturning the ISIS related conviction. And this is not only a miscarriage of justice, but yet another showing that Americans do come second to politically activist the Geller case second not to an illegal alien but to a convicted terrorist.

Makes you wonder who's worse...the illegals, the terrorists, or the activist judges who give these folks but a slap on the wrist and then basically lets them go. Sad isn't it...sad indeed.

So what's the answer to stopping liberal appeals judges from overturning rightful verdicts... to overturn them simply to meet their personal political agenda alone? Remember, it's not as simple as just replacing them with conservative justices for a defendant has the legal right to appeal any guilty verdict or in the above stated two cases any secondary part thereof said verdict without negating the original underlying guilty or not guilty conviction.

In the Zarate case his attorney Matt Gonzales used “error at trial” in his appeal to Judge Margulies, because of Judge Feng's perceived legal error of omission regarding “possession,” an error he believed contributed to a guilty verdict no matter this be right or wrong. In the Pamela Geller case, there is no rhyme nor reason for the ISIS related charge to be overturned, proving once again that liberal activist judges tread lightly in regards to those of the islamic persuasion.

So while a number of judges...whether they be appeals court judges or otherwise...must be replaced before the worst of the worst are coddled even more than they already are, they must not be replaced solely based upon their party affiliation, but based upon their judicial record of being either Constitutional judges or activist judges. Remember, we have seen Republican judges and even Supreme Court justices not following the Constitution at times, albeit to a far lesser degree than Democrat judges and justices. But no matter the judicial appointee and no matter the president who appoints them, said judge or justice must always interpret the law as per the Constitution not take it upon themselves to start legislating from the bench as the two above mentioned judges clearly have done.

It's way past time to clear America's judicial house and put it back in proper working order...and do so before it's too late.

Copyright @ 2019 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article
, Mullen, Nebraska Schools a Triggered Indoctrinator.

Tomorrow, Friday, September 13th, from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori
discuss 'Two Cases...Two Verdicts Overturned...Two Reason To Clear Our Judicial House'; 'Mullen, Nebraska Schools a Triggered Indoctrinator'; and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: on Tune-In at: