Monday, December 14, 2015

Back To Iraq: Secretary of Defense Says American Troops Might Be Deployed To Ramadi  

American troops might be deployed to Anbar province, Iraq to help the Iraqi government retake Ramadi, which fell into ISIS’ hands last May. What was disconcerting about this victory was that it showed the terror group has “tactical awareness” when executing their assaults (via Military Times):
Defense Secretary Ash Carter said he is willing to send American helicopters and troops to Anbar province to help the Iraqi military forces close in on and seize Ramadi from Islamic State militants. 
"The United States is prepared to assist the Iraqi army with additional unique capabilities to help them finish the job, including attack helicopters and accompanying advisers if circumstances dictate and if requested by Prime Minister [Hader al-] Abadi," Carter told lawmakers on Capitol Hill on Wednesday.
His comments came amid reports that the Iraqi security forces have advanced into downtown Ramadi and seized a key military operations center.
Hundreds of U.S. troops are deployed in Anbar province, but their mission has been limited primarily to inside-the-wire training activities at Al Asad Air Base and Taqaddum Air Base.
Nonie Darwish: Why the U.S. should not take in Muslim immigrants

Pamela Geller / Atlas Shrugs

AFDI Geller Fellow Nonie Darwish explains why there should be a moratorium on immigration from Muslim countries:

muslim_refugees1_1Islamic turmoil never fails to dominate the headlines, and the West is yet again split on how to deal with the polarizing issue of Islamic immigration. But liberals can no longer afford to be motivated by only political short-term goals expressed with the usual shouting, name-calling and emotion. This issue can really hurt liberal and progressive causes, as well as conservative causes.

Looking at the big picture of relocating populations, the first thing that comes to mind is that it should benefit and not hurt either the Muslim nations that are sending the immigrants out or Western nations that are absorbing the immigrants...


“I’m Christian and I LOVE the Qur’an”
By Robert Spencer / Jihad Watch


“I’m Christian and I LOVE the Qur’an”
This photo was apparently taken at a recent demonstration in Washington, DC: And there is so much in it for a Christian to love: Jesus is not the Son of God: “O People of the Scripture! Do not exaggerate in your religion nor utter aught concerning Allah save the truth. The Messiah, Jesus son of […]
Read in browser »

share on Twitter Like “I’m Christian and I LOVE the Qur’an” on Facebook Google Plus One Button 
Investigative Report
Obama's Deal With the Devil...Part 1 of 3
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots /

It’s been less than two weeks since the islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino and new information regarding the 7th century barbarians who carried out that attack continues to roll in. What we are learning about the two islamists is alarming, but there is more, much more, to it than the revelations coming to light about Tashfeen Malik and Syed Farook, but before we get into that let’s take stock in what information has been uncovered so far.

Malik, the female islamic barbarian, came to the United States from Saudi Arabia just a year ago on a K1 visa, more commonly known as the ‘fiancĂ©e visa,’ and according to government sources it is one of the hardest visas to obtain as the vetting process for it is reportedly the most vigorous.

We also now know that Malik was 'radicalized' prior to her ever coming to our country and that her 'radicalization' more than likely took place in Islamabad, Pakistan, years ago. Malik was, according to documents, one of a number that comprises only 0.3% of all visas handed out in 2014.

Early reports stated that Farook, the male half of the islamic terrorist connection, was 'radicalized' by Malik but that has now been replaced by reports indicating that Farook began the process of being 'radicalized' long before he ever met Malik. Farook, in fact, was 'radicalized' right here at home.

We also know that Malik, as per islamic ideology, was not employed and that Farook had an income of $51,000 per year meaning the some $30,000 plus worth of guns, ammo, and IED supplies, seemed way out of line with his income, fueling speculation that the couple had some outside source of funding. And it now appears that they maxed-out their credit lines, including the taking out of a $28,500 loan from the on-line lender, 'Prosper', who issued this statement, "All loans originated through the Prosper platform are subject to all identity verification and screening procedures required by law, including U.S. anti-terrorism and anti-money laundering laws. Like all Americans, Prosper is shocked and saddened by recent events in San Bernardino."

And we have learned that Farook and Malik had been planning their islamic terrorist attack for nearly a year and that Farook had apparently planned an earlier attack back in least a full year before he ever met Malik but was 'spooked' by a sweep of islamic terrorist suspects by law enforcement in Southern California back then and scrapped his plan at that time.

There have now been two witnesses who have come forward to say they saw both Malik and Farook at a Riverside, California, gun range, practicing their aim and shooting at paper targets for the past year and even in the days before their terrorist attack on December 2nd. And we know that the two islamists purchased thousands of rounds of ammunition and enough supplies to build dozens of IED devices, and that the two handguns used in the attack were purchased legally. We also know that a friend, Enrique Marquez, who is currently in the process of converting to islam, purchased two rifles that he either gave or sold to the islamic terrorist couple.

Investigators are now looking at Malik’s past and suspect that she had been an islamic terror operative for years. Investigators are also now looking at her family’s ties to terrorism including her possible contacts with al-Qaeda's Syrian arm, al-Nusra, and her possible connection to the known radical 'Red Mosque' in Pakistan. And let’s not forget that during the attack, Malik posted to Facebook that she had pledged her allegiance to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi.

Here’s something else we know...a report that was quickly removed from the headlines...that being the fact that San Bernardino law enforcement officials knew, within five minutes of the islamic terrorist attack, exactly who was responsible. Yes, they were tipped off by survivors of the attack, but according to reports, Farook was a person of interest to local law enforcement before the attack and that San Bernardino police had been wanting to talk to Farook.

As if all of this isn’t bad it gets downright chilling.

According to Farook’s father...Syed Farook...his son was a supporter of ISIS and believed that Israel should be wiped from the map. And according to CV Claverie, a friend of Nicholas Thalasinos, a coworker of Farook’s who was shot and killed by Farook and Malik in the attack, Farook had told Thalasinos that, “Islam will rule the world,” and that Farook had, for some time, been threatening Thalasinos...telling him that, “Christians and Jews deserve to die; and that he (Nicholas) was going to die.”

Perhaps the reason San Bernardino police wanted to talk to Farook, in the days before the attack, had something to do with these threats against his coworker, and maybe, just maybe, the reason police hesitated was because in a world where the cops are labeled as bigots of one sort or another, and in a world where political correctness is more important than the rule of law, having contact with a muslim regarding potential terrorist threats is seen as prejudiced.

However, it was clear that Farook and his islamist wife had intended to do more than just commit murder at the Christmas party, as now we have learned that Farook had several photos of Carter High School in Rialto on his cell phone, and we know the pair had enough ammunition and pipe bombs to have wreaked havoc on any second location they chose. And while it wasn’t out of the ordinary for Farook, a county health inspector, to take photos during inspections and area schools were on his work orders, according to investigators it would have been highly unusual for any inspector to photograph the outside of any building, and Farook’s photos of Carter High School were, indeed, of the outside of the building.

Now as a result of this attack, the Department of Homeland Security is reviewing the K1 visa program, "to assess possible program enhancements," and as Marc Rosenblum, the Deputy Director of the U.S. Immigration Policy Program at the Migration Policy Center put it..."This visa has been totally under the radar. The issue of marriage fraud has definitely gotten a lot of attention, just not as a security vulnerability."

Everything listed above, everything we now know after the fact, after the islamic terrorist attack in San Bernardino, should have been a waving red flag...a waving red crescent flag...a flag that should have stopped what happened years before it happened. And while the portrait of the islamist 7th century barbarians, Farook and Malik, is beyond chilling...seemingly, nobody noticed.

Clearly, islamic terrorism is the number one threat to the world and to our lives in this country, as it has been since September 11, 2001. And while we’ve been told that procedures and processes are in place to protect us...with evidence that many such attacks have been could this have happened? How could these two islamic terrorists throw up one red crescent flag after another for years on end, while making personal threats against the lives of American citizens, and yet nobody notices and nobody does one single thing to prevent it?

Obama tells us that his strategy, a strategy of being nice to islam, is working, and if you think that will change under any different liberal regime think again, as Hillary Clinton has told us that we must respect and understand our enemies. Respect and understand those who wish us dead by persuading them to seek a different path, Clinton says. 'We the People' are supposed to respect and understand the ilk of Farook and Malik...understand why they murdered 14 innocent people and wounded another 21 in an islamic terrorist attack...we don't think so.

Here’s what we do understand...there is no religion on earth, engaged globally in acts of murder, genocide, and destruction of those who do not adhere to that 'supposed' religion. Not the Christians. Not the Jews. Not the Sikhs. Not the Hindus nor any other. However, there is one particular political ideology that is committing mass murders, beheadings, burning people alive, and bombing any and all who don’t adhere to its political ideology...islam.

Another fact worth noting would be that while not all muslims are islamist terrorists...all islamist terrorists are muslims...but there are also differences in the political ideologies here in our own country.

The liberal ideology is that islam is a religion, and therefore must be tolerated and coddled. The conservative ideology is that islam is not a religion but a political ideology which cannot be tolerated. And while it is politically incorrect to believe that islam is anything but a religion in liberal circles, it is factually correct to see islam for what it truly ideology of death, destruction, and genocide.

So we are simply left with two possibilities...either the system, the protocols, the procedures, and the processes in place to keep islamic terrorists from perpetrating acts the likes of which were in play in San Bernardino are broken at best, or non-existent at worst, and something needs to be done...or they are working but were, in the case of San Bernardino...ignored.

Under the Obama regime, we have been living in a land where Republicans are seen as a more dangerous enemy than islamists like the ilk of Farook and Malik, and where conservative groups are more heavily vetted than potential islamist terrorists. We live in a land where every keystroke we make is recorded; where if we search for an item on Google, ads for that item become part of our Facebook feed; and where every phone call we make is tracked; and yet the San Bernardino husband and wife islamic killing team spent years preparing for their terrorist attack and nobody did a thing.

How could this be?

We believe that under the Obama regime, key players within our intel community have been ordered to virtually stand down where possible cases of terrorism and terrorist attacks are concerned, and we believe such orders could only come from the top. Is it possible that Obama is such a narcissistic, arrogant SOB as to believe that so long as he’s running the show his fellow islamists won’t act on their inbred barbaric impulses in this country?

Yes it is as this is Barack HUSSEIN Obama we’re talking about...sure it's possible and equally plausible is the notion that islam’s war council no longer views Obama as useful to its agenda of building the caliphate due to two major events. First, Iran got from Obama what it needed, the green light to build a nuclear arsenal, and just last week they again flaunted it in Obama’s face by testing yet another ballistic missile capable of carrying and delivering a nuclear warhead, which is in direct violation of the terms of the treaty Obama is so damned proud of. And remember, ISIS sees Iran as their competition and/or their enemy in ruling the hoped-for future caliphate, and they can’t be too happy that Iran now has the power of the bomb.

Second is Obama’s glaring inability to have prevented Putin from going all-in against ISIS in Syria. Obama has been propping up ISIS in Syria and in Iraq by employing the tactic of bombing empty warehouses and the occasional truck convoy while lying to the American people that he has ISIS contained and on the run, which sounds a whole lot like what he was telling us regarding al-Qaeda before the 2012 election. Obama has also been arming various ISIS loyal factions in Syria and allowing ISIS free run of Iraq, including access to whatever weapons of war we left behind when Obama pulled our military out of Iraq.

Another key indicator, we believe, can be found in Obama’s speech to the nation after San smacked of desperation. Not since 2010 had Obama delivered a speech from the Oval Office, but if what we suspect is true, he no longer felt he was in control and needed some way to add gravitas to his speech. Obama repeated the moniker ISIL...yet another shout-out to the Levant...over and over during that speech in an obvious signal to ISIS that he still has their backs, and in what could be described as a desperate plea for them to have his.

So while Obama’s love affair with ISIS may not be seems that maybe ISIS’ love affair with Obama is. And it seems highly impossible that with all the protocols and processes we as a nation have in place...good, bad, or indifferent...that our intel community could fail to see all the 'red flags' flying around the San Bernardino islamic terrorists. And when you add in the speed with which background information regarding their exploits has been flooding the airways, it seems to confirm that said information was already close at hand.

And while we believe profiling is a valuable tool against islamic terrorism, and one that is most likely already in play, we wouldn’t put it passed Obama to threaten members of the intel community with charges of racism should they divulge its use. It should be noted that profiling, in regards to islamic terrorism, is not racial in nature but ideological and psychological as islam is an ideology rife with psychosis and not a race of people, but that’s not how liberals see it and certainly not how the race card playing Obama sees it.

What we believe is that our intel community knew a great deal about the San Bernardino islamic duo well before the attack on December 2nd, and we believe they failed to act against the terrorists based on Obama’s orders...not to say that Obama specifically knew of the pending attack but that he had made it clear that muslims, despite their red flags, were to be given a free pass. And why... because we believe he covertly had a deal with the absolute worst that islam has to offer in that he, Obama, would allow safe passage and safe haven to as many islamists as possible in return for a promise that the sort of attacks of 9/11 or the Charlie Hebdo and Paris concert hall attacks would not happen here as long as he was running the show.

Obama, in his Oval Office speech, looked and sounded for all the world, like a man who’s grand plan was crashing down around the man behind the curtain as it was being drawn back to reveal that he is not a wizard...not a wizard at all. 

In tomorrow's Part 2 of our investigative report 'Obama's Deal With the Devil' we will expose facts about who this man really is and why he truly is dancing with the islamic devils.