Sunday, May 18, 2014


Official Public Statement from 
CPR Worldwide Media...

I'm Michael Collins-Windsor, aka The Stallion, and I'm the CEO of CPR Worldwide Media and I'm here to tell you that our CPR family of talk show hosts and DJs support the OAS movement currently ongoing at our nation's capital.

And while the media remains silent as 'We the People' raise our voices in protest of the most traitorous of presidents in U.S. history along with his equally corrupt and traitorous administration it has become obvious that we need to rally, we need to protest, we need to raise our voices together as one and say loud and clear for all to hear that we will NOT take it anymore.

Our beloved America is becoming unrecognizable to us as the 'enemy within' turns our great republic into a model of European socialism heading on its way to becoming yet another communist state...or worse...for if Barack HUSSEIN Obama has his way America will become an islamic caliphate within a matter of a few short years.

And as we Americans of every race, color, and creed face injustice, intolerance, political correctness, and a trampling of our Constitutionally given rights on a daily basis by the man who wields a phone and a pen to take away those rights, some brave American warriors have gathered together in our nation's capital to lay the groundwork for what might just turn into the long awaited Second American Revolution.

More than 230 years ago, great patriots like those in attendance at OAS, and those there in spirit with them, fought against a tyrannical king hell bent on subjugating the people to his will and he failed. Today, those at OAS are doing the same but the king has become a president so overstepping his bounds of power that silence or even the ballot box can NO long be the answer or the solution. We must follow the lead of those protesters and join hands across the nation and NOT only support those protesting today but we must gather together and start to protest all across this great nation for numbers is the most powerful weapon of all.

And only through numbers will we take our country back from those out to destroy her.

So to those in Washington, we here at CPR stand behind you, support you, and pray for your mission...and know that what you are doing today is just the beginning NOT the end.


Obama’s illegal alien aunt receives Muslim burial in Kenya

Pamela Geller / Atlas Shrugs

Those who dared to suggest during the 2008 Presidential campaign that Barack Obama might have some affinity for Islam arising from his familial connection were mocked, ridiculed, and dismissed as “bigots.” Yet the familial connections are real, and much more extensive than was reported in the enemedia at the time. And now after five years of his presidency, what is also clear is that whatever Obama’s personal connection to Islam might be, he has been a eager servant of the Islamic supremacist agenda. Whatever he may think of his large Muslim family, he has consistently and willingly abetted that agenda and made Sharia supremacists stronger and more confident than ever. It is the fundamental legacy of his disastrous presidency.
onyango
“Obama’s illegal alien aunt receives Muslim burial in Kenya,” Creeping Sharia, May 17, 2014:
via Standard Digital News :  Zietuni Onyango buried in Kisumu despite tussle. via Refugee Resettlement Watch.
Kisumu, Kenya: Zeituni Onyango Obama, the United States President Barack Obama’s aunt, has been laid to rest in Kisumu under the Muslim religion traditions.
Just like Osama bin Laden was, per Obama’s orders.
This is despite calls by a Homabay resident who had wanted to bury her body claiming she was her wife.
Last week a report attributed to President Barack Obama’s half-brother Malik Abong’o, that the remains of Ms Zeituni would be buried in a Muslim cemetery in Kisumu prompted Okoko to seek legal redress to the matter.
Last week a report attributed to President Barack Obama’s half-brother Malik Abong’o, that the remains of Ms Zeituni would be buried in a Muslim cemetery in Kisumu prompted Okoko to seek legal redress to the matter. He said he would go to court to get an order allowing him to bury the body. But Tuesday, Zeituni’s remains were laid to rest in a quiet ceremony that was not attended by political or administrative leaders. Neither Okoko nor anybody from his Kanyadhiang home was present during the viewing of Zeituni’s body at her sister’s home in Kisumu’s Kaloleni estate or at the burial site. A member of Obama family claimed that the ‘husband’ had not paid dowry hence could not legally claim Zeituni’s marriage.  
Last week a report attributed to President Barack Obama’s half-brother Malik Abong’o, that the remains of Ms Zeituni would be buried in a Muslim cemetery in Kisumu prompted Okoko to seek legal redress to the matter. He said he would go to court to get an order allowing him to bury the body. But Tuesday, Zeituni’s remains were laid to rest in a quiet ceremony that was not attended by political or administrative leaders. Neither Okoko nor anybody from his Kanyadhiang home was present during the viewing of Zeituni’s body at her sister’s home in Kisumu’s Kaloleni estate or at the burial site. A member of Obama family claimed that the ‘husband’ had not paid dowry hence could not legally claim Zeituni’s marriage.  
Last week a report attributed to President Barack Obama’s half-brother Malik Abong’o, that the remains of Ms Zeituni would be buried in a Muslim cemetery in Kisumu prompted Okoko to seek legal redress to the matter. He said he would go to court to get an order allowing him to bury the body. But Tuesday, Zeituni’s remains were laid to rest in a quiet ceremony that was not attended by political or administrative leaders. Neither Okoko nor anybody from his Kanyadhiang home was present during the viewing of Zeituni’s body at her sister’s home in Kisumu’s Kaloleni estate or at the burial site. A member of Obama family claimed that the ‘husband’ had not paid dowry hence could not legally claim Zeituni’s marriage.  
In case you were wondering:  The legacy of Obama’s illegal alien aunt
Auntie Zeituni had no job skills, no special talent, no compelling reason to keep her here in America as an asset to our culture or our economy. She didn’t value the American Dream. She was a dependency nightmare. She collected $700 a month in welfare benefits and disability payments totaling $51,000. Somehow, Auntie Zeituni also drummed up money to apply for asylum and finagled her way into both federal and state public housing in Boston.
She contributed nothing to this country. The only “work” she did was gaming the system, complaining about her lot and blaming everyone else for her problems while they subsidized her 14-year illegal overstay.
Auntie Zeituni’s ridiculous asylum application and what happened afterward are reminders that our asylum and deportation systems are appalling jokes. Auntie Zeituni’s bogus request was rejected by the immigration court system. A judge ordered her to return to Kenya in 2003. She appealed. She lost. A judge again ordered her to leave in 2004.
But Auntie Zeituni never went home. Like an estimated 700,000 other deportation absconders, she evaded the judicial order for nearly a half-dozen years and continued to feed at the government trough. When the Bush administration had the chance to put the pedal to the enforcement metal in 2008, they caved. Pandering to pro-amnesty forces, Bush officials issued a 72-hour cease-and-desist order to all fugitive apprehension teams to spare Obama embarrassment over his auntie right before Election Day.
As an Immigration and Customs Enforcement source told me at the time: “The ICE fugitive operations group throughout the U.S. was told to stand down until after the election from arresting or transporting anyone out of the U.S. This was done to avoid any mistakes of deporting or arresting anyone who could have a connection to the election, i.e., anyone from Kenya who could be a relative. The decision was election-driven.”
Millions more illegals will be enjoying your tax dollars if amnesty for illegal aliens is not stopped. Demand your elected officials reject amnesty. Number at top of the page.
Last week a report attributed to President Barack Obama’s half-brother Malik Abong’o, that the remains of Ms Zeituni would be buried in a Muslim cemetery in Kisumu prompted Okoko to seek legal redress to the matter. He said he would go to court to get an order allowing him to bury the body. But Tuesday, Zeituni’s remains were laid to rest in a quiet ceremony that was not attended by political or administrative leaders. Neither Okoko nor anybody from his Kanyadhiang home was present during the viewing of Zeituni’s body at her sister’s home in Kisumu’s Kaloleni estate or at the burial site. A member of Obama family claimed that the ‘husband’ had not paid dowry hence could not legally claim Zeituni’s marriage.  
The post Obama’s illegal alien aunt receives Muslim burial in Kenya appeared first on Pamela Geller, Atlas Shrugs.

FINALLY! Church of England speaks out against halalification and Islamization of the UK

From: Bare Naked Islam

 

Canon Eric Woods, the Vicar of Sherborne, in an article published in the Western Gazette condemns ‘invasion of halal meat’, says Christians oppose ‘the creeping Islamisation of our country.’

 

 

USDA Looking To Buy Submachine Guns

By Sandy Fitzgerald
Newsmax
 /


According to a solicitation filed on May 7, the department has a detailed list of specifications for its "commercial acquisition of submachine guns."

The department is seeking .40 caliber submachine guns complete with flashlights, optics, burst fire capability, and 30-round magazines.

The guns, the department says, should have an "semi-automatic or 2 shot burst trigger group, Tritium night sights for front and rear, rails for attachment of flashlight (front under fore grip) and scope (top rear), stock-collapsible or folding, magazine - 30 rd. capacity, sling, lightweight, and oversized trigger guard for gloved operation."

There are no solicitation documents for the gun buy, but "responsible and/or interested sources may submit their company name, point of contact, and telephone," and if the information is received in a timely manner, the sellers will be considered by the agency to contact and determine "weapon suitability."

Dan Cannon, a writer for the blog Guns Save Lives, notes that the U.S. Forest Service and its law enforcement division are under the USDA's control, and could be a likely place for the firearms to be used.

The two contacts on the solicitation document, Linda Josey, chief of the USDA's Procurement Management branch and Desiree Clayton, USDA Contracting Officer, could not be immediately reached Saturday for comment on the order.

The USDA isn't the only federal agency to seek weapons or ammunition in recent months.

Earlier this year, the U.S. Postal Service joined the list of federal agencies seeking to purchase what some Second Amendment activists say are alarmingly large quantities of ammunition.

The Postal Service listed a notice on its website, under the heading "Assorted Small Arms Ammunition," that said: "The United States Postal Service intends to solicit proposals for assorted small arms ammunition. If your organization wishes to participate, you must pre-register. This message is only a notification of our intent to solicit proposals."

Alan Gottlieb, chairman of the Washington-based Citizens Committee for the Right to Keep and Bear Arms, said in April that his organization is seeing a highly unusual amount of ammunition being bought by the federal agencies over a fairly short period of time. To be honest, I don't understand why the federal government is buying so much at this time."

A little more than a year ago, the Social Security Administration put in a request for 174,000 rounds of ".357 Sig 125 grain bonded jacketed hollow-point" bullets, shortly after the USDA requested 320,000 rounds.

And more recently, the Department of Homeland Security requested 450 million rounds — around the same time the FBI sought 100 million hollow-point rounds.

The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, which oversees the National Weather Service, has also requested 46,000 rounds.


EXCLUSIVE: IRS Stonewalling FOIA Request Surrounding Correspondence With Democratic Members of Congress  
Katie Pavlich / Townhall Tipsheet
 
On May 21, 2013 the National Republican Senatorial Committee sent the IRS a Freedom of Information Act request asking for "any and all documents or records, including but not limited to electronic documents, e-mails, paper documents, photographs (electronic or hard copy), or audio files," related to correspondence from January 1, 2009 and May 21, 2013 between thirteen different Democrat members of Congress and top IRS officials. Those officials include former IRS Commissioner Doug Shulman, former Commissioner Steven Miller, senior IRS official Joseph Grant and former head of tax exempt groups Lois Lerner. Members of Congress named in the request include Sen. Schumer (D-NY), Sen. Reid (D-NV), DSCC Chair Sen. Bennet (D-CO), Sen. Landrieu (D-LA), Sen. Pryor (D-AR), Sen. Hagan (D-NC), Sen. Begich (D-AK), Sen. Shaheen (D-NH), Sen. Mark Udall (D-CO), Sen. Franken (D-MN), Sen. Warner (D-VA), Rep. Braley and Rep. Peters (D-MI).

Since that request was received by the IRS nearly one year ago, IRS Tax Law Specialists Robert Thomas and Denise Higley have asked for more time to fulfill the request six times.

"I am responding to your Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request dated May 21, 2013, and received in our office on May 30, 2013," Higley wrote in a letter to NRSC Attorney Megan Sowards last year. "I am unable to send the information requested by June 27, 2013, which is the 20 business day period allowed by law. I apologize for any inconvenience this delay may cause."

Thomas and Higley have sent six letters with the same language and different dates to Sowards requesting more time to locate information in order to fulfill the FOIA request. Most recently, the IRS has asked for a deadline of August 1, 2014 to produce information.

Earlier this week Judicial Watch released documents showing Democratic Michigan Senator Carl Levin was in contact with former Deputy IRS Commissioner Steven Miller repeatedly throughout 2012 and was working with the agency on how conservative groups, specifically those working against his reelection, could be targeted through IRS rules and regulations. Last month we learned the staff of Ranking Member of the House Oversight Committee Elijah Cummings had been in touch with the IRS about voter fraud prevention group True the Vote, despite direct denials from Cummings any contact with the IRS had ever occurred.
Over at Reason, Peter Suderman writes about the possibility that Obamacare's employer mandate might never be implemented:
At this point, it's widely expected that the provision will remain in limbo permanently. Former White House Press Secretary predicted last month that the provision would never go into effect; the Urban paper will give the administration ammunition to defend the move on policy grounds if and when another delay or permanent postponement is announced.
The policy rationale for ending the employer mandate is clear enough: Because it requires employers to provide coverage for full-time workers once the 50-employee threshold is reached, it creates incentives for firms to avoid hiring, or to cap employee hours so that they do not qualify as full time. End the mandate, and those incentives disappear.
But the employer mandate wasn't included in the law for no reason. It's meant to prevent employers from simply dropping coverage and sending full-time workers to get insurance through the exchanges. In an initial draft of the law that lacked a mandate, the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimated that about 15 million employees would lose their workplace coverage and be sent to the exchanges instead—increasing the law's disruption of current coverage arrangements and the cost of subsidies for exchange-based insurance. The inclusion of an employer mandate significantly mitigated the CBO's estimate of these effects.
Here's the thing: health policy wonks on both the left and right have spoken about the upsides of disentangling employment and health insurance. The past (and current) status quo still includes huge incentives for employers to be the primary vehicles for insurance, however. The employer mandate is a part of that.

Obamacare was controversial enough on its own without going after the employment-insurance nexus, though. So one of the key promises from President Obama was the now-infamous "if you like your doctor, you can keep your doctor" promise. That was a blatant falsehood at the time and it has been exposed as such. The employer mandate was key to this promise. As Suderman writes, without the mandate, there are incentives for businesses to just ditch insurance as a benefit and let the exchanges and federal government subsidies take care of it.

Without the mandate, there would have been (and might still be, if it never goes into effect) a lot more disruption in the insurance market. If Obama had never made the "keep your doctor" promise, it would have been much easier to never include an employer mandate in the first place. Now that Obamacare is settling into an uneasy status quo, however, the "keep your doctor" promise is no longer needed. The employer mandate might no longer be needed either.

This is a subtle political point that Republicans might have overstressed: most conservative-ish health reform would have included as much insurance disruption as Obamacare. The point that Republicans should be attacking the President on is the lie of "keep your doctor," not necessarily on the inherent goodness of the insurance status quo. However, that has likely gotten mangled - and many conservatives do believe that everyone should be able to keep their insurance status quo in any broad-based reform plans. But the breaking of the employment-insurance nexus will by necessity require a lot of disruption, and honest conservatives will admit that to themselves.

The "keep your doctor" promise has been called "Obamacare's original sin." Now that we've admitted the sin, however, Obama might not feel compelled to even try to keep the original promise.

Report: 1 Million Americans Getting Wrong Obamacare Subsidies

By Sandy Fitzgerald / Newsmax                                                                                                                 


More than one million Americans may be receiving the wrong Obamacare subsidies and the government has not been able to solve the issue yet — meaning people who inadvertently got too much money could face crippling tax bills in upcoming years.

According to internal documents and people familiar with the situation, Americans who listed incomes on their insurance applications that differ significantly with what is on file with the Internal Revenue Service are likely receiving too much money, reports The Washington Post.

"I have this sick feeling that there are these people out there who have made unintentional errors, and in a few years will be subject to massive tax bills,” said Jessica Waltman, senior vice president for government affairs at the National Association of Health Underwriters, a lobbying group for health insurance brokers.

Normally, customers are notified if there is a problem with their applications and told to upload or mail in their proof of income. But only a few have done that, say IRS documents, and even for those who have, the federal computer system for the marketplace isn't able to match the proof with the application because the capability to do that hasn't been built.

The unprocessed documents are being stored at federal contractor Serco's Kentucky office as the improper subsidies keep being paid, and under current rules, people who get the subsidies will be required to return the extra money next year.

Federal health officials and Serco, facing pressure from the White House, are starting this weekend to resolve the inconsistencies. Serco, however, is facing its own issues, with dozens of workers complaining this past week that they're sitting idle,  playing games, or looking busy punching a computer button every 10 minutes because they're not being given enough work to fill their days.

The subsidy issue is one of the computer problems that have been going on since the Obamacare marketplace website, HealthCare.gov, floundered when it was launched last October.

And although contractors have corrected many of the problems that made it difficult for Americans to choose a health plan, many parts of the website are still defective or not finished

Since the operational system isn't complete, it is impossible for federal officials to know how many of the 8 million people who have signed up for healthcare coverage have paid their premiums, or how many enrollments were attempted but never completed.

Members of the Obama administration, however, promised congressional Republicans last year that an income-verification system would be in place.

Since the computer system isn't capable of doing the income comparisons, Serco workers will have to do the work by hand. But at first, sources told The Post, the work will focus on the approximately one million cases in which people enrolled or tried to enroll faced questions about their citizenship status.

Immigration documents, like the income information, are also caught in the backlog, meaning that sorting out the income issue and the improper subsidies will not start until summer, likely causing recipients to receive even higher tax repayment bills next year.

“The marketplace has successfully processed tens of millions of pieces of data — everything from Social Security numbers to tribal status to annual income," said Julie Bataille, communications director for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which oversees Obamacare. "While most data matched up right away during the application process, we take seriously the cases that require more work and have a system in place to expeditiously resolve these data inconsistencies, We’re working every day to make sure individuals and families get the tax credits they deserve and that no one is receiving a tax credit they shouldn’t.”

But about 5.5 million of the 8 million people who signed up for insurance coverage this year did so through the federal insurance exchange, and the internal documents examined by The Post shows that about 3 million of those applications contained at least one inconsistency.

Income discrepancies amount for the most frequent inconsistencies, the report said, showing up on 1.1 million to 1.5 million out of nearly 4 million inconsistencies, and customers have mailed in about 650,000 examples of proof of income.

“The longer it takes and the more months . . . go by, the more serious the consequences of any error that may have occurred,” said Judy Solomon, vice president for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.
Republican House Speaker John Boehner has given the conservative base of his party more than a few reasons to question his leadership. A chief concern of many opponents is his apparent willingness – along with other GOP leaders – to advance some level of amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens currently in the U.S.
In a candid address to Democrat supporters in Las Vegas recently, Senior Obama Adviser Valerie Jarrett added even more validity to such anxiety.
She described Boehner as “frustrated” regarding the immigration issue, explaining he is “hell-bent” to “get something done” by the end of the year.
It is clear that Jarrett feels she and the GOP leader are on the same page regarding implementation of immigration reform – otherwise known as amnesty – despite potential differences in rhetoric.

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-senior-adviser-announces-disturbing-partnership-john-boehner/#aDb7ctrFDwkz8r20.99

Report: 1 Million Americans Getting Wrong Obamacare Subsidies

Saturday, 17 May 2014 11:25 AM
By Sandy Fitzgerald
Share:
  Comment  |
   Contact Us  |
  Print  
|  A   A  
Copy Shortlink
More than one million Americans may be receiving the wrong Obamacare subsidies and the government has not been able to solve the issue yet — meaning people who inadvertently got too much money could face crippling tax bills in upcoming years.

According to internal documents and people familiar with the situation, Americans who listed incomes on their insurance applications that differ significantly with what is on file with the Internal Revenue Service are likely receiving too much money, reports The Washington Post.

Editor's Note: Over 50? Check Out These Free Government Giveaways...

"I have this sick feeling that there are these people out there who have made unintentional errors, and in a few years will be subject to massive tax bills,” said Jessica Waltman, senior vice president for government affairs at the National Association of Health Underwriters, a lobbying group for health insurance brokers.

Normally, customers are notified if there is a problem with their applications and told to upload or mail in their proof of income. But only a few have done that, say IRS documents, and even for those who have, the federal computer system for the marketplace isn't able to match the proof with the application because the capability to do that hasn't been built.

The unprocessed documents are being stored at federal contractor Serco's Kentucky office as the improper subsidies keep being paid, and under current rules, people who get the subsidies will be required to return the extra money next year.

Federal health officials and Serco, facing pressure from the White House, are starting this weekend to resolve the inconsistencies. Serco, however, is facing its own issues, with dozens of workers complaining this past week that they're sitting idle,  playing games, or looking busy punching a computer button every 10 minutes because they're not being given enough work to fill their days.

The subsidy issue is one of the computer problems that have been going on since the Obamacare marketplace website, HealthCare.gov, floundered when it was launched last October.

And although contractors have corrected many of the problems that made it difficult for Americans to choose a health plan, many parts of the website are still defective or not finished

Since the operational system isn't complete, it is impossible for federal officials to know how many of the 8 million people who have signed up for healthcare coverage have paid their premiums, or how many enrollments were attempted but never completed.

Members of the Obama administration, however, promised congressional Republicans last year that an income-verification system would be in place.

Since the computer system isn't capable of doing the income comparisons, Serco workers will have to do the work by hand. But at first, sources told The Post, the work will focus on the approximately one million cases in which people enrolled or tried to enroll faced questions about their citizenship status.

Immigration documents, like the income information, are also caught in the backlog, meaning that sorting out the income issue and the improper subsidies will not start until summer, likely causing recipients to receive even higher tax repayment bills next year.

“The marketplace has successfully processed tens of millions of pieces of data — everything from Social Security numbers to tribal status to annual income," said Julie Bataille, communications director for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, which oversees Obamacare. "While most data matched up right away during the application process, we take seriously the cases that require more work and have a system in place to expeditiously resolve these data inconsistencies, We’re working every day to make sure individuals and families get the tax credits they deserve and that no one is receiving a tax credit they shouldn’t.”

But about 5.5 million of the 8 million people who signed up for insurance coverage this year did so through the federal insurance exchange, and the internal documents examined by The Post shows that about 3 million of those applications contained at least one inconsistency.

Income discrepancies amount for the most frequent inconsistencies, the report said, showing up on 1.1 million to 1.5 million out of nearly 4 million inconsistencies, and customers have mailed in about 650,000 examples of proof of income.

“The longer it takes and the more months . . . go by, the more serious the consequences of any error that may have occurred,” said Judy Solomon, vice president for health policy at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities.

Read Latest Breaking News from Newsmax.com http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/subsidy-overpay-tax-bill/2014/05/17/id/571897#ixzz322NXqZXw
Urgent: Should Obamacare Be Repealed? Vote Here Now!
jarretboehner
Republican House Speaker John Boehner has given the conservative base of his party more than a few reasons to question his leadership. A chief concern of many opponents is his apparent willingness – along with other GOP leaders – to advance some level of amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens currently in the U.S.
In a candid address to Democrat supporters in Las Vegas recently, Senior Obama Adviser Valerie Jarrett added even more validity to such anxiety.
She described Boehner as “frustrated” regarding the immigration issue, explaining he is “hell-bent” to “get something done” by the end of the year.
It is clear that Jarrett feels she and the GOP leader are on the same page regarding implementation of immigration reform – otherwise known as amnesty – despite potential differences in rhetoric.
“There’s a lot of ways to skin a cat,” she explained. “I feel very encouraged about immigration reform. I think you’re going to see mounting pressure.”
Instead of fighting for an alternative to the Democrat plan, she concluded in an interview with the Las Vegas Review-Journal that Boehner is more concerned with opposing his own party.
“I think we have a window this summer, between now and August, to get something done,” she said. “We have a commitment from Speaker Boehner, who’s very frustrated with his caucus.”
In her opinion, those who favor amnesty are firmly in the majority.
“We haven’t been able to find that many people who aren’t sin support of it,” she said. Of course, that could be because those hoping to push through such legislation are not necessarily seeking out opponents.
Unfortunately, Boehner is far from alone among Republicans.
Potential presidential candidate Jeb Bush, for instance, recently declared illegal border crossing to be an “act of love.”
Furthermore, he asserted that it “doesn’t make sense” to him for Americans to criticize amnesty.
Nevertheless, Barack Obama recognizes the potential boon so-called immigration reform would to his party. As the conservative Eagle Forum pointed out, passage of an amnesty bill would “alienate the Republican base, working class whites, at least 4 million of whom stayed home in 2012.”
Photo credit: World Economic Forum (Creative Commons)

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-senior-adviser-announces-disturbing-partnership-john-boehner/#CZcbdIuXY4gccExy.99
jarretboehner
Republican House Speaker John Boehner has given the conservative base of his party more than a few reasons to question his leadership. A chief concern of many opponents is his apparent willingness – along with other GOP leaders – to advance some level of amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens currently in the U.S.
In a candid address to Democrat supporters in Las Vegas recently, Senior Obama Adviser Valerie Jarrett added even more validity to such anxiety.
She described Boehner as “frustrated” regarding the immigration issue, explaining he is “hell-bent” to “get something done” by the end of the year.
It is clear that Jarrett feels she and the GOP leader are on the same page regarding implementation of immigration reform – otherwise known as amnesty – despite potential differences in rhetoric.
“There’s a lot of ways to skin a cat,” she explained. “I feel very encouraged about immigration reform. I think you’re going to see mounting pressure.”
Instead of fighting for an alternative to the Democrat plan, she concluded in an interview with the Las Vegas Review-Journal that Boehner is more concerned with opposing his own party.
“I think we have a window this summer, between now and August, to get something done,” she said. “We have a commitment from Speaker Boehner, who’s very frustrated with his caucus.”
In her opinion, those who favor amnesty are firmly in the majority.
“We haven’t been able to find that many people who aren’t sin support of it,” she said. Of course, that could be because those hoping to push through such legislation are not necessarily seeking out opponents.
Unfortunately, Boehner is far from alone among Republicans.
Potential presidential candidate Jeb Bush, for instance, recently declared illegal border crossing to be an “act of love.”
Furthermore, he asserted that it “doesn’t make sense” to him for Americans to criticize amnesty.
Nevertheless, Barack Obama recognizes the potential boon so-called immigration reform would to his party. As the conservative Eagle Forum pointed out, passage of an amnesty bill would “alienate the Republican base, working class whites, at least 4 million of whom stayed home in 2012.”
Photo credit: World Economic Forum (Creative Commons)

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-senior-adviser-announces-disturbing-partnership-john-boehner/#EPoi6Dowt7fHVY2F.99
jarretboehner
Republican House Speaker John Boehner has given the conservative base of his party more than a few reasons to question his leadership. A chief concern of many opponents is his apparent willingness – along with other GOP leaders – to advance some level of amnesty for the millions of illegal aliens currently in the U.S.
In a candid address to Democrat supporters in Las Vegas recently, Senior Obama Adviser Valerie Jarrett added even more validity to such anxiety.
She described Boehner as “frustrated” regarding the immigration issue, explaining he is “hell-bent” to “get something done” by the end of the year.
It is clear that Jarrett feels she and the GOP leader are on the same page regarding implementation of immigration reform – otherwise known as amnesty – despite potential differences in rhetoric.
“There’s a lot of ways to skin a cat,” she explained. “I feel very encouraged about immigration reform. I think you’re going to see mounting pressure.”
Instead of fighting for an alternative to the Democrat plan, she concluded in an interview with the Las Vegas Review-Journal that Boehner is more concerned with opposing his own party.
“I think we have a window this summer, between now and August, to get something done,” she said. “We have a commitment from Speaker Boehner, who’s very frustrated with his caucus.”
In her opinion, those who favor amnesty are firmly in the majority.
“We haven’t been able to find that many people who aren’t sin support of it,” she said. Of course, that could be because those hoping to push through such legislation are not necessarily seeking out opponents.
Unfortunately, Boehner is far from alone among Republicans.
Potential presidential candidate Jeb Bush, for instance, recently declared illegal border crossing to be an “act of love.”
Furthermore, he asserted that it “doesn’t make sense” to him for Americans to criticize amnesty.
Nevertheless, Barack Obama recognizes the potential boon so-called immigration reform would to his party. As the conservative Eagle Forum pointed out, passage of an amnesty bill would “alienate the Republican base, working class whites, at least 4 million of whom stayed home in 2012.”
Photo credit: World Economic Forum (Creative Commons)

Read more at http://www.westernjournalism.com/obamas-senior-adviser-announces-disturbing-partnership-john-boehner/#EPoi6Dowt7fHVY2F.99