Monday, March 17, 2025

Op-ed:

The Business of Cancer...Political and Otherwise
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio
The article posted here is this authors opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com or Google

Cancer...the “Big C”...is probably the most dreaded and feared word any of us ever want to hear. Cancer, once again brought to the forefront of both the medical and public discourse after both King Charles and Princess Kate were diagnosed as having cancer, thus joining the ranks of the millions whose lives are forever changed by cancer...the very disease we had hoped would have been cured by now after the officially declared “War on Cancer” was begun.

A war we are still fighting with no seeming end in sight as we find ourselves 54 years into former President Richard M. Nixon's having signed into law on December 23, 1971, the “National Cancer Act,” and with it his hope that cancer would be “conquered” within five years time, but obviously it was not nor has it been to date. And while cancer research and treatment options have increased the survival rate of those afflicted with cancer, so too has the budget of the “National Cancer Institute (NCI)” increased over the years. And yet it's sad to say that it seems we are no closer to a true“cure” than when Nixon was in office.

Why so...because the word “cancer” itself actually encompasses over 200 diseases making it highly unlikely that what I call a “silver bullet” will ever be found to cure all cancers in one fell swoop, that is unless we can find a way to actually “turn off” what is the true common denominator in all cancers...as in the “switch,” that takes healthy cells and mutates them into cells run amok in what is now their “abnormal” state. In other words, what must be developed is a viable way to disrupt the flow of a cell's now corrupted DNA and prevent it from replicating itself and “interrupting” what was a normal cell's genetically programmed “behavior,” with “behavior” being the response of a cell to a specific stimulus or group of stimuli, which ever the case might be.

So until that's possible what we most likely will now see is even more of the standardized types of treatments being developed, but hopefully with less negative and way less sickening side effects, thus making it possible for even more folks to achieve “remission” for much longer periods of time. And while treatments themselves are still not and probably will never be a cure per se...treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy...naming but a few...still do play an important part in helping to turn cancer into a chronic but controllable disease...like diabetes and high blood pressure for example...instead of it being what many still consider to be an outright death sentence.

And so while progress has been made in slowing down the progression of certain types of cancer, one must remember that the hoped to hear word “remission” itself is not an actual cure. Why so...because too many times ones cancer will return in one form or another even decades after one has been deemed as having reached “remission.” So if not a cure then exactly is “remission?” Simply, it's the stage where no cancer cells are found in what will most likely be lifelong blood testing...testing that looks for increases in what are “carcinoembryonic antigens”...meaning bio-markers” as they're more commonly known... which would indicate the presence of recurring cancer cells now again circulating in what was the former cancer patient's body and blood stream.

So with cancer basics having been said, this article is not about the intricate medical logistics of cancer itself, that's best left for the doctors and researchers to explain. But this article is about why, after all these decades of cancer research and promises made, has no cure been found for what is still the “number two” cause of death here in the United States, as well as it being the “number two” cause of death worldwide...with cardiovascular diseases being “number one” in both cases. In fact, as per the “American Cancer Society,” in 2024 alone there were are about 1,680 deaths per day from cancer here in the U.S. even with all the cutting edge technology and treatments available...a very sad commentary indeed.

Sad for sure, but the answer as to why is really quite simple...in my opinion it's because a powerful triad of politics, economics, and ”Big Pharma” simply won't allow an all around cure to found...that is if a true “one size fits all” cure is even possible. But why won't the triad of three allow it...because cancer itself, unfortunately, translates into “big money.” And while some of said monies probably are well deserved, I'm sure some of what are “kickbacks” might even border on the criminal. But the bottom line is that cancer is “big money” no matter how one looks at it.

Unfortunately, at least for the foreseeable future, cancer will equate into “big money” for the oncology doctors who treat cancer...”big money” for the pharmaceutical companies who manufacture the drugs used in cancer treatments (drugs which at times can be just as toxic to the body, if not more so, than ones cancer itself)...and of course “big money” for those elected officials who not only love to spout off about how they cared so much about cancer that they helped to garner contracts and monetary grants for cancer research, while in reality they were helping to line their own pockets. How so...by their helping “Big Pharma” circumnavigate the numerous regulatory requirements in getting a given company's newest cancer drugs to market at “warp speed.” In other words, by allowing them to sidestep the long processes needed to study both a new drug's side effects and its effectiveness.

And dare we forget those elected officials who further lined their pockets by turning what is truly a racially unbiased and colorblind disease into yet another DEI sounding board by spouting off what is their own self-perceived “inequity of cancer treatments” in regards to minorities. And this includes what these folks deem to be “disparities” in “unequal access” to screening, diagnosis, and quality treatment, which might be true in a limited number of cases, but most assuredly has not been proven to be the case overall.

And then there's certain economic aspects as to why a “one size fits all” cancer cure surely will not be on the near horizon, Why so...because the economics of cancer itself feeds directly into the economics of our country. How so? With cancer being a “big business” in its own right, a cure would not only lead to a decline in what's called the “cancer treatment industry...which includes some major hospitals...but it would lead to substantial losses in both the pharmaceutical and the high priced healthcare industries in general. How so...since the need for cancer drugs and related services would no longer be needed, countless thousands of jobs would be lost which in turn would automatically put a strain on not just our economy but on our Social Security system as well. And why...because people would automatically live longer without the fear of cancer hanging over their heads, thus leading to more benefits having to be paid out to beneficiaries, no matter that less monies would now be paid into the the “Social Security Trust Fund” what with thousands of jobs having been lost.

But the biggest money maker from cancer remains, in my opinion, “Big Pharma” itself. And while they have poured billions of their own dollars into developing new cancer drugs and related treatments, the fact remains that today “Big Pharma” has roughly about 860 new cancer drugs being tested or in line to be tested in all-important clinical trials even as I write this. And while some might think that number to be outrageous, that figure comes directly from the pharmaceutical industry’s main trade group, as in the “Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)” who also just happens to be the industry's main lobbying group.

Now to break the money making side down even further, as per “PhRMA,“ we see the developing of new cancer drugs being more than twice the number of experimental drugs for heart disease and stroke combined; nearly twice the number of drugs being developed for AIDS and all other so called “infectious diseases” combined; and nearly twice as many for Alzheimer’s and other neurological diseases again combined. And why...simply because not only are said cancer drugs way more profitable when reaching market, but courtesy of their and other of political lobbyists in D.C., “PhRMA” gets to engage not only in lobbying for their own new drugs, but they are an actual key player in advocacy efforts regarding cancer and other drug pricing, the logistics of drug access itself, and their asking for even more across the board research funding as well. 

And dare not forget the previously mentioned politicians who aid “Big Pharma” in their efforts are usually, albeit silently, being “rewarded” for their efforts...most under the “proverbial table” so to speak, or with their being given a heads up to future pharmaceutical stock market activity.

So the bottom line is this...while a cure for cancer is desperately needed, what's needed might not be possible in the classic medical sense what with cancer's ability to morph, spread, and take over ones body. And besides, if cancer is literally eliminated from the discourse, Big Pharma not only looses its biggest money maker, but its political clout as well. But what is possible and way more likely is to see the dreaded “C” word being turned into a manageable, albeit chronic, disease...a disease that if handled properly will not affect what is ones genetically programmed “life span,” And Big Pharma will still rake in the profits with the trade off being that cancer patients will be able to live much longer and have a better quality of life. And this might be the best and the only option for now, in fact, maybe it's been the only option all along. 

And while Richard Nixon's dream of 54 years ago was but a jump off point in the War on Cancer,” the fact remains that maybe Elon Musk and DOGE still need to look into exactly where all our countless billions of taxpayer dollars supposedly used to fund cancer research actually did go. Case closed.

Copyright © 2025 / Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.

  ***************************************************************************************************

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, The Danger of the Liberal Psyche Exposed, Part Two.

****************************************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!                                           
Tomorrow, Tuesday, March 11th  from 7pm to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'The Business of Cancer...Political and Otherwise', 'The Danger of the Liberal Psyche Exposed, Part Two'; and important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50pm EST, show begins at 7pm EST.