Before I get into the political aspects
regarding the recently leaked “opinion draft” about the SCOTUS most probably
repealing “Roe v. Wade,” let me say that I, like most people of
conscience, am against abortion with “late term abortion”
and so-called “after-birth abortion” being, in my opinion,
paramount to premeditated murder. However, unlike some, I also
believe that abortion should be allowed under four instances, those
being if the mother's life is jeopardized, rape, incest, or if the
baby being carried is so medically compromised that it has zero
chance of either being born alive or surviving after birth.
In simple medical terms, after
conception what started out as a mere group of dividing cells goes
through many stages, from a zygote, to a morula, to a blastocyst,
while only becoming an embryo 12 days after conception. And the
embryo moniker remains through week six which by then has seen a
rudimentary heart having started to beat. And by week ten the fetal
heart will have fully developed and begun pumping oxygenated blood
through its now recognizable fetus body form, while by this time
most women know or at least suspect that they're pregnant as certain
bodily changes have already begun happening, whether she's willing
to accept that as fact or not.
And at this point I must emphatically
state that I believe abortion must not ever be used as a means of
either birth control nor as collective population control. And as for
the later, one needs to look at and truly understand the words
of Planned Parenthood's infamous founder Margaret Sanger. A true
racist who, throughout her life, showed disdain for black
people, Sanger carried on a not so silent crusade against said black
people. In fact, her very thought processes can clearly be seen in
her December 10, 1939 letter to Dr. Clarence J. Gamble where she
stated, “We don’t
want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro
population...”
And why...because abortion at this
point is surely being used as a last attempt means of birth control, something
that should have been thought of and used before having unprotected
sex. And with there being many contraceptive methods available both
over the counter and by prescription, the old adage of “oops”
has no place in today's modern society...no place as a reason to have
an abortion except in the four instances I've previously mentioned.
Remember, acts of passion, at times, do have consequences...
consequences that no innocent baby must be forced to pay with his or
her own life.
But also know that I personally have no
problem with the “morning after pill” for the simple
reason that it must be taken within 72-hours after unprotected sex,
which basically equates to pre-embryonic time...a time when no heart
has formed, no heart is beating...hence one is not technically
aborting life. And along with this I believe that abortion must never
fall into the “selective” category, meaning if the woman
carrying said baby and/or her partner does not want the gender she is
carrying...as in male or female with the other 60+ genders that
encompass the “woke movement” being but sheer stupidity
and utter nonsense...nor should a baby be aborted for treatable
conditions like, but not limited to, Downs Syndrome or spinabifida
for example, as these children can and do become valuable members of
society much loved by their families and friends.
And as for those women who do get
pregnant unintentionally and who do not meet the four criteria I
previously mentioned, these women should not abort what is their
mistake but put the baby they are carrying up for adoption as there
are many couples who face infertility issues...couples who would
gladly adopt to create their much wanted family... the family human biology itself cannot give
them.
Now as for the political aspect of
abortion, it is my belief that abortion should never have become a
political issue in the first place let alone a federal issue, it
should have stayed a state's issue if even that. Spawned of the
feminist movement of the 1970's, the entire “It's My Body, My
Choice” musings that led to the media's deemed “landmark
decision” by the High Court, found in “Roe
v. Wade” that the U.S. Constitution protects a pregnant
woman's “liberty” to choose to have an abortion without
“excessive government restrictions.”
Yet the problem with said ruling always
was and still is today, what about the life of the unborn child...what about its right to choose life instead of being disposed of like
yesterday's trash. And while Joe Biden...the man who for decades as a
senator was against tax funding for abortion...has raised quite a bit
of ire amongst those in his own party by his recently calling the
unborn what is to be aborted “a child,” as
the left still wants you to believe that what will be disposed of or
have its body parts sold to the highest "for profit" bidder is anything but “a
child.”
“Roe v. Wade”
and its right to abortion became not just the main catalyst
for a decline in American culture, values, and institutions, but
yet another distraction to pull us away from the Founders and Framers
true intentions regarding federal constitutional law vs. the
constitutionally given predominance of “states rights.”
And in regards to abortion, upon which in passing “Roe
v. Wade” in
1973, saw the High Court citing the
1868 Fourteenth Amendment...the very amendment which expanded protections
of rights for citizens at the state level, most especially for “freed
slaves” who were being subject to new discriminatory state laws...but it
was not intended to cancel out the key Tenth Amendment...the amendment
stating that, “the powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the
States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” Simply, “states rights” do
in this instance trump federal law. And why...because abortion
remains a social issue and not a matter of federal
policy.
And yet with the High
Court's 1973 decision that is exactly what happened in their
basically overruling states rights by granting federal protection to
those women who chose to about “the child”
they carry. And this decision alone allowed the baby killing
operation known as “Planned Parenthood”
to perform
354,871 abortions in one year alone, while only suggesting to 2,667
women that they place their unwanted “child”
up
for adoption as opposed to aborting it.
So
what are the chances of the Supreme Court reversing “Roe
v. Wade” and
sending abortion back to the states, especially after the recent memo
leak? The chances are still good if and only if the justices don't
bend to Democrat pressure, threats against their person, staged
revolts by loony leftist women or men who think they can give birth,
or to media-generated propaganda, for the truth remains that abortion
was and always should be an issue left up to each individual state.
Remember, in overturning “Roe
v. Wade”
the justices are not...I repeat not...banning abortion outright but
simply removing it from federal protection, thus allowing each state
to decide for themselves whether all abortions will be outlawed; if
they will implement the “Heartbeat
Law”
or some variation thereof; or choose or not choose to set a given
time frame and/or circumstances in which abortion will be allowed. In
other words, giving back to the states the right of “self-determination” that our Founders and Framers laid down as law in the
Constitution.
And
while so many do hold different views...religiously, personally, and
policy wise...than I do in regards to abortion, and believe that Roe
v. Wade is “settled
law”
into perpetuity, the fact remains that abortion itself does make a
mockery of our Constitution for nowhere in the Constitution does it
say neither in alluding nor in actual words that the killing of her
unborn “child” is a woman's right. And what those sitting on Supreme
Court back in 1973 forgot when handing down their politically
motivated and ever so misguided decision is the scientific fact that
there are two lives involved in abortion...the woman's and her
innocent “child”...a “child”
who has as much right to “life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness”
as she does. Simply, children are indeed our country's future, to
take away that future takes away the very essence of who we are now
and who we will be as a nation in the foreseeable future. Case
closed.
Copyright
© 2022 / Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.
************************************************************************************* For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, Roe v. Wade – The Bottom Line.
***************************************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Tomorrow, Tuesday, May 17th from 7 to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori will discuss 'Examining Abortion'; 'Roe v Wade – The Bottom Line'; and other important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
on
https://rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with show beginning at 7pm EST.
“The idea that we’re going to make a judgment that is going
to say that no one can make the judgment to choose to abort a child
based on a decision by the Supreme Court, I think goes way
overboard.” - Joe Biden's words regarding protecting
“Roe v. Wade,” and the right to abort
“a child” 
But also know that I personally have no
problem with the “morning after pill” for the simple
reason that it must be taken within 72-hours after unprotected sex,
which basically equates to pre-embryonic time...a time when no heart
has formed, no heart is beating...hence one is not technically
aborting life. And along with this I believe that abortion must never
fall into the “selective” category, meaning if the woman
carrying said baby and/or her partner does not want the gender she is
carrying...as in male or female with the other 60+ genders that
encompass the “woke movement” being but sheer stupidity
and utter nonsense...nor should a baby be aborted for treatable
conditions like, but not limited to, Downs Syndrome or spinabifida
for example, as these children can and do become valuable members of
society much loved by their families and friends. 
