Israel is born

65 years ago today, the country of Israel was formed. In a sea of murderers, terrorists, and constant threats from every direction, Israel stands today, stronger than ever. Israel has not only survived, but won, the 1948 War of Independence, the Six Day War, and the Yom Kippur War. In 1967, the Israel Defense Force carried out Operation Entebbe, one of the most (if not the most) successful counter-terrorist operations of all time, losing only one soldier (Yonatan Netanyahu) while killing 52 terrorists and extracting 102 of the 106 hostages.

Today, Israel faces threats from terrorist organizations, other countries, and as painful as it is for me to say this, the United States of America as long as Barack HUSSEIN Obama is president.. Our traitorous president feels less loyalty to the only bastion of democracy and freedom in the Middle East than he does for the terrorists who wish to destroy it. As citizens of the United States, it is our duty to do what we can to support Israel, not out of any religious reasons but because they are a free, democratic society surrounded by violent, extremist, xenophobic societies that treat women as property and Christians as the embodiment of pure evil.

Israel is strong. Israel will survive.

Heritage’s Carafano: Obama’s ‘Head in the Sand’ on Terror

Newsmax

• 3
  inShare

Heritage Foundation security and defense expert James Jay Carafano tells Newsmax the Obama administration is so eager to declare victory in the war on terror that it is “putting its head in the sand” and ignoring the rapid growth of non-al-Qaida terrorist groups.

Carafano, the vice president of foreign and defense policy studies at the conservative think tank, praised the post 9/11 homeland security effort as “very effective,” citing some 54 instances where attacks and bombings targeted the United States were thwarted. But he criticized the administration for downplaying the war on terror as if it already had been won.

In an exclusive Newsmax.TV interview on Friday, Carafano charged the administration has “defined their way out of the problem” by focusing only on al-Qaida.

See the interview here:

http://www.newsmax.com/Newsfront/heritage-foundation-carafano-obama/2013/04/20/id/500493?s=al&promo_code=13386-1

“They’ve basically said that we are fighting al-Qaida central, and al-Qaida and its affiliates, where people are actually planning operations to attack the U.S. or its allies. Well, when you define the enemy that way, you look pretty good.

“But the problem is there are a lot of groups that hate us, that aren’t necessarily directly affiliated with al-Qaida, which could attack the United States tomorrow and could be a significant threat, whether it’s Hamas, Hezbollah, or the Iranian Quds Force, or other things. And the reality is you’re not always going to get the early warning or signs that, ‘Tomorrow, I’m just going to decide to attack the United States.’”

Carafano told Newsmax.TV it is not clear yet whether Islamic extremism played any role in the Boston Marathon bombing. But he said he fears “we’ve adopted a counterterrorism strategy which generally means that the United States is putting its head in the sand and pretending that threats are laxing when the reality is, if you look across North Africa, if you look at what’s going on in Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria, the threat is not laxing. There is no waning.”

In fact, Carafano told Newsmax, the threat of terrorism is growing. And he says the current administration “has adopted a counterterrorism strategy which really relies on ignoring a lot of the people who might potentially want to kill us.”

Carafano, a leading U.S. national security expert, advised it is simply too soon to save what motivated the two bombing suspects to commit their horrific act. But he said authorities are leaving no stone unturned in an effort to determine if someone radicalized the youths and encouraged them to commit the bombing, perhaps via the internet.

“Pretty much the No. 1 one tool of global radicalization is the internet,” he said. “Now, we use the internet to buy stuff on Amazon.com. But to terrorists, it’s their most important asset.

“They use it for fundraising, they use it for recruiting, they use it for propaganda, and they use it for radicalization. So they lure people into these things called chat rooms, or emails or discussions, and then they move them into discussions about politics and religion into increasingly more violent activities, sometimes coordinated, sometimes just inspired.”

Carafano tells Newsmax that al-Qaida actually produces an online magazine called Inspire instructing Westerners how to commit acts of terrorism against Americans.

Carafano was critical of the quality of the mainstream media’s coverage of the attacks, which at several key points conveyed inaccurate information to the public. And he praised the national-security infrastructure for stopping as many terrorists attacks as it has.

“We’ve been constantly under attack since 9/11,” Carafano said. “We’ve seen everything. Plots overseas, homegrown plots, self-radicalized connected with something else. So we’ve seen a little bit of everything. We’ve seen a lot of very effective stopping of it.”

Casual Terrorism

By: Bill O'Reilly / Townhall Columnist

On Monday night, I went before a live television audience and tried to put the Boston terror attack into some perspective. I told the viewers that as an American, I was angry. I said the attack was vile and cowardly, designed to injure innocent people including children. I put forth that the Nazis did that kind of thing.

And finally, I said that President Obama made a mistake by using the word "tragedy" to define the attack.

While the dictionary defines "tragedy" as "a disastrous event, especially one involving distressing loss or injury to life," the word is not precise enough to define what happened in Boston.

If the bombers are foreigners, the event is an act of war.

If the killers are Americans, it is high treason; in committing an act of terror, you essentially declare war on your own country. There is a difference between detonating bombs that kill and maim innocent people and shooting up a school or movie theater. Both are murderous acts, but only one is politically motivated.

And it is the political factor that takes "tragedy" out of the descriptive equation.

Obama did not do anything wrong in describing the Boston bombings as a tragedy. But he did not use his pulpit to clearly define the issue. Americans need to know that this country is under attack by a variety of forces from within and without. U.S. authorities have performed brilliantly in keeping terror attacks on American soil to a minimum, but too many folks do not understand the danger this country is facing. There are fanatics who would kill each and every one of us if they could. That is not tragic; it is real. And we must deal with it.

Freedom puts all of us at risk. We are living in a time when just about every security measure is controversial -- from drones to Internet snooping with a warrant. In New York City, liberals rail against the "stop and frisk" police policy designed to control illegal weapons. Never mind that the policy has saved thousands of lives. The zealots don't like it, and that's that. Security be damned.

Hanging in the New York City office of the ACLU was a sign that read: "We reserve the right to check all bags." But if the cops want to check a suspicious bag on the street or in a subway car, get ready for the usual yelping by the ACLU.

Obama should bring a sense of urgency to terrorism. At times, he doesn't even like using the word. His style is cool, while the issue is hot. Americans react emotionally when children are blown up on the streets.

Obama's use of the word "tragedy" is a small thing, and again, he did not do anything wrong. But I want my commander in chief to command. All Americans are under attack. Let's sound the alarm in very vivid terms.

Obama’s Crude Conundrum

by John Myers / Personl Libert Digest

PHOTOS.COM

It appears that aging Hollywood movie star Robert Redford did not see the movie “Argo,” which was awarded Best Picture at the 2013 Academy Awards.

Had Redford seen it, he might have noticed that in 1979 Muslim radicals under Ayatollah Khomeini took Americans hostage. The only country to offer assistance was Canada.

Such history seems lost on Redford, an ultra-rich liberal active environmentalist. (His net worth is estimated at $170 million.) Redford is vehemently against the United States’ importing oil sands from Canada. His criticism reached a crescendo in the wake of the Exxon Mobil Corp. pipeline spill in Mayflower, Ark., on March 29.

It is estimated that 36,000 barrels of crude oil leaked from a pipeline, which forced the evacuation of more than 20 families from their homes.

In the aftermath, Arkansas Attorney General Dustin McDaniel is asking Exxon Mobil to pay $4 million to help pay for an investigation as to why the pipeline leaked.

The oil spill is only 1,000 miles from Redford’s mansion in Sundance, Utah. (The good news for the actor is that he also has residences further west.)

A post on ecorazzi.com stated:

Actor and environmentalist Robert Redford has been an outspoken opponent of the Keystone XL Pipeline since the beginning. Now that a pipeline in Arkansas has ruptured leaving a residential community with thousands of gallons of tar sands crude right in their yards, Redford is hoping the government will wake up to the dangers of building any new pipeline.

Blogging for Huffington Post, Redford wrote:

(W)hen it comes to the proposed Keystone XL pipeline… the Pegasus rupture in Arkansas is another red flag. We’ve had a lot of these red flags lately that show us what a raw deal tar sands is and we ignore them at our peril.
…
How many red flags do we need before we realize that the solution is to stop tar sands expansion and say no to tar sands pipelines? I think we’ve seen enough.

Redford wants Americans to contact their Congressmen and demand that they pressure President Barack Obama to pull the plug on the pipeline, a decision the President is expected to make this summer.

Redford and his Green advocates are making a mistake regarding Keystone and oil imported from Canada. This is why:

1. The Keystone project is expected to create 10,000 new U.S. jobs at a time when the Nation is still in a recession.
2. America must import more than 10 million barrels of oil per day (mb/d). Currently, Canada delivers the United States almost one-third of that total. Saudi Arabia sells the United States 1.2 mb/d. Imports from both countries have come down as U.S. domestic crude production has increased. However, America is going to be dependent on vast amounts of imported crude for the next decade and beyond unless newly found domestic reserves are quickly developed and/or renewable energies can begin to play a significant role in providing power.
3. Crude provided from the Mideast, South America and Africa is transported in oil supertankers. In 1980, the Exxon Valdez spilled 750,000 barrels of oil on the shores of Prince William Sound, Alaska, making that spill more than 20 times larger than last month’s pipeline leak in Arkansas. (The U.S. State Department’s environmental impact analysis concluded that there was no evidence that tar sands oil spills are more hazardous to the environment than other forms of crude oil.)
4. If America doesn’t buy oil sands from Canada (and principally Alberta), the Nation is going to have to buy it from other oil exporters — not one of which shares American ideals, as Canada has done for 200 years.

As the chart above shows, America must meet its energy needs with imported oil. My question: Would you rather deal with Allison Redford, the democratically elected premier of Alberta and a distant relative of Robert Redford, or would you rather buy oil from King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, the anointed leader of the kingdom that was the birthplace for 15 of the 19 9/11 hijackers?

Tale Of Two Leaders

I am a dual citizen of the United States and Canada. I think who America trusts for its future oil supplies is an important question.

It is reported that King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia has four wives and dozens of children. The king didn’t allow U.S. forces inside Saudi Arabia during the Iraq war. He has also launched a series of crackdowns including torture and public beheadings.

Ezra Levant wrote what Al Gore might refer to as “an inconvenient truth,” in his book Ethical Oil: The Case for Canada’s Oil Sands:

Saudi women are treated as the property of men, with fewer rights than children and only slightly more rights than animals. They are forbidden from driving cars; they cannot travel abroad without a man’s permission; and they can’t even have elective surgery without their master’s consent.

There is no gay marriage or any talk of it in Saudi Arabia.

Levant wrote:

And, according to Amnesty International, Saudi Arabia executes gays simply for being gay. Amnesty has documented this barbaric punishment, carried out in full medieval style: a beheading and a crucifixion.

Even children are not spared Saudi Arabia’s merciless “justice.” Teenaged “criminals” are beheaded with swords in the public square; children as young as thirteen have been sentenced to more than one thousand lashes.

In Alberta, the Legislature is led by Alison Redford, a Canadian lawyer and a member of Canada’s Queen’s Bench.

Redford does have a few thoughts about her famous and long-lost cousin. Recently, in an interview with the Calgary Herald, she indicated she doesn’t think highly of her namesake or others in Hollywood are knowledgeable on energy issues.

“It’s fine for people who aren’t really impacted by this stuff to talk about why it shouldn’t happen, but these aren’t the people that are out talking to the thousand guys that want jobs — or to returning veterans who want to be able to work on pipeline construction or get trained in new technologies,” Redford said.

Hollywood Hypocrites

Actors like Robert Redford and other activists for the Green movement like actress Daryl Hannah live in a cocoon and don’t see the world as it is and, more importantly, are blind to the contradictions.
 
In 2006, actor Redford wrote an article for CNN, urging the United States to “kick the oil habit.”

Not long afterward, Redford lent his voice to TV ads for United Airlines. That’s amazing when you consider that in 2011 United Airlines spent about $13 billion on jet fuel and that, according to scientists, aviation accounts for 2 percent of the carbon dioxide released into the atmosphere each day.

United Airlines may “fly the friendly skies,” but the airline needs a lot of oil to do it. My guess is that, in the long run, those planes will keep flying on Canadian oil.

Over the short term, I would not be surprised to see Obama block the Keystone Pipeline. He is a kindred spirit to celebrities who object to Canadian crude but are strangely silent regarding Islamic sins.

FBI Interviewed Boston Bombing Suspect in 2011
Newsmax

• 1
  inShare

The FBI in 2011 interviewed one of the brothers suspected in the deadly Boston Marathon bombings, a disclosure that raises questions about whether the government missed potential warning signs about the men's behavior.

The brothers had not been under surveillance as possible militants, U.S. government officials said. 

But the FBI said in a statement on Friday that in 2011 it interviewed Tamerlan at the request of a foreign government, which it did not identify.

"The request stated that it was based on information that he was a follower of radical Islam and a strong believer, and that he had changed drastically since 2010 as he prepared to leave the United States for travel to the country's region to join unspecified underground groups," the FBI statement said.

The matter was closed because interviews with Tamerlan and family members "did not find any terrorism activity, domestic or foreign".

Tamerlan Tsarnaev was killed early Friday in Boston after an overnight shootout with police. His younger brother, Dzhokhar, was taken into custody on Friday evening in the Boston suburb of Watertown after a dramatic, day-long manhunt, Boston police said.

Bleeding and in serious condition, Dzhokhar is in a Boston hospital, a Massachusetts State Police spokesman said.

A spokeswoman for Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston, Kelly Lawman, confirmed on Saturday that Tsarnaev was being treated there, but declined comment on his condition.

The revelation that the elder Tsarnaev was on U.S. law enforcement authorities' radar screens seemed likely to raise uncomfortable questions for the Obama administration about whether it could have done anything to detect and stop the plot.

"It's new information to me and it's very disturbing that he's on the FBI radar screen," Rep. Michael McCaul, Texas Republican and chairman of the House Homeland Security Committee, said on CNN late Friday.

In an interview with Russian state television broadcaster RT, the mother of the bombing brothers said Tamerlan, the older of the two suspects, had been under FBI surveillance for at least three years.

Tamerlan Tsarnaev, 26, who was killed in a shootout with police a day before his brother’s capture yesterday, was accessing extremist sites and was closely monitored by the FBI, Zubeidat Tsarnaeva said in a phone interview in English from Makhachkala, in the southern Russian region of Dagestan, posted on the channel’s website.

“My son would never do this,” Tsarnaeva said. “He was controlled by the FBI for three to five years, they knew what my son was doing, they knew what actions, on what sites on the Internet he was going,” she said. “So how could this happen? They were controlling every step of his.”

Tsarnaeva, whose younger son Dzhokar, 19, was captured after an almost 24-hour manhunt that shut down Boston and surrounding cities, said she had been interviewed by Federal Bureau of Investigation agents about Tamerlan, who had described him as an “extremist leader.”

The brothers’ father, Anzor, in an interview with The Wall Street Journal, said he was present when the FBI interviewed Tamerlan in Cambridge. He said they visited for what they called “prevention” activities.

“They said: 'We know what sites you are on, we know where you are calling, we know everything about you. Everything,'” he said as cited in the interview.

Tamerlan, a legal resident of the U.S., flew out of the country on a flight bound for Russia in January 2012 and may not have returned until July, said two law enforcement officials briefed on his travel.

U.S. intelligence agencies reviewing international communications and other terrorism intelligence found no signs that the suspected bombers were members of, or inspired by, any foreign terror group, said a U.S. official who asked not to be identified because those matters are classified.

The Tsarnaev brothers and their two sisters moved to the Dagestan region of Russia in October 2001 from the central Asian nation of Kyrgyzstan as refugees, and left for the U.S in March 2002, said Emirmagomed Davudov, director of Gimnasium Number 1 in Dagestan, where Tamerlan went to the seventh grade and Dzhokhar to first grade.

Ruslan Tsarni, their uncle in Gaithersburg, Maryland, said his brother’s children arrived in Cambridge when they immigrated in 2003. Asked for a possible motive for the attacks, Tsarni said they were “losers not being able to settle themselves and thereby just hating everybody who did.”

National security and law enforcement authorities said on earlier Friday that they had not turned up any evidence that the Tsarnaevs had contacts with al Qaeda or other militants overseas.

The brothers were in the United States legally. But Tamerlan Tsarnaev could have been deported after an alleged domestic violence arrest in 2009, the website Judicial Watch reports. It is unclear whether Tsarnaev was convicted in the case, but the arrest alone would have been sufficient for deportation, the site reports.

Tsarnaev came to this country in 2006 on a tourist visa, which means his alleged crime occurred within his first five years in the U.S.

According to Federal Immigration Law, anyone who commits a crime of “moral turpitude,”  including violent crimes such as assault and battery, during the first five years after being admitted to the country can be deported if the crime was punishable by a one-year jail sentence.

Violent plots involving a single individual or small groups who self-radicalize and have minimal dealings with other militants can be extremely difficult to detect in advance, according to U.S. counterterrorism officials and private experts. 

The revelation about the FBI contacts with the elder Tsarnaev came as U.S. officials told Reuters that investigators are scouring government data banks to determine if spy and police agencies missed potential clues that might have alerted them to the two brothers, originally from the Russian republic of Chechnya.

Another top priority for investigators is to determine whether the brothers had any confederates either inside the United States or overseas, one U.S. official said. This official and others spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss an ongoing investigation.

Three people were taken into custody for questioning in New Bedford, Massachusetts, police said on Friday. Two men and a woman are being questioned by the FBI "on the assumption there is an affiliation with" Tsarnaev, Lieutenant Robert Richard of the New Bedford Police said.

One official said the possibility that the U.S. government had information that should have raised questions about the Tsarnaev brothers before the attack could not be ruled out. Other officials said they were unaware that such material had turned up.

In several recent cases, U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies failed to put together clues that, in hindsight, might have led them to pre-empt a plot.

In 2009, U.S. Army Maj. Nidal Hassan killed 13 people and wounded another 32 at Fort Hood, Texas. Prior to the shooting spree, Hassan had email contacts with Anwar al-Awlaki, the U.S.-born cleric and leader of al Qaida's affiliate in Yemen who was later killed in a U.S. drone strike.
U.S. authorities had investigated Hassan's emails, but concluded they posed no threat of violence.

The father of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, the so-called "underwear bomber" who tried to bring down a U.S. jetliner over Detroit on Christmas Day 2009, reported suspicions about his son's activities to the U.S. Embassy in Nigeria. But Abdulmutallab's U.S. visa was never revoked.

A report by the Senate intelligence committee heavily criticized U.S. intelligence agencies for failing to act on available information in that case.

But Brian Jenkins, a respected terrorism expert at the RAND Corp., dismissed the idea that the Boston bombings represented an intelligence failure.

People will inevitably ask, "did we miss something in intelligence?" said Jenkins, speaking before the news of the 2011 FBI interview with Tamerlan Tsarnaev become public.

"Some people will label it an 'intelligence failure.' But that's because people have come to expect 100 percent security," he said.

Boston jihad bomber Tsarnaev's social media page shows his interest in Islam and bombs

From Jihad Watch / Posted by Robert Spencer

The page is here for now.
Note the two Islam links under "Noteworthy Pages" and the bomb underneath "send a gift."

Boston jihad bomber's YouTube page features videos by Sheikh Feiz Mohammed, who called on Muslims to kill enemies of Islam

From Jihad Watch / Posted by Robert Spencer

The YouTube page is here. On the right of the upper row and the left of the second row are videos by Feiz Mohammed.

"Police seize Muslim 'kill enemies' videos," by Simon Kearney and Tracy Ong for The Australian, January 20, 2007:

FIREBRAND cleric Sheik Feiz Mohamed's defence of his comments on a DVD calling children to jihad has been undermined by revelations, the video also urges Muslims to kill the enemies of Islam and praises martyrs with a violent interpretation of jihad. 

In the DVD, which runs for almost four hours, Sheik Feiz describes inmates of Guantanamo Bay as better Muslims than those in Australia, who would would not forsake their lifestyles for martyrdom.

"The brothers in Cuba are better than us," he said. "They are being examined through the best examination (a reference to God's judgment) and the like of them worldwide."

The sheik, who left Australia in 2005 to live in his father's homeland, Lebanon, exorts his followers to seek the honourable death of the believer, quoting from narrations about the prophet Mohammed.

"They fight in the cause, they kill others - the enemies who fight Islam and they themselves are killed as martyrs," he said. He gives the example of a mujaheddin who fought in Bosnia in the 1990s who spoke of nothing but jihad and was killed on the battlefield. "What a beautiful person to be associated with. Would you not like to be an associate of this person?"

The DVD was a recording of a series of passionate fire-and-brimstone sermons that told his audience over several weeks nearly four years ago his thoughts on the way to live their lives. "This is our intention that we want to have children and offer them as soldiers defending Islam, loving Islam," he said.

Details of the DVD's contents have sparked an Australian Federal Police investigation and have been met with condemnation.

AFP officers visited the Muslim youth centre founded by Sheik Feiz yesterday to collect a copy of his DVD, which was handed over voluntarily by members of the 4000-strong youth movement.

The two federal agents who arrived at the Global Islamic Youth Centre at Liverpool, in Sydney's west, declined to comment on the investigation.

About 200 worshippers were at midday prayers yesterday because Friday is Islam's holiest day of the week.

The centre's managers referred The Weekend Australian's inquiries to a phone number, which rang out.

One of Sheik Feiz's former students, Zeky Mallah, who was acquitted of terrorism charges, said the sermon was normal. "That's something that's normal with any Islamic scholar. It's just a way of speaking about things," he said.

Sheik Feiz told The Australian on Thursday that his reference to jihad did not mean violence. He said he was against suicide bombing and violence against others.

However, the DVD is littered with references to violence and a call to arms - most of which is made using examples of historical warriors as an admonishment to modern Muslims for straying from their path.

"If you're a hardliner, you'll say these in lectures; if you're a moderate, you'll keep these views to yourself," Mr Mallah said. "It's not really inciting violence. It is saying to stand up for yourself, to defend yourself and defend your land."

Muslim internet forums were buzzing with criticism of the media for running the story yesterday, accusing news outlets of misinterpreting the meaning of jihad, which can also mean a peaceful quest to be a good Muslim....

Tamerlan's name shows the world he comes from: he appears to be named for the renowned jihad warrior Tamerlane. Andrew Bostom wrote in 2005: "Osama bin Laden was far from the first jihadist to kill infidels as an expression of religious piety. This years marks the 600th anniversary of the death of Tamerlane (Timur Lang; 'Timur the Lame', d. 1405), or Amir Timur ('Timur' signifies 'Iron' in Turkish). Osama lacks both Tamerlane's sophisticated (for his time) military forces and his brilliance as a strategist. But both are or were pious Muslims who paid homage to religious leaders, and both had the goal of making jihad a global force."

Op-ed:

The nightmare ends...or does it

By: Diane Sori

It's over...one suspect is dead, the other is in custody...the nightmare is over...or is it?

Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, suspect #2 was just a 19-year old kid…a kid with his entire life ahead of him who proved NOTHING by his actions...yet he destroyed innocent lives leaving grieving families to a never ending hell…and we know who indirectly allowed this to happen by appeasing those out to kill us.

And that very man who appeases our enemies had the unmitigated gall to address the nation last night after the nightmare was over...after all it's photo-op time..and as expected he tried to deflect blame away from his brethren as a whole.

America has changed, make NO mistake about it, and that change started on September 11, 2001 when planes turned into missiles.

Our feelings of safety, of security, of feeling that we're NOT part of the nasty happenings far far away...those feelings came crashing down as we watched buildings fall, people dying, and muslims dancing in celebration in the streets in nations we used to give NO serious thought to.

Say what you will about George W. Bush but that man kept us safe here at home.

Now enter center stage the presidency of Barack HUSSEIN Obama and that change has become a nightmare...mass killings...children slaughtered...racial hatred reborn...and appeasing the enemy...appeasing, bowing down to, and catering to those out to kill us.

And on a beautiful Monday afternoon while Bostonians were out and about enjoying the festivities of Patriots Day, suddenly and without warning hell became reality as two makeshift bombs went off killing three and maiming over 170 others.

Legs blown off...bodies maimed...children riddled with nails and shrapnel...the smell of blood and burning flesh...sounds like a scenario from 'over there' in those far away places...a scenario NEVER supposed to happen in our country...after all our president is supposed to keep us safe...yet this president has done NOTHING to keep us safe...has done NOTHING but placate and make excuses for those out to kill us.

The bombers are muslim...from Chechnya, a country broken away from Russia but muslim nevertheless...a country of non-Arab muslims with connections to al Qaeda.

And even now our president does NOT speak out against the muslims, instead trying to shift blame away from this group of people. But it was muslims who did this...muslim terrorists...jihadists from lands far away living in our country...turning on our country, our country that welcomed them...and for what and why...why...because they are indoctrinated to kill us driven ever forward by their belief that if you don’t submit to islam then you’re an infidel and must die.

So I will say out loud for all to hear what Barack HUSSEIN Obama will NOT...the Boston bombers are muslim terrorists...jihadists...killers. Their nationality per se is NOT important...their islamic beliefs and there islamic goals are what's important, for they committed jihad on American soil...and yet our president remains eerily silent to that effect. 
 
And if you refuse to name the enemy, to identify them and call them by name, to call them the bast*rds they are, then this battle will NEVER be over.

And more attacks will happen on our soil...more Americans will die...more Americans will be maimed...as more Americans will become numb to the creeping encroaching take over of our country by those whose only goal is to kill us.

And still our president will NOT say who did this to us...will NOT call them by name instead using the generic word 'terrorist' instead of saying 'muslim terrorists' declared war on us, because he must after all placate his brethren.

So now we face the 'what happens next' scenario.  Dzhokhar Tsarnaev was captured cowering under a boat tarp like the coward that he is, and it will be interesting to see what Barack HUSSEIN Obama does knowing that his muslim brethren brought the battle to our shores. 
 
Will a cover-up be concocted like there was with Benghazi to draw attention away from the suspect being muslim...or will this individual be declared an enemy combatant who committed an act of war so he can be turned over to a military court for a swift trial and punishment. In Obamanation probably NOT as he most likely will be thrown into the criminal justice system where justice will NOT be fair and will NOT be swift, because Obama will most likely go the way of Fort Hood and whitewash this nightmare...making it just a hop, skip, and a jump away from workplace violence in Obama-speak.

And so for now the story ends or is it really just the beginning...the beginning of the end of accepting muslim abominations on our soil as 'We the People' say in one united voice to our muslim appeasing president 'this is OUR country NOT theirs and we will NO longer abide living in fear nor will we abide another Benghazi cover-up to happen.'

Oh and by the way...in five short days this nightmare came to an end yet many months later the nightmare of what is the truth about Benghazi continues.