Tuesday, May 26, 2026

Trump-Iran Deal on Edge as Tehran Vows 'Mass Sacrifice' and Total Resistance
Ward Clark / RedState
 
Could this be a virtual bucket of cold water tossed on all the optimism we had on a possible peace deal with Iran this weekend? Iran's President Masoud Pezeshkian doesn't seem too optimistic, and his latest foray into the wilds of "My Mouth is Writing Checks My Butt Can't Cash," well, it evokes a rather odd image, given the nature of the current conflict.
 
But Iran's president seems determined to go down this road

President Masoud Pezeshkian invoked one of Iran’s strongest wartime symbols on May 24, signaling Tehran’s resolve to hold its ground against the U.S. and Israel across the region, a counterterrorism expert said.

The Iranian leader's remarks came at a key moment in diplomacy, as President Donald Trump said a deal with Tehran to end the war is "largely negotiated" and warned the U.S. would either sign "a great and meaningful" agreement or walk away entirely.

While Iran signaled broad agreement with Washington on some points, it said a final deal is not imminent and that negotiations over the remaining details are still underway. Read more, and see X here.

Here's What Tulsi Gabbard Will Disclose Before She Leaves Her Post

Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard is stepping down. She resigned before the Memorial Day weekend, citing her husband’s health as the reason; he was diagnosed with bone cancer. Of course, the Left responded poorly because they are just miserable people. Gabbard has done well to expose the deep state conspiracy against President Trump, particularly regarding the trove of documents related to the Russian collusion hoax. She’s reportedly not done, planning to release more files before her June 30 exit. Gabbard plans to release documents related to COVID, the weaponization of the federal government, Havana syndrome, and the 2020 election (via Daily Wire) [emphasis mine]:

Before departing, Gabbard intends to release findings tied to investigations into Havana Syndrome, formally known as Anomalous Health Incidents (AHIs), the COVID-19 pandemic, the weaponization of the federal government, the 2020 presidential election, and more, according to the official. These findings will likely be released in weekly installments over the next month.

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! 

Today, Tuesday, May 26th from 7 to 8:00pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss Iran updates; what Tulsi Gabbard will release before stepping down as Nat'l Intelligence Director; Democrats use fallen heroes as props to bash Trump on Memorial Day; and the Pope weighs in on AI. Tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE.' 

Monday, May 25, 2026

Just a Thought

 Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved. 

Op-ed: 
Ignoring 'Separation of Church and State' 
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor                                                                                                      This an opinion piece, my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com. 

I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”                                                                  - These were the words of America's original “Pledge of Allegiance” written on August 1892.* In it there was no mention of the word “God.”

Earlier this month, on Sunday May 17th, at the National Mall, our nation's capital hosted an event for folks to come together in “prayer, worship, and the reading of scripture” ahead of our nation’s “250th Birthday,” to “Rededicate our Nation to God.” And while there is nothing wrong with the saying of prayers for our nation, there surely is something wrong when the “rededicating” seems to be focused on but one particular religion's view of who and/or what“God” is.

Why so...because, in my opinion, a “rededication” of this type tries to put religion not just above what is our Constitutional rule of law, but also has a possibly dangerous undertone of trying to combine a given religious ideology with power...power manifesting in some folks wishing that our nation would become a modern day version of a Christian based theocracy.

And when the “Pledge of Allegiance” is thrown into this “rededication” mix we find religion itself actually encroaching upon “separation of church and state”...a founding principal of our nation...the very principal that defines who we are as both Americans and as a nation. Religious embellishments are not needed to define us for embellishments are not tangible nor proven facts, but instead, in this case, are but words of bravado masquerading behind a facade of pretending to be facts...a dangerous and at times divisive religious based “good vs. evil” scenario indeed.

And this is why I find it odd that certain “of name” politicians today... politicians who relish in wearing religion on their sleeve only when pandering for votes at or near election time...have suddenly embraced the “God rededication,” and hooked it into our nation's upcoming “250th Birthday” celebration. Simply, we as a nation do not need to “rededicate” ourselves to “God” for to “rededicate” means we were already “dedicated to God” which, in actuality, we as a nation never were.

And that, dear reader, is indeed a fact as witnessed by proven cause and effect scenarios that have played out in our nation's history itself. So here let's start with the fact that no matter what some say...no matter what some want to believe...the United States of America is not...I repeat not...a Christian nation nor was she ever intended to be a Christian nation. And while, in part, Christianity did help shape early American culture and ensuing morality, what was to become the actual legal framework for our nation was most decidedly secular in nature, and rightfully so as “separation of church and state,” was indeed a key factor in our nation's founding.

How so? Folks tend to forget, or simply chose to ignore the fact that a number of our great “Founders and Framers”...including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison...saw “separation of church and state” as actually being necessary to protect religious freedom, while at the same time helping to prevent government overreach into ones personal and/or religious life.

I do tend to think that both Jefferson and Madison believed then, as I have always believed, that when an individual’s private beliefs...religious or otherwise...invades what is to be civil governance that its intention is to be` divisive, and thus work to destroy instead of uniting “We the People” together.

And so these very wise men...and some modern day presidents as well (like JFK and Reagan) ...did deem
“separation” to be the means by which to help ensure a stable and more diverse “Republic”...a “Republic” for “all the people” free from the confines of what are truly overly religious zealots, rhetoric, dogma, and of course drama. And it's drama that today tends to see certain branches of the Evangelical movement entwining itself not only into partisan politics, but calling those who do not share their faith or their political beliefs “heretics, infidels, and evil,” while at the same time damning them to hell, of which I myself have been a target of.

And so the truth is that these men...these patriots...understood at the time of our nation's founding what we all should understand today, but foolishly many do not. And that is by keeping religion out of “secular” government it in turn should mean keeping government out of religion, Remember, our “Founders and Framers” hoped to assure that the new “Republic” being formed would never fall into the trap of, or morphing into, a theocracy...the very form of government that did not serve the “Old World” well...the very form of government some not so silently hope America would turn into today.

And it is this not understanding the logic behind the “separation” concept itself...coupled today with an unhealthy dose, for some, of what is but an indoctrinated fear of “hell and damnation”...that has led a multitude to want religion...in this case their particular version of only the Christian faith... brought openly back into both the public and political discourse, as well as into America's public schools.

And this is also one of the reasons why our “Founders and Framers” were so adamant in their “separation” convictions, so adamant that when the Constitution was being drafted these same men made sure that no one religion...Christianity included...was ever to become or even hope to become the official religion of our nation. And this is witnessed by the fact...yes fact...that the words “Christian,” “Jesus,” or “ God” appears nowhere in either the“Declaration of Independence” or in the “United States Constitution.” In fact, the only time an official document used the word “Christian” in relation to our new nation, was in the text of the 1797 “Treaty of Tripoli,” signed by then President John Adams which stated these exact words, “the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”

Don't believe me...go read those very documents for yourself...go research the actual religious beliefs and practices of those men who put pen to our founding papers for it will surely surprise you...apologies accepted...as will the fact that many of our “Founders and Framers” were actually “Deists,” and not Christians in what we today consider to be the classical sense. In fact, some famous “Deists” at the time of our nation's founding included the aforementioned Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, as well as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, John Adams (who outwardly rejected orthodox Christian doctrines like the “Trinity” and “original sin”), Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and even George Washington himself who, while attending church is said to have avoided the key element of “communion.”

These men...again these patriots...did indeed have a more what was at the time called a “rationalist” approach to faith itself for they jointly rejected the so called “supernatural elements” of traditional Christianity while at the same time affirming a belief in what they deemed to be but a benevolent “Creator.” And said “Creator” remained unnamed...no words to the effect of “God” let alone “Jesus”...just the word “Creator” who they and their fellow “Deists” believed revealed himself through “acts of nature” solely driven by logic and simple reasoning alone. Sounds to me like our “Founders and Framers” were quite science driven in their thought processes...which again is why the words “Christian, Jesus, or God” appears nowhere in any of our founding documents.

And so here let me say that I personally do not believe or feel we need to “rededicate” our nation to “God”...to what is now being deemed by most to be only the Christian version of “God” meaning in the sense of “Jesus”...for I am not a Christian nor do I want to be one, but know I am not an atheist either. My personal religious beliefs are mine alone, I find no need to make them public for I believe one's religious beliefs, or lack thereof, should be between them, their “God,” and their conscience.

But I will say that as a Constitutional Republican I firmly believe in the “separation of church and state,” after all we as a nation never were officially dedicated to “God” in the first place, Constitutionally or otherwise. And the words “In God we Trust”...which appears on our paper currency...is in no way a “dedication,” but merely hope and wishes for divine protection...whatever protection that might be.

However, the words “a nation under God“ as stated in our in our current “Pledge of Allegiance” is not an issue, for it is not a “dedication” nor a “rededication” per se, for I see it as a “reaffirmation” to return our nation to the Constitution...the true law of our land...the very document whose words have been ignored and corrupted by too many for far too long. Word semantics I know, but sometimes word semantics do need both a semblance of justification and hence “reaffirmation.” Case closed.
__________________________________________ 
 
Footnote
 
* The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by Baptist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931) who understood the importance and need for a separation between church and state, and was originally published in The Youth's Companion on September 8, 1892. 
 
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved. 

Saturday, May 23, 2026

Just a Thought

Memorial Day Weekend Could Mark Next Chapter in U.S.-Iran Conflict
Scott McClallen / Townhall Tipsheet

The U.S. is reportedly preparing to attack Iran this weekend, according to multiple reports on social media. 

President Donald Trump posted on Truth Social that he couldn’t attend his son’s wedding this weekend in the Bahamas because of “circumstances pertaining to Government.” 

“While I very much wanted to be with my son, Don Jr., and the newest member of the Trump Family, his soon to be wife, Bettina, circumstances pertaining to Government, and my love for the United States of America, do not allow me to do so," Trump wrote. "I feel it is important for me to remain in Washington, D.C., at the White House during this important period of time.”

Other outlets have reported that national security teams have canceled their plans for this weekend. 

Earlier this month, Trump slammed Iran's response to a peace proposal. He said that Iran can't have a nuclear weapon. See Xs and videos here.\