In a sobering assessment of America's military, a new
report finds the nation's armed forces ready and able to handle "a
single major regional conflict" but "ill-equipped" to handle two such
campaigns.
The
Heritage Foundation's 2016 Index of U.S. Military Strength
gives mixed grades to each of the armed services, finding the Army
"weak" – a downgrade from last year's "marginal" rating – because of a
"drop in capacity," and the other units all "marginal."
For example, the report finds, the Navy is "just able to meet
operational requirements," the Air Force is suffering from "degradation
in capability and readiness" and the Marine Corps is hampered by aging
equipment and "troubled replacement programs."
"Overall, the Index concludes that the current U.S. military force is
capable of meeting the demands of a single major regional conflict while
also attending to various presence and engagement activities but that
it would be very hard-pressed to do more and certainly would be
ill-equipped to handle two nearly simultaneous major regional
contingencies," the summary states.
The Daily Caller notes
the standard for readiness has traditionally been deployment in two
arenas, although the Department of Defense modified that standard in
2014, counting a win in one major theater – and the ability to fend off
an attacker in another – as readiness.
The annual Index also gave Russia, Afghanistan and Pakistan-based terrorism and China "high-threats" grades.
"As a whole, the global operating environment currently rates a score of
'favorable,' meaning that the United States should be able to project
military power anywhere in the world as necessary to defend its
interests without substantial opposition or high levels of risk," the
report asserts.
