In a David vs. Goliath dispute, a group of fishermen sued a government agency that mandated the fishermen pay $700 for "at sea monitors," arguing that the rule is out of the bounds Congress set for the federal agency.
The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the fishermen in a 6-3 decision
last month, and, in doing so, overruled what is known as the Chevron
doctrine — a legal theory established in the 1980s that says if a
federal regulation is challenged, the courts should defer to the
agency’s interpretation of whether Congress had granted it authority to
issue the rule, as long as the agency's interpretation is reasonable and
Congress had not addressed the question directly. Read more and see video here.

