Investigative Report:
Betrayal for a Price
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots
"These are very
greedy people. These are people that have skirted the law for a long
time."
-
Donald Trump on calling for The Clinton Foundation to be shut down
Scandal
after scandal has dogged Hillary Clinton since she
first entered the political arena, and for this alone she should not
even be in
the running for president. Scandal after scandal that have all rolled
off her
back while leaving in her wake a slew of dead bodies…rolled off her back
not
for lack of facts or evidence but for a lack of guts I think for it
seems that no
one…except maybe Judicial Watch…is willing to seriously take on the
Obama
administration, James Comey’s F.B.I., Loretta Lynch’s D.O.J., or the
Clinton
machine itself. And it seems those in Congress are just too scared to
bring charges against her for something…for anything…and know there
really is a plethora of chargeable offenses they can choose from.
How about perjury…lying under oath…regarding Benghazi to
name just one…proof that just might be in the soon to be released newest batch
of previously withheld emails.
And while the Democrats think this 17-month long email
scandal is over, the fact is it most assuredly is not. And now with the
F.B.I.’s recent admission of and a federal judge’s order to release by
September 13th some if not all of the 15,000 previously withheld emails that Hillary
called
“boring" and her lawyers
deemed
“personal”… emails so
“boring” that Rep. Trey Gowdy said they
were removed in such a way "
so even
God couldn't read them"… emails so
“boring”
that some of them had to be permanently removed by ‘BleachBit’ (a highly specialized
program that deletes files in such a way as to prevent recovery and hide all
traces of the files deleted)…meaning one really has to wonder just what is
Hillary Clinton hiding.
And why did Hillary not turn them over when she left her position
as Secretary of State if they were just “boring”
emails…and James Comey's argument that Hillary did not have “intent" to do wrong and really
didn't know what she was doing has now been shot to hell for who but the guilty
feels the need to do what I call a ‘nuclear delete’ of what Hillary calls simple wedding plans and
yoga routine emails. Could it be perhaps that hidden within these very “boring” emails is something 'encrypted’
that could well expose The Clinton Foundation as being the money-laundering base of
operations from which she and Bill made payments to themselves from monies donated
by foreign governments and nationals who don’t like us very much…monies the
foundation received via a Canadian front group set up to shield donors’
identities. Or maybe Hillary couldn’t risk it being found out exactly to whom
questionable and oh so dubious monies were paid out to via said Clinton
Foundation and transacted through emails...monies paid out like to the February
17 Martyrs Brigade perhaps…as in can you again say Benghazi.
Something tells me the email deleting all comes back to Benghazi and always
has.
And The Clinton Foundation…technically ‘The Bill, Hillary, and
Chelsea Clinton Foundation’…is a cleverly devised base from which to promote all
things Clinton as they rake in the bucks to enable both their self-serving lust for
power and their all-encompassing greed to grow…the very foundation Hillary ‘supposedly’
resigned from when she assumed the Secretary of State position but oh so conveniently rejoined
in 2013 after leaving said position…and it could very well be the touch point from
which all of Hillary’s shenanigans radiated from for the server found and
confiscated from the bathroom of her Chappaqua, New York home was a server
previously used by The Clinton Foundation.
And emails
already released to the public show that the foundation and the emails
are indeed explicitly tied together as per the exposing of official
interactions via email between the Department of State and The Clinton
Foundation even though Hillary knew well that the two
should never have co-mingled.
And how did they co-mingle…here are but eight prime examples...there are too many to list in one article...of Hillary’s
not completely severing ties with The Clinton Foundation…a breach of contract
if you will…while serving as Secretary of State. Example one: an email already released
showed an associate thanking a longtime Clinton aide (Huma Abedin most likely) for
his being given the “opportunity” to go
on an “eye opening” Haiti trip with
the foundation while at the same time seeking work at the Department of State, and
with said department redacting said person’s name when the email was eventually
turned over. Questionable for sure and leaves one to wonder just who they’re
covering for. Covering for sure even as The Clinton Global Initiative head Douglas
Band wrote to top Clinton aides Huma Abedin and Cheryl Mills that it was important
“to take care of” the associate’s request,
and with Abedin’s response being “We have
all had him on our radar. Personnel has been sending him options.”
Example two: more than half of Hillary’s private meetings as
Secretary of State were with donors to...drum roll please...The Clinton
Foundation of course. In fact, there’s an April 2009 email exchange between Clinton
adviser and BFF Huma Abedin and the above stated Douglas Band where he insisted
Abedin set up a private meeting between Lebanese billionaire donor Gilbert
Chaoury…a convicted money launderer I might add…and then U.S. ambassador to
Lebanon Jeffrey Feltman because of donor Chaoury’s “business affairs” in the region…not saying of course that Chaoury
is listed as a one to five million dollar donor to the foundation coupled with
his also being listed as a one million dollar donor to The Clinton Global
Initiative.
Example three: cosmetic giant Estée Lauder’s chief executive
Nancy Mahon met with then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and donated to the
tune of between $1 and $5 million to The Clinton Foundation via Estée Lauder’s
charitable MAC AIDS Fund and in return got appointed to the prestigious Presidential
Advisory Council on HIV/AIDS. Becoming the chairperson of said council in December
2011, Mahon also received special government employee status (no salary is
given but this status affords all travel costs to be reimbursed by the
government) simply because of her donating to The Clinton Foundation.
Example
four: while Secretary of State, Hillary had a private one-on-one
audience with Crown Prince
Salman of Bahrain, but the meeting only took place after he had donated
$32
million to The Clinton Foundation. And an email exchange in which Huma
was involved shows that he at first was indeed declined said meeting
even though he went through the usual and normal official channels, and
then shows that after said donation was made Crown Prince Salman
'suddenly' was granted his audience and the arms deal Bahrain wanted
also 'suddenly' went through.
Examples
five, six, and seven concern Russia: back in 2010, Hillary worked the
room, so to speak, so that Russia could get approval for a $3.7 billion
purchase of 50 Boeing 737 Next Generation aircraft for Aeroflot, with
Russian Technologies reserving the right to order another 35 jets from
Boeing. And a mere two months after the deal was reached, Boeing
announced it had made a $900,000 contribution to The Clinton
Foundation.
And
lest we forget that it was Hillary Clinton herself who approved the
now-infamous deal that gave the Russians control over 20% of uranium
production right here in the U.S...a deal initiated via email when
Russia started taking control of the Canadian company Uranium One. And
it was here where in three separate
transactions from 2009 to 2013, as per Canadian records, cash
made its way to the Clinton Foundation via Uranium One’s chairman who
used his
family foundation to make four separate donations to said foundation
together totaling $2.35 million. And isn't it anything but a
coincidence that right after Russia's plans to acquire
Uranium One were made public, Billy-Boy received $500,000 for a
Moscow speech from a Russian investment bank that was promoting Uranium One stock and who reportedly had links to the Kremlin. Talk about collusion, backdoor
deals, unethical and possibly traitorous behavior.
And
then there's Skolkovo...a Moscow based research facility akin to our
Silicon Valley that was funded in part by the Russian government. And
Hillary helped spur the creation of Skolkovo when Obama failed to 'reset' (his words) U.S./Russian
relations...and whose initiative was
comprised of 'dual-use' technologies...simply meaning the operation had both
civilian and military uses. The Skolkovo initiative was made up of tech companies from
many different countries, and saw 17 of the 28 American, European, and
Russian companies that
participated in said initiative being Clinton Foundation donors
or sponsored high paying speeches for Billy-Boy. And this led to the
funneling of tens of millions of dollars into The Clinton
Foundation...monies to the tune of between $6.5 and $23.5 million and
that's according to Clinton Foundation
data itself, and all was done while Hillary was serving as Secretary of
State.
Impropriety
for sure, unethical without a question, and criminal perhaps for what
Russia got in return for its donations was access to advanced U.S.
technology including to highly
“classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the companies,” and that's according
to a 2014 F.B.I. issued
“extraordinary warning” to U.S. tech companies against involvement in the Skolkovo initiative.
Example
eight: Muhammad Yunus, a Bangladeshi economist and a 2006 Nobel Peace
Prize winner for pioneering low-interest "microcredit" for poor business
owners, was a man who no previous history of personal political giving
to the Clinton's, yet he met with Hillary twice in 2011 and once in 2012
during the time when Bangladeshi government authorities were
investigating his
oversight of the Grameen Bank...a non-profit bank of which he sat on the
board and which he ultimately was pressured to resign
from. He begged for help in
email messages routed to Hillary, and she ordered aides to find ways to
help
him...of course she did as he had recently and oh-so suddenly privately
donated between $100,000 and $200,000 to The Clinton Foundation.
And
to be noted is that his American affiliates of said Grameen Bank had
worked with
the Clinton Foundation's Clinton Global Initiative since
2005, pledging millions of dollars in microloans for the poor, and had
just given between $100,000 and $250,000 to the foundation...more than
enough to warrant getting help from America's self-perceived royal
highness.
Bottom line: by 2015 at least 181 companies, individuals of sometimes dubious character,
as well as foreign governments that had donated to The Clinton Foundation also lobbied
Hillary’s Department of State. In fact, during her tenure as Secretary, Billy-Boy
himself was paid more than $2.5 million by firms that were doing said lobbying.
Appearances of impropriety puts it mildly as now accusations
of collusion, conflict of interest, corruption, dirty and most probably
unethical and possibly illegal dealings have rightfully raised their ugly head.
And while Hillary herself might not have actually solicited said donations, her
former president husband did, and when that money comes from foreign powers it
reeks of concerns not only about ethics but about America’s past and current foreign
policy as well.
And it now truly becomes a game of paying for favors
… ”pay to play” as the talking heads say…improprieties
at the very least for the fact is that over half of all Hillary’s personal
meetings during her time as Secretary of State were with donors to The Clinton
Foundation…154 meetings in fact…154 meetings with people both foreign and domestic
who had private interests…business and otherwise…with much to gain from
donating to said foundation. Much to gain including buying, if you will, the
ability to feel like a ‘player’ and to be the recipient of political favors
given.
And
donate they did both personally and through companies and
groups...donating to
the tune of 85 people giving to The Clinton Foundation a total of $156
million with 40 of those people giving more than $100,000 each and with
20 of
those people giving more than one million dollars each. And some of
those donations got the donor a meeting with the Chinese entourage when
they visited D.C., while others got the privilege of sitting at Vice
President Joe Biden's table at state luncheon affairs.
And while it was recently announced that The Clinton Foundation
will start “scaling back” and then ban
all donations from both foreign countries and corporations should Hillary (gag)
win the election, and that Billy-Boy himself will pull back from the foundation
by stepping down from the board (but oh so conveniently Chelsea will remain) and
ending his fundraising role…yet all being way too little and so way too late
for like I said above the foundation has already accepted millions upon millions of
dollars from countries…from governments…from individuals…that don’t like us
very much.
And sadly that includes from muslim countries that outwardly
and shamefully mistreat women…countries that should raise the ‘red flag’ high
for Hillary has long tried to sell herself as a champion of women’s rights…unless
that championing happens to upset her cash flow that is. And what did these countries
and their governments get in return for their donations...I’m guessing Hillary’s
lobbying for U.S. policies that benefit those who donated including having us
look away to said countries human rights violations, coupled with Hillary’s
most likely manipulating those in Congress to allow for the sale of guns and
weapons to countries who ask, whether ‘friendlies’ or not…but like I said I’m
only guessing.
But if truth be told The Clinton Foundation…already being criticized
by the media for spending too little on programs and too much on overhead and
fluff…has also been ‘red flagged’ if you will by the I.R.S. for Hillary’s
accepting, again via The Clinton Foundation, the above stated foreign monies while
she was Secretary of State…no matter if she technically sat on the foundation’s
board or not. And know Hillary lied about monies received for the fact is that beginning
in 2010 and ending in 2013 The Clinton Foundation reported to the IRS that it
received zero…yes zero…funds from foreign governments which we know unequivocally
not to be true.
And so this woman turned what might have started as an altruistic
non-profit charitable foundation started by her husband when he left office and
morphed it into what seems to be an unethical, hypocritical, pay for favors, ‘so-called’
influence peddling operation…an oh so shady operation with emails sent and received
along with classified government information via a former Clinton Foundation server located in her private home all while
the foundation itself continues to hide behind its coveted 501(c)(3) status.
And when all is said and done what remains is the question
of who are the real victims of The Clinton Foundation…a foundation that even
Hillary ally former Governor Ed Rendell (D-Pa.) says should have been shut down
before she became Secretary of State in 2009… and the sad answer is that it’s ‘We
the People’ who are the victims…victims of deep-seated corruption that lives
and thrives right in front of our eyes and it’s the fault of Congress for remaining
for the most silent and for not taking action as they…especially on the
Democratic side of the aisle…protect the media-generated ‘lie’ that is Hillary Clinton.
Hillary Rodham Clinton who not openly mocks the law but does
so knowing she’s protected by an alphabet media and by a miserable excuse of a president
who gets a third term in office if she becomes president. And that coupled with
the email scandal not going away means ‘betrayal’ becomes the word of the day…betrayal
at Benghazi…betrayal via a computer…and betrayal of the trust of the American
people via a once upon a time charitable foundation that has become anything but.
And so the circle of betrayal is complete…complete when you
add in the ultimate of all betrayals...betrayal of country that is.
The Washington Examiner’s Paul Bedard crunched some the new numbers on gun politics from Pew Research and found that almost half the country has a gun in the home. Pew found that 44 percent of all homes
have guns, while 51 percent do not. It bucks the trend of other polls,
namely CBS News, which found that the percentage of gun ownership
hovered in the mid-30s.
