Vet Wounded by Iranian Explosives Warns Against Biden Presidency
By Pamela Geller / THE GELLER REPORT
A new ad that seeks to galvanize voters in the battleground state of
Pennsylvania says a Biden presidency is likely to embolden the Iranian
regime and loosen sanctions that have crippled Tehran’s economy.
The ad, part of a $10 million expenditure by the pro-Trump America
First Action SuperPAC, features an American war vet who was wounded by
Iranian explosives while serving abroad. It premiered in the
Philadelphia area on Thursday and seeks to sway voters who remain
concerned about the Obama administration’s landmark nuclear deal with
Iran, which provided the regime with billions in cash windfalls. Biden
has pledged to rejoin that deal and pursue increased diplomacy with
Iran.
The World Health Organization (WHO) has changed its position on
government lockdowns as a measure for combating the Wuhan coronavirus.
The WHO now believes that lockdowns have unintended consequences and
should be avoided.
"We in the
World Health Organization do not advocate lockdowns as the primary means
of control of this virus,” Dr. David Nabarro, the WHO's Special Envoy
on Covid-19 told The Spectator.
Dr. Nabarro then cited some of the harmful negative consequences of prolonged lockdowns that conservatives and President Trump have been warning about for months.
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on Right Side Patriots Radio
“The
American people deserve a straight answer and if you
haven’t figured it out yet, the straight answer is they are going
to pack the Supreme Court if they somehow win this election.” - Vice President Mike Pence's response to Kamala
Harris during last weeks Vice-Presidential debate
It's the ultimate Part A-Part B six
million dollar question that we've all been waiting to hear the
answer to...as in will Joe Biden “pack the Supreme Court”
if elected president coupled with why won't he tell us who's on his
“short list” of justice nominees. And with Democrats still
saying let the people make the nominee decision via their
presidential vote, Joe Biden instead is forcing voters to make a
“blind decision” as his answer to both parts of said
question remains “after the election,” and
that the voters "do not deserve to know." And
thus the problem is that our side...the Trump side...the
constitutional side...is not focused nor demanding enough as to force
those questions to be answered like right now.
But there's a reason for that question
not being at the forefront of the political discourse, and I'll
answer as to why in a bit.
And so with political skulduggery
continuing on, the ones being hurt the most by Biden's refusal to
answer remains both “We the People” and our nation's very
rule of law. How so? Simply, a Joe Biden win...whether by hook or by
crook...would surely see our Constitution being rendered
null-and-void. And why so? Because with Biden as
president...especially with Obama and the uber far left faction of
the now Democrat-Socialist party pulling his strings...the Supreme
Court’s days of being both the arbitrator and the interpreter of
Constitutional law (which is their job description) would come to an
end as the court would now be packed with liberal justices who would
willingly flaunt the D after their name. And this in turn would see
those justices handing down decisions based not upon Constitutional
law but as a way to solidify a solid Democrat voting block based upon
their personal political ideologies and leanings, thus changing the
High Court's political complexion, pushing it to the far left, for
many generations to come.
And if that were to be accomplished via a Joe
Biden win, Barack HUSSEIN Obama's fundamental transformation of
America will have come to fruition. How so...because if you couple a
Biden win with the Democrats keeping the House and possibly even
retaking the Senate, and then add in their promise to end the
“filibuster”...we would then bear witness to all
legislation that the Democrats propose being enacted by a simple majority
vote. And with their also “packing” the High Court, reality
then becomes that any challenges made by minority-rule Republicans
would be a mute point. Translation: the
entirety of the Democratic party's socialist agenda would
then be put into place simply with what would be President Biden's signature, and
America as we know and love her would never be the same again.
But why really are both Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris so afraid to answer this two part simple question? In
Biden's own words, “you know the moment I answer that question,
the headline in every one of your papers will be about that.”
And really why shouldn't it be as the truth has already been stated
in Biden and Harris' actually not answering said question.
Translation: Joe Biden most assuredly will start the process for
“packing” the High Court on day one of his administration,
thus succeeding not only in negating the entirety of the Trump
administration's policies, but allowing the party hierarchy to “save
a bit of face” for their having failed in their numerous
attempts to impeach President Trump.
However, nothing changes the fact that
Joe Biden has always been known as a "stooge of the establishment," and
while he has not historically been a proponent of the kind of
“norm-busting” that court "packing" would surely entail, Biden's
refusing to answer the “packing” question proves
he's sold out to the socialist left fringe of his party even while
knowing that “packing” the High Court does not sit will
with the vast majority of Americans on either side of the political
aisle...Americans who do understand how critical such an upheaval would
be for “packing” the court would indeed negate the
Constitution's mandated and very
much needed “balance of power” clause.And while Biden might relish in
the number of votes his selling out to the far left would garner for
him, I still don't believe said votes would be enough to bring a must
have change in control of the Senate, for without a Senate numerical
change court “packing”
will simply not happen even if Biden were to win the presidency.
And yet the media ignores or gives but cursory attention to this
what should be a key issue in the political discourse leaving one to
wonder why. So now I'll tell you why...it's my belief that the media
knows that first, liberal “packing” of the Supreme Court will not
happen as long as the Senate remains in Republican control and
second, they know that the polls are being manipulated...that the
poll numbers are lying...and that President Trump will indeed win
reelection. And with that said it's figured why even bother pushing the court
“packing” issue or even asking for Biden's hush-hush short
list of nominees as to do so would put negative focus back on Biden
whose list...which might even have Obama's name on it...would surely
give President Trump much needed fodder to light yet another fire on
Twitter and conservative sites.
Remember, the media's job remains
protecting candidate Joe Biden who's obviously in throws of dementia,
but in order to do so issues of controversy must be neutralized...or
better yet ignored. This is what the media has been ordered to do by
those in Democrat positions of power...this is what the media will
continue to do until the bitter losing end.
“This isn’t about any judgment anybody has about somebody’s
behavior. This is about a diagnosis, a professional medical
diagnosis. This is not with bad intent." So said House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi at last Friday's hastily called press conference
And in a somewhat related issue, we all know that last Friday
afternoon Nancy Pelosi announced her plans for a bill that she
believes could help remove President Trump from office based upon the
“removal process” granted under Section 4 of the 25th
Amendment which states in part that, “Whenever the Vice
President and a majority of either the principal officers of the
executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law
provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration
that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of
his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers
and duties of the office as Acting President.”
And while Pelosi's saying that the “coronavirus-infected president’s
recent erratic behavior” warrants such a bill and that she's
simply setting up a process authorized by the Constitution that
needed to have been codified long ago, she was quick to add that
the proposed bill does not seek to remove President Trump on said grounds
before next month’s election.
“This is not about President
Donald Trump — he will face the judgment of the voters. This
legislation applies to future presidents but we are reminded of the
necessity of action by the health of the current president,” were Nancy Pelosi's exact words.
Now let six of those words really sink in...“This legislation
applies to future presidents...” And
now narrow those six words down to just two words, “future
presidents,” and a dangerous
truth is revealed for the bill being proposed by the ever
vile, conniving shrew that is Nancy Pelosi was never...I repeat
never...intended to affect President Trump as neither Vice-President
Mike Pence nor the Republican controlled Senate would ever sign off
on it. From the beginning this proposed bill...which like the 25th
Amendment would allow for the temporary or permanent removal of a
president on the grounds of mental or physical incapacity...was
intended to remove Joe Biden from office...if he was so elected...
thus making then Vice-President Kamala Harris president.
And like with “packing” the Supreme Court, Obama's
fundamental transformation of America would also come to fruition for
we know that power hungry Kamala Harris will promise, do, say,
or sign off on every and anything to be president, and that the
Democrat-Socialists...as in the “Squad” who really are in
control of the party as well as being the ones pulling Nancy Pelosi's
strings ...think this act of what is overt political desperation will
make it all so, after all Joe Biden’s mental decline is on full
display for all to see.
So what specifically is in Nancy Pelosi's bill...actually the
'Pelosi-Raskin bill'...an updated version of a bill Rep. Jamie Raskin
first introduced in May 2017? First, said bill would create a
17-member commission comprised of four physicians, four
psychiatrists, and eight former high-ranking executive cabinet
members appointed by congressional leadership from both parties. The
final member would be selected by the other 16 to serve as chair of
the commission and if need be as the tie-breaker. And note Pelosi
cleverly crafted this bill so as to allow former Obama cabinet
members to participate for the word “former” is used as
opposed to “current” members and nowhere does the bill say
they must be from the “current” administration. Second, as
per the bill, said commission would get to work on examining the
president’s mental and physical capacity to hold office if both the
House and the Senate approve resolutions to that effect. And lastly,
after such an examination the commission would then compile a report
that could be used as support for invoking Section 4 of the 25th
Amendment.
Thankfully, this proposed bill has absolutely no chance of becoming law
before the election as the House is not scheduled to be in session
until after Election Day. But clever little party shill that she is,
Nancy Pelosi has put the focus back on President Trump's having
contracted COVID-19 (while at the same time not saying that he fully
and quite quickly recovered from it) by her ignoring the fact that in no way
did it affect his carrying out his presidential duties...which he did
so quite effectively I might add. And it's Pelosi saying that Trump
may be acting irrationally because of the wide range of experimental drugs
he took to fight the virus, that justifies the need for this bill.
And so the woman who now suddenly and oh so miraculously wants us
to believe that she cares about Constitutional law keeps reiterating
that, “Congress has a constitutional duty to lay out the process
by which a president’s incapacity as the president of any party is
determined,” and “What happens if a president, any
president, ends up in a coma or on a ventilator and has made no
provisions for the temporary transfer of power?” And these are
the words that has led many Republicans to erroneously believe that Nancy Pelosi is either still trying to overturn the 2016 election or that
she's now trying to overturn, in advance, the results of next month’s
election.
But like I stated earlier, this proposed bill is not now nor has
ever been about President Trump nor is about COVID-19, that's all
just a facade Pelosi hopes will help to reinforce undecided voters
negative views of President Trump in the remaining weeks leading up
to the election. It is and will remain about securing the presidency for
Kamala Harris by throwing Joe Biden by the wayside if he were to
become president. And Nancy Pelosi just about admitted so with her words,“If the president wins reelection, yes it will apply to him. If
he doesn’t, it will apply to the next president of the United
States”...for "establishment" Joe Biden was never who she nor her
party really wanted to head the ticket...for Biden is a man they simply cannot risk having for four let alone eight years in office as that
would greatly set back the timetable for their still hoped for fundamental changing of
America. Case closed.
**************************************************************************************************************************************** For
more political commentary please visit my RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
partner Craig Andresen's blog The
National Patriot
to read his latest article, Liberal Catch Phrases Decoded.
Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 13th from 7 to 9pm EST,RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'On Court Packing and Amendment 25'; 'Liberal Catch Phrases Decoded'; and important news of
the day.
Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTSon
our newly launched website rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with the show beginning at 7pm EST.
