MEDIA ALERT: Pamela Geller on Ezra Levant's "The Source" News Hour tonight to discuss ...

MUSLIM DAY PARADE Madison Avenue, New York  on Sunday, September 14 Sunday's Muslim Day Parade in NYC I'll be appearing on Ezra Levant's show tonight on Sun TV is discuss the Muslim Day Parade this past Sunday. Click here for FULL COVERAGE. More PHOTOS and VIDEO- click here. Sunday was the annual Muslim day parade, where Muslims take over Madison Avenue and convert it to an outdoor mosque. It is always scheduled near the anniversary day of September 11 — takbir! These marches are always controversial (more here). The theme of the parade was advertised as Islam and America’s shared common values. But it was anything but. It was a political parade in support of terrorists in Egypt and Gaza. There was a lot of anti-Jewish propaganda — the flags of annihilation coupled with outrageous pro-terror Muslim Brotherhood propaganda. Before the police confiscated the guns, the Muslim were posing and “shooting” people. Tune in tonight to Ezra Levant on SUN TV. If you missed Pamela Geller on Hannity on Friday- click and watch here. Caged girls at the Muslim Day Parade in NYC on Sunday Map of the Middle East - Israel is destroyed. Photos thanks to TMDRDD and Urban Infidel

Follow on Facebook Follow on Twitter Follow AFDI on Facebook Follow AFDI in Twitter Follow me on Instagram Read Atlas Shrugs Read Jihadwatch DONATE: Help Fund the Fight AFDI.us 1040 1st Avenue #121 N.Y., N.Y. 10022

This message was sent to DianeSori@gmail.com from:

Pamela Geller, pamelageller@gmail.com, AFDI | 1040 1st Avenue #121 | New York, NY 10022

Record Ice Coverage More Proof that Weather Still Exists Despite Obama's Attempt to Ban It

John Ransom Townhall Finance Editor

Record ice in Antarctica is more proof that Obama is a failure. Despite claiming to control the weather with both his genius intellect and the power of his superhuman Nobel prize, it's been apparent he is not succeeding.

And we’ve all noticed it for some time now.

No matter the circumstances, every weather event is blamed on global warming in an attempt to cover up Obama's nefarious plot failure.

Cold temperature? Global warming. Hot temperatures? Global warming? Snow? Global warming.

Drought? Global warming. Hurricanes, tornadoes or the lack thereof? Global warming. There was even an attempt by a ditzy news anchor on CNN—is there any other kind on CNN?-- to blame a meteorite on global warming.

It’s gotten so bad that I’m surprised that global warming hasn’t been tied to white men and rape.

Oh that’s right. It has been.

And now in another attempt to explain the unexplainable, to deny what is obvious—that global warming just isn’t happening (at least not how its evangelists would wish)—scientists have come up with a new theory why record ice at Antarctica could be yet ANOTHER weather event where cooling temperatures are an indication of global warming.

“CEO of the Antarctic Climate and Ecosystems CRC, Tony Worby,” reports ABCNews in Australia, “said the warming atmosphere is leading to greater sea ice coverage by changing wind patterns.”

The cool part—ha, ha cool part-- is that an old-time actor, one you thought was dead and gone, plays a prominent role in this global warming passion play.

"The extent of sea ice is driven by the winds around Antarctica, and we believe that they're increasing in strength and part of that is around the depletion of ozone," said Worby.

Ah, yes, our old friend the ozone hole-- the last greatest threat to the earth since Mikkos Cassadine targeted Port Charles with his diabolical weather machine in an attempt to keep the ratings going at General Hospital-- is making a comeback.

Yes, the big ozone hole above Antarctica that was supposedly going to melt the entire world-- because it was already too late to save the whales, or the darter snail, or the cheery woodland owl-- is actually warming the world again, while also helping generate record ice right below the hole that’s gonna melt the world in conjunction with global warming that is producing record low temperature and lots and lots of snow.

Right?

Right.

Texas Sheriff says it’s “naive” to say Islamic State not here: “We have found Muslim clothing, they have found Quran books”

Robert Spencer / Jihad Watch

 

In June 2014, Representative Ted Poe (R-TX) enunciated the concerns that increasing numbers of people have about jihadists exploiting our open Southern border when he said: “This jihadist group ISIS and its leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi have promised direct confrontation with America. He is looking forward to that day and he has said that publicly, we should believe him when he says that.

These folks hate everything about the United States.” What’s more, “Of course the way they would come to the United States would be through the porous border with Mexico. The drug cartels will bring people into the country no matter who they are — for money. Everyone in the world knows that the border between the United States and Mexico is completely porous.”

Jihad terrorists and their enablers and accomplices have been entering the U.S. illegally by means of the Mexican border for many years. According to TheBlaze, “Hezbollah members and supporters have entered the U.S. through the southern border as early as 2002, with the case of Salim Boughader Mucharrafille, a Mexican of Lebanese descent. He was sentenced to 60 years in prison by Mexican authorities on charges of organized crime and immigrant smuggling. Mucharrafille had owned a cafe in the border city of Tijuana, near San Diego. In 2002, he was arrested for smuggling 200 people into the U.S., including Hezbollah supporters, according to a 2009 Congressional report.” Nothing has changed since then. It’s only gotten worse.

“Texas Sheriff: Reports Warn Of ISIS Terrorist Cells Coming Across The Border,” CBS Houston, September 15, 2014 (thanks to all who sent this in):

Midland County, Texas (CBS HOUSTON) – Midland County Sheriff Gary Painter said that law enforcement agencies along the “wide open” border have received alerts to be on the lookout for terrorists from the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria crossing into the United States.

Painter, who said he has worked along the border for “about eight years,” stated that alerts have been issued to border law enforcement to be on the lookout for suspicious terrorist activity, specifically involving ISIS cells being smuggled into the United States.

“I received an intelligence report that said that there was ISIS cells that were active in the Juarez area, which is the northern part of the Chihuahua state, and that they were moving around over there, that there was some activity…” Painter told Fox News. The report asked “for the sheriffs along the border to be on the alert, for all law enforcement to be on the alert, and to be on the lookout for these people maybe trying to come across.”

Painter sidestepped any direct knowledge that ISIS, specifically, is along the border, but he reiterated that the border “is wide open.”

“Well I’m saying the border is wide open, there is no control on the border, it’s not shut off,” said Painter. “There’s places along the Rio Grande you can walk across, there’s no water in it. I worked the border for eight years I walked back and forth across the Rio Grande; I was in Mexico, I was on this side. I never got challenged.

“There’s always a way to get across, there’s coyotes that bring those people across for thousands of dollars.”

Painter noted that “Muslim” items have been strewn along the border and estimated that 10 to 15 million “undocumented aliens” have crossed the border.

“I think it’d be naive to say that (ISIS is) not here…We have found Muslim clothing, they have found Quran books that are lying on the side of the trail, so we know that there are Muslims that have come across and are being smuggled into the United States,” Painter told Fox News….

See video of interview here ... http://www.jihadwatch.org/2014/09/texas-sheriff-says-its-naive-to-say-islamic-state-not-here-we-have-found-muslim-clothing-they-have-found-quran-books?utm_source=Jihad+Watch+Daily+Digest&utm_campaign=ea467f5a21-RSS_EMAIL_CAMPAIGN&utm_medium=email&utm_term=0_ffcbf57bbb-ea467f5a21-123435571

Obama sending aid to devout Islamic schools

Pamela Geller / Atlas Shrugs

Obama doesn’t think Nigeria has enough devout Muslims. How many Boko Harams does he want to create?

“Obama sending aid to Islamic schools
Studies identified as ‘recitation and memorization’ of Quran,” by Steve Peacock, WND, September 15, 2014

A portion of the $120 million the Obama administration is infusing into Nigerian education programs fund Islamic schools that exclusively teach students “the recitation and memorization” of the Quran, government documents reveal.

The Northern Education Initiative Plus, or NEI+, project seeks to broaden access to education while strengthening literacy skills of the predominantly Muslim population of northern Nigeria, according to procurement documents WND located through routine database research.

Obama wants to increase the number of schools that offers an expanded “core” of subjects, including Islamic schools that currently offer little or no academic options.

Among other primary objectives of the five-year program is the modernization of these educational institutions by increasing the quality of teacher training and promoting the use of proven, internationally recognized teaching methods.

Northern Nigeria, however, is home to the Islamic jihadist group Boko Haram, whose name is loosely translated “Western education is sin” or “Western education is forbidden.”

The U.S. Agency for International Development, or USAID, mentions the role of religious conflict in disrupting regional...

Read the whole entry »

     

• Email to a friend • Article Search •

That’s Not What the Constitution Says!

by Chip Wood / Personal Liberty Digest

In a column last week, I had some harsh things to say about those wimps in Congress who seem perfectly willing, even eager, to surrender the war-making authority that the Constitution gives them to our imperial president.

But then I misstated what the Constitution does require. And several readers were quick to point it out. Here’s how commenter Vigilant described my error:

[Mr. Wood] says, “Whatever U.S. actions the President recommends, there is one thing his spokesmen have been clear that he definitely will not do. He will not ask Congress for a declaration of war, as the Constitution requires.”

The Constitution requires no such thing, Mr. Wood. Congress may declare war any time they so desire, and it does not require a request from anyone.

Vigilant is absolutely correct. While we have a tradition in this country of the president of the United States asking Congress for a declaration of war — such as Franklin Roosevelt’s “day of infamy” speech to a joint session of Congress after the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor — there is no such requirement in the Constitution.

World War II was the very last time that Congress issued a formal declaration of war. Every single military action since then, including the ones in Korea, Vietnam and the Middle East, has been fought under some other so-called authority. Remember the Tonkin Gulf Resolution that was used to justify our military involvement in Vietnam?

It’s enlightening to see exactly what the Constitution does say — and sometimes, what it doesn’t say. Article I begins by declaring: “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and a House of Representatives.”

What follow are several sections describing the qualifications for senators and representatives, how they shall be selected, when they shall meet and even how they shall be compensated.

It is Section 8 of Article I that lists the specific powers that the Constitution grants to the Congress. Among the long list there is the simple phrase, “To declare War.” That same proviso also gives Congress the right to “grant Letters of Marque and Reprisal, and make Rules concerning Captures on Land and Water.”

Section 8 also says it is the responsibility of Congress “To raise and support Armies,” “To provide and maintain a Navy,” and “To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.”

Ex-State Dept. Official: Damaging Benghazi Documents Removed

• 0
  inShare

Guy Richter / NEWSMAX
 

A former State Department official says he witnessed departmental employees separating out damaging documents on the Benghazi investigation before handing them over to the Accountability Review Board, The Daily Signal reports.

Investigative reporter Sharyl Attkisson says the man, former Deputy Assistant Secretary Raymond Maxwell, told her he saw the actions take place in a basement room at the State Department over a weekend.

Maxwell headed the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs at the time and was in charge of collecting emails and documents related to the probe of the attack on the Benghazi diplomatic facility on Sept. 11, 2012.

"I was not invited to that after-hours endeavor, but I heard about it and decided to check it out on a Sunday afternoon," Maxwell told Attkisson.

Once there, he said he saw stacks and boxes of documents. He saw one person who directly worked for him there, though he had not been advised of her extra duties.

"She told me, 'Ray, we are to go through these stacks and pull out anything that might put anybody in the [Near Eastern Affairs] front office or the seventh floor in a bad light,'" Maxwell told Attkisson. "Seventh floor" referred to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and her advisers.

Maxwell said he suggested that was unethical, to which the woman replied, "Ray, those are our orders."

Moments later, Maxewell said, two high-ranking State officials walked in. Rep. Jason Chaffetz of Utah told Fox News they were Clinton's Chief of Staff Cheryl Mills and Deputy Chief of Staff Jake Sullivan.

"When Cheryl saw me, she snapped, 'Who are you?'" Maxwell told Attkission." Jake explained, 'That's Ray Maxwell, an NEA deputy assistant secretary.' She conceded, 'Well, OK.'"

Maxwell said he decided to leave a short time later because "I didn't feel good about it."

Maxwell was eventually put on paid leave for a year, though no formal charges were filed. He told Attkisson he and three other State Department employees were scapegoated while higher-ranking officials responsible were not disciplined.

He said he talked to the State Department ombudsman about his punishment.

"She told me, 'You are taking this all too personally, Raymond. It is not about you,'" he said.

"I told her that 'my name is on TV and I'm on administrative leave, it seems like it's about me.' Then she said, 'You're not harmed, you're still getting paid. Don't watch TV. Take your wife on a cruise. It's not about you; it's about Hillary and 2016.'"

Maxwell was later reinstated and subsequently retired after a 21-year career in foreign service. He was a supporter of President Barack Obama's campaign and even contributed money, but has since soured on both Obama and his old boss, Clinton, he said.

EGYPT’S Foreign Minister takes John Kerry to school re: Islamic terrorism

Bare Naked Islam

Secretary of State John Kerry meets with 
Egyptian Foreign Minister Sameh Shukri in Cairo 
on Saturday, September 13, 2014.

Egypt tells John Kerry that ISIS brand of Islamofascist terrorism isn’t limited to Syria and Iraq, it’s all over the Middle East and should be dealt with everywhere.

CNS News  During Secretary of State John Kerry’s weekend visit to Cairo, his Egyptian counterpart pushed for the new international focus on countering terrorism to go beyond Syria and Iraq, arguing that the same ideology espoused by the jihadists there is driving other Islamist extremists, including those in Egypt’s neighboring territories.

 

During his current travels in the Middle East and Europe, Kerry is seeking support for a coalition to tackle the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS/ISIL), and he said Sunday he has received offers from some countries to take part in the military element of that campaign. But while the administration’s focus has been largely centered on ISIS, Cairo sees the problem as a far broader one.

A spokesman for President Abdul Fattah el-Sisi said that in talks with Kerry the president had “stressed that any international coalition against terrorism must be a comprehensive alliance that is not limited to confront a certain organization or to curb a single terrorist hotbed but must expand to include all the terrorist hotbeds across the Middle East and Africa.”

 

During a joint press appearance with Kerry, Foreign Minister Sameh Shukri underlined the point, calling for a fight against Islamist terrorists “wherever they may be.” “I support the international efforts to fight terrorism and work on supporting these efforts, and support the necessary measures to put an end to this phenomenon, whether in Iraq, Libya, any part of the Arab world, or in Africa,” he said.

 

In reply to a question about possible links between ISIS and Ansar Bayt al-Maqdis, a terrorist group based in the Sinai peninsula, he said the two organizations were linked through a common ideologically and vision, even if they portray themselves differently. “We definitely monitor these relationships between the various organizations, and in the end, this – ideologically speaking, this organization is linked and these organizations share that common vision,” Shukri said, speaking through a translator.

“And we don’t believe there’s a different – perhaps just in the tactics used by these organizations and the way they depict themselves to the international community,” he continued. “We believe that this extremist, exclusionary ideology is common among all terrorist organizations,” Shukri said, adding that Egypt monitors cooperation between such groups and recognizes that they pose threats across borders between national states.

 

Op-ed: 
ISIS and Islam...One and the Same
By: Diane Sori

While Obama continues pushing Congress to approve a $500 million arms package for the Syrian opposition...as in the anything but 'moderate' Free Syrian Army who continues to have ties to both ISIS and al-Qaeda...Secretary of State John 'Swiftboat' Kerry was in Paris trying to finalize a strategy against ISIS. And while NO Arab country in attendance would commit to participating in air strikes against Syria, Kerry claims he has some Arab countries on board to participate in air strikes against ISIS in Iraq...but he nor Obama will name those nations 'supposedly' on board until later this week.

Hmmm...red flags must be raised when you can't name those 'supposedly' allied with you...kind of makes you wonder who Obama and Kerry think they're fooling as many of the Arab countries at this strategy meeting actually funded ISIS in the past...and some still do to one degree or another. And when you add in that Iraq's (ceremonial) Kurdish President Fouad Massoum does NOT want Egypt, the UAE, or Saudi Arabia to participate in any air strikes at all, you have to wonder just who the enemy really is and who in the Arab world is actually against the enemy and who is with the enemy.

And it's hard to tell at times for those in the Arab world...those in the  muslim world...are masters in the art of taqiyya.

So now the 'unspoken truth' must be spoken as these Arab countries while NOT necessarily condoning certain 'tactics' of ISIS still have something very important in common with ISIS...they're all muslim...they're all islamic followers...and they all will stand together if they suspect the west...if they suspect the U.S...is trying to 'reign in'...if you will...islam.

Remember, when one is a muslim...as in a follower of islam...one is commanded by the qur'an to either convert the infidel, heavily tax the infidel, or kill the infidel...and ISIS is following the qur'an's commands especially in regards to killing the infidel. And if the Arab countries side with the west...side with America...against ISIS, the quandary is that they in fact are then going against their very own (un)holy book.

And what of the qur'an itself with its 109 verses that call for muslims to go to war with non-muslims...that call for muslims to kill the infidels...to kill the non-believers. What of islam's goal that all must live by islamic rule under the caliphate...all must accept as governance the law known as sharia...and all must accept islam or die. Under islam there is NO compromise...NO bargaining for one's life as violence dictates the norm.  And for those muslim sympathizers who try to compare the violence in the Old Testament to the violence in the qur'an there are two major differences between the two...the first being that the qur'an is open-ended... meaning it is NOT bound by the so-called 'historical context' of the text that comes before or the text that comes after like the verses in the Old Testament are. And second, the violence committed by the ancient Jews as told in the Old Testament is just that...ancient...as Judaism has undergone its reformation ...as has Christianity undergone theirs...but islam has NOT...nor do its followers ever want it to.

"They are killing and slaughtering thousands of people…they boast of their brutality…they claim to do this in the name of Islam, that is nonsense, Islam is a religion of peace. They are not Muslims, they are monsters." 

And these are the words that British Prime Minister David Cameron said after announcing the beheading of British humanitarian aid worker David Haines...NOT unlike the words said by Barack HUSSEIN Obama after the beheading of journalist James Foley...right before he took off to play a round of golf that is.

But pray tell how can islam be a religion of peace when islam is built upon tenets of savagery, perversion, and total intolerance of those who do NOT bow to their way. Under islam there is NO acceptance of others...just ask those of the religious minorities who live in muslim lands...those who suffer unyielding persecution where they can put up little if any resistance.  And if they do resist the outcome for them is to be slaughtered...slaughtered while the savages in the name of islam yell "allahu akbar" as they satisfy their blood lust as commanded by the very words set down in the qur'an.

Now to be fair it must be remembered that NOT all muslims are radical in their beliefs just like NOT all Jews are Orthodox nor are all Christians Evangelicals. But the followers of radical islam...like those who belong to ISIS and al-Qaeda...are those who literally take every word of the qur'an as allah's unquestionable truth...and it's those words that command them to do the unspeakable...to feed off the hate and perversion embedded in those words. Take Sura 8:12 which states, "I shall be with you. Give courage to the believers. I shall cast terror into the hearts of the infidels. Strike off their heads, strike off the very tips of their fingers." Or take Sura 47:3 which says, “When you encounter the unbelievers on the battlefield, strike off their heads until you have crushed them completely; then bind the [surviving] prisoners tightly.” 

And while some will say that these words of hate, perversion, and violent death are verses that need to be put into context...that they do NOT literally mean what they seem to say...the truth is that the meaning of those words are NO lie for there are 107 more verses just like them...and this is supposed to be a religion of peace...I seriously think NOT.

If islam is ever to become a true religion of peace...and I personally do NOT consider islam a religion but a cult-like quasi-political system that wraps its tentacles around its followers until it literally squeezes the life out of them...islam must undergo a reformation to remove itself from the tenets of 7th century barbarianism and come more inline with the reformations undertaken by Judaism and Christianity who both left their...at times...violent pasts behind.

And while some say there is a contemporary more modern form of islam that is totally separate from the islam that the radicals follow...a form of islam that wants NO part of its radical brethren's beliefs...then why has the qur'an itself NOT been stripped of its words of unspeakable violence...why has the qur'an NOT been 'adjusted'...so to speak...to fit these supposed contemporary beliefs. And why don't the 'moderates'...and I'm sure there are NOT but a handful or two of true 'moderates'...demand that the qur'an undergo a reformation of its own for until it does islam...all islam...remains the enemy for when one does NOT condemn the words one condones the words.

And the answer to the 'whys' asked cannot always be the excuse of fear of the radicals for sometimes one must stand strong against even the most adverse of situations...against the most violent of possible fates...for when one stands strong others will follow.

So while Obama and his ilk banter back and forth that ISIS is NOT islam, the truth is that until muslims themselves start to fight back against the likes of their evil brethren...against those like ISIS...the beheadings of westerners will continue of that I'm sure...for what these savages hope this most unspeakable of acts will do is provoke America and her allies into open warfare against them...provoke America and her allies into putting 'boots on the ground'...for when all is said and done those in ISIS are actually kamikazes of sorts who relish death more than they embrace life, and in their march towards death and allah they plan to take as many of we infidels with them as they can.

But Obama and his ilk will most assuredly be safe for they are one with those out to kill us all.