By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
Thought one:
Thought two:
Thursday, April 26, 2018
Two Thoughts For Today...
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
Thought one:
Why is everyone so into the ‘big names’ who get kicked off or sent to fb
jail instead of we ‘little guys’ who are the prime victims of fb
censorship. I’ve been in fb jail 23+ times for one nonsensical reason or
another…why aren’t the senators and such concerned about me. YES
Diamond and Silk and others ‘of name’ have their gripes…and rightly
so…but so do I and many many others just like me who are ‘targeted’ for
selective enforcement time and time again. Guess the truth hurts when
it’s given by conservatives and if there’s one thing fb is afraid of
it’s we who try to get the truth out against all odds.
Thought two:
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
Thought one:
Thought two:
The Supreme Court gave President Trump’s
travel limits a far more favorable hearing Wednesday than it has
received in most lower courts, with conservative-leaning justices
actively rebutting charges that the latest version of the president’s
policy is the “Muslim ban” that critics contend.The case marks the first of Mr. Trump’s major policies to squarely reach the justices, and analysts said their ruling will set the tone for how much deference courts give the unorthodox president for the rest of his tenure.
Immigrant rights activists, congressional Democrats and much of the rest of the anti-Trump resistance had been looking to the justices to block Mr. Trump. With Congress controlled by Republicans, they said, it is up to courts to constrain the president.
Some of the court’s liberal justices were inclined to agree, but they appeared to be outmatched by the Republican-appointed justices who defended the president’s powers and discounted lower courts’ findings of anti-Muslim “animus.”
“If you look at what was done, it does not look at all like a Muslim ban,” declared Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr.
Solicitor General Noel Francisco, arguing the case for Mr. Trump, agreed.
Two-Facebook: Claiming neutrality while punishing the Right
By Bosch Fawstin / Jihad Watch
Read in browser »
A new study conducted by a team of researchers at the American Institute
for Behavioral Research and Technology shows Google can actually
manipulate the large majority of voters by returning negative search
results. Basically, all Google censors have to do is affix a negative suggestion to a candidate’s name — and a positive to another chosen candidate’s name.
The findings are significant because they put numbers and evidence to what conservatives have long known — that the liberal-leaning anti-Republican, anti-conservative, anti-Donald Trumpers in social media are on an all-courts-press to stifle voices that counter their progressive goals.
From Breitbart:
By inserting negative search suggestions under the name of a candidate, search engines like Google can shift the opinions of undecided voters by up to 43.4 percent, according to new research by a team at the American Institute for Behavioral Research and Technology and reported exclusively by Breitbart News.
Read entire article here: https://gellerreport.com/2018/04/google-search-manipulation-can-swing-nearly-80-percent-undecided-voters-report.html/
Fox News First
|
|
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)