By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right
Side Patriots Radio
Nancy Pelosi went to Taiwan knowing well the political problems
her trip would cause what with China considering Taiwan but a
breakaway province that needs to be brought back into the Chinese
fold. And this is no matter that the Taiwanese people consider
themselves to be a self-ruled nation and not part of China proper,
whether Taiwan is officially recognized as an independent country or
not. And with Biden's recent reaffirming that the U.S. would defend
Taiwan in the event of a Chinese invasion, the stage was set for
China to raise the tensions up a notch by conducting "military drills" that
surrounded the island in a show of strength that some consider to be
an actual prelude to war.
And musings of a possible war between China and Taiwan are being
spoken of in hushed tones on both sides of our political isle as
Biden tries to pretend being a commander-in-chief what with the
recent drone take down of al-Qaeda leader Ayman
al-Zawahiri, But pretending is usually a game played by those
with truths that must be kept hidden, and the truth where Biden and
his fellow Democrats are concerned is that the timing of
al-Zawahiri's demise did succeed, for a awhile at least, in taking
our minds off their deliberately destroying our economy. And yet
destroying our economy has quite literally become the Democrats
payback tool of choice to help them “save
face” come their November shellacking, with a possible war with
China being but an added distraction used to their advantage.
And while history has shown that war
itself, whether just or not, does spur on a nation's economy as war
is the epitome of big business...a manufacturing windfall and a jobs
creator on par with little else...history also shows that the best
time to initiate a war is when your opponents leadership shows
weakness across the board.
Enter Joe Biden's Afghanistan exit
fiasco which emboldened Vladimir Putin to invade Ukraine, and where
Biden's promises made to President Zelensky concerning U.S. equipment
helping to fight this unjust war remains undelivered to some degree;
Biden's now fingers crossed behind his back May promise made to
Taiwan that a Chinese invasion of their country “will not
happen” and “will not be attempted” sawthe caveat being if the world could convince Beijing of the
potential "long-term disapprobation" coupled
with long term ramifications should China dare to do so. And
both are the direct result of Biden's weakness having now helped to
set the stage for China's current muscle flexing as the once thought
to be “status quo”...as
in the unofficial U.S. and our allies agreed upon “balance
of forces” regarding
Taiwan...now shows outward signs of crumbling. After all, America
under Biden's stewardship can no longer be trusted to back up words
said nor promises made.
And while China's leader, Xi
Jinping, and his People's Liberation Army (PLA), coupled with
the internally driven political dynamics of the Chinese Communist
Party favor national security priorities and the“saving of face,” the enforcement of China's sovereignty becomes paramount above all else, And with China
physically and militarily outnumbering the forces of Taiwan, Xi's
ultimate goal of conquest has now been emboldened by China's recently ended military drills. But more importantly, we now find that China's military strengths overpower those of the U.S. in a number of key areas, which could, if Biden were
to keep his promise of coming to Taiwan's aid if China were to
invade, actually become even more unbalanced in Red China's favor.
And while Biden's words
spoken are words that carry no true legal weight as Biden has now
twisted, for his own personal political gain, the meaning of
the 'Taiwan Relations Act of 1979,' the very act that
allows an American president to sell defensive weapons and arms to
Taiwan minus the promise of us sending boots on the ground to the
break away would be island nation. And this allows a simple non-binding
agreement on paper, coupled with ongoing bipartisan Congressional
support for increasing arms sales to Taiwan, to ramp up both the
tensions and the voices of war.
And with Taiwan's Intelligence Chief Chen Ming-tong
still seeing any conflict between the two countries not likely to
happen before 2024, I believe that to be but a hoped for fingers
crossed guess especially with Christina Chen, an assistant research
fellow at Taiwan's top military think tank, stating just the opposite as she sees the “likelihood of a military conflict in the
Taiwan Strait in the near term getting high.” And
sadly, I must agree with Ms. Chen that the probably
of such an event occurring currently does outweigh the possibility of it
not occurring, but it's not for the reasons most think. How so? I say
a conflict between China and Taiwan will not only be over quite
quickly what with China holding the military trump card, but with the
fact that Biden will in the end give but lip service to Taiwan in the
same vein he has given it to Ukraine...promises made not
kept... promises that should never have been made in the first place.
Simply and to the point, Joe Biden will
continue to use Taiwan as but a mere diversion with Taiwan ultimately
becoming the much needed sacrificial lamb that helps take the
collective mind of America off our failing economy as well as our
falling presence on the world stage. But even worse, I think, is that
Biden will play a dangerous game by throwing the proverbial ball in
China's court to see just how far they will go regarding Taiwan...as
in will there be a complete military absorption of Taiwan back into
the Chinese fold or will the ultimate takeover be political in name
only not unlike that of Hong Kong?
While neither scenario is good for
Taiwan the latter might make more sense for China as it would allow
much needed trade between our two nations to continue on while still
allowing China their coveted Taiwan prize. And not to be forgotten,
whether we like it or not, is the fact that China v. Taiwan is in
reality China's own civil war that they alone must fight for unlike
Ukraine, which is a sovereign nation, Taiwan unfortunately is not.
However, for China to go into Taiwan
militarily...to physically destroy the break away island province
like Putin has tried to do to Ukraine...I believe is not an option
China really wants to do no matter its decades long military threats,
for to do so would surely severe what economic ties we have left with
China, which could include our cutting off of all modes of trade.
Remember, China's economy is basically financed by trade with the
U.S...we are it's biggest customer if you will...something Xi knows
well. And for Xi to lose American dollars would send China's economy
into a tailspin from which they might never recover, never mind that
cheaply made Chinese goods already over flood the U.S. market. Bite
the hand that feeds your nations coffers might just be incentive
enough to keep China's takeover of Taiwan more like the
aforementioned political takeover of Hong Kong, which would still
garner China a publicity victory of sorts and would leave Joe Biden
with egg on his face.
Simply, China would win Taiwan
courtesy of military muscle flexed minus tangible battles fought with
little Taiwanese blood being shed, while the U.S. again losing like
we lost in Afghanistan in that we would have played Taiwan like we
continue to play Ukraine with leading from behind diplomacy again
being the order of the day. So while a war between China and the U.S.
over Taiwan might remain on the table for some it's thankfully, I
believe, not a likely scenario...at least not in the near
future...for there is something that many forget, as in China's
mutual defense treaty with North Korea along with its strong friendship and
both national security and economic ties with Putin's Russia.
Translation: a U.S. war with
China could well morph into a war with both Russia and North Korea as
well, something that would not end well for all parties involved. And
that's never mind the possible nuclear option, which in today's
heated political climate remains always on the table, nor is the fact
that even if a stalemate of sorts were to be reached between us and
China over Taiwan we could find ourselves becoming Taiwan's permanent
and very expensive sole means of defense, and we all know how well
that has worked out in the past...can you say Iraq and Afghanistan.
And besides, if China were to
actually attack Taiwan they most likely would do so via a surprise
attack, meaning we would not be militarily ready for war let alone
be able to come to Taiwan's immediate defense for remember that no
matter his words spoken Joe Biden cannot on his own decide that we
will go to war to defend Taiwan, only our Congress can do that as written in'Article
I, Section 8, Clause 11' of the Constitution which expressly gives
that power to Congress alone. And the time factor needed to get a
declaration of war would allow China the time to quickly overpower
and capture Taiwan as they have long been prepared for war. Simply,
our military is not ready to take on China...nor anyone else for that matter...thanks
to the Biden administration's woke neutering of America's fighting
forces...a truly sad commentary indeed...a commentary that needs
rewriting before it's too late for us all. Case closed.
************************************************************************************* For more political commentary please visit myRIGHT SIDE PATRIOTSpartner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, The FBI and DOJ – A Crisis of Credibility.
Tomorrow, Tuesday, August 16th from 7 to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori will discuss 'The U.S. v. China...An Unlikely Scenario'; 'The FBI and DOJ – A Crisis of Credibility'; and important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTSon
https://rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with show beginning at 7pm EST.
Tuesday, October 12, 2021
Op-ed:
Truth, Fear, and Constitutional Legalities
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriot / Right Side Patriots Radio
...Would the media again
side with the “element”...would they again make
excuses for them...using the “race card” to again give them a
“free pass” so to speak...or would the blame be turned
solely on the Supreme Court justices who would now be cowering in
fear behind their what should be noble black robes.
Fear is a powerful usurper of justice just as fear, at times, does blind one to the truth...especially when it's a truth one does not want to hear or a fear one does not want to face...a fear that would likely be twisted by said “race card” of course being played yet again. No, I believe as it stands now, that the Supreme Court in a
majority but not in a unanimous vote, would not get involved and that
they would again pass the buck back down to the state courts as they
have done on contentious issues many times before...
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side
Patriot / Right Side Patriots Radio
“No, I never admitted defeat.”
- President Trump to The Water Cooler
host David Brody
Let's start with the simple premise
that President Donald J. Trump did indeed win reelection in 2020, and
that all the forensic audits, recounts, and legal challenges prove
this to be so. And while that indeed would be a very good thing for
our country as it would mean that technically Joe Biden is out and
Donald Trump is in...unfortunately I don't think this will happen.
And why...simply because even if it were the case that Trump did
win...which I wholeheartedly believe he did...the problem lies within
the U.S. Constitution itself for our founding document makes no
mention of the ramifications of such a fraudulent situation occurring
nor does it give the steps needed to remedy said
situation.
In fact, even the go-to Federalist
Papers do not broach this subject nor have legal cases been heard
regarding such a dire situation. And know that our Founding Fathers
could never have imagined and thus planned accordingly for such a
situation occurring for even they could not grasp the concept that
someday in the future time itself would produce such evil people who
would be hell bent on destroying everything they had worked so hard
to create...create as in a representative republic where freedom...
and of course election integrity...would be valued above all other
legal matters.
And even today when constitutional attorneys do delve into the
Constitution's wording about the all-important Electoral
College...the process by which the presidential winner is
officially declared...the only fact that remains constant is that,
to date, the Electoral College has never had to re-convene to recast
their vote regarding presidential certification...whether it be
because of a fraudulent vote cast or otherwise. So where does that
leave President Trump and we his supporters if it were proven beyond
a shadow of a doubt that the 2020 election was stolen from him via
overt fraud committed by those on the left whose agenda reeks of
socialism...socialism that edges ever closer to the unabashed
totalitarianism that is the hallmark of communism itself.
Would individual state courts now be forced to step in, in the
states where the fraud had been proven to have be committed or would
any decisions that needed to be made be made by the Supreme
Court...the highest court in our land?
I think here I can safely say that the Supreme Court, as it stands
now, with certain "activist justices" sitting within its own ranks, would pass
the proverbial buck, if you will, on a case such as this for even they know well
that their job is but to interpret the words as written in the
Constitution not second guess what nonexistent words might or
might not mean or even imply. And why do I say certain "activist justices"
currently sit on the High Court...because if one does read some of their
latest decisions and sees who sided where and with whom on certain
key issues, nothing else makes any sense especially when supposedly
conservative justices are in the majority. And yet it seems the
needed majority did base some of their decisions not on the law as
constitutionally written, but on the mood of the country at a
specifically given time.
In fact, why else would the High Court not take up the issue of
election fraud when it was first presented to them...with proof given
but unheard I might add...proof that the vote tallies in some key
battleground states saw more ballots being cast than there were
voters eligible to vote. Why else indeed for if truth be told...as it
always must be...I believe the justices feared the outcome of what
likely would lay before both them and the country...of what they
alone would be blamed for causing...if they rightfully dared to rule
in President Trump's favor.
Can you say the “element” behaving ever so badly yet again...can you say miscreants and thugs
again ruling the streets what with rioting, arson, mayhem, and maybe
even murder again predominately happening in blue cities and states...blue cities and
states where the police were defunded making them basically
powerless to step in...and with it all happening again along the same racial and
socioeconomic lines as last summer. Would the media again
side with the “element”...would they again make
excuses for them...using the “race card” to again give them a
“free pass” so to speak...or would the blame be turned
solely on the Supreme Court justices who would now be cowering in
fear behind their what should be noble black robes.
Fear is a powerful usurper of justice just as fear, at times, does
blind one to the truth... especially when it's a truth one does not
want to hear or a fear one does not want to face... a fear that would
likely be twisted by said “race card” of course being played yet
again. No, I believe as it stands now, that the Supreme Court in a
majority but not in a unanimous vote, would not get involved and that
they would again pass the buck back down to the state courts as they
have done on contentious issues many times before.
So if not the High Court getting involved what would happen even
in a proven to be fraudulent election were to fall into the hands of
the states...would the states themselves do right by President Trump?
And with state legislators having the power to
recall electors for fraud, would they have the courage and fortitude
to take electoral college votes away from Joe Biden and rightfully
re-certify the 2020 election in favor of the true winner, Donald J.
Trump? I think not for not only would the Democrats tie up such a
scenario in the federal courts for years...long past a Biden
presidency...or would the issue of statute of limitations itself come
into play what with electoral votes now being taken away almost a
year after the election.
Personally, I think even if a legal call for
re-certification was raised, I'm not sure it would happen, for again
no mention of this occurring or how it would be handled is in the
Constitution.
And not to be forgotten is the fact that
today's political climate exists solely in an arena ripe with
partisan driven politics...politics dirty way more times than not.
Simply, the Democrats...both the rank and file in Congress and most
especially the Democrat hierarchy...including it's not so shadowy
puppet master Barack HUSSEIN Obama... would then tightly circle the
wagons around Joe Biden, the now proven to be faux president rather
than risk losing both the implementation of Obama's decidedly
anti-America agenda or risk having a canary amongst them “singing”
the truth in order to cut a deal to save his or her own political
life. But with jail not being an option for certain believing
themselves to be “above the law”
folks still lurking in the shadows, know they would willingly
sacrifice one of their own for “the
cause,” especiallyif
itkept
their “puppet”
still dangling on the puppet master's string.
So if a recall and re-certification of the
2020 election is slim to none possibility wise, where do “We
the People” stand and what do we
do knowing that America now has a Commander-in-Chief who should not
be in office but is? Would our anger finally boil over, especially with
the now disastrous Biden administration on full display for all the
world to see...would it boil over to such a degree where only a
military coup could right this grievous wrong...as in mutiny in the name of
saving the Republic if you will...a noble quest but would it work?
Maybe and maybe not for today's military
hierarchy still seems to hold their allegiance not to Joe Biden, but
to his puppet master Obama, the man who appointed most of them to
their current positions. And while the rank and file troops
overwhelmingly appear to side with the Constitution, as their oath of
service demands, mutiny remains an action never to be taken lightly
especially when the Constitution's Article II, Section 4: states
that, “The President,
Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be
removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason,
Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.”
And while one would think that
election fraud does meet the legal definition of “High Crimes
and Misdemeanors,” the problem
remains,as before, in
that the Constitution does not give detailed examples as to specific crimes except to allude to allegations of misconduct committed by officials, even though many legal scholars today do believe these
words refer to what we call "felonies." So as of now we're still left wading through uncharted
legal grounds regarding a situation such as that we are now facing.
And while one Thierry Etienne Joseph Rotty,
a senior Controller at NATO, has laid out how a military coup
of sorts could take place in the U.S. in but two simple steps...with
the first being that with
White House communications controlled by the military, communications would simply be cut off after having advised the
Secret Service not to resist an impending assault and second, the 3rd
Infantry Regiment would “assault
the White House” and
literally remove the sitting president with help from the Joint
Chiefs of Staff and Secret Service if need be...but know this is highly
if not totally unlikely to ever happen.
But
for arguments sake let's say a military coup did happen, would Vice
President Kamala Harris then assume the presidency? I believe she
would not as she too would be subject
to the same questions of legitimacy...as in her also being elected via
fraud...as was Joe Biden, therefore she would not be deemed legally
fit to serve as president as well. So that then leaves yet another
nightmare scenario for it would be the infamous, ever power hungry
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi who would become
“acting president” until the
next presidential election, as per the Presidential Succession
Act of 1947. However, even if this were to occur Pelosi should would be rendered "politically impotent" if the
Republicans did end up controlling both the House and the Senate.
But again, the above stated scenario is for arguments sake alone for the hard to accept reality and truth is
that either Joe Biden or Kamala Harris will be president until
2024, a sad fact we Trump supporters must accept. And why...because
with the bad guys in power even the 2022 midterms remain in
question for voter fraud shows no signs of abating as states like
California, but one state amongst other blue states, are now making it
even easier for voter fraud to be committed via mail-in ballots being
sent out to even unregistered voters. Simply, until Republicans take
back the House, the Senate, and the White House, no election will
matter for the fix is in with elections being decided even before the
first vote...whether it be legally or illegally...is cast.
The clock is ever so silently ticking down for a possible Second
American Revolution to begin, but it will only begin when we patriots
have reached the final breaking point... something that seems that for
far too many has not yet been reached. Case closed.
************************************************************************************* For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article,People Aren't Seahorses.
Tuesday, October 12th, from 7 to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Truth, Fear, and Constitutional Legalities'; 'People Aren't Seahorses'; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTSon
https://rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with the show beginning at 7pm EST.
Monday, October 12, 2020
Op-ed:
On Court Packing and Amendment 25
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on Right Side Patriots Radio
“The
American people deserve a straight answer and if you
haven’t figured it out yet, the straight answer is they are going
to pack the Supreme Court if they somehow win this election.” - Vice President Mike Pence's response to Kamala
Harris during last weeks Vice-Presidential debate
It's the ultimate Part A-Part B six
million dollar question that we've all been waiting to hear the
answer to...as in will Joe Biden “pack the Supreme Court”
if elected president coupled with why won't he tell us who's on his
“short list” of justice nominees. And with Democrats still
saying let the people make the nominee decision via their
presidential vote, Joe Biden instead is forcing voters to make a
“blind decision” as his answer to both parts of said
question remains “after the election,” and
that the voters "do not deserve to know." And
thus the problem is that our side...the Trump side...the
constitutional side...is not focused nor demanding enough as to force
those questions to be answered like right now.
But there's a reason for that question
not being at the forefront of the political discourse, and I'll
answer as to why in a bit.
And so with political skulduggery
continuing on, the ones being hurt the most by Biden's refusal to
answer remains both “We the People” and our nation's very
rule of law. How so? Simply, a Joe Biden win...whether by hook or by
crook...would surely see our Constitution being rendered
null-and-void. And why so? Because with Biden as
president...especially with Obama and the uber far left faction of
the now Democrat-Socialist party pulling his strings...the Supreme
Court’s days of being both the arbitrator and the interpreter of
Constitutional law (which is their job description) would come to an
end as the court would now be packed with liberal justices who would
willingly flaunt the D after their name. And this in turn would see
those justices handing down decisions based not upon Constitutional
law but as a way to solidify a solid Democrat voting block based upon
their personal political ideologies and leanings, thus changing the
High Court's political complexion, pushing it to the far left, for
many generations to come.
And if that were to be accomplished via a Joe
Biden win, Barack HUSSEIN Obama's fundamental transformation of
America will have come to fruition. How so...because if you couple a
Biden win with the Democrats keeping the House and possibly even
retaking the Senate, and then add in their promise to end the
“filibuster”...we would then bear witness to all
legislation that the Democrats propose being enacted by a simple majority
vote. And with their also “packing” the High Court, reality
then becomes that any challenges made by minority-rule Republicans
would be a mute point. Translation: the
entirety of the Democratic party's socialist agenda would
then be put into place simply with what would be President Biden's signature, and
America as we know and love her would never be the same again.
But why really are both Joe Biden and
Kamala Harris so afraid to answer this two part simple question? In
Biden's own words, “you know the moment I answer that question,
the headline in every one of your papers will be about that.”
And really why shouldn't it be as the truth has already been stated
in Biden and Harris' actually not answering said question.
Translation: Joe Biden most assuredly will start the process for
“packing” the High Court on day one of his administration,
thus succeeding not only in negating the entirety of the Trump
administration's policies, but allowing the party hierarchy to “save
a bit of face” for their having failed in their numerous
attempts to impeach President Trump.
However, nothing changes the fact that
Joe Biden has always been known as a "stooge of the establishment," and
while he has not historically been a proponent of the kind of
“norm-busting” that court "packing" would surely entail, Biden's
refusing to answer the “packing” question proves
he's sold out to the socialist left fringe of his party even while
knowing that “packing” the High Court does not sit will
with the vast majority of Americans on either side of the political
aisle...Americans who do understand how critical such an upheaval would
be for “packing” the court would indeed negate the
Constitution's mandated and very
much needed “balance of power” clause.And while Biden might relish in
the number of votes his selling out to the far left would garner for
him, I still don't believe said votes would be enough to bring a must
have change in control of the Senate, for without a Senate numerical
change court “packing”
will simply not happen even if Biden were to win the presidency.
And yet the media ignores or gives but cursory attention to this
what should be a key issue in the political discourse leaving one to
wonder why. So now I'll tell you why...it's my belief that the media
knows that first, liberal “packing” of the Supreme Court will not
happen as long as the Senate remains in Republican control and
second, they know that the polls are being manipulated...that the
poll numbers are lying...and that President Trump will indeed win
reelection. And with that said it's figured why even bother pushing the court
“packing” issue or even asking for Biden's hush-hush short
list of nominees as to do so would put negative focus back on Biden
whose list...which might even have Obama's name on it...would surely
give President Trump much needed fodder to light yet another fire on
Twitter and conservative sites.
Remember, the media's job remains
protecting candidate Joe Biden who's obviously in throws of dementia,
but in order to do so issues of controversy must be neutralized...or
better yet ignored. This is what the media has been ordered to do by
those in Democrat positions of power...this is what the media will
continue to do until the bitter losing end.
“This isn’t about any judgment anybody has about somebody’s
behavior. This is about a diagnosis, a professional medical
diagnosis. This is not with bad intent." So said House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi at last Friday's hastily called press conference
And in a somewhat related issue, we all know that last Friday
afternoon Nancy Pelosi announced her plans for a bill that she
believes could help remove President Trump from office based upon the
“removal process” granted under Section 4 of the 25th
Amendment which states in part that, “Whenever the Vice
President and a majority of either the principal officers of the
executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law
provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the
Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration
that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of
his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers
and duties of the office as Acting President.”
And while Pelosi's saying that the “coronavirus-infected president’s
recent erratic behavior” warrants such a bill and that she's
simply setting up a process authorized by the Constitution that
needed to have been codified long ago, she was quick to add that
the proposed bill does not seek to remove President Trump on said grounds
before next month’s election.
“This is not about President
Donald Trump — he will face the judgment of the voters. This
legislation applies to future presidents but we are reminded of the
necessity of action by the health of the current president,” were Nancy Pelosi's exact words.
Now let six of those words really sink in...“This legislation
applies to future presidents...” And
now narrow those six words down to just two words, “future
presidents,” and a dangerous
truth is revealed for the bill being proposed by the ever
vile, conniving shrew that is Nancy Pelosi was never...I repeat
never...intended to affect President Trump as neither Vice-President
Mike Pence nor the Republican controlled Senate would ever sign off
on it. From the beginning this proposed bill...which like the 25th
Amendment would allow for the temporary or permanent removal of a
president on the grounds of mental or physical incapacity...was
intended to remove Joe Biden from office...if he was so elected...
thus making then Vice-President Kamala Harris president.
And like with “packing” the Supreme Court, Obama's
fundamental transformation of America would also come to fruition for
we know that power hungry Kamala Harris will promise, do, say,
or sign off on every and anything to be president, and that the
Democrat-Socialists...as in the “Squad” who really are in
control of the party as well as being the ones pulling Nancy Pelosi's
strings ...think this act of what is overt political desperation will
make it all so, after all Joe Biden’s mental decline is on full
display for all to see.
So what specifically is in Nancy Pelosi's bill...actually the
'Pelosi-Raskin bill'...an updated version of a bill Rep. Jamie Raskin
first introduced in May 2017? First, said bill would create a
17-member commission comprised of four physicians, four
psychiatrists, and eight former high-ranking executive cabinet
members appointed by congressional leadership from both parties. The
final member would be selected by the other 16 to serve as chair of
the commission and if need be as the tie-breaker. And note Pelosi
cleverly crafted this bill so as to allow former Obama cabinet
members to participate for the word “former” is used as
opposed to “current” members and nowhere does the bill say
they must be from the “current” administration. Second, as
per the bill, said commission would get to work on examining the
president’s mental and physical capacity to hold office if both the
House and the Senate approve resolutions to that effect. And lastly,
after such an examination the commission would then compile a report
that could be used as support for invoking Section 4 of the 25th
Amendment.
Thankfully, this proposed bill has absolutely no chance of becoming law
before the election as the House is not scheduled to be in session
until after Election Day. But clever little party shill that she is,
Nancy Pelosi has put the focus back on President Trump's having
contracted COVID-19 (while at the same time not saying that he fully
and quite quickly recovered from it) by her ignoring the fact that in no way
did it affect his carrying out his presidential duties...which he did
so quite effectively I might add. And it's Pelosi saying that Trump
may be acting irrationally because of the wide range of experimental drugs
he took to fight the virus, that justifies the need for this bill.
And so the woman who now suddenly and oh so miraculously wants us
to believe that she cares about Constitutional law keeps reiterating
that, “Congress has a constitutional duty to lay out the process
by which a president’s incapacity as the president of any party is
determined,” and “What happens if a president, any
president, ends up in a coma or on a ventilator and has made no
provisions for the temporary transfer of power?” And these are
the words that has led many Republicans to erroneously believe that Nancy Pelosi is either still trying to overturn the 2016 election or that
she's now trying to overturn, in advance, the results of next month’s
election.
But like I stated earlier, this proposed bill is not now nor has
ever been about President Trump nor is about COVID-19, that's all
just a facade Pelosi hopes will help to reinforce undecided voters
negative views of President Trump in the remaining weeks leading up
to the election. It is and will remain about securing the presidency for
Kamala Harris by throwing Joe Biden by the wayside if he were to
become president. And Nancy Pelosi just about admitted so with her words,“If the president wins reelection, yes it will apply to him. If
he doesn’t, it will apply to the next president of the United
States”...for "establishment" Joe Biden was never who she nor her
party really wanted to head the ticket...for Biden is a man they simply cannot risk having for four let alone eight years in office as that
would greatly set back the timetable for their still hoped for fundamental changing of
America. Case closed.
**************************************************************************************************************************************** For
more political commentary please visit my RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
partner Craig Andresen's blog The
National Patriot
to read his latest article, Liberal Catch Phrases Decoded.
Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 13th from 7 to 9pm EST,RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'On Court Packing and Amendment 25'; 'Liberal Catch Phrases Decoded'; and important news of
the day.
Hope you can tune in to RIGHT
SIDE PATRIOTSon
our newly launched website rspradio1.com. Click 'LISTEN
LIVE' starting
at 6:50 pm EST with the show beginning at 7pm EST.
