Op-ed:
Unmasking the Snake and His Vipers
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on Right Side Patriots Radio

“The biggest political crime in American history, by far!”
- President Trump on the targeting of incoming officials and the sabotaging of his new administration

He was and remains the head of the den of snakes...the very snake who orchestrating and held sway over the anything but transparent White House meeting back on January 5, 2017...a meeting to further plot and plan how to use the knowingly fabricated nonsense about Russian interference in the 2016 election and tie it into newly-elected President Donald J. Trump. And slithering alongside the head snake, slithering and hissing like the vipers they are in their own right, was then Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates, then FBI Director James Comey, ex-CIA Director John Brennan, then Director of National Intelligence James Clapper, as well as then National Security Adviser Susan Rice, plus other assorted members of the National Security Council.

And dare we forget that then Vice-President and now presumed Democrat presidential nominee Joe Biden was there as well although he now says that he didn’t know anything about the unmasking of General Flynn even though he was actually in on the planning. 

And so they secretly gathered to layout the logistics as to how best to overthrow our duly elected president as well as to plan how it would all be covered up. In fact, the snake tasked certain of those present with the job of protecting his and his administration’s using of the then secretly funded Clinton campaign research that was the cornerstone of the entire Trump colluded with the Russians hoax... tasked them with keeping it from being discovered by the now incoming Trump administration. So as the snake continued tightening his grip over his vipers, on the meeting's completion the snake then asked Sally Yates and James Comey to "stay behind," to further discuss something he had recently learned...as in "the information about [then-incoming National Security Adviser Michael].Flynn," along with Flynn's phone conversation with then Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak...a conversation supposedly about possible forthcoming sanctions against Russia.

So with the snake hissing that he "specified that he did not want any additional information on the matter, but was seeking information on whether the White House should be treating Flynn any differently, given the information," the snake knew his words were rhetorical as he was and will remain the one who directed the show while trying to hide his head in the sand like a foolhardy ostrich always does. 

And only now are we starting to see just what steps were actually taken to try and accomplish the snake's goal... steps that included high-level partisan operatives leaking selective information in support of the now ongoing Russia-Trump conspiracy hoax; steps that included setting-up the ambush of incoming National Security Adviser Gen. Michael Flynn; and steps that included making doubly sure that Jeff Sessions, Trump's incoming AG, would be forced to recuse himself from any investigations into now President Trump. And let's not forget that at every step taken carefully orchestrated media leaks were a diabolical given.

And we all know...or should know...that the snake of course is Barack HUSSEIN Obama...a man besides himself after being denied his defacto third term in office as he was the one who would have been pulling Hillary Clinton's presidential strings. And it's Obama, in my opinion, who should be the first of many charged with treason for his orchestrating the thankfully failed attempt at a political coup. Also, in my opinion, all who attended said meeting and who carried out their Obama designated assignments are just as guilty of treason for they, too, knowingly tried to undermine and negate the results of a fair and open election. 

Remember, it was at this Obama called for secret meeting where it all began for not only was General Flynn under surveillance by this time, but he was already set-up to be the fall guy as well. And this was being done solely to give a semblance of credence to what was still an Obama loyal FBI, an FBI that until this point could find not a thing to nail President Trump on simply because nothing of any dubious nature was going on. And so this became a plan concocted out of revenge for an election lost...a carefully hidden...or so they thought...plan that finally saw the light of day when now AG William Barr announced that not only was the Department of Justice completely dropping the case against the general...a case Barr said was never justified to begin with...dropping the case even after General Flynn had admitted under duress that he lied to the FBI about having discussed sanctions with Ambassador Kislyak... something he later retracted.

So what was Obama's response to the dropping of the case? When a recording of a call between Obama and former members of his administration were leaked these were but some of the words he said, "the rule of law is at risk." And here the anything but constitutional lawyer is wrong.

How so? First is the fact that General Flynn was never charged with perjury, a charge which requires a "material false statement" be made under oath with "intent to deceive," and no such thing happened as no such charge was ever levied against Flynn. And why wasn't such a charge levied...because there's a huge legal distinction between lying and perjury. And second, remember no perjury charges for his lying under oath were ever brought against Andrew McCabe regarding the lies he told in a number of fully recorded and then transcribed interviews with the Inspector General about a leak only he knew he had caused, thus meaning that a breech of the Rule of Law would only have occurred if McCabe had been charged with perjury and Flynn wasn't. And besides, General Flynn was never placed under oath, he had no legal counsel present...McCabe did...nor were his statements recorded, but instead those statements were created as being false by FBI agents, like Peter Strzok, who also falsified the 302 document, the very document President Trump now wants to see.

So whether Obama likes it or not, what's good for the goose is good for the gander. And with the DOJ not prosecuting Andrew McCabe, the Rule of Law actually required that the Justice Department dismiss the prosecution of General Flynn.

And so what Obama loyalists tried and are still trying to pass off as but a harmless Obama critique of “prosecutorial procedures” by law enforcement officials serving under his administration, was and remains a carefully planned, carried out, but thankfully failed attempt at a coup, an “act of treason” with the Rule of Law itself aiding in the snake and his vipers finally being caught. 

Treason in baby-step increments I call Obama and his vipers actions, but first know that plotting a coup...plotting treason...is not treason in and of itself for only when plans are put into action does it truly become an “act of treason.” And in Obama's case the steps towards treason actually starting when a senior U.S. government official first leaked the contents of General Flynn's phone call to Ambassador Kislyak to the Hillary supporting and endorsing Washington Post...a leak considered to be a felony in and of itself as the information regarding said phone call was designated as “classified”...with “classified” meaning not to be shared with anyone let alone leaked to the press.

And another treasonous baby-step taken was the out-and-out lies told by Obama shill and then U.N. Ambassador Samantha Power who, in 2017, testified under oath to Congress that she never sought to unmask records containing information about now former White House National Security Adviser Michael J. Flynn. But now we know as fact that she lied thanks to newly declassified documents from the NSA that clearly show Samantha Power's name on at least seven separate requests to unmask Flynn’s name between November 30, 2016 and January 11, 2017.

Lies and treason do go hand-in-hand as one easily feeds off the other.

And to add fuel to the fire of Obama's treasonous plot for revenge, most components were being delegated not only to the a fore mentioned key players, but to those cleverly hiding in plain sight...those Obama deliberately left behind, like Eric Ciaramella, during the time of transitioning from his to the Trump administration...persons now tasked with spying on Trump and his people. And it was also a time when even more false narratives were being concocted in order to cause sideline distractions that would not allow President Trump to govern as he should, thus putting national security at risk. And when on May 9, 2017, President Trump rightfully fired Obama shill James Comey as head of the FBI, the Obama hoped for coup was launched with Comey's firing being the signal that set the wheels in notion starting with the Mueller investigation and hopefully ending with Donald Trump's removal from office.

But on some level Obama had to fear that his carefully laid plans could someday come back to haunt or simply outright fail. And why...because no matter how many loyal spies he left behind during transition even he had to know that spies cannot always be trusted not to turn on their spymaster. Simply, there was no way to guarantee that once he left office all would go as planned, hence the January 5th meeting where he ordered, where he demanded, that the FBI investigation must be protected at all costs via coordinated and complicit media leaks...leaks released only when they could do the most damage to Trump and his people.

And when all the pieces are assembled together the picture that emerges is one of treason for now the facts show that Obama and his vipers did indeed frame top Trump officials in an effort to derail and hopefully negate Donald Trump's presidency truly making this, "the biggest political crime in American history," as per President Trump's own words.

And it truly is for the Obama-loyal hierarchy of the FBI was more than willing to frame an innocent man...General Michael Flynn...even while knowing that there was absolutely no evidence whatsoever to tie him into any wrongdoing, Russian or otherwise. And it appears that both FBI Director James Comey and Deputy Director Andrew McCabe got those orders to do so on word from Obama even though said investigation had already been marked “closed,” allowing their Trump-hating henchman, Peter Strzok, to deliver the final blow. And we also know that James Comey, as head of the FBI, did not brief any in the incoming administration nor President Trump himself regarding the investigation of General Flynn, thus not only protecting Obama's direct involvement, but failing to do the job his position dictate he do.

So where do we go from here knowing that this is not Obama's nor his administration's first of what many believe to be treasonous acts...remember Benghazi, the Uranium One deal, the Iranian nuclear deal, the $150 billion dollar middle of the night payoff to Iran, just to name but a few? The fact is that while there is evidence to bring the snake Obama and his vipers up on charges of treason, there are too many hurdles needing to be crossed...hurdles like constitutional law, criminal procedure as in due process, and partisan loyal judges who could and probably would throw a wrench into the legality end of the mix.

And then there's this pesky little fact that would need to be unequivocally proven...as in did Barack HUSSEIN Obama deliberately and with malice intended undermine the interests of these United States. And know there is a huge difference between a president doing something illegal and doing something to undermine the country. So while certain actions of his did undermine our country...the Iranian nuclear deal for one...said deal was not technically illegal, nor did it meet the Constitutional definition of treason.

“Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.” - 18 U.S. Code § 2381

That's what the Constitution says is treason and in no way do those words dismiss an ex-president nor ex-appointed government officials from being accused thereof for to attempt a coup against a duly elected president does indeed give “aid and comfort” to America's enemies, and in the broadest sense is also an act of war against America and “We the People” as well.

And so Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his vipers who not only plotted to remove a duly elected president not of their liking from office, but who maliciously worked to destroy a 33-year veteran of the United States Army who defended the Constitution and this country “from all enemies, foreign and domestic” with the highest of honors, should be charged with treason for not to do so sets the precedent that the law that is the Constitution applies to some but not to all.

And to Lindsay Graham and his fellow Senate Republicans who fear bringing charges against America's first black president...actually America's first mixed-race president...you're letting his skin color blind you to the truth that Barack HUSSEIN Obama, in my opinion, through his attempt to overthrow President Donald J. Trump is guilty of treason as he and his vipers worked to undermine the very Rule of Law that is the United States Constitution. Case closed.

Copyright @ 2020 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.
  

************************************************************************************* 

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, ObamaGate’s Liars, Spiers and Deniers - Part 2.

*************************************************************************************************************************************  

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!    

Tomorrow, Tuesday, May 19th from 7 to 9pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Unmasking the Snake and His Vipers'; 'ObamaGate’s Liars, Spiers and Deniers - Part 2'; and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in to RSP Radio at: https://streamingv2.shoutcast.com/right-side-patriots

Investigative Report: 

Generals Stirring the Proverbial Political Pot

By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

Last Friday AG Jeff Sessions held a press conference to address the ongoing leaks that are affected the Trump presidency...a press conference I expected so much from only to get little to nothing of substance. Same old, same old, was the order of the day to such a degree that I am convinced Jeff Sessions is not up to the task he is now charged with. With the demeanor of a milquetoast of sorts, what Trump needs from his AG, especially with the leaks actually increasing not decreasing, would be what amounts to a bull in a China shop...and simply...Jeff Sessions ain't it.

"This nation must end the culture of leaks"...Sessions said, stating the obvious when the obvious did not need to be said. And saying that the DOJ might...I repeat...might...as in there's a possibility it will not...begin reviewing the potential for media subpoenas...shows a laize-faire attitude towards a media whose actions amount to treason if what they are willfully leaking affects national security or the safety of our troops. I did, however, agree when Sessions said that the press does not have an "unlimited" role in American society. "They cannot place lives at risk with impunity. We must balance the press' role with protecting our national security and the lives of those who serve in our intelligence community, the armed forces, and all law-abiding Americans," were his exact words rightfully said, but following those words was no stating of how to do what his words insinuated we do.

A let down for sure yet not unexpected when a weak man is put into a position that calls for a man of fortitude and strength...not one whose strongest words to the leakers were, “Don't do it.” The leakers must be shaking in their boots with that one...sarcastically said.

 

And the timing of this press conference was laughable at best for it was announced just the day before a new and most grievous of leaks hit the public venues...as in the transcripts of private telephone conversations between President Trump and the president of Mexico, and President Trump and the prime minister of Australia. 

 

“No government can be effective when its leaders cannot discuss sensitive matters in confidence or talk freely in confidence with foreign leaders," Sessions said, again stating the obvious while ignoring the fact that the answer to the leaking is hiding in plain site. And I cannot believe that AG Jeff Sessions has no clue as to who the leaker is...but I'll say again what I have said since day one...I believe National Security Advisor Gen. H.R. McMaster is the very man they all seek.

Now I will lay out my case for why McMaster must go.

I first stated some reasons for believing so almost immediately upon his appointment, and wrote about it back in March in article titled, The Manipulation of Willful Ignorance...an article you can read in-full by simply clicking on said title. Briefly and to the point, Gen. H.R. McMaster is an islamic-condoner whose beliefs about islam and the enemy we currently face are directly in opposition to those of President Trump...in opposition to such a degree that he vocally supported Barack HUSSEIN Obama's 'very bad' nuclear deal with Iran. 

 

And McMaster on numerous occasions has stated that he believes islam is a religion of peace hijacked by radicals, as could be witnessed in his first words said to his new staff after he assumed the national security advisor position...words to the affect that he considered the term “radical islamic terrorism” both “unhelpful” and “counterproductive,” and that eliminating that term would be “an improvement” in how we fight the enemy. 

 

An improvement in how we fight those out to kill us all I think not for the man who said those words believes that the term radical islamic terrorism as per his own words, “angers the Muslim world, stokes anti-American fires, and endangers U.S. troops and national security,” forgetting that words are not a weapon of war...actions taken are. 

 

And all of McMaster's words said fit perfectly together with Obama's words that we must “win the hearts and minds of the enemy”...that we dare not send his brethren to kingdom come where they truly belong. And really why wouldn't McMaster say what he says and do what he does for I believe the general is an Obama operative...as he is a holdover from the Obama administration...one of but a few generals not fired by Obama when he purged his command of generals he deemed "not loyal" to his way of fighting the enemy...or should I say not fighting the enemy. 

 

An Obama operative 'planted' to do as much damage to the Trump presidency as he can do for who would dare to question the doings or decisions of a lieutenant general with an almost impeccable military record, but a general who is a known anti-Semite who hates Israel (remember, Gen. McMaster was the lone voice against President Trump visiting the Western Wall and if Trump insisted on doing so not to let Netanyahu accompany him for fear it would offend muslims not because of falsely reported security concerns), and who like Obama has no love or respect for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu unlike President Trump who does and also calls him friend. 

But even with this, what I want to know is who recommended and got President Trump to appoint as national security advisor a man who opposes almost all of his 'to-do' list...the start of which is the fact that McMaster opposes the president's temporary muslim travel ban; that McMaster opposes getting us out of Afghanistan while wanting us further engaged in Syria; and that he wants the 'very bad' Iranian nuclear deal kept in place as is. And to McMaster, China is not a big issue...to Trump it rightfully is.

So the rumor mill is ripe with possibilities but seems to be zeroing in on RINO Sen. John McCain as the one who pushed for McMaster's appointment after the firing of Gen. Flynn, and that he did so while pretending to have buried the hatchet after Trump apologized for some questionable words said about McCain's war-time service in Viet Nam...words said during a contentious campaign season. And if these rumors are true McCain buried the hatchet all right...right in President Trump's back.

And now on top of all this surfaces an undated and unclassified letter Gen. H.R. McMaster himself wrote and sent via U.S. snail-mail...a letter delivered the last week in April...to Obama's former National Security Advisor Susan Rice...she of Benghazi talk show infamy and he using Obama's oft said catch phrase “going forward” in the second line of said letter. And in this letter McMaster gave Rice permission to not only keep her top-secret security clearance, but he also afforded her both “unfettered” and “continuing” access to highly classified information as well as waiving her “need-to-know” requirement on any and all...as in everything...she viewed and/or received during her tenure under Obama. 

 

And what makes this beyond grievous is the fact that McMaster allowed Susan Rice these privileges even after she had been exposed as the one who “unmasked” both members of President Trump’s transition team and other Americans surveilled under the Obama administration...even giving some of their names to the media and the press.

But know that under some specific circumstances as per “Executive Order 13526 Section 4.4 Access by Historical Researchers and Certain Former Government Personnel,” certain senior government officials can be given what's called “unfettered” access to classified information, with their “need to know” being waived for a set period of time. But the question is why would one of Trump's key advisors give such privileges to someone now under Congressional investigation...especially someone who is assuredly part of the shadow government trying to take this president down. Simply, they would not unless that person was not loyal to the man he now works for, but was a man whose loyalty and allegiances still lie with the very man who runs said shadow government...as in one Barack HUSSEIN Obama. 

 

But the bottom line concerning this letter and what amounts to McMaster overstepping his bounds...his position is an advisory one not one where he can delegate policy...means that with Susan Rice actually no longer holding a government position and with Obama who appointed her no longer president, Rice should no longer be in possession of or have any access to any paper work or computer files she had when she was working in her official government capacity...it is as simple as that. And McMaster knew this, still did what he did, and said not a word about it to President Trump.

And dare we forget that McMaster has fired many folks our president trusted and counted on. To name just a few... McMaster fired top White House intelligence aide Ezra Cohen-Watnick who played a key role in exposing Obama's appointed personnel eavesdropping on Trump officials; he fired Rich Higgins, senior director for strategic planning after he wrote a memo about globalists and islamist collaborating together to subvert Trump’s policy agenda; and just recently McMaster fired Col. Derek Harvey, the senior director for the Middle East after 'supposed' complaints from Secretary of Defense James Mattis, a McMaster ally of sorts who, unfortunately while a great military tactician, takes a somewhat soft stance on islam itself while taking a somewhat questionable stance on Israel. More on this in a bit.

To add to the list of those fired by McMaster is Adam Lovinger, senior director for strategic assessments, fired after he attended a bar-mitzvah in Israel because he accused anti-Trump bureaucrats of politicizing the security clearance process; as well as Deputy National Security Adviser K.T. McFarland, who was forced out of the NSC in April. And according to word out of D.C., McMaster is still firing others...including any and all opposed to Obama's 'very bad' nuclear deal...and any and all who dare to mention any of Obama's islamic-condoning holdovers.

But what did and do most of these folks have in common... first, most were hired by Gen. Michael Flynn, the very man Trump first appointed as national security advisor and a man who dared to tell the truth about muslims and islam. And second, most of those fired were champions of Israel... with many being Jewish...and were opposed to the 'so-called' Palestinians so-wanted two-state solution...the solution to help her enemies nail Israel's coffin shut.

And if all I stated was not reason enough to fire McMaster there's the matter of both his Deputy Security Advisor Dina Habib-Powell...a close friend of Obama's roomie and still string-puller Valerie Jarrett as well as being friends with Huma 'Muslim Brotherhood' Abedin...and of Kris Bauman, the man he appointed the National Security Council’s new "point man" on all things Israel. 

First...Habib-Powell. This woman is a member of Vital Voices, an organization founded and co-chaired by none other than Hillary Clinton herself and its rumored to be yet another part of her "donation racket"...and she is the one person reported to work hand-in-hand with McMaster...sort of a 'twofer' if you will. But here's a bit of extremely disconcerting information...in the 1990s Habib-Powell was actually caught leaking to the press “negative stories” on Ginny Thomas, the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas. 

Birds of a feather it seems as what one got caught doing the other is now highly suspected of doing...and I believe did do...or even did it together.

Second...Kris Bauman. McMaster appointed Bauman, a fellow islamic-condoner, Hamas supporter/apologist and John Kerry protege...who believes that the “Israel Lobby” is a threat and that Israel should be pressured into making concessions to islamic terrorists as well as retreat to its now indefensible '67 borders...and a man who when part of the Obama team's last round of peace talks said, “the Obama Administration must find creative (but legal) ways to include Hamas in a solution”...to basically be his personal advisor on Israel. A man who believes that Israel is at fault for the failure of all previous peace efforts and that peace can only be achieved when the U.S. applies enough diplomatic and economic pressure on Israel, will now be advising our president via McMaster on critical Israeli-Palestinian issues.

A friend and supporter of Israel Gen. H.R. McMaster is not no matter the media's or his supporter's claim to the contrary as his NSC is now full of anti-Israel, pro-Palestinian, supporters.

And last for now it must be said that it was Gen. McMaster himself along with his recently appointed Senior Director of Counter-Terrorism Mustafa Javed Ali...who is CAIR’s 'so-called' diversity outreach coordinator...blocked anti-islamic activist Ayaan Hirsi Ali from formally presenting her paper on radical islamic terrorism at the NSC unless an official representative from CAIR could speak to refute her work. Traveling to D.C. to present her work before the Senate, McMaster was also the one who prevented Ali from meeting with President Trump, allowing her only an 'informal' meeting with NSC members.

But even with all I presented here know there is more that will come out about Gen. H.R. McMaster and those he surrounds himself with...after all he appears to be James Comey's 'deep state' replacement...much more to add to the case for his firing (and dare I say arrest for subversion) for McMaster serves solely at the pleasure of the president, and like his buddy Comey, he can be fired for any reason or no reason at all.

“Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” - words once said by Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis.

A bit ago I mentioned Secretary of Defense James Mattis... a man 'eased' into retirement by Obama...but know that one critical Middle East stance of his raises some red flags for me for Gen. Mattis, has instead of placing blame for the region’s unrest on islam’s 1,400-year-old violent history, he places the blame for regional anti-Western, anti-American, sentiments and hostilities on the “Arab street’s” perception of the “injustice of oppression” supposedly suffered by the Palestinians under the Israeli occupation. In fact, in 2013 at the Aspen Security Forum, Mattis defended...and still defends...the two-state solution saying,“I paid a military security price every day as the commander of CENTCOM because the Americans were seen as biased in support of Israel.”

Guess what we are and rightly so as Israel is the Middle East's only democracy...a beacon of freedom amongst those out to kill us all...as well as being our staunchest ally.

And Gen. Mattis also recently stated that Israel's control of Judea and Samaria was “unsustainable,” and that Jewish “settlements” could turn Israel into an “apartheid state.” Sounds a bit too close to words said by Obama if you ask me, but remember, General Mattis was Obama's appointee to head CentCom.

But please don't get me wrong as I support our military one hundred plus percent, but supporting our military does not mean I cannot disagree with some choices made for why out of our vast military pool of possible choices did President Trump give two key positions to one holdover Obama appointee and the other a man who might or might not be a true supporter of Israel. Why...obviously our president is being given cleverly manipulated information... information not to help his presidency succeed but information to help in destroying it...and to do so via his own appointees.

Also, and with all honor and due respect for their service, I feel it must be noted that maybe the time has come for our political leaders to realize that those military men and women who came of age and wore our nation's uniform during the Viet Nam era up to the time of the First Gulf War fought a different type of war and a vastly different enemy than we are fighting today. And so when choosing military men to lead our troops into today's wars and even when choosing those who will advise our president, maybe those people should be drawn only from those valiant and brave men and women who have lived and fought...and maybe still do... during this age of escalating islamic terrorism for they know first hand better than most the here and now tangibles of the enemy we currently face.

And in the case of Gen. Mattis, who not long ago told Congress that we are "not winning" the war in Afghanistan (see and hear the general saying those words here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8iRcRLsbFxc)...not a great morale booster for our troops currently on the ground or those being sent there...the most important question that must be asked is are we, under his command, really winning in the Middle East more so than we were before. Unfortunately, I think not for while Mosul has been won back from ISIS control that winning in the long run remains tentative at best...Syria is still in turmoil as we continue to support the wrong side as in the anything but 'rebels' who are tentacles of ISIS and al-Qaeda...and Iran gets closer everyday to its goal of wiping Israel off the map.

So while the good general wages an intensely focused battle against ISIS, the fact remains that there is more to the Middle East conundrum than just ISIS, including the political battle of words we fight with our NATO allies over Israel...Israel who NATO condemns while they excuse the actions of the islamists even as their countries are being invaded and overrun by said islamists. And we have our own problems right here at home in that certain policy setters and advisors, while not condoning the islamists per se, still refuse to stand strong and admit who the enemy we fight really is...as in islam itself. And Gen. James 'Mad Dog' Mattis is one such person, for this general above all else should know that you cannot win a war against an enemy you still refuse to name.

And that leads into the question do military men make good politicians or good cabinet choices. To that, except for some well-known exceptions, I'm not so sure they do. And why...while service in the military does prepare someone to make tough decisions and show leadership especially in times of war...politics is and will always remain a game that most times does not play by the rules. And with the military demanding allegiance to a certain set of rules above all else, and with politicians rarely playing by the rules, a politician is better suited to play the dirty game called politics. But a military leader close at hand is needed for their battle, weapons, tactical, and delegating of duties expertise, but even that can turn into a game playing negative when said military leader is not really part of the...in this case... president's team.

This is surely the case with Gen. H.R. McMaster who needs to be sent packing post-haste, but in the case of General James Mattis and even to some degree with newly appointed Chief of Staff Gen. John Kelly, only time, battles won, right sides taken, and people rightfully fired will tell. But know that sometimes too much brass itself does indeed tarnish the proverbial political pot especially when that political pot is hand delivered by Barack HUSSEIN Obama... the still in operation enemy within.

Copyright @ 2017 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor

************************************************************ 

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!

Today, Tuesday, August 8th from 7 to 9pm on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss "Generals Stirring the Proverbial Political Pot, revisit the issue of sanctuary cities, and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history

Op-ed:
Master of Illusion...Perpetrator of Collusion
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio

“We had no indication prior to the election that adversaries were planning cyber operations against election infrastructure that would change the outcome of the 2016 election.” - Samuel Liles, acting director of the DHS Cyber Division 

He thought he had moved the pieces on the chess board in such a way as to not only assure that Hillary would be anointed president, but in such a way as to checkmate the enemy in the outside chance that she did not win...in the outside chance the American people were fooled, bamboozled, or were just he thought stupid enough to elect a man whose presidency he would need to bring down.

And so he lined up his pawns, being ever so careful to pick and chose those he thought would serve him well and he did the same with those he chose to be the behind-the-scenes manipulators and string pullers...string pullers he thought had enough political smarts that they knew the ways of how not to be caught. But as events unfolded the fact was shown that sometimes even he who thinks himself all powerful and all knowing can and does misjudge the very ones whose strings he pulls...and so he becomes exposed as not the chess master he thought himself to be but the court jester in the true chess king's court.

So when all the puppets, the manipulators, and string pullers are played in such a way as to remove them from the game board, the piece left on the board is not the one who thought himself the chess master but is the one who actually was the architect of all things anti-Trump. And while first in one's mind is probably sore-loser Hillary Clinton...a 'she' thinking herself powerful enough to be considered a political 'he'...know that while she most assuredly is part of those who laid the ground work and perpetrated the lies of Russian 'supposed' involvement in the 2016 election...also know that she is not smart enough to lay out the all-important time line of what would happen when, where, how, and to whom.

Nor is it the 6' 8" giant of man named James Comey... former F.B.I Director and Hillary protector James Comey...for no matter his size or the position he once held he is a weak and cowardly man...a man who fell for President Trump's cleverly crafted chess move of 'what if tapes existed' of conversations said...he is a man who folded under pressure not for altruistic reasons but because he knew he had to save both his and Hillary's sorry selves for fear of his becoming yet another victim left in the wake of the Clinton's, I believe, body count numbers.

And then there's former Attorney General Loretta Lynch...another 'she' who thinks herself still powerful enough to be a political 'he'...who met with Billy-Boy Clinton himself on a tarmac in Phoenix AZ not to talk about grandkids and golf as they first claimed, but who now say they cannot talk because 'supposedly' what they discussed involved national security information and as such is not for public consumption. Oh really, then what about AG Lynch discussing 'supposed' national security issues with a man who was then and remains now a private citizen. Guess there's is a lot of 'ooops' going around on that one.

And dare we not forget the collective 'he' known as the mainstream media...the bishops of sort always riding across the chess board on horseback to help 'save the Democrat's very bad day'...or at least to help deflect the attention off of who is the real architect of the 24/7 'fake news' story that then-candidate Donald Trump colluded with the Russians to steal the election away from Hillary.

But when the strategy used via secrets kept is the hoped for final move that would allow a checkmate position to be had...when that strategy 'somehow' makes it into the public domain...there not only is no checkmate but the one architect of this so vile a game plan is now exposed as Barack HUSSEIN Obama himself.

Now we knew that along didn't we...if we didn't we should have.

And why is Obama the architect of all things anti-Trump...simply because Obama knew about 'supposed' Russian hacking activity directed at U.S. political parties, think tanks, and other targets in early August 2016. And how did he know...because it was then C.I.A. Director John Brennan himself who alerted Obama to possible Russian election interference as well as telling him that in no way could the Russians interfere with the all-important voter tabulations and that the "integrity of the vote" was secure.

And yet with the election being mere months away, and with it now being known that DNC computer systems were indeed breached in the summer of 2015 and again in the spring of 2016, Obama still did not say or do a thing about it, thus willingly and maliciously also covering-up what he was eventually told by Brennan. And he knew well that his silence would buy him the time needed to both plan and set in motion his now being formulated scenario to 'blame the Russians' if by some chance Hillary lost...something we all know she was never expected to do what with all the illegal and dead votes Obama had waiting in the wings ready to be cast for Hillary's first term in office...actually what he knew would be his third term in office.

“It is the hardest thing about my entire time in government to defend, I feel like we sort of choked,” said a former senior Obama administration official involved in White House deliberations on what to do about Russia, but said on the condition that he would  remain anonymous

So what was Obama's response upon learning from the C.I.A. in August that the Russians were 'supposedly' trying to influence the election in Donald Trump's favor.. .they were mere token responses actually not taken until late December 2016...five months after he found out...symbolic responses made to placate his critics and quiet down those who demanded he do something as he still needed a bit more time to finalize the last details of his 'Trump colluded with the Russians' nonsensical scenario.

According to a recent Washington Post article some key staffers said that Obama's actions finally taken against Russia were "modest" at best, with others claiming they were not "aggressive" enough because Obama did not want to "make things worse" with Putin, while still others stood by Obama and his decisions made. And those decisions consisted of his issuing some token economic sanctions on Russia in late 2016...economic sanctions so narrowly targeting that some who helped design them stated their impact was largely symbolic especially since those sanctions were put in place to punish Russia for other issues and not specifically for their hacking and 'supposed' collusion.

And those actions also included Obama approving but never using...I repeat...never using...a previously undisclosed covert measure that authorized the planting of cyber-weapons into Russia’s infrastructure...cyber-weapons referred to as 'digital bombs'... digital bombs that could be remotely detonated to help prevent us from becoming the target of further Russian cyber-threats or if we found ourselves "in an escalating exchange with Moscow"...yet never once saying specifically what 'escalating' meant.

And oh yes, girlie-man Obama also told Vladimir Putin, aka the Russian-bear, to “cut it out." when they met at the G-20 Summit in China. How Putin must have been shaking in his steel-toed boots with that one.

So basically Obama did nothing of true substance as he, I believe, fervently worked to set in motion (with the help of James Comey, Hillary Clinton, and not surprisingly then-National Security Adviser Susan Rice who ordered the National Security Council to "finalize" the above list of "modest" options to use against Russia), what he saw as his payback for not just an election lost, but for an election lost that angered his New World Order string pullers, for now their 2020 and 2050 agenda got set back as well.

And no matter how hard the media works to keep the Trump/Russia blame game in the forefront of the 24/7 news cycle, to date no evidence whatsoever has been found by anyone...neither Democrat or Republican...to prove that candidate Trump colluded with anyone let alone the Russians. And even after the late-July 2016 WikiLeaks dump...which quite coincidentally (yeah right) just happened to come on the eve of the Democratic convention...saw U.S. intelligence officials continuing to express their uncertainty about who was behind the hacks or even why they were carried out. 

Also, has there been no evidence found that President Trump or the White House tried to obstruct justice or close down any Congressional or federal investigation. In fact, fired F.B.I. Director James Comey himself, under oath, told Congress that Trump never obstructed justice, and former DHS Secretary Jeh Johnson also said U.S. intelligence officials continued to express "uncertainty" about who was behind the hacks or why they were carried out. And with us now knowing that Obama knew that the Russians were hacking into certain key Democratic Party data networks for months leading up to the election...just as we do to theirs in the game called spying I might add...and that as he did virtually nothing to stop them...logic dictates that all roads lead back to Obama.

And while Barack HUSSEIN Obama differed with now sore-loser Hillary Clinton in the fact that he accepted that Donald Trump won the election not by voter fraud or voter intimidation (as he had done during his second election and as Hillary had just tried to do), but simply by his playing by the rules...as in candidate Trump understanding that Electoral College votes 'trump' the popular vote, leading him to work even harder in those swing states whose electoral votes he needed to win...states Hillary ignored because she assumed she was a shoe-in...no need to waste time campaigning in those states she was told.

Bad political advice given coupled with sheer stupidity fueled on by arrogance and narcissism alone cost Hillary the presidency and thus denied a very angry Obama his third term in office. And know payback for that had to be not only the proverbial bitch slap, but it had to be payback with no prisoners taken.

And so Obama's hoped for political take-down of now President Trump began in earnest, beginning even before Trump was sworn in, and it began while Obama laid low by traveling the world doing God only knows what. And this so-called 'resistance movement' was then and continues to be now brutal in its applications, and shows no sign of abating as it moves ever forward in its allowing a simple federal investigation to morph into an outright witch hunt into everything Trump. And Obama did not have to lift a finger to make it all happen for his lack of serious actions when he was first informed of the Russian hacking not only helped him construct his revenge but set his quest for that revenge in motion.

And it also shows his U.N. New World Order puppet masters that he is trying...that he is begging...for the chance to make-up for what amounts to basically screwing the ones he dare not screw as they hold the key to his securing the coveted U.N. Secretary General position...a position that would allow him to push forward the islamic agenda he truly adheres to.

Simply stated, all this Russian nonsense does indeed lie at Obama's feet for he is the one who obstructed justice with his silence...he is the one who concocted the whole Trump/Russia/collusion scandal out of his quest for revenge...and he is the one who not only needs to be but must called to task for it. Only then can this Russian nonsense stop...not just because it's nonsense...but because this nonsense is a waste of our taxpayer dollars for as per the words of AG Loretta Lynch herself who said that "no technical interference occurred on election night and any vote counting irregularities that could have impacted the election would have been detected" and as per DHS and intelligence officials "no increased level of malicious cyberactivity aimed at disrupting our electoral process was found on Election Day,” now putting the game into check.

So it's time to move on folks and get back to focusing on the true issues facing us all...as in the economy, jobs, health care, islamic terrorism, the list goes on and on. And the only thing we need to concern ourselves with regarding the Russia nonsense is seeing Barack HUSSEIN Obama being measured for an orange jumpsuit for his being ground zero of this whole sorted mess...checkmate... game over.

Copyright © 2017 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor

************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!

Today, Tuesday, June 27th from 7 to 9pm on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane discuss collusion illusions, liberals and their one core value, and important news of the day.

Hope you can tune in at: https://tunein.americanpoliticalradio.com/platinum-plus-player/