Op-ed: 
The Benghazi cover-up leads straight to the Oval Office

By: Diane Sori

"The point is we should have tried."..."As another saying goes - always move to the sound of the guns."

- Retired Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell speaking yesterday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee about awaiting orders to go into Libya...orders that NEVER came.

As the next round of Darryl Issa's hearings on Benghazi began and seven months after Senator Ted Cruz called for an independent joint select committee to investigate the attacks at Benghazi...the very select committee that House Speaker John Boehner keeps saying NO to...the in the pocket of Obama media must be besides itself as they now have to cook up even more nonsense for us to focus on as they try to divert and deflect attention off the corrupt and traitorous Obama Administration yet again. And a diversion is needed now more than ever especially after documents were released last Friday to Judicial Watch...a Conservative watchdog group...released as result of a June 2013, Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against the State Department. This release allowed access to more than 100 pages of documents and what was discovered must have Obama very nervous...very nervous indeed.

And these now publicly released e-mails show a direct White House link to covering-up the truth about Benghazi via their revealing that after the attacks the top priority of the Obama administration was to concoct a story...build a LIE...to cover the truth about Obama's involvement in Benghazi...to cover the fact that his aide, Ben Rhodes, helped in that cover-up by communicated directly with then U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and helping her prepare for her appearances on the Sunday talk show circuit. In fact, the e-mails show Rice was, “to convey that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad; [and] to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, not a broader failure of policy.”

In other words, our embassy is attacked and four Americans are murdered but to Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his minions our national security be damned... conducting a NO holds barred investigation into the attack be damned...and the deaths of four Americans be damned...as none of these were part of the equation for reaching the all-important goal...a goal that trumped all else...a goal to make Barack HUSSEIN Obama “look good” against Mitt Romney in the upcoming foreign policy debate leading up to the 2012 Presidential Election.  And this manipulation of the truth was needed because if you remember Obama kept repeating ad-nauseum in the months leading up to the election that "Osama bin-Laden is dead, GM is alive, al-Qaeda is on the run."

Running a campaign leaning heavily on foreign policy issues because the economy, in a word, stunk, Obama needed foreign policy successes to win against a man who had NO foreign policy experience to speak of but who was strong on economic issues, so his calling card became that he killed Osama bin-Laden and that al-Qaeda was on the run. Well Benghazi proved it was NOT and so damage control was needed...and enter center stage a group of traitors unlike any America has seen since the likes of Benedict Arnold...Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Hillary Clinton, Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice, Jay Carney (who knowingly perpetrated the lie), and so many others connected to this administration...so many others complicit in the LIES about Benghazi.

And now with these incriminating e-mails surfacing...e-mails that were originally redacted when the documents were first asked for and only gotten by a court order...the made-up fable of Benghazi has been blown straight to hell. In fact, an e-mail from Ben Rhodes, one of Obama's assistants and National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications, shows that since the night the attacks occurred one of the Obama administration’s primary communications goals was NOT to get to the truth about what happened that fateful night but was “To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.” 

And in order to pull that rhetoric off a cover-up was constructed that included taking a poorly-made but somewhat widely viewed YouTube video called 'The Innocence of Muslims' and bring it front and center as the cause of the violence...after all its well-known that anything that upsets a muslim's sensibilities brings them to violent responses.  And once that foundation was laid the stage was set for the final part of the plan, and that was to get the American public to buy their story...to buy their LIE. And how did Obama and crew do that...by listed goals for Susan Rice to use in explaining the Benghazi attack and getting her to voluntarily agree to repeatedly LIE to both the families of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty, and to the American people as well during her rounds on the talk show circuit. 

Following the pre-planned script...a script changed many times...where she was told what to say and how to say it, Rice spewed over and over the LIE that “Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response to what had transpired in Cairo." And by doing what she did, Susan Rice has now become as guilty as the rest of them for she knowingly colluded with those perpetrating  a LIE to cover for what we (I believe) know to be Obama's gun and weapons running operation to the al-Qaeda (our enemy) backed Syrian rebels.

  

And this e-mail was NOT just sent to Susan Rice but was also sent to a dozen other members of Obama's top advisors and assistants and was titled: “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET”.  In fact, Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before Susan Rice made her infamous round of the Sunday talk shows to discuss...to LIE...about the attacks at Benghazi.

And another e-mail to Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the U(seless) N(ations) also showed that senior officials had already said the Benghazi attack was “complex” and planned in advance, yet Rice stayed on script repeating over and over the concocted LIE that the attack at Benghazi was “spontaneous.”

So with these e-mails it's now been proven what we long have suspected...the man aiding and abetting the enemy...the man sitting in the White House... deliberately blamed an innocuous YouTube video for terrorist attacks on our people at our Benghazi consulate. This man...Barack HUSSEIN Obama... directly provided a fabricated cover story to deflect blame off the jihadi bast*rds who murdered our people...to deflect blame off his muslim brethren. In other words, these e-mails prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that NOT only did Barack HUSSEIN Obama know that NO YouTube video was involved in the Benghazi attacks but that he also knew of or actually helped to orchestrate the ruse to try and cover his own involvement in Benghazi.

So what should happen now...any and all witnesses with any knowledge of the attack including administration officials...including the traitor-in-chief himself... must be called to testify before the Boehner so NOT wanted independent joint select committee so we can once and for all know the truth about what happened that fateful night. And Boehner, I believe, is indeed involved in the cover-up...see my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT radio partner Craig Andresen's and my Benghazi expose in either my blog, The Patriot Factor, http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/or in Craig's blog, The National Patriot, http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/

I have said since day one that Benghazi will be proven to be Obama's Achilles heel and these e-mails do just that as the cover-up they expose leads right to the desk of the Oval Office. And NO matter how the White House and the media tries to spin these developments...NO matter how they try to make excuses for what went down both on that fateful night and in its aftermath...the only rightful thing to do now is call for the immediate arrest of Barack HUSSEIN Obama on the grounds of treason for aiding and abetting the enemy and for his complicity in the murders of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty. 

GITMO beckons while Barack HUSSEIN Obama awaits the final decree for those found guilty of treason...just saying.

Op-ed:
Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 3 of 3                        By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen

After the attacks in Benghazi many questions remained that needed answers even after the Johnny-come-lately FBI investigation said all had been answered, and those who wanted to protect the Obama regime by refusing to answer them was in full operational mode. The Rose Garden speech blaming the video...Obama jetting off to Vegas for a fund raiser…Susan Rice spreading the video nonsense on five Sunday shows… Hillary and Obama blaming the video at the memorial service as the caskets of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty arrived...and more of Obama's blathering on about the video ruse at the U(seless) N(ations). We do NOT need to go into details with which everyone is already all too familiar. What we must do however, is connect the most disturbing of dots. Let’s begin with the 'stand down' orders.

Issuing a ‘stand down’ order does follow a specific chain of command, and the one relating to Benghazi would go like this, in order from top to bottom…President, Secretary of Defense, Secretary’s of the various armed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines), Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the various Chiefs of Staff for each military service, the Commanding General for AFRICOM, and the local command structure under AFRICOM.

All in the command chain below Obama have denied giving such an order, including then Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen. Martin E. Dempsey, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (remember, Dempsey testified that orders were given to assist in Tripoli but NOT to assist in Benghazi but NEVER telling who gave that order but we know it was NOT him). And all the military branch Chiefs have also said they gave NO such order. And while AFRICOM Commander General Carter Ham did give testimony in a closed door hearing before the House Armed Services Committee investigating Benghazi, we still do NOT know his testimony, but know that if he had given such an order it would have been made public for all to hear for it would have cleared Obama, especially important because everything possible is being done to try and distance him from this event, especially after his nonsense about a YouTube video.

But NO such announcement assuming responsibility for that ‘stand down’ order has been made by General Ham so logic would dictate he gave NO such order. And remember, Panetta announced back in October 2012, that General Ham would be retiring for refusing to obey orders NOT to assist the US personnel in Benghazi on that fateful night, and that on Saturday, October 27th, Panetta confirmed that General Ham had indeed been ‘relieved’ of his AFRICOM command.

Now here is something interesting about the official command chain…neither the Vice-President nor the Secretary of State is in that chain. But, the Vice-President and the Secretary of State do have the authority through the President to countermand any one below the President. And while the National Security Council and the Department of Homeland Security Secretary influence military decisions (to some degree) through the National Security Act and through their advisory positions to the President, they do NOT have the authority to issue an actual ‘stand down’ order on their own as that can ONLY be done by those in the direct chain of command.

Yet according to whistleblower Gregory Hicks (the Deputy Chief of Mission in Libya at the time of Benghazi), who when testifying before Congress said that after the first attack a security team left Tripoli for Benghazi with two military personnel, and that four members of a special forces team in Tripoli wanted to go in a second wave but were ordered to ‘stand down’ (but he did NOT know who gave that order).

Op-ed:

Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 2 (of 3)

By: Diane Sori

My RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT partner and owner of The National Patriot, Craig Andresen, and I have teamed up to expose the truth about Benghazi...the truth the media...including FOX News...will NOT tell you. And as they say, 'the devil is in the details'...and those details can be found buried within the entirety of 'The U.S. Senate Select Committee on INTELLIGENCE REVIEW of the Terrorist Attacks on U.S. Facilities in Benghazi' and NOT within the abbreviated version the media 'sold' to the public.

These details are so critical and so ignored that Craig and I are doing a three-part series running today and tomorrow in our respective blogs and on Facebook leading up to our RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS radio show this Wednesday at 2pm. Comprising our full second hour starting at 3pm, Craig and I will break down our finds into even more details...details and facts Obama and Hillary need to be kept hidden for fear that both a Constitutional crisis and their respective arrests might be in the making. Please visit Craig's blog thenationalpatriot.com first (Part 1) as he exposes the events leading up to Benghazi.

And now I will pick-up where Craig's article leaves off...

When foreign diplomats sense their lives are in danger they try to send paper 'classified documents' to 'safe' places or they destroy those documents which could fall into enemy hands. And if choosing to smuggle documents out they do NOT send them to just one person...they send copies of said documents to many...either couriering them out via a trusted person or most likely in Stevens' case sending the computer files through the internet and e-mails to those they trust.  I would safely guess that's what Stevens did, for being the consummate professional he was known to be, he probably documented everything (I believe) he suspected about Obama's involvement in the guns and weapons running operation, and sent it to those he trusted as the events in Benghazi and around the area started to heat up. And most likely Stevens' actions and his suppositions were discovered by Obama's and Hillary's people, and thus he was marked for a 'targeted kill' to silence him, because the presidential election was coming up and Obama could NOT afford any bad press. Sadly, Smith, Woods, and Doherty were mere collateral damage.

As I've explained in my previous op-eds and Craig in his, we both believed within mere hours of the attacks that Ambassador Stevens most certainly suspected Obama was ILLEGALLY running guns and weapons to the al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels, and was going to expose him. However, in the weeks leading up to Benghazi, Stevens started sensing he was in serious danger and reached out to Hillary Clinton...in her capacity as Secretary of State and as his boss...for help and protection, because he had NO reason NOT to trust her and thought she would come to his aid (NOT realizing that Hillary was also involved in the operation). That would explain his many e-mails directly sent to her where he pleaded for additional security. In fact, on June 7th, July 9th, and August 15th he asked for more protection or that plans in the making to draw down security be halted as security was in danger because the February 17 Martyrs Brigade guarding the Mission was becoming "unreliable." And these e-mails either went unanswered or were flatly refused. BIG mistake in trusting Hillary as she in turn probably told Obama that they were about to be exposed...making the attack on the Benghazi Temporary Mission a calculatedly constructed  cover for what was to be the 'targeted killing' of Ambassador Christopher Stevens. 

Craig and I also believe that towards the countdown to September 11th that Stevens realized he was betrayed and that NO help would be forthcoming from either Hillary or any in the Obama administration. And so he did what was once unthinkable... Ambassador Stevens reached out to the political opposition...reached out to Republicans ...more on that tomorrow.

Now as to the attacks themselves...

September 11, 2012

6:43am...(all times given are Libyan time) staff at the U.S. Special Mission in Benghazi woke up to find one of the Libyan policeman who was supposed to be guarding them, filming the compound from a neighboring rooftop and who then went missing. Happening just two days after Stevens received a warning that one of his diplomats had met with two islamist militia leaders to discuss the U.S. support of secular leader Mahmoud Jibril for Libyian prime minister in the September 12th elections, and warning Stevens that if Jibril won they would "no longer guarantee security" for the Mission.

Later that day the U.S. Senate's Homeland Security Committee issued a statement that warning lights were "flashing red" as news broke of attacks on the U.S. embassy in Cairo. Claiming the attacks were a response to the now infamous YouTube video...The Innocence of Muslims...the CIA sent cables to its foreign consulates warning of possible copycat attacks. And Sean Smith, Stevens' information management officer e-mailed a friend: "Assuming we don't die tonight. We saw one of our 'police' that guard the compound taking pictures."

 

9:30pm...militia jeeps bearing the black banner of a local islamist militia, Ansar al-Sharia, and packed with militiamen who made no attempt to hide their identities, were seen by locals blocking the streets leading to the compound. 

9.42pm...explosions were heard from the far side of the compound and then shouting and detonations were heard at the front entrance. Gunmen entered by jamming a gun in the face of an unarmed Libyan guard. On the monitor at the tactical operations center (TOC) one of the agents... out of the five on duty from the state department's security force (DSS)...saw the front gate open, armed men running in, and Libyan guards running out. Only then was the alarm set off. 

Procedure had it that in case the outside Mission wall was breached, they were then to take position at the sandbagged emplacements, but three of the four agents with Stevens had left their rifles, helmets, and body armor in the accommodation block, this according to the review ordered by Hillary Clinton...a revue full of LIES and inconsistencies. So as the DSS agents tried to reach the accommodation block to get their weapons, Stevens and Smith remained inside. By the time the three had their weapons, attackers were circling the grounds blocking their path. They retreated, locking themselves into safe rooms in the barracks and TOC. 

9.50pm...Stevens now sent a message to Gregory Hicks, America's Deputy Chief of Mission in Tripoli, telling him: "We're under attack." The attackers then set fire to the guardhouse and a rocket-propelled grenade slammed into the lintel above the front doors, allowing gunmen to rush inside. The DSS agent with Stevens and Smith led them into a final place of refuge, the so-called 'safe haven.' 

10:15pm...by now the Mission was on fire and the 'safe haven' was filling smoke and while the DSS agent made it outside through an escape hatch in the wall Stevens and Smith did NOT make it out. The other DSS agents locked in the two safe rooms in the TOC and barracks remained safe as attackers entered the buildings, ransacked and set them on fire, but did NOT penetrate the safe rooms.

10.25pm...a six-person force of Americans with 40 'supposedly' friendly militiamen began fighting their way through to the compound from the now known to be a CIA facility (annex) a mile away. At 10.50 pm the message "firing has stopped" was sent to Washington, and the five DSS agents went back to the 'safe haven' through the escape hatch finding the body of Sean Smith but Ambassador Stevens was missing. 

September 12, 2012

Around midnight or shortly thereafter...the CIA and DSS teams arrived at the CIA annex, and rocket attacks began just as seven embassy and CIA staff members stationed in Tripoli chartered a plane and flew to Benghazi arriving at 5am, coinciding with the second attack on the annex. The bombs of the first attack fell beyond the walls, but the attackers then 'walked' the remaining bombs into the annex where they exploded. Then there was a lull for about 5 hours, but at 5am as the embassy and CIA staff members arrived the second attack occurred killing CIA security contractors Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.
 

12:15am...after the CIA team abandoned the consulate, crowds of local men and boys stormed the consulate. The fires were dying down and walking the grounds they found the unsecured window into the 'safe haven' where they found Christopher Stevens barely alive. A video, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzGZEFrODP8 timed at quarter-past midnight, shows them carrying Stevens onto the patio (at 48 seconds) amidst shouts of "Allahu Akbar" before deciding to bring him to the Benghazi Medical Center where he was officially pronounced dead after 90 minutes.

 * IMPORTANT NOTE...The five DSS agents went into the 'safe haven' at 10:50pm and Ambassador Stevens was NOT there as they only found Sean Smith's body. However, at 12:50pm when the locals went in they found Stevens barely alive (notice how they dragged a barely alive man out) and took him to the hospital. The fact that the DSS agents could NOT find him could be as simple as the smoke obstructed their view in the room or was Stevens NOT there because he was taken out, brutalized, and returned so as to appear to have died of smoke inhalation. And who are these locals who found Stevens...could they have actually participated in the attack or were they just curiosity seekers who wandered into the compound to see what all the ruckus was about..we might NEVER know. 

At daybreak, (6:05am) reinforcements from the February 17 Martyrs Brigade and the Libyan police arrived to escort the remaining 31 American survivors and three bodies (Smith, Woods, and Doherty) to the airport for evacuation to Tripoli. And only after all were evacuated did anyone go to the hospital to retrieve Ambassador Stevens' body for his final flight home. 

Now you must understand that the Benghazi attacks all told continued on for eight hours with the call about the attacks reaching the White House at 3:40pm EST which corresponds almost directly with the 9:42pm Libyan start time for the attacks, and in this call Obama was informed that NOT only was the Benghazi Mission under attack, but also that Ambassador Stevens and other Americans were missing.  And at 3:59pm EST(2:58am Libyan time) the DOD ordered an unmanned surveillance aircraft (Predator drone) to reposition overhead of the Benghazi Mission, and was subsequently replaced by another unarmed Predator to enable the first to return to base for refueling.

* IMPORTANT NOTE...both Obama and Clinton claimed they did NOT watch the Benghazi attacks on a monitor in the Situation Room in real time but the truth according to some that were there is that they did.

 

At 5:40pm EST, Undersecretary of State Patrick Kennedy refused to send FEST (Marine Fleet Antiterrorism Security Teams) to Libya. At 6:06pm EST, a third DOS e-mail arrives at the White House from Ansar al-Sharia claiming responsibility for the attacks, and at 8pm EST, Gregory Hicks, the Deputy Chief of Mission in Tripoli (Stevens second in command in Libya), calls Hillary Clinton to tell her unequivocally that the attacks at Benghazi were terrorist attacks. At 10pm EST Hillary Clinton and Barack HUSSEIN Obama met via a phone call to discuss the situation and at 10:30pm EST Clinton, for the first time, publicly blames "inflammatory material posted on the internet" for the violence. 

In that critical half hour between 10 and 10:30pm EST, Obama and Clinton set in motion the video ruse that they had planned as cover all along. And with that done the President of the United States excused himself from the Situation Room as he deemed it more important to go to sleep and be ready early in the morning to jet off to Las Vegas to raise money for his presidential campaign...deeming that more important than staying to learn the fate of the four missing Americans. Amazing...unless he chose to excuse himself because everything was going according to plan...meaning Ambassador Stevens and what he knew could NO longer touch him.

Or so he thought...

Tomorrow, Craig Andresen and I will wrap up our three part series on Benghazi with information about the all important 'stand down' orders that could have only come from the Commander-in- Chief, and we will expose a secret long held as to whom we believe Christopher Stevens turned to for help, and who now just might go down with the rest for both his inaction in helping Christopher Stevens and his complicity in covering up the truth about Benghazi.

Op-ed: 

Another traitor in the fold  

By: Diane Sori

"Chairman, I do not know who took al-Qaeda out of the talking points, but you should know that I myself made a number of changes to the points."

- Michael Morrell at Wednesday's Benghazi hearing

Simply...the media generated story about a YouTube video being the cause of the attacks on our Benghazi compound was NOTHING but a LIE created to cater to the political ambitions of Barack HUSSEIN Obama...period.

And the Obama administration...ALL in the Obama administration...knew this from day one, and that includes former CIA Deputy Director Michael Morrell, who in Wednesday's Benghazi hearings before the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, outright denied he covered-up or “inappropriately altered and influenced” the now infamous Benghazi talking points, and did so in an effort to downplay if NOT outright dismiss the role of terrorism in the attacks...to distance the media 'anointed' savior of us all from everything Benghazi before it tainted his re-election bid.

Called to testify after several key Republican members of Congress claimed new evidence showed he deliberately misled them by withholding what he knew about the talking points after the attacks, Michael Morell was indeed the very person who editing and made eight changes to said talking points (his name, initials, and notes are all over the original pages), and was the one who was in direct contact with the Obama White House at all times. And at one point during his testimony Morrell admitted that he was the one who removed the information about al-Qaeda and the word islamists from the talking points even though the CIA had warned those in the administration about a possible al-Qaeda terrorist attack in the making before the attacks on the Benghazi compound occurred.

And then in the next breath...while claiming to be an intelligence professional... Morrell in trying to cover his own butt said,"... the group of officers from our office of Congressional affairs and our office of public affairs,” were the ones who removed the references from said talking points.

LYING and passing the buck...the blame everybody else game...the hallmark of those in the Obama administration surfaces yet again in Morrell's testimony, and for a minute there I thought he might just blame George W. Bush for removing the al-Qaeda and islamic references.

Continuing on Morrell claimed that administration officials...like Susan Rice...were told the day before Rice went on the Sunday morning talk show circuit that a 'key point' in the Benghazi talking points "just might" be inaccurate.

In other words, they all knew the YouTube video nonsense was an out-and-out LIE, and yet this administration continued to spew that LIE until caught and only until caught. And they all (I believe) knew the truth that Benghazi was Obama's ILLEGAL gun and weapons running operation that originated in Libya, funneled through Benghazi into Turkey, with the final destination being the al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels. And they all (I believe) knew Ambassador Stevens found out and was going to expose said operation and therefore had to be silenced before he could talk...as in a 'targeted' kill...and that Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty were just throwaway collateral damage they could care less about.

And why else would Morrell have said that these supposed 'professionals' relied on and based their entire analysis and talking points on media coverage instead of on information generated from the operatives on the ground...information from CIA personnel and those who were there during the attacks, including information from Woods and Doherty before they were killed...if NOT to cover for this most politically damaging of truths.

Giving credence to my words above is that when further questioned about the video supposition, Morrell continued to refuse to explain to the Committee why this administration stayed to the pre-set video narrative even after U.S. intelligence completely discredited the reports that the attack was a protest over the anti-islam video gone awry. In fact, Obama himself continued to spew this very LIE in a speech he gave at the U(seless) N(ations) on September 26, 2012...more than two weeks after the attacks.

And when directly questioned yet again about al-Qaeda and islamic ties to the attacks, Morrell responded by saying, “The only way we knew that anybody who was involved in that attack that night was associated with al Qaeda was from classified sources.” Claiming that leaving in reference to al-Qaeda could have jeopardized classified sources and that, “To leave it in, the [CIA] director would have had to declassify that information,” is simply NOT true for Ambassador Stevens himself had sent numerous messages to Hillary Clinton saying he feared for his and those at the compound's safety due to continuing al-Qaeda presence in the area.

And this is more than just merely infuriating because here we have a CIA Deputy Director more concerned about protecting those involved...those who are the enemy...than in telling the truth about that horrific day where four brave Americans lost their lives because of the actions of Barack HUSSEIN Obama and those who orbit around him.

“These allegations accuse me of taking these actions for the political benefit of President Obama and then [former] Secretary of State [Hillary Rodham] Clinton... these allegations are false,” Morrell said in his summation but I think NOT for any and everything this administration does is indeed solely for the political benefit of NOT only Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his administration, but for the benefit of the Democratic party as well.

And so Morrell's tampering with the truth actually 'aided and abetted' the enemy...in other words Michael Morrell committed an act of TREASON...and he knows he did for he is NOT a stupid man. Now he has to find a way out of this mess...or have Obama's spin meisters do it for him. I just wonder if they will or if Michael Morrell will offer himself up as Obama's sacrificial lamb...and let's NOT forget as Hillary Clinton's sacrificial lamb as well...for answers to that I guess only time will time.

Op-ed: 
Cuts to our military and Susan Rice's arrogance have me actually seething
By: Diane Sori

"Secretary Hagel has been clear that, while we do not want to, we ultimately must slow the growth of military pay and compensation." - Admiral John Kirby, Defense Department spokesman

Seething...I'm actually seething as once again the very people who lay their lives on the line to keep us safe and free at home are being both dishonored and put in harm's way as muslim sympathizing, Obama-loving Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel is recommending major cuts to our military... especially to the Army. And he's adding in for good measure a one-year freeze on military pay raises for officers, higher out-of-pocket costs for health-care benefits, and less monies for housing allowances for both our returning troops and our vets, in an all out effort to cut billions of dollars from our defense budget.

Wanting to downsize our military to pre-WWII levels (in 1940 the Army had 267,000 active-duty members but by 1941 it increased to 1.46 million as we approached America's entry into World War II)...this downsizing includes the loss of battleships and fighter planes including the retiring of older weapons such as the U-2 spy plane and the A-10 attack aircraft...leaving the U.S. homeland and our foreign interests more vulnerable to enemy attacks. And these cuts are disproportionately being done to our military budget over any and all other department's budget cuts...can't dare cut the freebie and handout programs now can they...and are 'supposedly' being done based on the assumption the U.S. military will NOT ever engage in ground wars again.

Hate to tell Hagel but that same erroneous assumption was made after WWII when cuts were done and look how that turned out...do the words Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, and Afghanistan ring a bell...guess NOT.

And the Army, the largest of our armed services, currently with 522,000 active-duty soldiers is now scheduled to be downsized to 490,000 by 2015 from its wartime high of 570,000. And to make matters worse, Hagel wants to actually make even more cuts to stabilize levels to between 420,000 and 450,000...very dangerous to say the least.

In fact, some, like Army Chief-of-Staff General Ray Odierno, have said that "an army of 420,000 would be too small for a world that has such an uncertain national security landscape." The minimum size, he believes, should be NO lower than 450,000. He said shrinking to 420,000 would make a big difference in the capabilities of the force.

In other words meaning that our troops might NOT be able to go toe-to-toe with an enemy out to kill us all...well maybe NOT all of us as Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his merry band of miscreants and traitors do side with said enemy after all.

So if this is NOT an act of treason I don't know what is as the first duty of the president and those elected or appointed to office...after protecting and defending the Constitution of course...is to assure the health, safety, and welfare of the American people, and these cuts put NOT only American lives here at home in danger but put our troops themselves and Americans overseas in even graver danger.

And Obama and crew know this and just do NOT care.

So what are we going to do about this...are we going to sit back and allow Barack HUSSEIN Obama to cut our military forces to dangerous levels leaving us vulnerable to an attack on our own soil and leaving our troops vulnerable to major attacks when stationed overseas...or are we finally going to collectively in a loud and clear voice say "enough" and demand this most traitorous of presidents and his equally traitorous minions be removed from office immediately...as in ARREST the bast*rds now!

I sure hope it's the latter.

And to further add to my seething is that this past Sunday on Meet the Press, Susan Rice, the very woman who towed the Obama line last September when she made the talk show circuit rounds saying that Benghazi was a direct result of a poorly made YouTube video that defamed islam and mohamed ...a video by the way that NO one in the region had seen....had the audacity...had the unmitigated gall...to say she had NO regrets...NO regrets at all about anything she previously said about Benghazi ...grrrrrrr...

And when David Gregory directly looked her in the eye and asked her why she had NO regrets about Benghazi, Rice said, "What I said to you that morning, and what I did every day since, was to share the best information that we had at the time...the information I provided, which I explained to you, was what we had at the moment. It could change. I commented that this was based on what we knew on that morning, was provided to me and my colleagues and indeed to Congress by the intelligence community, and that’s been well validated in many different ways since." 

Translation: this miserable excuse of a woman has NO regrets whatsoever about LYING to the American people two months before a presidential election just so Benghazi would NOT tarnish the Obama media-created myth that he was and is the 'savior' of us all. Boy would I love to bitch-slap her upside her LYING head!

And then the infamous blame game kicked into high gear with Rice's words that it was “patently false” to allege that the White House deliberately misled the American people.

'Misled' my eye as the White House...as Barack HUSSEIN Obama...as Hillary Clinton...blatantly and with malice LIED about the deaths of four Americans...LIED about the reasons for those deaths...LIED about what was actually ILLEGALLY going on within the Benghazi compound...and then covered it all up with even more LIES...LIES that Susan Rice helped spread.

And as Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty's deaths mean NOTHING to this miserable administration...they mean EVERYTHING to their parents and loved ones left behind...and to 'We the People'...yet we are still left with NO answers...NO truths...and that is the saddest thing of all next to these LYING bast*rds still NOT being in jail that is.

Can you say "beyond seething"...

Op-ed:
The newly released bi-partisan Benghazi report tells us NOTHING we didn't already know
By: Diane Sori

"In spite of the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi and ample strategic warnings, the United States Government simply did not do enough to prevent these attacks and ensure the safety of those serving in Benghazi.”
- Senator Saxby Chambliss, ranking Republican on the Intelligence Committee.

Well our ever-LYING, traitor-in-chief and his cohort in crime Hillary 'What Does It Matter' Clinton are in big trouble...as they should be...as the ghosts of Benghazi have come back to haunt.

Benghazi can now NO longer be called a 'phony scandal' by Barack HUSSEIN Obama or by Hillary Clinton for the bi-partisan Senate Intelligence Committee's just released 'supposedly' comprehensive 85 page report...that is anything but...officially stated what some of us have said since day one...that the attack on our Benghazi compound was indeed a preventable terrorist attack and that any and all policy for handling the attack aftermath was done for political expediency alone.

Calling to task the entire Obama administration's response to Benghazi and to the fact that 15 people who tried to help the FBI investigate the attack have been killed, this report still rightly faults Hillary's State Department for failing to increase security after deliberately ignoring Ambassador Stevens' many pleas for help, and despite “ample strategic warnings” from the CIA stating that because the danger of militant attacks was increasing throughout eastern Libya, that U.S. personnel “were at risk.”

"The bottom line is Hillary Clinton wanted the appearance of normalization" in Libya...Security was not driving these decisions. Politics was," said Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Republican on the House Oversight Committee.

Yet NOTHING about Benghazi was normal as Benghazi became and remains despite this anything but 'comprehensive report,' a tale of murder, cover-ups, and LIES all put in place to protect at all costs the 'anointed one' and the woman next in line to that title. And yet NO matter how those in Obama's orbit try to divert the truth, the fact remains that the attack on Benghazi was terrorism...TERRORISM...and that fact must NO longer be glossed over.

And this report comes late to the critical fact that Barack HUSSEIN Obama knew damn well that both he and Hillary were LYING through their teeth when they deliberately, calculatingly, and with malice intended, intentionally told 'We the People' over and over that the attack that claimed the lives of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty was because the what were 'peaceful' demonstrations over the video got out of hand.

This report NO matter its true intentions...whether good or bad...tells us NOTHING we already didn't know even as it lays out that in the first hours after the attack began that every single Pentagon military briefer and defense department official...including General Carter Ham (then head of AFRICOM) and Marine Corps Colonel George Bristol (commander of AFRICOM's Joint Special Operations Task Force for the Trans Sahara region)...who briefed the White House referred to Benghazi as a terrorist attack and NOT as a response to an anti-American demonstration to a poorly made YouTube video critical of mohamed and islam.

In fact, then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta and Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff General Martin Dempsey told those on the House Armed Services Committee (the committee conducting the actual investigation) that when they briefed Obama as the attack was ongoing, that it was al-Qaeda and al-Qaeda's regional affiliates (AQIM, Ansar al-Sharia, AQAP, and the Mohammad Jamal Network) who orchestrated and carried out the attack. And when Republican committee member Senator Jim Inhofe (OK) asked whether Panetta...who directly briefed Obama...believed "unequivocally" at the time that it was a terrorist attack, Panetta said, "There was no question in my mind that this was a terrorist attack."

Also faulting the intelligence agencies for NOT telling the U.S. military in Libya about the existence of the CIA outpost at the Benghazi compound, the report NEVER touches upon the possibility that maybe the omission was deliberate on the intelligence agencies part because they were covering for the CIA who themselves had something to hide...as in their duplicity in helping Obama run guns and weapons to the al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels...just saying.

Simply, the President of the United States knowingly and willfully LIED to the American people, to the victim's families, to the media, and to our troops in the field that a farce of a video cost four Americans their lives. And he did this because (I believe) he had to cover-up his own...and possibly Hillary's...involvement in a constitutionally ILLEGAL and outright criminal guns and weapons smuggling operation to the al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels that Ambassador Stevens found out about and was going to expose...I have said this since day one and I stand by these words.

Obama knew the truth about Benghazi being a carefully planned terrorist attack opportunistically coordinated to mark the 9/11 eleventh year anniversary...he knew it all along and I still wonder if he had a direct hand in it as Stevens had to be silenced at all costs...yet he spewed...as did Hillary...his carefully concocted LIE in the hopes that Benghazi...along with its four 'bumps in the road'... would just go away especially with the presidential election coming up. And this thought is critical for I believe Barack HUSSEIN Obama hoped that his LIES would help Benghazi go away so that his standing by his video bloviations would appear to his muslim brethren...to whom his true allegiances lie...that he was defending the prophet mohamed against the American infidels.

You think I'm kidding...I'm NOT as Obama's actions or lack thereof NOT only in relation to Benghazi, but in relation to Iraq and Afghanistan as well, speak volumes as to whose side he's really on. And proof of that is that the report cited the failure of the Obama administration to "bring the attackers to justice," meaning nobody believed to be involved in the attack or in the cover-up of the attack...as in Hillary Clinton...has gone to jail yet alone been arrested...that is except for the hapless Coptic film maker who made a cheap YouTube video showing mohamed and islam to be the joke we all know they are.

“I hope this report will put to rest many of the conspiracy theories and political accusations about what happened in Benghazi," said Intelligence Chairwoman Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) upon the report's release, but truth be told all this report does is raise even more questions...questions that must be answered for a sitting U.S. president NOT only LIED to the American people...again...but might also be complicit in the death of four Americans who he watched die in real time before jetting off to yet another fundraiser...and that is NO conspiracy theory or political accusation...that is documented fact.

And so NO matter what the report states...or what the alphabet media decides to report or NOT report it states...the fact remains that Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his cohort in crime Hillary 'What Does It Matter' Clinton are still free to sit back in their cushy chairs relishing in the fact that for now at least they've pulled another one off on 'We the People'...oh where the hell is someone to arrest these two...where the hell are they...

Op-ed: 

Back to the YouTube video we go...back to covering up for Hillary 
By: Diane Sori

"The attack was led ... by fighters who had benefited directly from NATO's extensive air power and logistics support during the uprising against Colonel Qaddafi. And contrary to claims by some members of Congress, it was fueled in large part by anger at an American-made video denigrating Islam." - The New York Times

Well it's started.  Laying the groundwork for a Hillary run in 2016, the New York Times has come out with a farce of an article...actually a six-part series about the attack on Benghazi which leads back to that ridiculous claim that a YouTube video about mohamed was the cause of it all.

Trying to defect all blame for Bengahzi away from Hillary...to actually try and exonerate her...good leftist newspaper that they are...the New York Times this past Saturday started running the series 'A Deadly Mix In Benghazi' by David Kirkpatrick. This series claims there is NO evidence whatsoever to prove that al-Qaeda was involved in the Benghazi attack, and that the attack was carried out solely by local militant islamist groups who were furious over the American-produced video the 'Innocence of Muslims' that slammed islam and the (supposed) prophet mohamed.

And this series uses quotes from 'anonymous' sources...Libyans who claimed they were in Benghazi and who claimed to have direct knowledge of the attack...as their 'supposed' credible sources. Anonymous sources who in their very anonymity means they are NOT credible at all.

Hate to tell The New York Times but this was a pre-planned well orchestrated attack by al-Qaeda and done in conjunction with the al-Qaeda aligned Muslim Brotherhood. Even Muslim Brotherhood members who were directly connected to ousted US educated, former professor at California State University (1982-1985) Muslim Brotherhood puppet President Mohamed Morsi, admitted to having had an operational role in the attack. And here's a little something our media has NOT reported on...the first two of Morsi's five children were born in the US and have US citizenship and passports they will NOT give up.

After being arrested at the scene, statements and confessions were taken from six members of one of the cells who took part in the attack and they admitted to being Egyptians connected to the al-Qaeda affiliate group Ansar al-Shariah. During interrogations these Egyptians, according to a US government verified Libyan intelligence document, “confessed to very serious and important information concerning the financial sources of the group and the planners of the event and the storming and burning of the U.S. consulate in Benghazi…. And among the more prominent figures whose names were mentioned by cell members during confessions were: Egyptian President Mohamed Morsi."

In fact there's even a video (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_eRgZ82OTRk) shot on a cell phone that shows a mob approaching the American compound while it was under siege, clearly showing some in the mob telling the terrorists in the dialect of Upper Egypt: “Mahadesh, mahadesh yermi, Dr. Morsi ba`atna” which translates to, “Don’t shoot, don’t shoot, Dr. Morsi sent us.”

By the way, the name 'Morsi' is Egyptian only and appears in NO other Arabic dialect.

Four Americans were murdered in the attack on the Benghazi diplomatic mission and CIA compound and to date still NO one at the top has been called to task. Some low-level minor State Department employees were slapped on the wrist but that's it. Then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton walked away seemingly untouched even after saying about those killed at Benghazi, "What difference at this point does it make" when questioned by Congress. Barack HUSSEIN Obama, who watched them die in real time and who, as Commander-in-Chief, could have been the only one to tell rescuers to 'stand down,' jetted off the next morning to a fundraiser in Las Vegas and I can imagine him laughing that he pulled off another one. But isn't it odd that all the generals, admirals, and high-ranking officers who knew the truth about the attack have either 'suddenly' retired early or been relieved of their commands.

And all this because of a poorly crafted video...NO...I do NOT think so.

Claiming that everyone is confusing local Libyan extremist groups like Ansar al-Shariah (Supporters of Islamic Law) for al-Qaeda’s world-wide terrorist network, the New York Times series states that Ansar al-Shariah and other local islamic militia groups were already planning an attack when the video just happened to be released adding the much needed final bit of fuel to the fire...a video that stirred up the restless already out for blood who now wanted the time frame for the attack moved up...a video that became the perfect foil for Obama's much needed cover for the truth.

Remember, with the Benghazi attack occurring in the middle of the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama knew this attack could seriously damage his chances of winning re-election if the truth were ever to come out that Ambassador Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty died in a carefully planned attack by al-Qaeda to mark the eleventh anniversary of 9/11, and that he knew it was going to happen and did NOTHING to stop it or to try and rescue those in danger. So instead Obama and his minions concocting and spread the YouTube story to cover up al-Qaeda’s role to avoid the sure to come discrediting of Obama's bloviations that al-Qaeda had been decimated and was on the run, all because he had single-handily (said with much sarcasm) taken out Osama bin Laden.

And of course the video was used to deflect any and all blame away from Hillary Clinton...the woman the media had already deemed to be the next in line for the presidency...never mind that she time and again willfully ignored Ambassador Stevens' many pleas for help.

Willfully ignoring those pleas for help because the most probable scenario...a scenario I have said since day one and still stand by...is that Benghazi was an Obama funded and orchestrated ILLEGAL gun and weapons running operation to the al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels that Ambassador Stevens found out about and was going to blow the whistle on. And I bet Hillary knew it all...and knowing that Hillary had sympathy towards the Muslim Brotherhood (due to her close friendship with her then State Department Deputy Chief of Staff Huma Abedin) she probably even condoned the gun and weapons running.

It's pretty obvious that Ambassador Stevens had to be silenced one way or another (Smith, Woods, and Doherty were considered 'collateral damage') and both Obama and Hillary need this truth hidden at all costs...especially Hillary if she is going to run in 2016. And it's the truth that many in Congress also know but are just too afraid to admit to or to seriously act upon beyond the 'dog and pony show' Congressional Benghazi hearings that went nowhere.

And so the true objectives of this New York Times series...especially coming out now while speculation about a Hillary run are all over the media and the internet...are clearly NOT to get to the truth about Benghazi, but are about trying to diffuse the right from being able to use Benghazi against Hillary. And to that I say, sorry but it will indeed be used every chance we get NOT only to damage and diffuse her campaign but also to try and prevent Hillary from running in the first place for America has had quite enough with Barack HUSSEIN Obama...America does NOT need his socialist agenda continued under a Hillary Clinton presidency... period.