Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 3 of 3 By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen
After the attacks in Benghazi many questions remained that needed
answers even after the Johnny-come-lately FBI investigation said all had
been answered, and those who wanted to protect the Obama regime by
refusing to answer them was in full operational mode. The Rose Garden
speech blaming the video...Obama jetting off to Vegas for a fund
raiser…Susan Rice spreading the video nonsense on five Sunday
shows… Hillary and Obama blaming the video at the memorial service as the
caskets of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen
Doherty arrived...and more of Obama's blathering on about the video ruse
at the U(seless) N(ations). We do NOT need to go into details with
which everyone is already all too familiar. What we must do however, is
connect the most disturbing of dots. Let’s begin with the 'stand down'
Issuing a ‘stand down’ order does follow a specific chain of
command, and the one relating to Benghazi would go like this, in order
from top to bottom…President, Secretary of Defense, Secretary’s of the
various armed services (Army, Navy, Air Force, Marines), Chairman of the
Joint Chiefs of Staff, the various Chiefs of Staff for each military
service, the Commanding General for AFRICOM, and the local command
structure under AFRICOM.
All in the command chain below Obama have denied giving such an
order, including then Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta and Army Gen.
Martin E. Dempsey, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff (remember,
Dempsey testified that orders were given to assist in Tripoli but NOT
to assist in Benghazi but NEVER telling who gave that order but we know
it was NOT him). And all the military branch Chiefs have also said they
gave NO such order. And while AFRICOM Commander General Carter Ham did
give testimony in a closed door hearing before the House Armed Services
Committee investigating Benghazi, we still do NOT know his testimony,
but know that if he had given such an order it would have been made
public for all to hear for it would have cleared Obama, especially
important because everything possible is being done to try and distance
him from this event, especially after his nonsense about a YouTube
But NO such announcement assuming responsibility for that ‘stand
down’ order has been made by General Ham so logic would dictate he gave
NO such order. And remember, Panetta announced back in October 2012,
that General Ham would be retiring for refusing to obey orders NOT to
assist the US personnel in Benghazi on that fateful night, and that on
Saturday, October 27th, Panetta confirmed that General Ham had indeed
been ‘relieved’ of his AFRICOM command.
Now here is something interesting about the official command
chain…neither the Vice-President nor the Secretary of State is in that
chain. But, the Vice-President and the Secretary of State do have the
authority through the President to countermand any one below the
President. And while the National Security Council and the Department of
Homeland Security Secretary influence military decisions (to some
degree) through the National Security Act and through their advisory
positions to the President, they do NOT have the authority to issue an
actual ‘stand down’ order on their own as that can ONLY be done by those
in the direct chain of command.
Yet according to whistleblower Gregory Hicks (the Deputy Chief of
Mission in Libya at the time of Benghazi), who when testifying before
Congress said that after the first attack a security team left Tripoli
for Benghazi with two military personnel, and that four members of a
special forces team in Tripoli wanted to go in a second wave but were
ordered to ‘stand down’ (but he did NOT know who gave that order).
And remember even though many were close enough to assist and
possibly save Ambassador Stevens and the others, including Rear Admiral
Charles Gaouette, commander of a Navy Carrier Battle Group that was
within range to help… including two Marine anti-terrorist teams based in
Rota, Spain who were ready, willing, and able to help…and also including
a 130-man, fully armed Marine Force-Recon unit on the ground in
Sigonella, Sicily…all ready to deploy to Benghazi to help, yet all say
they were told to ‘stand down’. And that ‘stand down’ order assured that
Ambassador Stevens would die with Information Officer Sean Smith and
ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty becoming collateral
damage…becoming just more ‘bumps in the road’.
So, the bottom line is if then Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta did
NOT give the order to ‘stand down’…if then AFRICOM General Carter Ham
did NOT give the order to ‘stand down’…if General Dempsey, then Chairman
of the Joint Chiefs of Staff did NOT give the order to ‘stand down’…and
if all the other then Commanders and Officers did NOT give the order to
‘stand down’…that leaves only one person who had the authority to give
that order…the one person who had the most to lose if Ambassador Stevens
survived…and that one person is Barack HUSSEIN Obama.
As we continue to connect dots, let’s not forget the FBI
investigation in Benghazi. Yes, THAT investigation. The one that didn’t
begin until 20 days after the attacks.
Why 20 days?
Because, we were told, Benghazi was unsafe.
This of course, begs the question…If Benghazi was so dangerous that
the FBI couldn’t go there, why then was the place crawling with western
reporters just two days after the attacks?
If reporters were there and everything seemed 'normal' or as normal
as an al-Qaeda held region could be, it would lend some air of
'credibility' to the whole You Tube video/spontaneous protest ruse
cooked up by Obama and Hillary Clinton prior to the attacks.
Remember too that reporters found one of the ring leaders of those
attacks, calmly sipping strawberry frappes and willing to talk about the
attacks while sitting at a Benghazi sidewalk café.
Too dangerous for the FBI and yet, perfectly safe for the media?
It was, after all, the media that became one of the CIA’s trusted
sources regarding the You Tube video ruse. According to the CIA’s own
second in command, Mike Morrell, in last week’s testimony before a house
committee so it should come as no great surprise that the media was
unencumbered in their forays into Benghazi following the attacks.
While we’re on the topic of a stalled FBI cooling their heels in
Tripoli while the media was free to roam about in Benghazi, let’s recall
another major idiosyncrasy.
Just three days after the Benghazi attacks, on Saturday September
14th, 2012, CNN reporters, nosing about in the State Department’s burned
out Mission, made a stunning discovery…the personal journal of one
Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
CNN notified the family of Christopher Stevens hours after their
discovery, and through a third person, returned that journal to the
That was AFTER Hillary’s State Department went into orbit and
DEMANDED the journal be returned because CNN had admitted to using
information from the journal in their reporting including one very
CNN reported, based on a Stevens journal entry, that the Ambassador had great concerns over a…"HIT LIST!!!"
When asked to comment on that report, State Department spokesman
Philippe Reines, A SENIOR ADVISOR TO THEN SECRETARY OF STATE HILLARY
CLINTON responded, "I have absolutely no information or reason to
believe that there's any basis for that.”
Interesting, isn’t it? The number of rather “fortunate coincidences” for the Obama administration here?
The FBI not being in Benghazi because it was “too dangerous” while reporters had free reign of the place without incident?
How it took exactly the amount of time, three weeks, for the FBI to
finally arrive in Benghazi as Obama and Hillary continued to try and
float the You Tube video ruse?
How the personal journal of Chris Stevens was discovered and used to
report his concerns over a “HIT LIST” but then turned over to his
FAMILY rather than to the FBI investigators?
And the fact that said personal journal containing the “HIT LIST”
passages was found on September 14th…(by sources cited by the CIA’s 2nd
in command and used to “confirm” the phony You Tube video/spontaneous
protest cover story) only to be secreted OUT of Benghazi in the nick of
time for Susan Rice’s five Sunday Show 'Blame-the-Video' performances on
In what we firmly believe to be a well-orchestrated, pre-planned hit
on our Ambassador in Benghazi, there are NO 'fortunate coincidences.'
There are, however, too many CONVENIENCES to be ignored.
And now, let’s take a look at a part of the Senate Select Committee
on Intelligence Report that received virtually NO media coverage and, an
excerpt that sheds a truly shocking light of truth on all the dots we
We find the passage on page 46 of the report:
First, the ‘deliberative process.’
Deliberative process privilege is a privilege exempting the
government from disclosure of government agency materials containing
opinions, recommendations, and other communications that are part of the
decision-making process within the agency. This encourages open and
independent discussion among those who develop government policy. The
theory behind the protection is that by guaranteeing confidentiality,
the government will receive better or more candid advice,
recommendations, and opinions, resulting in better decisions for society
as a whole.
Obviously, this administration obstructed the Senate Committee's
investigation because there were things in the 'deliberative process’
or, the building of the cover story, they don’t want 'We the People' privy
Go figure but, the SHOCKING part of this passage involves, ‘Executive Privilege.'
THAT is a privilege that can constitutionally ONLY be employed when a
PRESIDENT is DIRECTLY INVOLVED in the situation at hand...DIRECTLY
Therefore, by exerting EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE…Obama has tipped his hand
that, as our connect the dots Benghazi investigation into the TRUTH has
surmised…Obama’s fingerprints are all over what happened there. Obama’s
fingerprints are on the before, during and after the attacks situations
and, if he colluded with the likes of Hillary Clinton and Leon Panetta
in the gun running acts of treason we believe they all did, the very
idea that Obama was personally involved would also cover their
involvement under the cloak of 'Executive Privilege.’
We can find NO investigation or coverage of this revelation by anyone else in the media.
All of this said, why haven’t there been arrests? Why has NO one
from al-Qaeda or Ansar al-Sharia involved in those attacks been brought
to justice and, perhaps a better question, why has NO one from within
this administration, other than the whistle-blowers like Gregory Hicks,
been held accountable for their actions and involvement in the attacks
that left Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods
We believe we can also shed the staggering light of truth on that as well.
As was said in Part 2 of this investigative report, we believe
Benghazi was constructed to cover for the 'targeted kill' of Ambassador
Christopher Stevens for Obama dared NOT let the information leak out
that guns and weapons were being run to the al-Qaeda backed Syrian
rebels. And as said, we also believe that towards the end Stevens
realized he was betrayed and that NO help was coming from Hillary or
from any in this administration, so he reached out to the political
opposition...as in John Boehner...the Speaker of the House.
We believe that this is what Boehner refers to in his interview with
Laura Ingram when he said, he's heard the "chatter" about gun-running
being at the center of the Benghazi scandal, but can't elaborate on it
because it came from a "classified source"...(like Ambassador Stevens
<iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/FTOpd0UMoh8" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>
Blackmail plain and simple.
We believe Boehner knows the others, besides himself, to whom Stevens
sent his information, and that Obama and crew know he knows but at this
point have NOT been able to 'break him' if you will, but by blackmailing
him they can keep him in check. It's been public knowledge that Boehner
has been suspected of having an affair with Lisbeth Lyons, Vice
President for Government Affairs for the American Printers Association
and a DC lobbyist...which both have flatly denied, but what if Obama and
crew have proof...as in pictures or tapes. Remember, a sex scandal
destroyed General Petraeus' career and got Billy-Boy impeached, as it
destroyed others as well.
Now consider this as an adjunct possibility...with a good
old-fashioned sex scandal the only thing that seems to be what brings a
DC politician down...and with Boehner being the third in line for the
presidency...a position he so wants to keep...maybe a tit-for-tat
tradeoff of silence was reached...as in Boehner maybe telling Obama you keep
your DNC cronies and lapdog media out of my personal business or else I
blow the lid off Benghazi.
Everyone of late thinks Boehner is a coward or a wimp, but he is NO
such thing for to get where he is politically he had to crush his
opposition and crushing your adversaries involves dirty politics. In DC
the nice guy does finish last...the cut-throat politician...and Boehner
behind closed doors could very well be more cut throat than crybaby. And
NO matter what people say about Boehner he, at this point in time, is
indeed safely ensconced in his position as Speaker of the House.
This could well be the reason why John Boehner is blocking an
Independent Investigation, because to go forward would implicate him in
the cover-up and there goes his political career... and welcome to
What we have done, throughout our three article series, 'Benghazi: The Truth Exposed' has been to pour through all the available
information, facts, testimony, and those items abbreviated by the media,
to form the most plausible scenario by connecting the dots.
We have explored other possible theories, however, we have always
found the available facts to lead directly back to those we have put
forth in this series. We believe there was indeed a covert gun running
operation, we believe that the Obama administration deliberately set up
Ambassador Stevens for a hit, and that in the aftermath, the Obama
administration deliberately endeavored to cover-up their acts of
Furthermore, we believe that there must be those on our own side of
the aisle helping to stall or block any attempts to expose the entirety
of truth of what took place leading up to, during, and after the
Benghazi attacks as outlined above.
We also hope that this three part series…this putting together of
the individual pieces of the puzzle…will help those in the families of
Ambassador Stevens, Sean Smith, Glen Doherty, and Tyrone Woods find some
understanding as to what really happened to their loved ones, and we
hope they can find some closure through knowing what we believe to be
the truth surrounding that fateful night. We are keenly aware that
justice can only be served by bringing those responsible to trial
whether they be foreign or domestic.
This administration, Barack Hussein Obama and Hillary Clinton, know
more than they are willing to divulge as the truth regarding their acts
of treason is something they do NOT want exposed.
Numerous British Investigative Reports
Direct links to Parts 1 and 2
Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 3 of 3
Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 2
Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 1