Op-ed:
The Details of the Democrats Evil Plan Exposed
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots on
American Political Radio
"It's not her job to corroborate her story"
- Debra Katz, Christine Blasey Ford's attorney
As we all know things are not always what they seem to be on the
surface. Such is the case with Dr. Christine Blasey Ford who at
last Thursday's Senate Judiciary Committee hearing...who in the
throws of what amounted to caffeine induced shakes, who with her hair
constantly falling in her face, and who with a little girl squeaky
voice whose tone she carefully modulated depending on which political
side of the committee she was addressing...tried to paint herself as
a victim of a 36-year old claimed sexual assault by Judge Brett
Kavanaugh when the two were in high school.
*
And so in a maliciously
orchestrated scenario that was egged-on by the Democrats on the
committee...Democrats who never asked her any direct questions per se
but who one-by-one straight down the line heralded her supposed
“bravery” for coming forward with her story...more like
heralding her for coming forward with a lie.
But the thing is that Dr. Christine Blasey Ford was no sexual
assault survivor of Brett Kavanaugh or possibly of anyone else...but
if anything happened at all it probably was just a different teenage
boy trying to get to
“first” or
“second base”
as teenage boys have always done and will continue to do...I mean
there was not even any clothing removed. Teenage drunkenness and
misconduct has been twisted in Dr. Ford's own mind into attempted
rape.
And this woman whom the Democrats have now anointed as the new
spokeswoman and
"face" for sexual abuse survivors everywhere put on one hell of a
performance as Republicans treated her with kid gloves for fear of
being labeled as both sexist and overbearing towards a woman who
supposedly had gone through so much inner turmoil in order to keep a
deep dark secret inside her until she alone felt it was the right time to
come forward and do her
“civic duty.”
Bravo...and the Oscar goes to Dr. Christine Blasey Ford for a
performance of a lifetime but that's all it was...a performance...for
it's important to remember that Dr. Ford herself stated that
she
was eventually able to escape before she was raped or worse but that
the experience was very traumatic because she felt like she had “no
control and was physically dominated.”
That is a very liberal stance as it relates to feelings not to the
actual physical act of rape itself which showed that neither she nor
the Democrats were really interested in getting to the truth
of what happened or didn't happen on the night in question. But it
did give the Democrats a tool by which to manipulate a frail easily
swayed individual into doing their bidding.
And manipulate Dr. Ford they did as she became the conduit by
which the Democrats were able to both slander and defame a good man
and hopefully stop Donald Trump from not only stacking the Supreme
Court with conservative justices, but by which they could restart the
now thanks to Trump stalled fundamental changing of America that
Barack HUSSEIN Obama had set in motion. To read more on that please read my Right Side Patriots partner and friend Craig Andresen's article
The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System.
But first let's start by looking at an all-important timeline and
how that timeline was willfully ignored by the media.
Before Christine Blasey Ford got married in 2002 she says she told
her husband about a sexual assault that supposedly happened when she
was in high school but never told him who did it or the details of
exactly what happened. Then in 2012, just as Barack HUSSEIN Obama
began his final term in office, Dr. Ford and her husband went into
couples therapy...with some claiming for issues relating to
alcoholism...where she tells a therapist who shares her leftist
anti-Trump political leanings about being sexuality assaulted at a
party by someone she knew in high school, but like with her husband
she never mentioned any name.
Flash forward to July 2016 when Donald Trump became the Republican
nominee for president. And when he did so, much to the utter
chagrin of liberals everywhere, Christine Blasey Ford was amongst
those who feared that Trump would turn our country hard to the right
by picking only pro-lifers if he was given the chance to nominate
future Supreme Court justices. And he rightfully stroked those fears
when in September 2016 then candidate Trump released his first list
of those he would be considering as possible nominees to the High
Court if elected. On that list was Neil Gorsuch...who did become the
nominee on January 31, 2017 and who ultimately became the justice who
would replace Justice Antonin Scalia who had passed away the year
before.
Also on that original first list of possibilities of then
candidate Trump was Steven Colloton of Iowa, Allison Eid of Colorado,
Raymond Gruender of Missouri, Thomas Hardiman of Pennsylvania,
Raymond Kethledge of Michigan, Joan Larsen of Michigan, Thomas Lee of
Utah, William Pryor of Alabama, David Stras of Minnesota, Diane Sykes
of Wisconsin and Don Willett of Texas.
Judge Brett Michael Kavanaugh, a staunch originalist and constitutionalist
then sitting on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of
Columbia Circuit...as you can see was not on then candidate Donald
Trump's original 2016 list of possible SCOTUS nominees but was
included on now President Trump's official November 17, 2017 list
after The Heritage Foundation recommend his name be added. And Brett
Kavanaugh's name only appeared on then retiring Justice Anthony
Kennedy's replacement 'short list' on July 5, 2018, with his ultimately
being announced as the nominee on July 9, 2018.
Now why is this particular timeline so important, because in her
interview with the Washington Post, Dr. Christine Blasey Ford stated
that she became upset back in September 2016 when she saw Brett
Kavanaugh's name appearing on then candidate Trump's original list of
possible SCOTUS nominees. But how can that be when Brett Kavanaugh's
name was not on now President Trump's official nominee list until
November 17, 2017...a full year after she said she saw it. Meaning if
Dr. Ford can lie about something so easily but obviously not looked
into, what else is she lying about...how about everything.
“Falsus
in uno, falsus in omnibus”...“False
in one thing, false in everything.” - common
law legal doctrine
Remember, this is the very woman who
could not name the exact
date when said sexual assault occurred; whose house
it was where the supposed assault took place; how she got to and home
from said house; and who also admitted that she had been
drinking...all that has been twisted by the media, the Democrats, and in Ford's own
mind into attempted rape. And critical to remember is that this woman
did not tell anyone the name of who assaulted her until 36 years later
when a political opportunity arose for her to help stop Trump's
nominee from being seated on the High Court...a nominee she and her
fellow liberals knew would decidedly swing the court to the right for
probably decades to come.
And that could not be allowed, and it
was at this point that Christine Blasey Ford became but a useful tool
to stop Donald Trump and his nominee at any cost. And it all started
with a Democrat loyal therapist being able to take a memory of a long
ago assault that might or might not have happened and manipulate that
memory into a time sensitive weapon to be used against President
Trump with an innocent man's life being thrown to the wolves in a media
driven feeding frenzy of Dr. Ford's and the Democrats doing.
But how did key Democrats accomplish this feat? First let's
remember that Democrats were not happy when Neil Gorsuch made it to
the Supreme Court especially since Obama had nominated liberal leaning Merrick
Garland after Antonin Scalia's death. Not happy that Trump was
successful in stalling Garland's Senate confirmation vote until
Obama's term in office ran out with said nomination now legally being
cast aside, Democrats see Dr. Ford's accusation as their last ditch
attempt to stall Kavanaugh's nomination until after the midterms in
hopes of their retaking the Senate and then being able to throw out
both Kavanaugh's nomination and any future
nominations Trump would make.
As always it's all about politics...dirty D.C. swamp politics
emanating primarily from the left side of the political aisle.
But what exactly would they need to do to now, at the so-called eleventh hour,
to stop Brett Kavanaugh's nomination for it appeared Kavanaugh was
poised to get the votes needed to take a seat on the High
Court...simply they used the tried and true last minute tactic of
fabricating a sex scandal because Democrats know that political sex
scandals garner more outage and passion than just about anything
else...just ask Billy-Boy Clinton about that.
And so their plan was set into motion...a plan dedicated to stopping Brett Kavanaugh from ever becoming a Supreme Court Justice. But
to do so Democrats needed someone to come forward and claim that he had
sexually assaulted them with the time frame of when it happened not
really mattering, thus leaving the Democrats to start searching through their
databases of their supporters and/or financial contributors to see if
any had crossed paths with Kavanaugh. And they hit the mark with Dr.
Christine Blasey Ford, a registered Democrat, a Hillary supporting
pink pussycat hat wearing far left feminist who had also contributed
to both the Obama and Hillary campaigns and to the DNC itself. And
they also found out in their search that she had been in therapy back
in 2012 where she told her therapist that she had been the victim of
an unnamed assailant back when she was in high school in Maryland.
Ding, ding, ding...and the bells went off for the Democrats as
Trump's nominee Brett Kavanaugh was also from Maryland, was about the
same age as Dr. Ford and who by luck went to a 'sister' high school
of his, and whose mother had ruled in a foreclosure case involved the
Blasey family, which while she ruled in their favor still cost them a
great deal of money to settle. And from there it was easy pickings to
manipulate and possibly pay off an emotionally unstable
woman...emotionally unstable no matter how many degrees she has...to
a point where a previously unnamed assailant morphed in her mind into
Trump's Republican nominee to the Supreme Court...one Brett
Kavanaugh.
And Dianne Feinstein herself has her hands all over this what
amounts to a witch hunt for besides her broken promise to keep Dr.
Ford's infamous letter confidential, it was she who helped Dr. Ford
secure her big shot D.C. lawyers. But doesn't that in itself seem odd
as Dr. Ford's own two brothers are both respected attorney's in the
Washington D.C. area...maybe they know the truth about their sister
and were wise enough not to get involved...as maybe they know about
her taking part in crackpot feminist and anti-Trump marches...and
maybe they know that the rumors going around about their sister
having
“issues” as far back as childhood are true.
And so the woman who couldn't even remember also sending the New York
Time a copy of the infamous letter that started the witch hunt just
three short weeks ago, in reality did not come off at the hearing as
someone credible in my eyes contrary to what many conservative
talking heads are continuing to say if for no other reason than
they're afraid of 'outing' a woman as a liar on national
television... especially a woman who claims to be a sexual assault
“survivor.”
But
the bottom line to me is this...then Christine 'Chrissy' Blasey was
most definitely not...I repeat not...sexually assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh, and if any
boy did assault her back then what happened was not rape but was at
best teenage drunkenness and bad behavior. And really, Brett
Kavanaugh has already gone through six thorough F.B.I. investigations over the
years as he rose up through the ranks of our judicial system...including a
critical investigation that allowed him to be privy to America's
nuclear code...and now he must go through a seventh all because a
lying woman with an agenda has been manipulated to do the Democrats
bidding.
If Dr. Christine Blasey Ford is a victim of anything, she's a
victim of her own twisted delusions and of being manipulated into becoming
“the face” of
a misplaced political agenda that will not serve her, our county, or true victims of real sexual assault
well.
And let's not forget the yet to be mentioned future victims of Dr. Ford's lie and the Democrats witch hunt...our husbands, fathers, brothers, nephews, and sons as any woman or girl can now make up a story that can neither be proved or disproved all in an attempt to completely ruin those above stated lives. And while these misguided Democrat sorts thinks this empowers women, all it does is place guilt on the innocent before anything even happens.
But most importantly of all right now, let it be known that Judge Brett Kavanaugh is no sexual
predator and never was and to state otherwise is to dismiss the
notion that the F.B.I. actually did its job when investigating him
the first six times they did so. The only true victim here is the
good judge whose career and reputation has been irrevocably harmed
and his family forever hurt by the truly evil sorts who comprise
today's Democrat party. Judge Brett Kavanaugh deserves his seat on the
Supreme Court...it's now up to the Republicans to make sure he gets
that seat for if they don't the midterm results just might not be to
their or our liking.
_________________________________________
*Prosecutor Rachel Mitchell's all-important
MEMO regarding the Kavanaugh/Ford hearing...a must read.
Copyright @ 2018 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.
********************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog
The National Patriot to read his latest article
The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System.
*******************************************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Tuesday, October 2nd from 7 to 9pm EST on
American Political Radio,
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss '
The Details of the Democrats Evil Plan Exposed;' 'The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System;' and important news of the
day.
Hope you can tune in at:
http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history
...or on
Tune-In at:
https://tunein.com/radio/American-Political-Radio-s273246/
And manipulate Dr. Ford they did as she became the conduit by
which the Democrats were able to both slander and defame a good man
and hopefully stop Donald Trump from not only stacking the Supreme
Court with conservative justices, but by which they could restart the
now thanks to Trump stalled fundamental changing of America that
Barack HUSSEIN Obama had set in motion. To read more on that please read my Right Side Patriots partner and friend Craig Andresen's article The Social Reengineering of Our Justice System.
But
the bottom line to me is this...then Christine 'Chrissy' Blasey was
most definitely not...I repeat not...sexually assaulted by Brett Kavanaugh, and if any
boy did assault her back then what happened was not rape but was at
best teenage drunkenness and bad behavior. And really, Brett
Kavanaugh has already gone through six thorough F.B.I. investigations over the
years as he rose up through the ranks of our judicial system...including a
critical investigation that allowed him to be privy to America's
nuclear code...and now he must go through a seventh all because a
lying woman with an agenda has been manipulated to do the Democrats
bidding.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
But the Democrats never even entertained the
possibility that Brett Kavanaugh was a man of true inner strength and
conviction...a man who boldly stated on day one and has not wavered
since that said accusation never happened and that he would fight
this until both his integrity was restored and the allegation was
exposed as the lie that it is.
Besides
Dr. Ford being an avowed liberal Democrat and vehemently anti-Trump, her
apparent hatred for Brett Kavanaugh might have nothing to do with an
attempted rape that never happened, but might have to do with a
twisted revenge of sorts against his mother for putting her parents
through what she perceived as monetary hell so to speak.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Issued after months of negotiations with Obama and his people about
what should or should NOT be censored (redacted), five hundred
pages...including an executive summary and conclusion...out of a
still-classified 6,700-page report were released. And after reviewing
six million documents the committee requested and secured from the
CIA...or so they claim...those investigating said they could find NO
example of what the CIA called "unique, life-saving intelligence gleaned
from coercive techniques."
This committee claimed the CIA misled both Congress and the Obama White House about
the use of these so-called 'enhanced' techniques...'torture' they
called it...by saying they were NOT effective and did NOT produce critical
information that would have led to the killing of Osama bin Laden and
other known operatives. But I beg to differ for the very techniques the
Democrats condemn did in fact lead to the capture of other key al-Qaida
leaders and operatives thus saving the lives of countless American
troops in the process.
And of course Obama had to chime in when the Senate report was released and
once again side with those whose bloodlines he shares for these legally
used techniques were what worried this man while America's enemy cutting
the heads off fellow Americans sent him running off to the golf course. By
declaring these past practices...and the key word here is 'past' as
these techniques are NO longer used thanks to the CIA having to cater to
Obama's liberal sensibilities of having these practices discontinued
when he took office...to be "contrary to our values" and pledging that,
"I will continue to use my authority as president to make sure we never
resort to those methods again," meaning he'll be using his infamous pen
and phone to once again protect his brethren instead of protecting those he and his
cronies have now placed in harm's way.
And anyway, all this is being done for revenge against those who
dared to do what Obama and the Democrats will NEVER do...as in bring
these barbarians to justice...and taking out Osama bin-Laden solely to
win an election is NOT what I'm talking about. Also, in NO way is what
was done by the CIA "a stain on our nation's history" as Committee Chairwoman Dianne Feinstein called it, for the
only stain on our nation's history is that we now have traitors amongst
us who by their very actions are now helping to 'aid and abet' the enemy
for the enemy now knows what we might do to certain 'key' prisoners.
And know that they will surely use that knowledge against both our
troops and any U.S. civilians caught within the still ongoing war zone, let
alone use it as fodder for recruitment to seek their own revenge of
sorts.
"In spite of the deteriorating security situation in Benghazi and
ample strategic warnings, the United States Government simply did not do
enough to prevent these attacks and ensure the safety of those serving
in Benghazi.”
"The bottom line is Hillary Clinton wanted the appearance of
normalization" in Libya...Security was not driving these decisions.
Politics was," said Utah Representative Jason Chaffetz, a Republican on
the House Oversight Committee.
This report NO matter its true intentions...whether good or
bad...tells us NOTHING we already didn't know even as it lays out that
in the first hours after the attack began that every single Pentagon
military briefer and defense department official...including General
Carter Ham (then head of AFRICOM) and Marine Corps Colonel George
Bristol (commander of AFRICOM's Joint Special Operations Task Force for
the Trans Sahara region)...who briefed the White House referred to
Benghazi as a terrorist attack and NOT as a response to an anti-American
demonstration to a poorly made YouTube video critical of mohamed and
islam.
Simply, the President of the United States knowingly and willfully
LIED to the American people, to the victim's families, to the media, and
to our troops in the field that a farce of a video cost four Americans
their lives. And he did this because (I believe) he had to cover-up his
own...and possibly Hillary's...involvement in a constitutionally ILLEGAL
and outright criminal guns and weapons smuggling operation to the
al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels that Ambassador Stevens found out about
and was going to expose...I have said this since day one and I stand by
these words.
“I hope this report will put to rest many of the conspiracy theories
and political accusations about what happened in Benghazi," said
Intelligence Chairwoman Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) upon the
report's release, but truth be told all this report does is raise even more
questions...questions that must be answered for a sitting U.S.
president NOT only LIED to the American people...again...but might also
be complicit in the death of four Americans who he watched die in real
time before jetting off to yet another fundraiser...and that is NO
conspiracy theory or political accusation...that is documented fact.
Waterboarding Terrorists is NOT Torture
By: Diane Sori
And as the traitor Senate Intelligence Committee Chairwoman Senator Dianne Feinstein continues to drone on and on about America's so-called shame...claiming shame without her or her committee ever having interviewed any of the CIA operatives who inflicted this 'supposed' shame upon our enemies...a question remains of, were the acts perpetrated upon the enemy's person actually shame in the guise of torture or just standard practices used by many nations to get much needed information from prisoners.
Before I answer that question we first must understand the nature of torture, its legal aspects and parameters. The Geneva Convention of 1949 and its Additional Protocols of June 8, 1977 contain provisions that prohibit torture and other 'cruel or inhuman treatment' inflicted upon 'individual dignity.' And in 1984 the U.S. signed... along with 74 other countries...an international treaty initiated by the UN against the use of torture. But what constitutes 'cruel and inhumane treatment'...in other words 'torture'...to one culture might NOT be considered so by another culture. However, most would agree that what could be defined as torture is the act of deliberately and with malice inflicting severe physical and/or psychological pain to someone either physically restrained or under the torturer's control and who is unable to defend themselves against what is being done to them.
But again, what are the specifics that constitute one an act of torture and the other just 'enhanced interrogation' techniques.
To begin, certain techniques now in question...techniques used during the George W. Bush presidency...now have the Democrats taking Obama's mantra of 'It's all Bush's fault' to a new level. And while Bush stated in the aftermath of 9/11 that "The United States of America does not torture," and although he signed the Detainee Treatment Act of 2005 that addressed supposed incidents of now called detainee abuse, Bush made it clear that he reserved the right to waive this act if he thought it was needed to do so...and in NO uncertain terms it indeed was needed.
In fact, most of the techniques that were used during the Bush administration were sanctioned by our military including the use of yelling, loud music, light control, environmental manipulation, sleep deprivation, stress positions, 20-hour interrogations, and controlled fear (including the use of dogs) as acceptable techniques to be used against any and all enemies as the need warranted. And anyway terrorists...especially islamic terrorists...pose such an extreme threat that, I believe, governments should be freely allowed to use some degree of so-called torture if it helps gain information that saves innocent lives NO matter what the kumbaya Democrats or their America-hating president says.
Contrary to what Feinstein and her ilk want you to believe in their anything but truthful 'Torture Report' (please see my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT partner and friend Craig Andresen's article on the specifics of this report at http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/12/15/torture-report-is-all-about-liberalism-part-2/) is the fact that waterboarding was NOT born with the CIA but predates the Inquisition and has been used worldwide for centuries, waxing and waning as a preferred 'enhanced interrogation' technique. Simply, waterboarding relies on a person's innate fear of drowning and suffocating to coerce confessions, and while it does cause physical and mental suffering, it leaves no tell-tale marks on the body nor does it cause death, making it an optimum tool to get an enemy to talk.
And lest anyone forget, waterboarding was designed and is executed in such a way as to let the person it is done to live.
Also, as late as November 2005, waterboarding was on the CIA's list of approved 'enhanced interrogation techniques' that was intended for use on 'high-value' terror suspects. And according to memos released by the U.S. Department of Justice in April 2009, waterboarding was still listed among 10 'enhanced interrogation' techniques authorized for use on al-Qaida operatives...especially for use on top-tier al-Qaeda operatives...you know like those who planned the 9/11 attacks...like those three it was used on.
However, the question that still remains is this...is waterboarding a form of illegal torture...and to that I say NO and I base that on the fact that there is indeed such a thing as 'legally' allowed torture under specific circumstances when it relates to terrorists. While we as a nation specifically outlaw American citizens from practicing torture in Title 18 of the U.S. legal code and allow for anyone who kills another person through torture to face the death penalty, this code applies to an act of one civilian against another and does NOT address what happens during a time of war.
So, do the torture laws that protect enemy combatants captured under the normal rules of war extend to terrorists...in the aftermath of 9/11 the Bush administration (rightfully) concluded that the Geneva Convention did NOT apply to enemies in the 'War on Terror' and therefore they were interrogated thusly. And the 'Rumsfeld Memo' (put together by Constitutional attorneys) concluded that under the Constitution and the executive authority it grants to the president in his role as commander-in-chief of the armed forces, Bush was afforded 'wide powers' that superseded international and domestic laws concerning torture and thus gave him the ability to order terror suspects be interrogated using methods then that are today considered torture under international law.
In addition, this what was a 'legally' binding memo also allowed those who followed said orders to waterboard the three islamic terrorists to be immune from any legal prosecution under a 'good faith' defense...a defense which stated that the torturer was told beforehand that the act he would perpetrate upon a prisoner did NOT constitute torture.
So, the bottom line is that since the U.S. NO longer uses waterboarding as a tactic to garner intelligence why bring up something that happened almost a decade ago to three islamic terrorists who would kill us all if given the chance. Why NOT focus instead on our current national security needs as the threat of those like ISIS are moving ever closer to our shores if they are NOT already here. And why do those like Feinstein who claim that this 'American shame' must be exposed in the name of transparency instead worry about those they have now put in danger. They willingly forget that America is the greatest nation the world has ever known...that America has done more to free more people than any nation that has come before...so one has to wonder just why these known Obama minions bring this all up and bring it up now.
Well, a few simple words say it all...they must circle the wagons around Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his love for and protection of his islamic brethren is why...need I say more.