Showing posts with label e-mails. Show all posts
Showing posts with label e-mails. Show all posts

Monday, June 30, 2014


Op-ed: 
Is the key to the IRS scandal hiding in Russia...part 3 of 3 
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen

As more testimony is given in the IRS scandal it's becoming obvious that the missing e-mails could very well be the key to collapsing the entire Obama administration, but it first must be understood that the IRS e-mails were NOT being secured because the IRS did NOT want them to be secured...period.

And why...because e-mail messages are considered official documents and can be offered as evidence in court and therefore can be legally binding...especially e-mails regarding the transaction of official business...of IRS business.

And the missing e-mails in question needed to be destroyed because...we believe ...they contained evidence that the IRS...a supposed nonpartisan government agency...knowingly engaged in criminal activities to cover for the actions of Barack HUSSEIN Obama as explained in part 2 of this investigative report (http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/06/op-ed-is-key-to-irs-scandal-hiding-in.html). We also believe that NSA whistle blower Edward Snowden could also have noticed something was amiss at the IRS especially concerning e-mail correspondence...and with his vast computer expertise he could have 'secured' copies of those e-mails for himself out of fear such incriminating e-mails would go missing...which indeed they did...as outlined in part 1 of this report (http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/06/24/is-the-key-to-the-irs-scandal-hiding-in-russia-part-1/).
   
Now what everyone needs to understand is how the IRS...a mega-agency that according to government records spent more than $4 billion on contracts labeled 'information technology and software' over the last five years...yet according to last week's testimony by IRS Commissioner John Koskinen himself...the IRS had NO funds with which to save and store e-mails due to budgetary constraints...due to “declining budget resources”...that he claimed prevented the agency from spending the $10 million needed to save and store e-mails...basically to upgrade their system from having to use tape for backups, from having to use hard-drives instead of servers to store information, and from only having the capacity to hold information garnered for six months.

Now ain't that a kick as 'We the People' are told to store our records for a minimum of seven years yet the very agency telling us to do just that only stores their information for six months...talk about the epitome of hypocrisy.

Excuse me but with $4 billion dollars having been spent over five years...and what a coincidence that such extravagant spending occurred during the exact time frame that Barack HUSSEIN Obama has been in office...that $10 million could NOT have been put aside from their $4 billion spending spree for such an important endeavor as securing critical interdepartmental e-mails. Of course it couldn't and for very good reason as those e-mails (we believe) were NEVER intended to be saved because to save them would possibly risk exposing...if they fell into the wrong hands...hands like those of Edward Snowden...the truth about an administration and about a traitor of a president run amok.

NO...that could NOT be risked so all e-mails of critical importance that tied Obama in any way into the IRS scandal...especially those between Lois Lerner and Obama himself..had to go 'poof' either by using the cooked up phony crashed computer story or by someone simply hand destroying the hard-drives themselves.

But the question remains where was $4 billion of our taxpayer dollars spent if it was NOT spent on securing and protecting these critical computers and the important information they housed...well let me tell you and it will NOT make you, the reader, happy at all. First, between 2010 and 2012...covering most of the time frame of the missing e-mails...some $50 million of that $4 billion was spent by the IRS on 220 conference trips...with $38 million of that in 2010 alone. And if you break that $50 million down into more easily recognizable and manageable numbers that comes out to $227,272.72 being spent on each conference trip. And this includes our tax dollars being spent on...actually wasted on...$3,500 per night hotel rooms, promotional materials, paintings, and other frivolities all while our economy was tanking, many were without jobs or health insurance, and some even without a roof over their heads.

Now let's look at one conference in particular...a conference approved by then IRS Deputy Commissioner Mark Ernst (who left the IRS in 2010), and then Commissioner Steve Miller... one of many conferences where our taxpayer dollars were spent on IRS hierarchy having a grand old time instead of having those monies spent on securing and upgrading IRS computers. In 2010, with the IRS already engaged in the targeting of TEA Party and Conservative groups seeking 501(c)(3) status, they had the audacity to spend $4.1 million for its entire management staff to attend the Small Business/Self-Employed (SB/SE) Division Conference, called 'Leading into the Future,' held in Anaheim, California...a conference where none of those attending were required to document their attendance at the supposedly important training sessions.

But where exactly did the money for this conference come from...according to SB/SE Division management, they were allocated $132.7 million in the IRS's FY 2010 budget to hire 1,315 full-time employees, and the conference was paid for with what they called "leftover money" as they did NOT hire all the employees they could have hired...all the Americans they could have put back to work.

However, a complaint about this conference's cost was filed, and after conducting a thorough investigation the Treasury Department's then Inspector General for Tax Administration Steve Miller (who was forced to resign amid revelations that the IRS targeted conservative groups for special scrutiny and who was replaced by Daniel Werfel who was then replaced by John Koskinen) concluded that the IRS did indeed spend excessive sums of money on what they deemed to be "questionable expenses" during this conference.

And "questionable expenses" they were with some of the 2,600 attendees receiving high-priced baseball tickets and stays in 'presidential' hotel suites that normally cost $1,500 to $3,500 per night. And the 15 non-IRS speakers at the conference were paid a total of $135,000 in fees, with artist Erik Wahl being paid $17,000 to talk about what was called "leadership through art"... like art has anything to do with IRS business...and another $11,430 being paid for so-called 'positive psychology' guru Shawn Achor...referred to as a 'happiness expert'...to lead a 90-minute workshop. I guess the only one made happy by that expenditure was Achor himself because I know 'We the People' sure ain't happy about our hard-earned tax payer dollars being spent on such nonsense.                            

Also, at this conference was shown two now infamous videos...the 5 minute and 40 second 'Star Trek' video that consisted of a scripted presentation featuring SB/SE Division managers portraying Star Trek characters in a 'supposed' tax-themed parody that SB/SE Division upper-level executives claimed was used to open the conference by highlighting "current issues facing the IRS and SB/SE [Division] in the leadership arena and set the stage for the many topics being covered at the conference," and the other called the 'SB/SE Cupid Shuffle' where IRS managers were seen dancing on a stage. And the cost to make these two videos...over $50,100 of our taxpayer dollars spent on pure unadulterated nonsense that had NOTHING really to do with the IRS or the actual business being conducted at the conference.

But the most egregious aspect of this most egregious of conferences...besides the $35,800 spent on three planning trips before the conference...remains the fact that about $3.2 million of the $4.1 million spent (actually spending when all was said and done $4,297,285 but the IRS could NEVER account for the additional $1 million plus spent) did indeed come from the unused funds that had been allocated for hiring...meaning instead of creating all the jobs the monies had been allocated for...instead of putting Americans back to work...the IRS spent that which they called "leftover money" on themselves...as in to party hardy on our taxpayer dime and 'We the People' be damned.

So now we have a 'perfect storm' brewing between an arrogant government agency who thinks they're untouchable...sounds a bit like the 'anointed one' doesn't it...and a gutless Congress who holds hearing after hearing to get to the bottom of what should be in-your-face obvious and who in the end will most likely do NOT a thing...thus leaving it up to the likes of Edward Snowden or others like him to do what needs to be done...that is find and release the missing e-mails for all to see...for all to realize that they've been duped by the man who would be king.

Now that we have shown, beyond ANY reasonable doubt that a lack of funding was not responsible for not having the sort of computers or retention services necessary to minimize hard drive failures and properly store emails and documents at the IRS, as Commissioner Koskinen fraudulently claimed in hearings last week, it’s time to take a hard and fast look at the probabilities OF having 7 key hard drive crashes such as those that supposedly wiped out the subpoenaed documents.

Professor Ken Homa at Georgetown University looked into this and what he discovered is stunning.

According to BackBlaze, an IT group that tests hard drives, tens of thousands of them at a time by keeping them running 24/7/365 until they crash…of average consumer grade hard drives, about 4perent fail annually. Only 4 percent.  Of the LOWEST grade hard drives available, the failure rate is about 25 percent annually.

During the hearings last week, Congressman Massie of Kentucky challenged Koskinen as to how many computers are used in the IRS and how many hard drives crashed.

According to Koskinen…90,000 employees suffer about 2000 hard drive crashes per year which points to the 4-5 percent category and NOT the 25 percent group of lowest rated hard drives available so…and hold onto your seats…by using a factor of 7 because of the 7 key hard drives...the odds of them failing all at the same time are...

Well, let’s put it this way…the odds are better that you will be struck and killed by lightning (1 in 2,320,000) than you becoming a saint recognized by the Catholic church (1 in 20 million) and yet we are asked to believe that 7 key people of interest in the IRS targeting scandal all had their emails wiped out when their individual hard drives crashed…all just days after first being notified that house committees were interested in LOOKING at those emails when the odds against that VERY thing are…a staggering 6 BILLION to 1.

To put this another way…while the odds of such a 7-way hard drive crash at the IRS is 1 in 6 billion…YOUR odds of being audited are about 1 in 104 and while the IRS only keeps THEIR crucial information for 6 months, you had damn well better have the last 7 YEARS of yours.

It’s clear that these 7 key hard drives didn’t just up and fail but, to wrap all this up…exactly to whom did these 7 hard drives belong?

Agent Julie Chen, IRS ID number 31261 an Exempt Organizations Official in the Cincinnati office.

Agent Nancy Heagney, IRS ID number 31306…another Exempt Organizations Official from the Cincinnati office who worked under Lois Lerner.

Both Chen and Heagney would be considered small fish and likely the “couple of rogue agents” cited by Obama in the early days of this breaking scandal…those he would gladly throw under the bus in order to stay above the fray himself but, the fish get bigger.

Supervisory Agent Tyler Chumney, IRS ID number 31321 who, like Heagney and Chen operated out of the Cincinnati office and likely the supervisor to whom Heagney and Chen reported.

Then, there’s Agent Kimberly Kitchens, IRS ID number 31457 who, along with the previous three, worked in Cincinnati and Kitchens was also a donor to Obama’s 2012 campaign.

What we can take from the information on these IRS employees is that the spate of computer crashes were not confined to, as we have been led to believe, the DC office but also took place in Cincinnati meaning that the odds of these 7 hard drive crashes occurring in 2 separate offices to the exact 7 key people whose emails had just been drawn into question just went from 1 in 6 billion to something substantially more improbable.

Every scandal complete with a cover up needs someone to handle PR and feed the media only what propaganda is deemed suitable and the IRS targeting scandal seems to have had their own, built-in control for just such an occasion…IRS National Media Relations Chief Michelle Eldridge, the woman who took the IRS through the media gauntlet after IRS whistle blowers were targeted by the agency AND from allegations leveled by none other than CHUCK GRASLEY when the IRS leaked confidential info on Conservatives to the LIBERAL nonprofit organization, ProPublica.

And, it gets even more interesting when one considers that Eldridge met with Joe Biden, in the White House, on March 22nd 2010…about the time the targeting scandal started.

Want one more?

How about Former Chief of Staff to IRS Commissioner Steven Miller, one Agent Nikole Flax who also worked for Lois Lerner in the Exempt Organization division. Yes, that’s the exact same Nikole Flax whose name appears on the WHITE HOUSE VISITOR LOGS a surprising 31 times between... July 12th, 2010 and…May 10th, 2013…exactly 3 days before the targeting scandal went public last year.

Still not convinced that this targeting scandal goes all the way to the Oval Office?

You may not be familiar with the name Jeanne Lambrew but she met with Flax TWICE, in the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, next door to the West Wing of the White House where the offices for White House staff are housed and Jeane Lambrew, a top aide to Barack Hussein Obama did in fact, act as a conduit for confidential info on Conservative groups with…Lois Lerner.

It’s now time to connect the dots by asking a few pertinent questions.

What are the chances that all six of the IRS agents and executives named above along with Lois Lerner had their hard drives crash, in concert just days after first being asked to turn over their emails?

Well…as we now know…the chances are 1 in 6 billion.

Why would a top aide to Obama, one we know acted as an agent in exchanging confidential information regarding Conservative groups during the IRS targeting scandal, be meeting with the former Chief of Staff to the IRS Commissioner who also worked for Lois Lerner during the targeting scandal if Obama himself wasn’t intimately involved?

If Obama isn’t intimately involved, there would be no reasonable explanation for the Flax and Lambrew meetings.

Why would Lois Lerner be giving the fast tax exempt green light to the organizations highlighted in part 2 of this series (http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/06/op-ed-is-key-to-irs-scandal-hiding-in.html) if Obama wasn’t intimately involved?

She wouldn’t.

Along with the criminal activities exposed here in this 3 part series, the IRS has also violated privacy laws by leaking confidential information on American citizens to the FBI, obstructed house and senate investigations, and Lois Lerner has been found to be in contempt while current IRS Commissioner John Koskinen may well have committed perjury during his testimony last week.

Given all of this and what is undoubtedly yet to come, is there any reasonable reason to believe that the IRS can or should be trusted as the enforcement arm of Obamacare?

Simple answer…no way in hell.

Given what we have presented in this 3 part series, can anyone reasonably believe that Obama didn’t know of the IRS targeting of Conservative groups until he heard about it in the media?

Absolutely not.

Can ANYONE reasonably believe THIS statement from Obama on the day the IRS targeting scandal broke…May 13th, 2013: "If in fact IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that have been reported on, and were intentionally targeting conservative groups, then that's outrageous. And there's no place for it. And they have to be held fully accountable. Because the IRS as an independent agency, requires absolute integrity and people have to have confidence that they're applying it in a nonpartisan way. Applying the laws in a nonpartisan way. And you should feel that way regardless of party. I don't care whether you're a Democrat, Independent or a Republican."

Can anyone now reasonably doubt that Obama was launching a preemptive strike against what he knew would be breaking news regarding the IRS targeting scandal just one week earlier when he told graduates:


Edmund Burke said: “All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people of good conscience to remain silent,” and given the long and growing list of abuses of power, contempt, high crimes and misdemeanors and treason committed over the past 5 ½ years…tyranny is not “lurking around the corner…” it is personified by Obama’s insistence that “people of good conscience remain silent.”

Can ANY credibility be assigned to Obama's response to a question regarding the possibility of corruption or mass corruption at play in the IRS targeting scandal when he said: “Not even mass corruption -- not even a smidgen of
corruption?"

Are you kidding?

And while we realized that the theory put forth in Part 1 of this series (http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/06/24/is-the-key-to-the-irs-scandal-hiding-in-russia-part-1/) appeared on its face to be something of a stretch, with what we have exposed in Parts 2 (http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/06/op-ed-is-key-to-irs-scandal-hiding-in.html) and here in part 3 of this series, what do you now think are the chances that there were enough red flags flying to garner the interest and attention of Ed Snowden and that he just might, in fact, have copies of the emails the IRS claims are now unrecoverable?

A whole hell of a lot less than 1 in 6 billion…and if the names Lois Lerner, Nikole Flax, Nancy Heagney, Julie Chen, Tyler Chumney, Kimberly Kitchens or Michelle Eldridge just happen to appear on the Ed Snowden leaked, soon to be published full list of all Americans upon whom the NSA was spying…the odds against Snowden having copies of those incriminating emails drops significantly.

Obviously, the targeting scandal was not just a couple of rogue agents in the Cincinnati office, it was a rogue agency operating above the law and we believe at the personal direction of Barack Hussein Obama for his political gain and to seek political revenge on his behalf.

This is a Constitutional Republic not a dictatorship.

We are a nation of laws and when government agencies, our highest elected officials and government as a whole are allowed to operate outside and above the law there can be no reasonable expectation that the people of the nation should act within or abide by the law.

***********************************************************

Sources:

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/06/04/breaking-report-shows-lavish-spending-at-irs-conference/
http://hotair.com/archives/2014/06/27/irs-spent-4-4-billion-on-it-over-past-five-years/
http://firstread.nbcnews.com/_news/2013/06/03/18731628-2010-irs-conference-featured-happiness-expert-17k-art-session?lite
http://dailycaller.com/2014/06/26/meet-the-seven-irs-employees-whose-computers-crashed/
http://kenhoma.wordpress.com/2014/06/24/what-are-the-odds-of-7-specific-irs-hard-drives-crashing/

Saturday, May 24, 2014


Op-ed:
More e-mails...another thorn in Obama's side     By: Diane Sori
And so the clouds of Benghazi gather yet again over the White House as e-mails have surfaced showing that Barack HUSSEIN Obama...this most traitorous of men...contacted YouTube about the infamous 'Innocence of Muslims' video while the attacks at Benghazi were ongoing. This is serious stuff folks as it shows that while Obama did NOT send troops to help our people under attack at the mission...saying there was NOT enough time to save them (and how did he know the time frame while the attack was ongoing unless he helped plan it)...but he did have time to call YouTube and lay the foundation for the LIE that the attack was caused by said video.

And these e-mails unequivocally prove that the video accusations did NOT come from the CIA as Obama and his minions claimed...as they came BEFORE the CIA even began comprising their own talking points on what they believed happened that night. This basically means that the cover-up story was concocted by Obama and his people BEFORE the attacks occurred, thus ignoring a phone call that was made from Benghazi while that attack was ongoing that linked the attack to an al-Qaeda group.

So while the main e-mail still remains classified...and I'm sure that even when released certain words (possibly) tying Obama into the attack will be redacted...one line from it has been 'leaked' out. Sent to the Diplomatic Security Command Center at 9:11pm EST on September 11, 2012, hours BEFORE the attack was over, the subject line of the e-mail reads: “Update on Response to actions – Libya.” Now please tell me how can you have an update on response to actions when NO response to actions on our part ever took place nor before a suspension of violence occurred...you simply cannot...that is unless the events of that fateful night were known to you in advance of them unfolding.

And what do those circling the wagons around Obama say about these e-mails... “We actually think this proves what we’ve (Obama) said. We were concerned about the video, given all the protests in region,” according to an administration official who wanted to remain anonymous (of course he would as NOT taking responsibility for one's own words is a hallmark of this administration).

But Darrell Issa, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee currently investigating Benghazi...as do those of us really searching for the truth...believes differently and rightly so. Contending the e-mails directly contradict the Obama White House's assertion that it was the CIA who first blamed the attack on protests in response to the video, Issa said, "The e-mail shows the White House had hurried to settle on a false narrative - one at odds with the conclusions reached by those on the ground - before Americans were even out of harm's way or the intelligence community had made an impartial examination of available evidence."

And how right he is.

And to make this even more grievous, a memo from the State Department...Hillary 'What Does It Matter' Clinton's State Department...a memo in regards to a condolence letter sent to Sean Smith's family dated September 12th, refers to both the video and to a group linked to al-Qaeda as the cause of the attack. In trying to cover their bases...in trying to cover their LIE by throwing in words about a possible terrorist link to the attack into the mix on paper only, as the video alone was made the cause of the attack in the weeks that followed...this administration again blew it as NO ground investigation by our side had been conducted at that point in time to point a definitive finger anywhere. Remember, it took weeks for the FBI to investigate...so how could a letter of this sort been sent...and yet it was.

“At least 20 armed extremists, members of Ansar al-Sharia, set fire to the Principal’s office, allegedly retaliating for videos posted on the internet of a film deemed insulting to Islam,” the memo reads. And while an Ansar al-Sharia (a tentacle of al-Qaeda) connection was proven true (as per a released e-mail coming three hours after they took credit for the attack and BEFORE this condolence memo was sent), the attack had NOTHING to do with retaliation for the controversial video as NO protests about this video or any video were going on anywhere within the area of Benghazi, and everything to do (I believe) with covering up Obama's gun and weapons running operation to the al-Qaeda backed Syrian rebels and the targeted silencing of Ambassador Stevens who was going to expose Obama's unlawful operation. 

And as Obama and crew continue stalling on declassifying the e-mails, certain facts remain that are indisputable... Ambassador Stevens begged for help in the months leading up to that fateful night and all pleas went either unanswered or were dismissed as unfounded...Hillary had enemy combatants guarding the mission instead of our troops doing so...the time frame for the attacks seemed to have been known by the administration as NO help was sent when the attacks were in progress and NO one could have known how long the attacks would last yet apparently someone (as in Obama) did...the White House held a 'prep call' after the attacks with then-U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice in which the video was 'decided upon' to be the cause of the attacks she was to use when she made the rounds of the Sunday morning talk show...and most importantly NO, I repeat NO, YouTube video or protests against said video was involved in these attacks.

These are facts, simple indisputable facts, and connecting the attacks to the video almost from the outset...if NOT having it ready to be used even before the attacks...the bottom line remains that Barack HUSSEIN Obama has now been caught NOT just lying about the events of September 11, 2012, but also knowingly and willingly lying about who the perpetrators were. But now with these e-mails...if everything has NOT already been redacted that is...Obama (and Hillary) might actually be tied into the planning and cover-up of the whole sorted affair as well.

So if those in Congress would just follow NOT only the e-mail paper trail but the timeline of events as well and put two and two together like my good friend and CPR-RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen and I did in our 3-part Benghazi expose*...only then will the truth finally be exposed.

But I'm sad to say that NO one in this sitting Congress appears really willing to do this as even the new House Select committee led by Trey Gowdy has had the Democrats circling the wagons around Obama, and doing so by allowing Nancy Pelosi to pick the worst possible people...including the mouth that roared Elijah J. Cummings...to sit on the committee. And anyway, the fear of repercussions of impeaching and then arresting America's 'supposed' first black president seems to trump doing the right thing...trumps getting to the truth about the murders of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith, and ex-Navy SEALS Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty.

And that is the saddest thing of all.
_________________________________________________________
 
*Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 1 of 3  http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/04/benghazi-truth-exposed-part-1-by-craig.html
  Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 2 of 3  http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/04/op-ed-benghazi-truth-exposed.html
  Benghazi: The Truth Exposed...Part 3 of 3  http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/2014/04/op-ed-benghazi-truth-exposed_9.html

Friday, May 2, 2014

Op-ed: 
The Benghazi cover-up leads straight to the Oval Office
By: Diane Sori

"The point is we should have tried."..."As another saying goes - always move to the sound of the guns."
- Retired Brig. Gen. Robert Lovell speaking yesterday before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee about awaiting orders to go into Libya...orders that NEVER came.

As the next round of Darryl Issa's hearings on Benghazi began and seven months after Senator Ted Cruz called for an independent joint select committee to investigate the attacks at Benghazi...the very select committee that House Speaker John Boehner keeps saying NO to...the in the pocket of Obama media must be besides itself as they now have to cook up even more nonsense for us to focus on as they try to divert and deflect attention off the corrupt and traitorous Obama Administration yet again. And a diversion is needed now more than ever especially after documents were released last Friday to Judicial Watch...a Conservative watchdog group...released as result of a June 2013, Freedom of Information Act lawsuit filed against the State Department. This release allowed access to more than 100 pages of documents and what was discovered must have Obama very nervous...very nervous indeed.

And these now publicly released e-mails show a direct White House link to covering-up the truth about Benghazi via their revealing that after the attacks the top priority of the Obama administration was to concoct a story...build a LIE...to cover the truth about Obama's involvement in Benghazi...to cover the fact that his aide, Ben Rhodes, helped in that cover-up by communicated directly with then U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice and helping her prepare for her appearances on the Sunday talk show circuit. In fact, the e-mails show Rice was, “to convey that the United States is doing everything that we can to protect our people and facilities abroad; [and] to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, not a broader failure of policy.”

In other words, our embassy is attacked and four Americans are murdered but to Barack HUSSEIN Obama and his minions our national security be damned... conducting a NO holds barred investigation into the attack be damned...and the deaths of four Americans be damned...as none of these were part of the equation for reaching the all-important goal...a goal that trumped all else...a goal to make Barack HUSSEIN Obama “look good” against Mitt Romney in the upcoming foreign policy debate leading up to the 2012 Presidential Election.  And this manipulation of the truth was needed because if you remember Obama kept repeating ad-nauseum in the months leading up to the election that "Osama bin-Laden is dead, GM is alive, al-Qaeda is on the run."

Running a campaign leaning heavily on foreign policy issues because the economy, in a word, stunk, Obama needed foreign policy successes to win against a man who had NO foreign policy experience to speak of but who was strong on economic issues, so his calling card became that he killed Osama bin-Laden and that al-Qaeda was on the run. Well Benghazi proved it was NOT and so damage control was needed...and enter center stage a group of traitors unlike any America has seen since the likes of Benedict Arnold...Barack HUSSEIN Obama, Hillary Clinton, Ben Rhodes, Susan Rice, Jay Carney (who knowingly perpetrated the lie), and so many others connected to this administration...so many others complicit in the LIES about Benghazi.

And now with these incriminating e-mails surfacing...e-mails that were originally redacted when the documents were first asked for and only gotten by a court order...the made-up fable of Benghazi has been blown straight to hell. In fact, an e-mail from Ben Rhodes, one of Obama's assistants and National Security Adviser for Strategic Communications, shows that since the night the attacks occurred one of the Obama administration’s primary communications goals was NOT to get to the truth about what happened that fateful night but was “To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.” 

And in order to pull that rhetoric off a cover-up was constructed that included taking a poorly-made but somewhat widely viewed YouTube video called 'The Innocence of Muslims' and bring it front and center as the cause of the violence...after all its well-known that anything that upsets a muslim's sensibilities brings them to violent responses.  And once that foundation was laid the stage was set for the final part of the plan, and that was to get the American public to buy their story...to buy their LIE. And how did Obama and crew do that...by listed goals for Susan Rice to use in explaining the Benghazi attack and getting her to voluntarily agree to repeatedly LIE to both the families of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty, and to the American people as well during her rounds on the talk show circuit. 

Following the pre-planned script...a script changed many times...where she was told what to say and how to say it, Rice spewed over and over the LIE that “Our current best assessment, based on the information that we have at present, is that, in fact, what this began as, it was a spontaneous — not a premeditated — response to what had transpired in Cairo." And by doing what she did, Susan Rice has now become as guilty as the rest of them for she knowingly colluded with those perpetrating  a LIE to cover for what we (I believe) know to be Obama's gun and weapons running operation to the al-Qaeda (our enemy) backed Syrian rebels.
  
And this e-mail was NOT just sent to Susan Rice but was also sent to a dozen other members of Obama's top advisors and assistants and was titled: “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET”.  In fact, Rhodes sent this email to top White House officials such as David Plouffe and Jay Carney just a day before Susan Rice made her infamous round of the Sunday talk shows to discuss...to LIE...about the attacks at Benghazi.

And another e-mail to Payton Knopf, the former deputy spokesman at the U.S. Mission to the U(seless) N(ations) also showed that senior officials had already said the Benghazi attack was “complex” and planned in advance, yet Rice stayed on script repeating over and over the concocted LIE that the attack at Benghazi was “spontaneous.”

So with these e-mails it's now been proven what we long have suspected...the man aiding and abetting the enemy...the man sitting in the White House... deliberately blamed an innocuous YouTube video for terrorist attacks on our people at our Benghazi consulate. This man...Barack HUSSEIN Obama... directly provided a fabricated cover story to deflect blame off the jihadi bast*rds who murdered our people...to deflect blame off his muslim brethren. In other words, these e-mails prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that NOT only did Barack HUSSEIN Obama know that NO YouTube video was involved in the Benghazi attacks but that he also knew of or actually helped to orchestrate the ruse to try and cover his own involvement in Benghazi.

So what should happen now...any and all witnesses with any knowledge of the attack including administration officials...including the traitor-in-chief himself... must be called to testify before the Boehner so NOT wanted independent joint select committee so we can once and for all know the truth about what happened that fateful night. And Boehner, I believe, is indeed involved in the cover-up...see my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT radio partner Craig Andresen's and my Benghazi expose in either my blog, The Patriot Factor, http://thepatriotfactor.blogspot.com/or in Craig's blog, The National Patriot, http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/

I have said since day one that Benghazi will be proven to be Obama's Achilles heel and these e-mails do just that as the cover-up they expose leads right to the desk of the Oval Office. And NO matter how the White House and the media tries to spin these developments...NO matter how they try to make excuses for what went down both on that fateful night and in its aftermath...the only rightful thing to do now is call for the immediate arrest of Barack HUSSEIN Obama on the grounds of treason for aiding and abetting the enemy and for his complicity in the murders of Christopher Stevens, Sean Smith, Tyrone Woods, and Glen Doherty. 

GITMO beckons while Barack HUSSEIN Obama awaits the final decree for those found guilty of treason...just saying.

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Op-ed: 
The Benghazi e-mails...an Obama hoped for panacea that isn't  
By: Diane Sori


Oh whoopee-do...under intense pressure from Republicans to answer charges that the Obama administration covered up details of the night of September 11, 2012, out of the thousands of pages of e-mails and communiques concerning Benghazi, the White House 'suddenly' decided to release about 100 pages of 'repetitive' internal e-mails concerning their response, or lack thereof, to the horrific events of that night.

In what amounts to throwing Republicans a bone, Obama and crew thinks a Benghazi 'document dump' (including communiques with pertinent information and names redacted) of a mere 100 or so pages will placate his critics, and will make Benghazi and the Republicans go away.

Guess what...it won't...even though AG Eric 'Fast & Furious' Holder again said today that he will NOT appoint a special prosecutor to get to the truth about Benghazi..hell, this administration doesn't want the truth about anything getting out now does it.

And so this White House tried for months to keep these e-mails and communiques secret because they knew they would show how the CIA report was changed...re-edited...over and over as to what would be told to the public about that night and what wouldn't be told...as in what must stay hidden at all costs.

In fact, those who have seen the e-mails say they speak volumes about what has always been suspected...that in the days after the Benghazi attack when State Department officials met with Obama administration officials at the White House, that the Obama officials crossed out sections of the original CIA report, a report that was supposed to be made public but wasn't. The report that was released reflected a removal of any mention of terrorism, and any mention of the name of the islamic militant group Ansar al Sharia, an al Qaeda-linked group whose members the CIA said were involved in the attack.

The earlier pre-changed versions of the report, as witnessed by the e-mails, also spoke of prior attacks against western targets in Benghazi, as well as intelligence warnings by the CIA up until the day before the attack, but these were also missing from the final report as was reference to the fact that a day before the attack radicals in Cairo had called for a demonstration in front of the US embassy "encouraging jihadists to break into the Embassy."

The final report was truly unrecognizable from the original CIA report, and this unrecognizable report became the 'talking points' Susan Rice used when she went on the Sunday talk-show circuit, where her bloviations and lies dared NOT speak the truth about Obama's possible involvement in Benghazi.

And isn't it odd that CIA Deputy Director Mike Morrell signed off on the final report (even though then-CIA Director David Petraeus objected to the final watered-down version) knowing that it was all a lie thus putting his career on the line, and for what...to protect a miserable excuse of a president and his equally miserable administration's lie about a YouTube video being the cause of the attack.

But any and everything had to be done to protect the 'Benghazi Secret'...and you know what secret I mean...the secret about a gun and weapons running operation to Syria that Ambassador Stevens found out about...that Ambassador Stevens had to be silenced for...for the Benghazi cover-up was NEVER about a re-election campaign, and I wish those media talking heads on our side would stop trying to push that as the reason why the murder of four Americans had to be covered-up.

And to cover for that gun running secret WH Press Secretary Jay Carney outwardly lied over and over to 'We the People' that the White House and State Department made NO major changes to the 'talking points', even when State Department officials admitted the 'talking points' were changed to protect the FBI investigation and sensitive intelligence.

And the lies continued even in recent days as Carney, speaking on Obama's behalf, claimed that months ago congressional committees had already reviewed the e-mails in question, and "concluded that, in fact, there was nothing afoul in terms of the process that we had used."

LIAR for NO such conclusion was ever made by anyone on any congressional committees.

But lying is the forte of this administration...for they knew damn well that the attack had NOTHING to do with a ridiculous You-Tube video, and even these 'selectively' released e-mails prove just that.

So whether Obama likes it or NOT Benghazi is NOT going away any time soon for all these e-mails do is raise even more questions about what happened that fateful night, and even more importantly raise the question as to why it happened...and the answer to the why might very well bring down a man who should NEVER have been allowed to run for president in the first place.