Investigative Report:
Biden's Autopen...Truths, Questions, and Ramifications
By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots / Right
Side Patriots Radio
The article posted here is the authors opinion alone, and does not
necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com
or Google.
To start with let's be clear
that neither of us are attorneys. And while the legalities of the
latest Biden scandal will be argued by legal experts with opinions
differing between them, our approach to this is more “common
sense” than “common law.” But with that said there
are absolutes involved in the Biden autopen scandal which are clearly
addressed by the Constitution.
We, as Right Side Patriots,
don't know at this point what the outcome of all this will be, but we
can say without hesitation that the ramifications of this scandal has
the potential to be unlike anything this country has ever
experienced.
From the moment Joe Biden
announced he was running in 2020, we knew something was very wrong.
Sure, the liberal media tried to cover it all up by claiming covid
was preventing Biden from hitting the campaign trail, but when we did
see Joe Biden it was most always on video from his Delaware basement
bunker.
Joe Biden was being hidden
from public appearances not because of social distancing as per covid
mandates, but because he was a mental disaster. His handlers were
terrified of what he might say or that his dementia would be so
apparent as to tank Obama’s plan to install a puppet in the Oval
Office. We believe the plan to rig the 2020 election was already in
place, and if Biden’s handlers could just keep him away from
unscripted moments the fix was in.
After the bogus 2020 election
how many times while giving remarks did Joe Biden refer to himself as
a senator? How many times did he refer to his V.P. Kamala Harris as
“President
Harris?” Frankly, way too often for anyone
to believe the cover-up liberal media when they claimed that Biden
was just so busy, and had too many important things on his mind that
a simple, inadvertent slip of the tongue was all that those glaring “red flags" were. How many times did the world witness Biden getting
lost trying to leave a stage or wander about aimlessly trying to
enter the White House? How many times did Joe Biden shake hands with
thin air?
Johnson said the meeting was
hard to get because, as we now know, Biden’s handlers were
intentionally keeping him from having any such meetings due to his
obvious cognitive decline, but when Johnson finally got the meeting
he related, “I show up and I realize it's actually an
ambush 'cause it's not just me and the president,” Johnson
said, "It's also Kamala Harris, Chuck Schumer, Hakeem, you
know, the CIA Director." After some time, Johnson was
finally left alone with Biden in the Oval Office and the Speaker
asked Biden why he had issued a pause on LNG exports..LNG being
Liquefied Natural Gas. “Sir,
why did you pause LNG exports to Europe? Liquefied natural gas is in
great demand by our allies. Why would you do that? Cause you
understand we just talked about Ukraine, you understand you are
fueling Vladimir Putin’s war machine, because they gotta get their
gas from him."
And Joe Biden’s response? “I
didn’t do that.”
The Speaker than reminded
Biden that he had indeed signed an executive order and suggested that
a staffer actually print out the order so that they could then read it
together, and yet Biden reiterated that he had never signed such an
order. In recalling the story, Speaker Johnson said, "He
genuinely did not know what he had signed. And I walked out of that
meeting with fear and loathing because I thought, ‘We are in
serious trouble—who is running the country?’ Like, I don't know
who put the paper in front of him, but he didn’t know."
Naturally, we made jokes about
it and wondered at the time how many other things had Biden signed
that he had no awareness of. But now it seems that when Biden told
the Speaker, “I
didn’t do that,” it may have been a very
rare moment of clarity for Joe Biden. It may well be that it was not
a case of not remembering that he signed the EO, it now seems clear
that he did not sign it at all.
As for the autopen itself,
surprisingly it dates back to Thomas Jefferson's time...albeit in a
different guise than today's autopen device. Patented here in the
U.S. in 1803, it was originally called a “polygraph machine,”
and since that time eight U.S. presidents have used it. But none used
it as much or as rampantly as did Joe Biden. To understand the
ramifications of autopen usage try this as an experiment...get ten
note cards and a pen. Sign your name to each card placing each face
down once you have signed it so that you cannot look at it again
until all ten have been signed. Once you have affixed your signature
to all ten cards, turn them over and compare them. You will find that
no two are exactly alike. They have slight differences in slant,
thickness, shape and perhaps length.
That was not the case with the
documents examined by the Heritage Foundation. Those document’s
signatures were exactly the same. Each Joe Biden “signature”
was exactly the same as every other Biden “signature” down to the last
minute detail. The only way that can happen is through the use of the
autopen.
A year ago, in March 2024,
Robert Hur issued a report regarding Joe Biden’s handling of
classified documents. In that report, Hur included observations
regarding Biden’s mental capabilities, and said that Biden
struggled to recall major events from his time serving as
vice-president, and could not remember when exactly his term in
office had begun or when his son Beau died of cancer. Hur also noted
that Biden could not remember who packed the boxes found in his
garage with classified documents. And in perhaps the most damning
part of the report, Hur stated, “At
trial, Mr. Biden would likely present himself to a jury, as he did
during our interview of him, as a sympathetic, well-meaning, elderly
man with a poor memory. It would be difficult to convince a jury that
they should convict him—by then a former president well into his
eighties—of a serious felony that requires a mental state of
willfulness.”
Along with the mental collapse
of Joe Biden, there were also physical effects that were very
noticeable. And while the media tried to cover-up both the mental and
physical decline of Joe Biden, his handlers did everything they could
to shield Biden’s most glaring physical “trait” from the
public which was his declining inability to walk without difficulty.
The stiff gate, his falling on stairs or off his his bike were what
most focused on, but we also noticed other “traits.” Often
when Biden needed to look to the right or left, rather than turning
his head, he would stiffly turn his entire body. And Biden also was
seen holding a pen in his hand…a pen he would never use for
anything other than for something to hold onto.
Remember, in the
aforementioned meeting with Speaker Johnson that Biden claimed he
never signed the pause on shipping LNG to Europe, and we believe it
wasn’t that he couldn’t remember signing it, but that, that
particular Executive Order, and potentially many others as well as
the bulk of the pardons he supposedly signed were done by autopen
courtesy of those in his inner circle as they were orders or pardons
that Biden himself would not have signed had he known about them.
With that said, let’s get
into the legal end of this with a focus on the constitutionality of
autopen signatures and the potential ramifications of this
unprecedented scandal.
“Whoever
controlled the autopen controlled the presidency.”
- The Heritage Foundation 's Oversight Project
So
the question now is, does the Constitution allow for the use of the
autopen when a president signs a bill into law or when presidential
pardons are issued? Remember, an autopen signature is not ones actual
“pen to paper”
signature in the classical sense, instead it's but a mechanically
manufactured “proxy”
signature
that is primarily
used
if
the president is unable to physically attend a signing to make sure
that his interests are protected, honored, and heard.
And
while “proxy”
signatures are Constitutionally allowed on certain White House
documents, the Constitution requires that when the president, or
whomever signs said document by
“proxy,”
that both the pen used by the principal signer...in this case Biden
in his role as president...and the “proxy”
itself...meaning the actual autopen device... must be together at the same time
and place of signing.
In
fact, the Constitution has strict words regarding both the use of a
“proxy,”
and how said “proxy”
relates to government
officials. As per the Constitution, a “proxy”
is either a person who
is authorized to stand in place of another or is the legal
“instrument”...in
this case “instrument”
would mean the actual physical autopen device itself...to
which authority is conferred.
In other words, while today the word
“proxy”
in political speak is usually used in regards to Congressional voting
matters and quorums, the Constitution's broader sense of the word encompasses purposes which are either general in nature or for
purposes under “special
limited circumstances.”
And while Biden's signing laws and pardons with the autopen does fall under the latter category, in no way negates the important fact that
said autopen and all its users must still follow the rule of law
regarding other parties being publicly present at signing along with
their needed disclosures.
Simply,
what brings Biden's seemingly constant autopen use into question is
not the visible pen held in his hand per se, but it's the logistics
as to where was the autopen device itself, which in turn raises two
questions that no one seems willing to answer. First, were the
legally required “proxy”
documents disclosed and if not why and second, were all the persons
and the autopen “instrument”
deemed “necessary”
to be present at the same time Biden was signing bills into law
and/or issuing pardons, actually physically present in the same room
as constitutionally required.
And
all this is information his handlers were privy to but willingly
chose not to publicly disclose..a crime in and of itself in our
opinion. And if so...the next question becomes who exactly was
feeding the autopen device the documents needing Biden's signature,
and who told Biden to blindly sign what was put in front of him. And
lastly, was there someone
else actually behind the scenes autopen signing documents without
Biden’s permission without his
legal
“consent” or
formal authorization?
In
other words, are the laws and pardons Joe Biden autopen signed...with
pardons being given to knowingly dangerous criminal types and his
highly “questionable”
family members...still
considered to be legally binding in light of his not having followed
the letter of the law regarding “proxy
signatures and disclosures?”
So what are the possible ramifications...political and otherwise...of
Biden's actions or lack thereof?
Ramifications
whose questions and answers could well lead to a true governmental
“falling house of
cards” effect.
First
though, remember again, that thanks to “The
Heritage Foundation's Oversight Project”
we
found out that nearly
every document during Biden's four-year presidency was signed by
autopen with the only authentic...in his own hand...signature was his
letter announcing his official withdrawal from the 2024 presidential
race.
Biden's
“cognitive
decline”
was obviously visible to all, even those closest to him, but that
raises the question as to who really was running our country not just
on Joe Biden's “bad
days,”
but seemingly everyday. And this then leads to other questions
pertaining to not only the probability of “unauthorized”
autopen's usage by others, but could all the autopen signatures on
executive orders be considered unconstitutional because Biden did not
really know or understand what he was signing.
Everyone, especially
those in daily contact with him, knew Biden's mental and physical
health was failing as the visuals he showed were quite obvious. And
yet those closest to him ignored or covered up for that fact leading
to yet another two questions , First, why wasn't Joe Biden “25thAmendmented” out and second, could the issue regarding Biden's
cognitive decline...which in this case is more important then his
physical decline... and its still ongoing cover-up scenario actually
pose a constitutional crises regarding said 25th Amendment not being
used and why?
So
while all the aforementioned questions have yet to be answered, maybe
its time that AG Pam Bondi and the DOJ start an official
investigation into what or what might not
be both a criminal and constitutional matter. And if either is proven
true you would think that every document Biden signed by autopen
would be negated in full.
But even if such an official
investigation were to take place it might run up against the
proverbial “brick wall,” because the fact is that in 2005
the DOJ itself issued a ruling stating that, “The President need
not personally perform the physical act of affixing his signature to
a bill he approves and decides to sign in order for the bill to
become law.” Simply, it would be hard for anyone to prove that
each and every document Biden signed with an autopen was done so
under either mental or physical duress or without his knowing what he
was signing.
So here let's look at some
possibilities as to who might actually have put the autopen to paper
and did sign Biden's name on official documents. And let's start with a
“New York Post report” stating that a key “aide” to Joe
Biden might be the culprit. And while that is indeed possible, we
seriously doubt it. Why so...because while an “aide” might have used
the autopen to sign a few documents while in the presence of Biden, especially if he had given said person legally required
“consent” to do so...or if Biden was physically or mentally
unable to sign on one of his many “bad days”... the point
worth remembering is that during his four-year term as president, Joe
Biden signed 162 executive orders, 242 presidential memorandum, 725
proclamations, 152 notices, and 46 bills into law while vetoing 13
others which still did need his presidential signature, equaling 1.340
times Joe Biden had to sign a document. We seriously doubt that a
lowly “aide” alone would have been in Biden's presence
each and every time his signature was required.
But looking at the big
picture, it's highly unlikely that one person alone had
unquestionable access to Joe Biden and therefore his autopen. And
with that said it seems more likely that a small group of folks...a group
loyal not only to Biden but to his puppet master Obama as well...took
turns using the autopen when need be.
Why so...because such a group
collectively would know how to deal with the ramifications if they
were caught signing...including how to cover for or deflect their
involvement...but one person acting alone most probably would not. Safety
in numbers if you will. And if those persons were to be available
when needed, each person then becomes a valuable asset courtesy of
their having unfettered access to Biden, his office, and the autopen
itself.
So
who meets the above stated small group criteria? Remember, Joe
Biden's inner circle, for the most part, was comprised of Obama
holdovers and loyalists who had daily access to both presidents and
their offices. How about Biden's Secretary of State Anthony Blinken
who was not only Obama's Deputy
National Security Advisor and his deputy Secretary of State, but was
also National Security Advisor to who was then Vice President Biden.
Or how about Biden's Chief of Staff Jeff Zients who was Obama's
National Economic Council's director and acting Director of the
Office of Management and Budget, and who also had direct access to
both Biden and his office...the very place where the actual autopen
device was likely kept.
Copyright © 2025 Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots / Investigative Reports / All rights reserved.
***************************************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Tomorrow, Tuesday, March 25th from 7pm to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss their Investigative Report: 'Biden's Autopen...Truths, Questions, and Ramification'; and important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50pm EST, show begins at 7pm EST.
