Tuesday, October 20, 2026

Just a Thought

The thought below is my thought alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com

[[[ When Trump was campaigning yesterday in Kansas for the midterms, he rattled off a list of all the people in countries followers of Islam hate, but he said NOT a word…NOT ONE WORD…about Israel and the Jewish people! A "slip of the tongue" some will claim, but I say it's way more telling than that, and NOT in a good way.
 
How so...because I believe Trump knows that it will be Israel who puts an end to the Iranian regime, and thus the war itself, by finishing the job he is too politically cowardly and legacy wise afraid to do. ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.

Op-ed:
Bipartisanship and Compromise...Measuring Success and Failure 
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
This opinion piece is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com  

...when you add in the fact that both sides refuse to even listen to what the opposing side has to say, then we as a nation find ourselves faced with the distinct possibility that the uber conservative far right has...albeit maybe unbeknownst to them...actually shaken hands with the uber liberal progressive far left. One and the same in temperament while being polar opposites in core beliefs, a party scenario not good for our country itself nor for the collective known Constitutionally as, “We the People.”

And with both sides of the aisle are always relishing in pointing out what they consider to be the other side's strategic, economic, foreign policy, and political differences, they're also busy trying to coverup their own political blunders. And it's being done while we voters continue to be subjected to overtly partisan driven newscasts replete with neatly tied up bundles of omissions and lies so as to help divert and deflect us away from the fact that America today is indeed in dire trouble. Why so...because no government, no party, and especially no president, can govern effectively when common sense, logic, tangible facts, coupled with the all-important need for “compromise,” plays little to no part in what should be the reality of successful governing discourse. Read entire article here.
Hamas document reveals plan to exploit civilians as Netanyahu warns 'Israel is ready to strike'
Syria condemns IDF incursions into territory • At least 18 killed in Houthi attack on Yemeni government military camp • Egypt seeks approval to send military assistance to Saudis
Reuters / The JERUSALEM POST

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said regional issues should be resolved through diplomacy and blamed the United States for insecurity and tensions in the Strait of Hormuz, speaking at a joint news conference with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov on Monday.


China's premier meets Iran's first vice president, urges dialogue to restore peace

Chinese Premier Li Qiang told Iran's First Vice President Mohammad Reza Aref that the sovereignty and security of all countries should be respected, as the two met on the sidelines of a Shanghai Cooperation Organization meeting in Dushanbe on Monday, according to China's state-run media Xinhua.

China is ready to advance exchanges and cooperation across various fields with Iran, Li was quoted as saying. Read more and see updates here.

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Tuesday, October 20th from 7-8:00pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Economics + War = A Maybe Midterm Loss...Part Two'; the maybe Moscow summit; Iran updates; and Where's Ilhan? On https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE.' 

Monday, October 19, 2026

Just a Thought

The thought below is my thought alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com
  
[[[ Something Trump needs to think about before spouting off again about his now seeming to be buddy and ally Vladimir Putin. Why so...because many Democrats and even some Republicans could well and rightfully so construe this as being anti-NATO (our NATO allies rightfully support Ukraine in its war with Russia, and with us being a member of NATO we should 100% be doing so too); as well as his suddenly being seen as anti-western democracy (after all he is considering siding with Communist Russia if it helps end the war...gotta save his "Peace President" legacy you know); and actually also being anti-American as the majority of "We the People" are on the side of Ukraine and thought...or so Trump's been telling us...that he was too. But his actions of late against Zelenskyy prove otherwise, and it's on display for the whole world to see including those former satellite countries who want NO part of Putin or Mother Russia.
 
Simply, a big mouth, mismanagement, and siding with America's enemy...and YES communist Russia is an enemy... could well lead to impeachment charges once again being brought against Trump if the Democrats win the midterms. Not only would this then be a repeat of 2016, but it would give new meaning to the term "lame duck president" as NOTHING...I repeat NOTHING... will get done for our country or "We the People." And if this be the case we can kiss 2028 bye-bye too!
 
Still think Trump is a great...especially war time...president, I sure as hell don't! ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.  
Op-ed:
Bipartisanship and Compromise...Measuring Success and Failure 
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
This opinion piece is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com 

As I write this we are just about two weeks away from the midterm elections...an election not only important to Republicans who wish to see President Trump's agenda reach its final fruition, but an election that is just as important to Democrats who believe that they can stop what they consider to be an agenda against democracy itself. And yet, as voters, we still find both parties to be unyielding, unwavering, and unwilling to even try to compromise on anything they now consider to be part of their party's agenda and/or objectives.

And when you add in the fact that both sides refuse to even listen to what the opposing side has to say, then we as a nation find ourselves faced with the distinct possibility that the uber conservative far right has...albeit maybe unbeknownst to them...actually shaken hands with the uber liberal progressive far left. One and the same in temperament while being polar opposites in core beliefs, a party scenario not good for our country itself nor for the collective known Constitutionally as, “We the People.”

And with both sides of the aisle are always relishing in pointing out what they consider to be the other side's strategic, economic, foreign policy, and political differences, they're also busy trying to coverup their own political blunders. And it's being done while we voters continue to be subjected to overtly partisan driven newscasts replete with neatly tied up bundles of omissions and lies so as to help divert and deflect us away from the fact that America today is indeed in dire trouble. Why so...because no government, no party, and especially no president, can govern effectively when common sense, logic, tangible facts, coupled with the all-important need for “compromise,” plays little to no part in what should be the reality of successful governing discourse.

So what exactly, in this case, would help to comprise a successful governmental and political discourse, or at the very least come replete with a purpose? To that I say, how about our elected officials really striving for a bit of Reagan style “bipartisanship”...as in the time when both Republicans and Democrats actually worked together and compromised...the time when both sides of the political aisle willingly chose to put hateful, divisive, and nonsensical rhetoric aside for the good of our country, and for the good of the sum of “We the American people.”

But as simplistic as it might sound in concept, here it's important to remember that our country today is not only divided along the usually expected Democrat vs. Republican...liberal vs. conservative...party lines, but by the growing fractures within each party themselves.

For Republicans its the pro-Trump camp vs. those who now have...and I believe rightfully so...what's referred to as “buyers remorse.” And for Democrats it's now the mainstream and middle of the road Democrats...JFK Democrats as they're sometimes called...vs. the new Gen-Z driven breed known as “Democrat Socialists,” folks who would love nothing better than to see our beloved America disintegrate into a clone of socialist style Europe, or even more so into what is abject communism. You know where freebees and handouts become the required and mandated new norm...capitalism be damned...and where the word “bipartisanship” is not even allowed to be part of what has become their new “collective style” vocabulary.

Simple translation...the general populace must all be on an equal level...albeit at the bottom rung of the proverbial economic ladder...while those in charge sit fat and happy at the ladder's top.

An America destroyed from within...an America being destroyed by their fellow Americans whose voices of the few shouted much louder and longer than did the voices of the many...voices of what is deemed political righteousness now being drowned out by the voices of entitlement...entitlement meaning that what is yours is mine, there is no need for me to work for it. Simply, in what is today's version of unbridled progressive liberal speak, it tends always to come replete with what is an unhealthy dose of DEI thrown into what has become the proverbial political mix.

And a perfect example of this can be seen in the economics and the political landscape of what is today's Trump era of economics...economics being surely not the same as it was during Reagan's time of strived for “bipartisanship”... yet many Republicans still compare and contrast the components of the two economies in regards to the overlap of one era over the other...with the hot button issue of tariffs being a current example.

But first let's begin with the fact that during the Reagan years we did see double-digit inflation and prime interest rates hitting nearly 20% (thanks to the ineptitude of Jimmy Carter)...while today, as I write this, those rates under Trump are 3.4% and 7.00% percent respectively.

However, don't start jumping for joy for while Reagan championed “supply-side economics”...as in “free and open markets,” and that economic growth was best achieved by lowering taxes, reducing government regulations, and promoting “free trade” to increase the “supply and demand” production of goods and services coming into our country...the fact remains that there existed no economic warfare or ridiculously high tariffs under the Reagan presidency...the very opposite of under what is President Trump's watch today.

And this aspect alone allowed the American consumer back in the 1980's to not feel those higher rates nearly as much on a day to day basis, neither at the grocery store nor at the pump, then they do today under Trump's tariff influenced economic agenda. Remember too, whether some want to hear it or not, that Trump's overburdening raise in tariffs does indirectly translate into an additional tax on we the American consumer.

Now in regards to what's referred to as “Trump economics,” we see a total turnaround from what once was“free trade” under Reagan now being buried under the weight of aforementioned overburdening tariffs...where tariffed countries are forced to raise their prices on goods coming into our country in order to help pay for the Trump raise in tariffs...a vicious circle now resulting in many Americans being quite unhappy with the seemingly day to day rise in groceries and at the pump as we pay for the raise in price on goods via what are taxes.

And Trump's reasoning behind said tariffs remains his belief that tariffs protects domestic manufacturing, helps in shrinking trade deficits, while also helping to pay off the national debt, which is still increasing under Trump's watch, and has surpassed $40.050 trillion as I was writing this article, as per the U.S. Debt Clock.

So much for Trump's claiming that tariffs would help to lower the national debt, something President Reagan claimed tariffs would never do...something Trump should himself have known as both the president and as a successful businessman.

So now that two Republican presidencies have been compared and contrasted in regards to key elements of their economic agendas, let's discuss why “bipartisanship” worked regarding Reagan's economic agenda, but unfortunately it's not working for Trump, and it goes beyond his unwillingness to discuss anything even remotely related to the word, “compromise.”

And here is where the temperament, personality, and oratory style of the two men does come into play regarding both their economic successes and failures...more successes than failures for Reagan...more failures than successes for Trump. Why so...because when ones ego is allowed to overtake reality...when one thinks and speaks as if they alone have all the needed answers...then the word “compromise” is and remains a non-starter and plays no part in their political discourse...a sad state of affairs indeed.

“Bipartisanship” is not nor should it ever be thought of as a political dirty word for at its core remains but the simple reaching of what is “common ground”... where our commonalities outweigh our partisan differences in order to do what is right for our country and for “We the American People”...the very people we elected to office to work for the common good. And doing so should involve both “compromise” and the willingness to listen, while the act of negotiating itself is what would allow for a meeting in the middle, thus “compromise” is successfully reached.

But in today's world it now seems that loyalty to one man and to his party outweighs even the willingness to listen, and is exactly why we find ourselves at a political crossroads where neither Democrats nor Republicans want to even sit down and talk to each other let alone listen. Gone, seemingly, are the days when Reagan was able to work in tandem with his Democrat opposition in Congress, and together accomplished dedicated acts of “compromise.”

And this included when in 1983 both parties worked together in the spirit of “bipartisanship” and jointly pass much needed “Social Security” reforms, thus saving the program from what was then a bankruptcy crisis. And “bipartisanship” worked again via the “Tax Reform Act of 1986”...which not only simplified the U.S. federal income tax code, lowered top marginal tax rates, eliminated numerous tax shelters and loopholes, but saw many Democrats co-sponsoring said act in conjunction with Republicans. Too bad we're far from seeing such cooperation and love of country today.

But here the question then becomes why so, especially when both Presidents Reagan and Trump did and do love this country? Simply because, in my opinion, the want for what should be acts of “bipartisanship” has now been drowned out by those with loud voices and misplaced loyalties...as in loyalty to a man and to a party instead of to what's best for what is now a deeply divided America. And with Trump continuing to rely on “partisan reconciliation” and party-line votes to get things passed in Congress, he likely sees “compromise” as being a liability...as in a watering down of what he wants to get done with consensus...thus working with Democrats seems not to be an option.

Sadly, when all is said and done we nor Trump can go back to the time of Reagan because the voices and discourse of today remain blatantly angry and unyielding in both tone and rhetoric especially now in a time of war...a war the Democrats opposed on constitutional, economic, and procedural grounds. And when said war is coupled with what many believe to be strategic miscalculations and mistakes made by our Commander-in-Chief...the sum of the political discourse itself in relation to both economic and foreign policy decisions...tends to be set back even further.

So with the midterm elections now fast approaching, and with the Iran War and the economy not being on par with what we were promised they would be, we Americans face what could be a split down the middle reality of a Democrat controlled House and a Republican controlled Senate, which means that unless “compromise” and “bipartisanship” becomes the order of the day 2028 might truly become a free-fall disaster. I wonder what Reagan would say and do to remedy that. Case closed.                
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.

    *************************************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Tomorrow, Tuesday, October 20th from 7-8:00pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'Economics + War = A Maybe Midterm Loss...Part Two'; the maybe Moscow summit; Iran updates; and Where's Ilhan? On  https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE.' 

Sunday, October 18, 2026

Just a Thought

The thought below is my thought alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com 
[[[ As Secretary of State Marco Rudio's political star continues to rise, as does the most successful of all state governors...as in Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis...and with the great TX Senator Ted Cruz not having dismissed another WH run...it's no wonder Israel defaming Trump VP 'YES man' JD Vance...as per today's NEW YORK POST...says he's considering NOT RUNNING for POTUS in 2028, and using as his excuse that he has young children (so did JFK yet he still ran), and that his wife is not a fan of politics, although no final decision has been made yet.

But no matter what his excuse is DON'T RUN...PLEASE DON'T RUN...for we do NOT need Trump in the background running the the show...like Obama likely did for Biden. And besides, Vance would NOT win what with his not long ago Democrat side at times showing through, and with his Israel hating 'good buddy' Tucker Carlson shining through more times than not.

Our Republican chances of holding onto the presidency in 2t028 truly does lie with either Rubio, DeSantis, or Cruz...especially with the right VP by their side. Either of those three works for me, and would be a great choice for America. I just hope Trump doesn't try to push Trump Jr. down our throats (he was the one who pushed Vance down daddy's throat)...so nothing like keeping it in the family you know...especially if Vance does decide NOT to run. Just saying.
 ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved. 

Saturday, October 17, 2026

Just a Thought

The thought below is my thought alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com
 
[[[ It's sad to say but I'm seriously beginning to wonder about the mental state of President Trump...the man I voted for three times, and who I supported when he took us to war with Iran in the summer of 2025. But as the "6-weeks top" war continues on Trump has proven himself, to me anyway, NOT to be the man I voted for.

Why so...because all Trump's self-spewed, ego-driven, bravado regarding him standing strong with America's allies and friends against those who are our common enemy, has proven to be but empty-winded talk at best. 

How so? In regards to Iran, we still find President Trump trying to make "deals" with the very terrorist regime who relishes in publicly executing the "freedom fighters"...those brave Iranian men and women who begged him for help...including for much needed weapons so they could help in the fight against the regime... and whose help has yet to come.

And also there's the fact that Trump has seemingly now turned his back on both Ukraine's President Zelensky and the Ukrainian people courtesy of his not only making a "diesel deal" with his now buddy Vladimir Putin that actually works against Ukraine and in Russia's favor in their war, but to add insult to Ukraine's injury by his having decided to waiver U.S. sanctions against Russia. How so... by his claiming that it's in America's best interest.to do so. 

But the truth is that it's in Trump's best interest so that we don't see higher gas prices at the pump right before the upcoming midterm election...nothing like trying to divert and deflect the American voter's attention away from their ever dwindling pocketbooks which could well be the decider of the election.

And so the man who was the target of the Democrats and Russia's 'Steel Dossier" political generated witch hunt has now cozied up to Russia and against Ukraine after both India and China raised concerns about how his Russian economic sanctions bill would negatively affect them as well.

Trump has proven himself to be but a  "paper tiger" at best whose bark has become but a joke instead of a much needed bite. 2028 cannot come fast enough...my opinion and I stand by it no matter what Trump's blind followers have to say about it. ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.  

Friday, October 16, 2026

Just a Thought

The thought below is my thought alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com
[[[ As EU leaders are again rallying around Ukraine's President Zelensky...and rightly so...after Trump called Ukraine's retaliatory strikes on Russian refineries a "disgrace"...never mind the fact that Russia has deliberately been targeting Ukraine's civilian population areas and major cities for years...never mind the fact that recent Russian attacks on Ukraine have left thousands of Ukrainians without power as winter approaches.
 
But what upsets Trump the most is that Ukraine's rightful retaliatory response now is upsetting the recent "diesel deal" he made with his buddy Putin while at the same time claiming that the strikes by Ukraine are pushing up energy prices both here at home and elsewhere, and could well cost 'HIM' at the ballot box.
 
I didn't know that Trump's name would be on the midterm ballot ...and I say that both jokingly and facetiously. But seriously, I will say once again that Trump has proven that more times than not he does speak without thinking...thinking about the ramifications his foolishly spoken words could cause, ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.  
Trump says US 'may have to' strike Iran's Pickaxe Mountain nuclear site in future
Emma Bussey / Fox News 

President Donald Trump has confirmed that the United States is evaluating Iran's heavily fortified Pickaxe Mountain nuclear complex as a potential target for future military action, stating, "We may have to go there... We'll knock it out fast" in a Thursday interview. Trump ruled out the use of nuclear weapons or the deployment of U.S. ground troops, but left the door open for conventional air strikes. The comments follow recent reports that the Pentagon has drawn up options involving massive conventional ordnance against Iranian infrastructure, even as Trump expressed optimism that ongoing back-and-forth tensions and negotiations could bring a swift end to the conflict. 

WHAT TO KNOW
  • President Donald Trump ruled out using nuclear weapons in Iran, but floated the possibility of using a Massive Ordnance Air Blast bomb, also known as a MOAB, against the Islamic Republic.

  • Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps struck a Singapore-flagged civilian vessel in the Strait of Hormuz on Wednesday, leading to the ship's sinking, U.S. Central Command (CENTCOM) reported Thursday. See LIVE UPDATES here.

Fort Hood survivors praise Trump for scrapping Hasan execution livestream: ‘We’re not barbaric’
Victims warned a broadcast could become a propaganda tool for terrorist groups like al-Qaeda and ISIS
Fox News  

Survivors of the 2009 Fort Hood massacre praised President Donald Trump's decision not to livestream the execution of Nidal Hasan, after warning that broadcasting his death could turn the execution into a spectacle and hand terrorist groups a propaganda tool.

Hasan is still set to be executed by firing squad on Dec. 3, 2026, and Trump said the immediate families of his victims will be permitted to witness the execution in person. But it will no longer be broadcast to the general public as previously announced by Secretary of War Pete Hegseth.

Alonzo Lunsford, who was shot seven times by Hasan during the attack nearly 17 years ago, told Fox News Digital that Trump's decision is a "positive move." 

"It proves that we are a better people, a better nation, and that we're not barbaric," Lunsford said in immediate reaction to the walk-back by Trump on Thursday. "We don't glorify such actions." Read more, see videos and photos here. 

Thursday, October 15, 2026

Just a Thought

This opinion is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com
[[[ Simply stated, if Republicans do win the upcoming midterm election, I believe it will NOT be because of Trump or his policies, but in spite of Trump and his policies. And here might I add that it will also be because too many of my fellow Republicans have sadly and willingly chosen to ignore the fact that Trump does tend on too many occasions to let his ego speak before he thinks...facts and truths be damned. ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.   
Elon Musk points to Trump for Starshield throttling in Ukraine that Zelensky warns will cost lives
Ryan King / NEW YORK POST  

WASHINGTON — Tech titan Elon Musk on Wednesday indicated the Trump administration, not SpaceX, caused the throttling of a military version of Starlink in Ukraine that set off panic in the war-torn country.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky warned the slowdown of Starshield, a military offshoot of Starlink, would cost lives by limiting its ability to fend off Russian invaders.

Initially, Ukrainian and European officials blamed Musk.

“Starshield systems are owned and controlled by the US government,” Musk said hours after a firestorm over the throttling erupted. “Any limits on speed or usage are decided by the US military and ultimately POTUS.”

“Starlink is a commercial service owned and controlled by SpaceX,” he added. “Usage of Starlink is limited to civilian or defensive activities and cannot be used for offensive military action, as doing so would be inappropriate for a commercial company.”

Wednesday, October 14, 2026

Just a Thought

This opinion is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com

[[[ The president who loves to "cry wolf" is at it again as Iran continues to refortify and rebuild it's nuclear facilities that were NOT completely destroyed last year, and which FOX News reported on earlier today. 
 
And how is ^Trump "wolf-crying" again...by his issuing yet another warning to the regime...or what's left of it...that this time, "We're going to do a number on Iran." What is this like warning number 100...another warning with NO serious action taken...as Iran obviously still stands, meaning this war will linger on. So much for his original "6-weeks top" war time frame
 
Seriously folks...it's time that we actually fight to win this war and end Iran's nonsense once and for all...even if it means some "boots on the ground...otherwise this war will NOT end well for anyone, and in more ways than most people think. ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.  

Inflation heats up to 3.7% in September — more than expected amid soaring energy costs
Taylor Herzlich / NEW YORK POST 

Inflation heated up in September at a faster pace than expected as rising energy costs kept pressure on prices, bolstering the Federal Reserve’s case for another interest-rate hike this year.

The Consumer Price Index rose 3.7% over the past 12 months, heating up from 3.4% the previous month and above expectations of a 3.6% rise, the Bureau of Labor Statistics said Wednesday.

It rose at a 0.6% pace over the month.

 Core CPI – which excludes volatile food and energy prices, giving a better look at underlying inflation – also heated up to 2.6%, above 2.4% in August and higher than estimates of a 2.5% rise.

Rising energy costs amid the war in Iran largely drove the inflation reading.

The energy index is up 20.4% over the past 12 months.

This is a developing story. Please check back for updates.

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...Podcast 
Here's the podcast of last nights LIVE radio broadcast where Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discussed  'Economics + War = A Maybe Midterm Loss...Part One'; ' 'Iran's Regime - Low on Time, Out of Leverage, Long on Desperation.'; Iran updates; Rep. Ilhan Omar's DC home raided; and the upcoming supposed 'live-streamed' execution of Fort Hood murderer Nidal Hasan. Listen to it on https://rspradio1.podbean.com or on our RSP website at https://rspradio1.com/?page_id=39 

Tuesday, October 13, 2026

Just Two Thoughts

This opinion is my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com
  
[[[ As a Constitutional Republican and NOT a Conservative Republican (and yes there is a difference), I believe that the bro-ha-ha over "anchor babies" has been made way more complicated and divisive than it should or need be. Why so...because the U.S. Constitution clearly defines who is and is not an American citizen in Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment (ratified in 1968) as in, "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and the State wherein they reside."  
 
The Constitution says NOTHING about "anchor babies" being non-citizens just because their parents came here illegally or that innocent children should be punished...as in deported...for something that their parents did.
 
Simply, if a child was born on American soil no matter the circumstances of their birth, I do believe they should get to legally stay here, as per the Constitution, if they're old enough to make that decision for themselves or if their parents...who still rightfully can be legally deported...decide to place said child either with family members here legally, or place said child into the "system" where they can be fostered or adopted especially if the parents reason for coming here (even if done so illegally) was to give their child a chance at a better life, and was NOT a "gimmee-gimmee" free ride decision. ]]]

                                 `*****************************************************

[[[ Also, in regards to who can or cannot vote in U.S. elections that is also clearly laid out in the Constitution, one only has to look to the Fifteenth Amendment, Section 1, which clearly states that, "the right of citizens (notice the word citizens) of the United States shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude." 

Simply, if one is NOT a citizen one cannot vote...no ifs, ands, or buts...it really is that simple. ]]]                                                                                                                    copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.