
On the eve of the Conservative Political Action
Conference, South Carolina’s legislature decided to pass a bill that
would nullify any new federal gun regulations that limit access to
firearms and ammunition. Yet, the debate isn’t your typical one seen
pervasively in blue states. Democrats, some of whom are pro-gun, said
that the bill would hinder anti-domestic terrorism efforts; quite a
departure from the talking points emanating from New York City (via
The Post and Courier):
The Second Amendment Preservation Act directs state
officials to not enforce any federal law, rule or regulation that took
effect after Jan. 1 that limits access to firearms and ammunition.
[…]
The bill’s author, Laurens Republican Rep. Mike Pitts, rebuffed that
argument. He said the measure aims to protect from new laws enacted
after Jan. 1. It would not apply if Congress extends the gun-buying
waiting period from 72 hours to 10 days or more because they would be
amending existing law, he said.
“The ‘Charleston loophole’ was a sidetrack to use a motion to fight
this particular bill,” Pitts said. “I don’t think (the bill) would’ve
drawn any debate if it weren’t an election year.”
Charleston Democrat Leon Stavrinakis was among those who argued
against the bill on the floor by stressing the need to protect the
country from domestic terrorism. Now its opponents have to count on the
bill gaining no traction in the Senate, which has been stuck in
filibuster limbo since the start of the session, or for it to return
with a more narrow scope.
Stavrinakis also said that if the federal government ever took
actions to limit Second Amendment freedom, the legislature would fight
to the death to protect our oldest civil right.
No comments:
Post a Comment