
When the United Nation’s conference on global warming begins in Paris come December,
American Action Forum has
a friendly reminder:
we already regulate greenhouse gases and the Obama administration’s
regulatory cost in fighting so-called climate change could cost us $45
billion annually:
…[R]egulators have already imposed $26 billion in
annual costs to limit GHGs and have proposed an additional $1.7 billion.
However, to meet President Obama’s climate goals the nation will have
to spend up to $45 billion more each year by 2025.
What are the benefits of these investments? According to the
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) estimates, previous actions will
avert a combined 0.0573 degrees Celsius of warming. Meeting the
president’s 2025 goals could add reductions up to 0.125 degree Celsius.
In other words, full achievement of the president’s climate goals will
cost more than $73 billion in annual burdens to alleviate less than
two-tenths of one degree of warming.
See video 'Big Cost, Little Benefit: The UN Paris Climate Deal' here:
http://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2015/10/30/good-news-obamas-global-warming-campaign-to-cost-45-billion-a-year-in-regulatory-costs-n2072791?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
Of course, the president’s Clean Power Plan is factored into all of
this, which aims to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 32 percent from 2005
levels by 2030. Already we have studies showing that it will
disproportionately impact fixed-income seniors, and
most of rural America. Moreover,
everyone knows it will increase energy costs. Secretary of State John Kerry is working to make sure the U.S. leaves Paris with something that
isn’t a treaty since there’s a slim chance of getting it through a Republican Congress. The administration’s Clean Power Plan already has
over half the states
opposing it. Both Democratic and Republican attorneys general have
joined a lawsuit against the president’s agenda. As of now, states have
until September 6, 2016 to submit their blueprints that balances their
energy needs with CPP’s goals. Those who fail to submit one will have a
federal plan imposed until a state-centered strategy is drafted. Like
Obamacare, we have another serious policy fight ahead, one that isn’t
being discussed much on the 2016 campaign trail.
No comments:
Post a Comment