Hillary Uses Gender To Win
By DICK MORRIS
Published on TheHill.com
Throughout her political career, Hillary Clinton has
used her gender and the still novel concept of a woman running for
president to cloak her advances and shield her from losses. It is never
about her. Her own merits, qualifications, defects, failures or
shortcomings are never the issue. The question is always: How are we to
treat women in politics?
Now that she is on the verge of running again for
president, a Gallup poll shows that about one Clinton voter in five
cites her gender as the leading reason to vote for her. Coming in
second, mentioned by only half as many respondents, were her
qualifications.
Clinton's use of her gender as cover was evident when
she conceded her battle for the Democratic Party's nomination in 2008.
Her line was that her candidacy had made "18 million cracks in the
hardest and highest glass ceiling," despite the prize of the presidency
eluding her. It was not Barack Obama who beat her, nor her own
limitations. She was defeated by the "glass ceiling," and her campaign
was a common effort of all feminists to crack it.
From the start of her entry into politics, she has
always used her gender to advance politically and to deflect negatives.
When she compared her focus on a career to women who
"stayed home and baked cookies and had teas," she did not admit that her
comments were elitest and offensive to stay-at-home moms. Instead she
said that she was under attack because she "had been turned into a
symbol for women of my generation" and the "fundamental change in the
way women functioned in our society."
Criticized for doing legal work for the state of
Arkansas while her husband was governor, she said: "This is the sort of
thing that happens to women who have their own careers and their own
lives. And I think it's a shame but I guess it's something we're going
to have to live with. Those of us who have tried to make a career, tried
to have an independent life and make a difference and certainly like
myself who has children but other issues, you know I've done the best I
can to lead my life." Nobody was attacking her for having her own life.
The attacks concerned the fact that the wife of the governor was being
paid from tax money to do legal work for the state.
Clinton approaches her political career as if it were a
class action lawsuit on behalf of all women, rather than an effort by
one woman to get elected.
As my wife, Eileen McGann, and I wrote in our book Rewriting History:
"When Hillary is attacked, she frequently parries the charges by
arguing that it is all women who are under attack rather than just one
in particular. ... Criticized for her business dealings as a lawyer, she
treats it as an attack on all professional women. Knocked for
tolerating her husband's adultery in her bid to hold on to political
power, she gathers around her all women who want to protect their
privacy. Slammed with allegations of insider trading in the commodities
market, she cloaks herself in the garb of every woman seeking financial
security for her family."
Now, as she again floats the trial balloon of her
candidacy, she gains a key advantage by making her ambition the generic
goal of all women -- to elect one of their own as president.
But it is this woman, not all women, who is about to
run. It was this secretary of State who neglected the security of her
Benghazi outpost. It was this person who naively called for a reset with
Russia. She was the one who initially advocated healthcare reform
legislation, which served as the foundation of the ill-fated ObamaCare.
It was Clinton, as secretary of State, who had to have known about and
approved NSA wiretaps on foreign leaders.
Not all women. Just her.
I hate to admit this, but I voted for her during the Virginia primary in 2008. Mitt Romney and everyone else was out and only John McCain remained (he won the republican primary.) One may ask why I did something so stupid? Well...blame Rush Limbaugh and operation chaos! The last person I wanted was Obama; and Hillary - I thought - would give John McCain a better chance of winning (although I had to pinch my nose to vote for him... but adding Sarah Palin helped the ticket!).
ReplyDeleteOK...one has to bear in mind...an old guy going against a woman would be tough, but going against an articulate black guy (Biden's words) would be a juggernaut.
The people who are not white are very racist against anything white...prove me wrong. In election after election, the minorities vote for the democrats who have proven to side with minorities over whites. What is really funny...liberal whites don't get this! Their guilt has them voting for people who hate them...kinda like American Jews! Why do the Jews vote democrat seeing the democrats hate Israel and anything remotely Jewish?
I think Hillary will run...so the republicans better count on it. A poll just taken shows Hillary kicking butt in Virginia (not with me....and I vote each time.) I wonder who Diane favors? Rand Paul, Ted Cuiz? Whoever it is, we need to be sure to support them with everything we have. Once they win the nomination, people like Mark Levin need to shut up and support them! I blame radio for keeping many Republicans at home. Levin whined about Romneycare for weeks (even after Romney won and was going against a powerful Obama)! The putz wouldn't shut up and support the nominee. If Romney had won we wouldn't have OBAMACARE you putz! Didn't he say that?
This election coming up is the last free election unless the republicans win; from then on we will turn into a banana republic (not far from there now with O Bow Wow ignoring laws he doesn't want to obey!)
Excellent points throughout Anonymous!
Delete