Written by Justice Thomas, the majority opinion released Friday morning explains that "Congress could have linked the definition of 'machinegun' to a weapon's rate of fire" in the National Firearms Act of 1934 but "it instead enacted a statute that turns on whether a weapon can fire more than one shot 'automatically...by a single function of the trigger.'"
"We hold that a semiautomatic rifle equipped with a
bump stock is not a 'machinegun' because it cannot fire more than one
shot 'by a single function of the trigger,'" Thomas writes. "And, even
if it could, it would not do so 'automatically.'" As such, the Supreme
Court arrived at its ruling that the "ATF therefore exceeded its
statutory authority by issuing a Rule that classifies bump stocks as
machineguns." Read ore and see Xs here.

No comments:
Post a Comment