And while our “Founders and Framers” did design our Constitution in order to “establish a more perfect union, ensure justice, promote domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, and to secure liberty,” they also made it very clear that being an “American citizen” was not just needed in establishing a government based upon both “popular sovereignty” and the “consent of the governed,” but that “citizenship” itself was to be an integral part of who were are as a nation. Read entire article here.
Tuesday, May 13, 2025
Monday, May 12, 2025
Score one for now President Trump, his agenda, and of course the MAGA movement.
So as pride in our beloved America continues to grow...as American exceptionalism reemerges thanks in part to this one man...we must not become complacent as to Trump's accomplishments for the 2026 mid-term elections are not as far off as one might think. And with the House being especially vulnerable to a possible switch in party control due to Republicans currently holding but a slim majority of seats, we must make sure that Trump's much needed “election reforms” do become law before said elections take place. Why so...because if we lose the House, and even if we were to hold the Senate, all MAGA stands for could well become but a memory of what could have been accomplished if only more folks had been paying attention.
But our president knows well how critical the midterm elections are, and he has been trying to get laws passed to help assure that our elections are not only free, fair, and most especially honest so that “We the People”...as in the sum of we “American citizens”...have no doubt that all our votes have been properly counted and tabulated minus what is now being referred to as “illegal dilution”...as in the great number of people who have been voting all along...especially in “blue” states...yet people who have no legal right to do so.In fact, the blame for this “illegal dilution” falls not just on the federal level, but on the state and local levels as well. Why so...because a long held system of “checks and balances” has existed in every state for quite some time, and yet in many “blue” states and cities said system is simply being ignored, but then again so too is the Constitution's own words regarding whom exactly can vote...as in those deemed to be United States “citizens.” And know that the 14th Amendment clearly states in Section 1 that, “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”
Simply, “citizens” is the key operative word in regards to voting as there's no mention; at all, in the Constitution of “illegals” or “non-citizens” being given the right to vote. And yet we all know that many do vote in certain parts of our country, because “leftist” judges and “bleeding heart” Democrat elected officials seem to be working in tandem to not only help those illegally crossing our border to do so...including amongst them thugs, thieves, drug mules, gang members, child molesters, rapists, murderers, and terrorists...but they also help to keep illegals safe from Trump's now ongoing and rightful deportations. And how do they accomplish this task...by “blanketing” those who are but criminal invaders under the Constitution's already existing words “due process” and “fundamental rights”...voting laws be damned.
So while our Constitution's 14th Amendment does indeed protect, on the federal level, what is known as “due process rights”...“rights” which ensure that no one can be deprived of “life, liberty, or property” without “due process” of law....basically what the words “due process” means to Democrats in regards to voting rights is that the government must follow what is known as “fair procedures and rules”* before disallowing an individual or a specific group of individuals the right to vote in a federal election. In other words, most Democrats and leftist judges want the Constitutionally deemed word “citizens” to be taken out of the voting mix so that future elections could become a Democrat “free for all” voting scenario. But try as the Democrats may, the 14th Amendment also has a few things to say about that as well.
And while, unfortunately, it is common knowledge that “illegal voting”...especially when considering the numbers now involved...has already influenced the outcome of many state and local elections...especially in “blue” what were once “ purple states”...in this political discourse all other words, while important, do now become secondary to the Constitution's key word, “citizens.” Why so...simply because it alone, as per the words of our “Founders and Framers,” not only protects we American “citizens” along with our actual right to vote, but its principal and intent also guards against what is now the rightfully deemed aforementioned “dilution by illegal voting.” And the fault here again lies within all branches of government...federal, state, and local level governments...however, said “dilution” most assuredly starts with the top tier elections and filters down from there.
How so...here's but one example
that's being completely ignored, for the fact is that existing
Federal election requirements...which includes the establishing of a
uniform “Election Day”...already
prohibits States from counting ballots received after “Election
Day” because these are the
ballots where most of the “illegal dilution” usually
takes place...as
well as prohibiting “foreign nationals”...aka
“non-citizens”...from
registering to vote in any national election. Don't believe me...see
the law for yourself in both Federal
law 2 U.S.C. 7 and 3 U.S.C. 1. and
18
U.S.C. 1015 and 611
as
written as per the rulings of the United States Court of Appeals for
the Fifth Circuit regarding the Republican National Committee v.
Wetzel (2024).**
So if “settled law” has already been established with “precedence” set as to who can and cannot vote in our elections, why has this, what is fact, not just been ignored, but sees“blue” state governors and “blue” state elected officials not even being called to task for their allowing ballots received after Election Day to continue to be counted...ballots mailed in more times than not by those who should not be voting in the first place. In fact, the 14th amendment also authorizes the federal government to “punish states” that try to either take away, curtail, or stall...with stalling election results now being all too commonplace... a U.S.“citizen's” right to have their vote counted with results tallied and revealed in a timely, fair, and above all else legal manner.
And that brings us back full circle to the Constitution's five key words,“Citizens of the United States”...it cannot be said any clearer, more directly, truthfully or consistently than that, and for both liberal activist judges and elected officials to deny those five words is to deny the Constitution itself...the very document they took an oath to protect and defend. And by their doing so these folks, in my opinion, willingly and with malice intended choose to not only “aid and abet” those breaking our laws, but also took it upon themselves to do any and everything possible...legally or otherwise...to not only corrupt but to redefine the Constitution's words to help push forth their anti-American agenda, as well as to keep their anti-Trump political “witch hunt” ongoing.
Simply, “divert and deflect” the issues at hand has become the obstacles thrown in both Trump's and the laws path...“settled law” included...to not only help keep but “up the numbers” of those illegally voting, with the hope that declining Democrat party numbers will at least start to reverse.
Remember, these current slew of liberal activist judges trying to remove the word “citizen(s)” from the voting discourse are, for the most part, Obama and Democrat party loyalists who are resurrecting, if you will, the meaning behind the words stated by Barack Obama back when he was president...the words where he implied that our Constitution was an “outdated document” no longer appropriate for “modern times.” And so with his now infamous words that,“We can no longer rely on a rule book made a few centuries ago,” it can clearly be seen that the fair and honest voting laws President Trump is trying to enact...laws regarding only “citizens” being able to vote as per the Constitution...are laws which could permanently derail Obama's still to this day hoped for “fundamental transformation of America.”
And so it was and remains Obama's own words that, I do believe, laid the very foundation upon which these liberal judges are actually not just trying to usurp President Trump's Constitutionally given presidential powers...most especially those regarding voting laws...but that they are using Obama's words as the means and conduit by which to help assure that every individual of voting age residing in our country today...no matter their legal citizenship status...is allowed to vote. Why so...as in a last desperate attempt to help Obama's socialist driven “transformation of America” not only reach fruition, but across the board implementation as well.
Simply, the above stated is why not only must Trump's March 25th signed executive order to overhaul U.S. federal elections...including voters having to show proof of “citizenship” before voting in the 2026 midterm elections...but why the Constitution's word “citizens” remains one of the most important words...after “We the People” of course...in the very document Obama arrogantly dared to call but a “rule book.”
So as I write this, President Trump's “Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections“ executive order seems to be facing court challenges and delays revolving around the all-important word “citizens”...meaning the Constitution's stated words, as written, continue to be challenged by liberal judges with a decidedly anti-America/anti-Trump agenda. Better to them to make a mockery of the Constitution...one of the greatest documents to freedom ever written...then it is for them to abide by its words.
And while our “Founders and Framers” did design our Constitution in order to “establish a more perfect union, ensure justice, promote domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote general welfare, and to secure liberty,” they also made it very clear that being an “American citizen” was not just needed in establishing a government based upon both “popular sovereignty” and the “consent of the governed,” but that “citizenship” itself was to be an integral part of who were are as a nation.
In fact, these learned gentlemen viewed “citizenship” as the cornerstone in which ultimate power would reside, as in “We American Citizens”...while at the same time protecting individual liberties, ensuring equal treatment under the law, and encouraging what they referred to as “active civic engagement.” And it's the sum of these individual parts that our “Founders and Framers” deemed an inherent component of being a U.S. “citizen.” Simply, “citizenship” itself was the very cornerstone of this new nation they helped to create, and in his standing strong for we “citizens”...and specifically only “citizens” being allowed to vote...President Donald J. Trump honors the rule of law that is our Constitution while activist judges and Democrat politicians continue to deem her as but an “outdated document” that needs an infusion of illegal alien blood...and that is the saddest, and most traitorous act of all. Case closed. ___________________________________________________________
Footnotes
* “Fair procedures and rules” help to ensure a “just process” is in place when decisions affecting someone's rights or interests are in play. These rules include, but are not limited to, providing adequate notice, a fair hearing with the right to respond, and an unbiased decision-making process.
** The Republican National Committee v. Wetzel (2024) is the case involving a challenge to a Mississippi statute that allows absentee ballots to be received up to five days after the federal Election Day.
Copyright © 2025 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.
*********************************************************************************************
*********************************************************************************************
Monday, May 16, 2022
Now here, and while some might be taken aback, I want to state that as one grounded in science fact not religious dogma...and please know that no malice or disrespect to others beliefs is intended here...I do not believe that human life begins at conception, but that it begins when what has become the fetus sees its heart starting to beat. And why do I believe this...because science fact, let alone common sense, proves that without a beating heart human life is unsustainable.
In simple medical terms, after conception what started out as a mere group of dividing cells goes through many stages, from a zygote, to a morula, to a blastocyst, while only becoming an embryo 12 days after conception. And the embryo moniker remains through week six which by then has seen a rudimentary heart having started to beat. And by week ten the fetal heart will have fully developed and begun pumping oxygenated blood through its now recognizable fetus body form, while by this time most women know or at least suspect that they're pregnant as certain bodily changes have already begun happening, whether she's willing to accept that as fact or not.
|
|
Now back to week ten where at this point the fetus' heart is now continuously beating, and the once what was but a group of cells is now a living human being growing within its mother's body, still parasitic in nature as it has yet to reach viability, meaning it cannot exist and survive on its own. And still it truly is an individual who has a right to his or her life no matter if the mother now decides she no longer wants or ever wanted the being growing inside her. And it's at this stage in development...the stage where the beating human heart dictates that life has truly begun...where the so called “Heartbeat Law” comes into effect for to take a human life at this point or beyond, in my opinion, remains murder.
And why...because abortion at this point is surely being used as a last attempt means of birth control, something that should have been thought of and used before having unprotected sex. And with there being many contraceptive methods available both over the counter and by prescription, the old adage of “oops” has no place in today's modern society...no place as a reason to have an abortion except in the four instances I've previously mentioned. Remember, acts of passion, at times, do have consequences... consequences that no innocent baby must be forced to pay with his or her own life.
But also know that I personally have no
problem with the “morning after pill” for the simple
reason that it must be taken within 72-hours after unprotected sex,
which basically equates to pre-embryonic time...a time when no heart
has formed, no heart is beating...hence one is not technically
aborting life. And along with this I believe that abortion must never
fall into the “selective” category, meaning if the woman
carrying said baby and/or her partner does not want the gender she is
carrying...as in male or female with the other 60+ genders that
encompass the “woke movement” being but sheer stupidity
and utter nonsense...nor should a baby be aborted for treatable
conditions like, but not limited to, Downs Syndrome or spinabifida
for example, as these children can and do become valuable members of
society much loved by their families and friends.
And as for those women who do get pregnant unintentionally and who do not meet the four criteria I previously mentioned, these women should not abort what is their mistake but put the baby they are carrying up for adoption as there are many couples who face infertility issues...couples who would gladly adopt to create their much wanted family... the family human biology itself cannot give them.
Now as for the political aspect of abortion, it is my belief that abortion should never have become a political issue in the first place let alone a federal issue, it should have stayed a state's issue if even that. Spawned of the feminist movement of the 1970's, the entire “It's My Body, My Choice” musings that led to the media's deemed “landmark decision” by the High Court, found in “Roe v. Wade” that the U.S. Constitution protects a pregnant woman's “liberty” to choose to have an abortion without “excessive government restrictions.”
Yet the problem with said ruling always was and still is today, what about the life of the unborn child...what about its right to choose life instead of being disposed of like yesterday's trash. And while Joe Biden...the man who for decades as a senator was against tax funding for abortion...has raised quite a bit of ire amongst those in his own party by his recently calling the unborn what is to be aborted “a child,” as the left still wants you to believe that what will be disposed of or have its body parts sold to the highest "for profit" bidder is anything but “a child.”
Simply, this is but another instance of where the liberal left gets away with what is now, in my personal opinion, government sanctioned “murder,” for once that “child's” heart has started beating it must be afforded the same Constitutional rights and protections as the woman who willingly is taking away said child's right to life...let alone its “liberty and happiness.” Just because the then Supreme Court justices seemed to have misinterpreted the word “liberty” fifty years ago does not mean that said decision cannot be repealed today. Times change, the mood of the people change, politics itself changes, while common sense again gets lost in the shuffle of the left's political agenda game playing.
“Roe v. Wade” and its right to abortion became not just the main catalyst for a decline in American culture, values, and institutions, but yet another distraction to pull us away from the Founders and Framers true intentions regarding federal constitutional law vs. the constitutionally given predominance of “states rights.”
And in regards to abortion, upon which in passing “Roe v. Wade” in 1973, saw the High Court citing the 1868 Fourteenth Amendment...the very amendment which expanded protections of rights for citizens at the state level, most especially for “freed slaves” who were being subject to new discriminatory state laws...but it was not intended to cancel out the key Tenth Amendment...the amendment stating that, “the powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”
Simply, “states rights” do in this instance trump federal law. And why...because abortion remains a social issue and not a matter of federal policy. And yet with the High Court's 1973 decision that is exactly what happened in their basically overruling states rights by granting federal protection to those women who chose to about “the child” they carry. And this decision alone allowed the baby killing operation known as “Planned Parenthood” to perform 354,871 abortions in one year alone, while only suggesting to 2,667 women that they place their unwanted “child” up for adoption as opposed to aborting it.
Don't believe me...here's “Planned Parenthood's 2019-2020 Annual Report” (2021-2022 is not out yet) where you can see these and more disturbing facts and figures for yourself. And said litany includes that “Planned Parenthood” continues to receive both government grants and more than $500 million dollars in taxpayer funding every year, with much of their taxpayer dollars coming through reimbursements for Medicaid services provided...services which are jointly funded by federal and state taxpayers...meaning monies are garnered from even those of us against abortion...and also through Biden's reinstating “Title X,” which President Trump had rescinded, thus allowing federal funds to once again refer women for abortion.
So what are the chances of the Supreme Court reversing “Roe v. Wade” and sending abortion back to the states, especially after the recent memo leak? The chances are still good if and only if the justices don't bend to Democrat pressure, threats against their person, staged revolts by loony leftist women or men who think they can give birth, or to media-generated propaganda, for the truth remains that abortion was and always should be an issue left up to each individual state.
Remember, in overturning “Roe v. Wade” the justices are not...I repeat not...banning abortion outright but simply removing it from federal protection, thus allowing each state to decide for themselves whether all abortions will be outlawed; if they will implement the “Heartbeat Law” or some variation thereof; or choose or not choose to set a given time frame and/or circumstances in which abortion will be allowed. In other words, giving back to the states the right of “self-determination” that our Founders and Framers laid down as law in the Constitution.
And while so many do hold different views...religiously, personally, and policy wise...than I do in regards to abortion, and believe that Roe v. Wade is “settled law” into perpetuity, the fact remains that abortion itself does make a mockery of our Constitution for nowhere in the Constitution does it say neither in alluding nor in actual words that the killing of her unborn “child” is a woman's right. And what those sitting on Supreme Court back in 1973 forgot when handing down their politically motivated and ever so misguided decision is the scientific fact that there are two lives involved in abortion...the woman's and her innocent “child”...a “child” who has as much right to “life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness” as she does.
Simply, children are indeed our country's future, to take away that future takes away the very essence of who we are now and who we will be as a nation in the foreseeable future. Case closed.
Copyright © 2022 / Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.










