The statesman vs. the bully
By: Diane Sori
The name of the game is strategy as Mitt Romney wins last night’s
debate war. This is an economic election
first and foremost, and all Romney had to do was pass the Commander-in-Chief
test...proving to America that he could lead with common sense and reason...and
pass that test with flying colors he did.
Using a deliberately calculated move of NOT being
confrontational with Obama on his Libya debacle, Romney cleverly forced a
checkmate by showing he was NOT a war monger against a man who was condescending,
petty, and bullying in his response...a man who has tried to paint him as a
George Bush clone when it comes to the Middle East. Being calmly measured by saying to Obama, “attacking
me is NOT an agenda, attacking me is not about how we’re going to deal with the agenda
of the Middle East...” Romney showed the cool steady hand needed in a true
leader of men...a true leader of America.
But the needed tone of anger did surface in Romney’s response
in regards to Israel when he said, "The president began what I have called
an apology tour, of going to various nations in the Middle East and criticizing
America...and the reason I call it an apology tour is because you went to the
Middle East and you flew to Egypt and to Saudi Arabia and to Turkey and Iraq. And by the way, you skipped Israel, our
closest friend in the region, but you went to the other nations...by the way,
they noticed that you skipped Israel...”
“And then in those nations and on Arabic TV you said that
America had been dismissive and derisive. You said that on occasion America had dictated
to other nations...No Mr. President America does not dictate to other nations,
America frees other nations from dictators.”
This response by Romney hit home the point not only in
regards to Israel but also brought to the forefront the fact that Obama failed
to provide support for protests by Iranian dissidents, leading the mullahs who
run the country to conclude that they could keep pushing toward development of
nuclear weapons...weapons to use to wipe Israel off the map.
And Obama’s response was to bloviate about the trip he took to
Israel when he was a candidate the first time he ran...the first time he ran
back in 2008...the man who has NEVER visited Israel as president...the man who
bold-faced snubbed Prime Minister Netanyahu so he could sit and chat with the
ladies on The View instead of sitting and talking with Netanyahu about the threat
Israel faces from Iran.
This point alone drives home the contrast between a sitting
president who has made clear to both the American people and to the world that
he really could care less about Israel, made it clear to all that while saying
the right words about Iran publicly but doing otherwise behind the scenes, the
difference with Mitt Romney’s stance of standing behind our ally and friend (even
if it means supporting Israel militarily) against Iran became evident for all
to see.
And no matter how much bullying Obama tried to do, bullying
so evident in his grimaces, hautiness, and jittery moving about shown in the
split screen images flashed throughout the debate, Mitt Romney was extremely successful
in turning the tables on Obama and tying foreign policy into how it effects economic
policy here in America. Using a key
point of speaking of how the economy ties into our debt to foreign nations and stressing
how can you lead in the world when you owe foreign nations so much money,
Romney rightly brought home to the viewers the point that everything America
does throughout the world does indeed revolve around and effect the economy
here at home.
And this link between foreign and domestic policy came to
the forefront when the issue of China came up.
Repeating his previously said statement that he would
declare China a currency manipulator on his first day in office
while stressing that China is a valuable trade partner but one who will NO
longer be allowed to set the game but one who will abide by the rules we set
down for the game.
“I want a great relationship with China. China can be our
partner. But that doesn’t mean they can roll all over us and steal our jobs,” Romney
said.
Obama replied by accusing Romney of shipping U.S. jobs
overseas as a businessman, and of encouraging the growth of automobile manufacturing
in China...not Detroit.
“If we had taken your advice, Governor Romney, about the
auto industry, we’d be buying cars from China instead of selling cars to
China,” Obama said.
Well guess what Obama...all one needs to do is check out the
numerous production facilities GM has opened in China with American monies,
borrowed from China, Obama invested in China to create jobs for the Chinese NOT
for Americans and ALL on your watch!
But the bottom line in last night’s debate is that while it’s
obvious that a political outsider will always be at an obvious disadvantage to
a commander-in-chief when foreign affairs are the topic, Mitt Romney finished
strong and steady. Obama’s nasty,
childlike, and very un-presidential snide remarks and butt-in attempts to make
points while Romney was speaking, showed that Romney remained above the fray
sticking with facts and facts alone...something a true statesman will always
do.
Obama had to show mastery over Romney and he failed to do that
on all accounts. Mitt Romney had to show
that he is NOT a warmonger eager to send U.S. troops into sovereign country’s
affairs and he did that. Mitt Romney looked
presidential as he spoke of wishes for ALL Americans while Obama talked about ‘me,
myself and I’ first and the nation second.
Mitt Romney displayed control and humility, showing a
presidential aura we haven’t seen these past four years as he spoke of his
plans for America’s future with a voice that was hopeful, knowledgeable and
reassuring as he asked Americans do you want more years of the same failed
policies or a vision for the future.
Last night Mitt Romney proved to all that he is a
statesman...a statesman for ALL Americans willing to work across 'the aisle'...while Barack HUSSEIN Obama put
forth the face of a bully and a whining child, a man truly out of his league
and I hope out of a job on November 6th.

Great commentary, Diane. I have a niggly thought - I believe that had Mitt Romney come out hard and strong on the Libya-Benghazi-Middle East situation, right at the beginning of the 3rd debate, we would not be talking about a 'close race' any more. Rather, we would have all been saying: Bring out the champaign/grape-juice already!! :) Having said that, though, MR, as you have so competently articulated, achieved what he set out to achieve, which is what matters, isn't it? Just means more hard work to spread the word, I guess, and another two weeks of hand-wrenching and crossing fingers!! He will be such an AWESOME President! Thank you.
ReplyDeleteThanks and please rest assured that Mitt made a strategic move NOT to take Obama's bait and feed into his bully tactics. By laying low on Libya he just gave Obama all the rope he needs to hang himself.
DeleteI just started reading your blog, and find your opinions to be similar to mine most of the time. Keep up your fine commentary.
ReplyDeleteAs for the debate #3, I hope MR has it right by playing it as a
"Statesman" when he could have hammered BHO on the Libya disaster.
It's best he didn't as the Libya fiasco is still unfolding and it's best to wait until ALL the true facts are in.
Delete