Wednesday, April 30, 2014


GOP: 'Smoking Gun' Benghazi Email Proves White House 'Cover-Up'
By Greg Richter and Todd Beamon


  / Newsmax

Republicans charged Tuesday that an email in which a White House official advises former U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to link the 2012 Benghazi attack to an anti-Muslim video confirms the linkage was fabricated to help President Barack Obama's re-election.

"This email is a smoking gun," Sen. Lindsey Graham told Newsmax. "It shows political operatives in the White House working to create a political narrative at odds with the facts.

"Their goal was not to tell the truth about what actually happened," Graham said Tuesday. "They did not want to provide the best information available.

"Instead, we were provided the most beneficial political story for President Obama."

New Hampshire Sen. Kelly Ayotte told "On the Record With Greta Van Susteren" on Fox News Channel: "We always said, 'Where did the video reference come from?' Now we know it came from the White House" and not the intelligence community.

Both Graham and Ayotte are members of the Senate Armed Services Committee. They have been among the many Republicans who have called for an independent investigation of the attacks on Sept. 11, 2012, that killed Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans, including two former Navy SEALS.

Oklahoma Sen. Jim Inhofe, the panel's ranking GOP member, told Newsmax: "This was a cover-up, and these e-mails only continue to confirm my belief."

"The emails show that in the days after the attack in Benghazi, Libya, the White House was more focused on protecting President Obama than informing Americans about the terrorist attack that left Ambassador Chris Stevens and three other Americans dead."

The email, dated Sept. 14, 2012, was among more than 100 pages of documents released by Judicial Watch on Tuesday. It shows White House Deputy National Security Adviser Ben Rhodes advising Rice, who now is Obama's national security adviser, to focus on the YouTube video as the cause of a spontaneous protest that led to the attack.

But previously released emails show senior defense officials told the administration on the night of the attack that it was terrorism linked to al-Qaida and that no protest had occurred.

Rhodes outlined several talking points for Rice, with the advice "to underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy."

The email was prepared for a Sept. 15 "prep call" with Rice that was to occur at 4 p.m., according to the document. The following day, five days after the attack, Rice appeared on five Sunday talk shows, each time linking the Libyan attacks to the anti-Muslim video.

Then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton cited the same reason for the attacks, while Obama would not say whether it was terrorism until several days afterward.

Former CIA deputy director Mike Morell testified earlier this month that he had no idea where the story about a video protest came from when he saw Rice make the claim on television.

The other Americans killed in the attacks on the U.S. consulate and adjacent CIA annex were Sean Smith and two former Navy SEALs, Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

Judicial Watch obtained the documents on April 18 via a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit it filed against the State Department last June, said President Tom Fitton. The group obtained 41 emails, many of which had portions redacted.

"Now we know the Obama White House's chief concern about the Benghazi attack was making sure that President Obama looked good," Fitton said.

"These documents undermine the Obama administration's narrative that it thought the Benghazi attack had something to do with protests or an Internet video," he said. "Given the explosive material in these documents, it is no surprise that we had to go to federal court to pry them loose from the Obama State Department."

Some of the top White House officials who received the Rhodes memo were White House Press Secretary Jay Carney; Deputy Press Secretary Joshua Earnest; then-White House Communications Director Dan Pfeiffer; then-White House Deputy Communications Director Jennifer Palmieri; then-National Security Council Director of Communications Erin Pelton; Special Assistant to the Press Secretary Howli Ledbetter; and then-White House Senior Adviser and political strategist David Plouffe.

In her interview with Van Susteren, Ayotte said the email made it clear that the focus of the "prep call" was to ensure that Obama, who was less than two months away from a tight re-election bid, looked like a strong leader rather than try to get out the facts on the attacks as they were known.

Further, since both Carney and Plouffe were among the email's recipients, it can be assumed they read it and were aware of the story that Rice was going to tell, Republicans said.

Also troubling, Ayotte said, was that in the email was a reference for Rice to make sure to mention that al-Qaida had been destroyed.

"That was nowhere in the talking points, and actually it's contradicted by what we know happened on that day," Ayotte told Van Susteren.

Meanwhile, Catherine Frazier, a spokeswoman for Sen. Ted Cruz, another member of the Armed Services Committee, told Newsmax that the email confirmed "how little we really know about what happened in Benghazi on Sept 11, 2012."

"This administration must be held accountable to telling the truth so that we can find closure, bring our attackers to justice, and prevent future attacks," Frazier said.

Arizona Rep. Paul Gosar told Newsmax: "Today we learn, from documents obtained by Judicial Watch, that the president's communications team intentionally fabricated a story about Benghazi in order to deceive the American public."

"The Obama administration made up a story out of whole cloth to deceive the American people and to try to make the president look good," he said.

Gosar is a member of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, which also has been investigating the Benghazi attack.

"Whether lying about Obamacare, and now lying about Benghazi, this administration has no decency," Gosar said.



News Susan Rice Face The Nation
Published on April 29th, 2014 | by Editorial Staff
0

TRUTH REVEALED: Official Emails Show White House Cover Up Of Benghazi Attack

    
New information has been released on the Benghazi attack from emails obtained by Judicial Watch show that Obama Administration officials had emailed Ambassador Susan Rice before her Sunday talk show appearance to coach her to inform the public that the attack occurred as a spontaneous protest because on the controversial Internet video.  Susan Rice made this argument even though defense officials had informed administration officials the night of the attack that it was terrorism.  The emails call into question the timeline of events the White House has stood by and Congressional testimony by administration officials. ______________
Newly released emails on the Benghazi terror attack suggest a senior White House aide played a central role in preparing former U.N. ambassador Susan Rice for her controversial Sunday show appearances — where she wrongly blamed protests over an Internet video.
More than 100 pages of documents were released to the conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch as part of a Freedom of Information Act lawsuit. Among them was a Sept. 14, 2012, email from Ben Rhodes, an assistant to the president and deputy national security adviser for strategic communications.
The Rhodes email, with the subject line: “RE: PREP Call with Susan: Saturday at 4:00 pm ET,” was sent to a dozen members of the administration’s inner circle, including key members of the White House communications team such as Press Secretary Jay Carney.
In the email, Rhodes specifically draws attention to the anti-Islam Internet video, without distinguishing whether the Benghazi attack was different from protests elsewhere.
The email lists the following two goals, among others:
“To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”
“To reinforce the President and Administration’s strength and steadiness in dealing with difficult challenges.”
The email goes on to state that the U.S. government rejected the message of the Internet video. “We find it disgusting and reprehensible. But there is absolutely no justification at all for responding to this movie with violence,” the email stated.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton said the documents read like a PR strategy, not an effort to provide the best available intelligence to the American people.
“The goal of the White House was to do one thing primarily, which was to make the president look good. Blame it on the video and not [the] president’s policies,” he said.
The Rhodes email was not part of the 100 pages of emails released by the administration last May — after Republicans refused to move forward with the confirmation of John Brennan as CIA director until the so-called “talking points” emails were made public.
The email is also significant because in congressional testimony in early April, former deputy CIA director Michael Morell told lawmakers it was Rice, in her Sunday show appearances, who linked the video to the Benghazi attack. Morell said the video was not part of the CIA analysis.
Read More
- See more at: http://americanmilitarynews.com/2014/04/truth-revealed-official-emails-show-white-house-cover-benghazi-attack/#sthash.sATMvcQR.dpuf

1 comment:

  1. Hey Diane...all the smoking guns lead back to Obama and his cover-up. I do believe that he is involved in this tragedy.

    When men were getting killed, an aide to Obama said he was playing game after game of spades. He wanted the men to die, so he did nothing.

    Men of power sometime fall into the power trap: King David had Uriah - his trusted military leader - sent to the front of the battle line and then commanded his generals to retreat from Uriah leaving him alone in fierce battle. This was done because David wanted Uriah's wife Bathsheba.

    How is Obama any better than that by not sending aid to our men in Benghazi, but leaving them to fight alone against hoards of Muslim radicals? In Obama's case, the ambassador knew about the guns and Obama was in a presidential election. The ambassador had the audacity to know too much. Obama metaphorically sent him to the front of the line, and then had his people retreat.

    In David's case, he repented, but in Obama's case, I don't think we will see that! Obama is a psychopath.

    ReplyDelete