CBS Anchor to Rubio: What Do You Mean Hillary 'Lied' About Benghazi?
Guy Benson / Townhall Tipsheet
Marco Rubio embarked on something of a post-debate victory tour today, visiting six national morning shows to reflect on last night's proceedings. One of his stops was CBS This Morning, where puzzled host Charlie Rose pressed Rubio
about what he meant when he said that last week's Benghazi hearings
proved that Hillary Clinton had lied. The Florida Senator basically reiterated his explanation from last night (via the Weekly Standard):
See video here: http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2015/10/29/cbs-anchor-to-rubio-what-do-you-mean-hillary-lied-about-benghazi-n2072775?utm_source=thdaily&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=nl&newsletterad=
Rose counters with Clinton talking points, muddying the waters by
blaming confusing and conflicting intelligence offered by the CIA -- but
as they say, that dog don't hunt:
Stephen Hayes
Hillary's email to Chelsea on the night of Benghazi unequivocally blamed
an Al Qaeda offshoot (Ansar Al-Sharia) for the attack; her discussion with an Egyptian official the next day made her position even more explicit:
Ex-DepCIA dir: WH blamed: "Benghazi attack on the video which is not something CIA did in its talking points or in its classified analysis"
Stood in front of 4 flag draped coffins and blamed YouTube
One of Clinton's assertions fell into doubt Friday as the State Department said it was unaware of any basis for her claim that the agency "had between 90 and 95 percent of all [her] work-related emails" even before she turned over 54,000 pages of records last December. "I'm not aware that we have given that figure," State spokesman Mark Toner told reporters on Friday. "We've not been able to confirm that. I not sure where that information comes from"...Asked about Clinton's assertion at the hearing, a Clinton campaign aide returned to the March statement and referenced new disclosures about weaknesses in State's recordkeeping system, but notably declined to repeat her new claim.One more Benghazi-related note, breaking today:
#BREAKING: The Committee has received new documents from the White House related to the military response to the #Benghazi terrorist attacks
Strange, isn't it? We've endlessly been told that this select committee
is a duplicative waste of money and time, and yet here they are
unearthing additional relevant documents -- all of which were supposedly turned over years ago, according to the administration.
Stephen Miller

No comments:
Post a Comment