Very true. Jefferson thought that by establishing freedom of religion he was allowing reason to be free of being controlled by revelation. And that is , of course, what freedom of religion was intended to accomplish.
But Islam demands that its claimed revelation control reason even when that claimed revelation is contrary to reason. It wants to fuse church and state, instead of keep them separate.
Just another example of how opposed to our founding principles and constitution Islam is.
And another reason why we should have a constitutional amendment that states that islam shall not be considered to be a religion within the meaning of our constitution and laws and why sharia law should not be recognized or enforced.
A devout muslim who believes in sharia law believes that he is required to subvert our constitution by force or deceit, whichever works best at any particular time. Accordingly such a person cannot be trusted to obey the oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the US and should not be placed or maintained in any US public office or in the military. After all one of Mohammed's basic teachings, followed today by devout muslims, is that a muslim has the duty to lie to non muslims when that will help to advance Islam, and is free to break any contract with non muslim when it is to his advantage to so so. So much for the value of Obama's deal with Iran.
Very true. Jefferson thought that by establishing freedom of religion he was allowing reason to be free of being controlled by revelation. And that is , of course, what freedom of religion was intended to accomplish.
ReplyDeleteBut Islam demands that its claimed revelation control reason even when that claimed revelation is contrary to reason. It wants to fuse church and state, instead of keep them separate.
Just another example of how opposed to our founding principles and constitution Islam is.
And another reason why we should have a constitutional amendment that states that islam shall not be considered to be a religion within the meaning of our constitution and laws and why sharia law should not be recognized or enforced.
A devout muslim who believes in sharia law believes that he is required to subvert our constitution by force or deceit, whichever works best at any particular time. Accordingly such a person cannot be trusted to obey the oath to uphold and defend the constitution of the US and should not be placed or maintained in any US public office or in the military. After all one of Mohammed's basic teachings, followed today by devout muslims, is that a muslim has the duty to lie to non muslims when that will help to advance Islam, and is free to break any contract with non muslim when it is to his advantage to so so. So much for the value of Obama's deal with Iran.
All true.
ReplyDelete