
Well, executive action of gun control is something the
Obama White House seems to be considering in the aftermath of the
horrific San Bernardino shooting that the FBI has recently reclassified
as
a federal terrorism investigation.
Even with this development in the investigation, which renders the
narrative in gun control moot–the president is looking to close the
non-existent gun show loophole (via
LA Times):
White House officials are seeking a way to use
executive authority to close the so-called gun show loophole that allows
thousands of people to buy firearms each year without a background
check, but complicated legal issues have slowed the process.
Almost three years ago, after the killing of 20 children and six
adults at Sandy Hook Elementary School in Newtown, Conn., President
Obama asked Congress to change the law to require background checks for
weapons sold outside the network of licensed gun dealers, including
sales at gun shows or through the Internet. A bill to tighten the
background system died in the Senate a few months later — dashing the
administration’s hopes for legislative action.
This goes back to the pro-gun control advocates’ nonsensical claim
that 40 percent of all gun sales are conducted without a background
check. The
Washington Post both gave President Obama and Hillary Clinton
three Pinocchios for peddling that claim; Obama mentioned it after Newtown, Clinton
uttered it in October:
By any reasonable measure, Clinton’s claim that 40
percent of guns are sold at gun shows or over the Internet — and thus
evade background checks through a loophole — does not stand up to
scrutiny.
As we demonstrated, the 40-percent figure, even if confirmed in a new
survey, refers to all gun transactions, not just gun sales. A large
percentage of the gun transactions not covered by background checks are
family and friend transactions – which would have been exempt from the
universal background checks pushed by Democrats. Indeed, many gun-show
sales are made by licensed firearm dealers — and 17 states even have
that requirement, at least for handguns.
Clinton earns Three Pinocchios.
The
Free Beacon’s Stephen Gutowski also mentioned that there is
no such thing as a gun show loophole:
…[G]un shows and online sales enjoy no special
carve-out or loophole. Under federal law, all sales through commercial
gun dealers, known as Federal Firearms Licensees (FFLs), must be
processed through the Federal Bureau of Investigation’s National Instant
Background Check System regardless of whether the sale was made at a
gun shop, gun show, or over the Internet. Similarly, sales of used guns
between private parties living in the same state are not required, under
federal law, to go through the background check system regardless of
where the sale occurs.
Bud’s Gun Shop
prides itself for being the #1 online retailer of firearms in the
world. They include a YouTube video showing the process for purchasing
firearms, which includes–by law–shipping your purchase to a local FFL
dealer in order to…conduct a background check in accordance with all
state and federal laws. Without FFL dealers, online sales couldn’t be
possible.
So, what exactly is the Obama administration actually pondering that
isn’t already federal law when it comes to executive action on
background checks? Hillary Clinton warned that she
might go down the same road if she’s elected president next year.
I so agree.
ReplyDeleteObama just basically asked the American people not to hold Islam accountable, based on an ideology, which is based on a religion with a political agenda. And then said, we are going to make it harder for people to buy assault rifles, to defend themselves.
ReplyDeleteNo mention that the so called JV team is withstanding strikes from the US, Russia, France, Turkey, and Germany, with no signs of letting up.
The only message I received was basically, he defends Islam.