Op-ed:
Treason, sedition, and Barack HUSSEIN Obama
By: Diane Sori

So now it seems the U.S. military will pick-up all the medical bills for Bowe Bergdahl (too bad they do NOT do that for all our honorably serving veterans). So now it seems that the only thing Bowe is suffering from is some 'cognitive issues' after five years of captivity, and that physically he is quite stable NOT on the verge of imminent death as claimed by the White House. So now it seems that when search-and-rescue teams first went out to look for Bergdahl after he went missing that they were given orders NOT to bring him back alive, but were to shoot him on sight, because command knew he was NOT only working with the Taliban but that he would kill our people if given the chance.

And so now it seems that even as more information comes to light everyday supporting the fact that Bowe Bergdahl did in indeed go AWOL...did indeed desert...this administration...this president...  continues to stand by its claim that they did the right thing by making a deal with terrorists but claiming the deal was made to bring peace to Afghanistan.

And if you believe that...to put it as kindly as I can...you are simply clueless or suffering from kool-ade overload.

And negotiating with terrorists...caving to terrorist demands actually...got us what...it got us a traitor back as the enemy got to welcome back into their fold five of the world's most cold-blooded hard- core murdering terrorists...terrorists listed by the U(seless) N(ations) as perpetrators of war crimes ...terrorists now biding their time in Qatar until they can freely kill more of our troops yet again.

And Obama still claims we got the better part of the deal because he left NO man behind...I say this was more like a deal made in hell...and one for which we'll be paying the price in American blood for many years to come.

And now out comes the devil's minions...ooops...I mean Obama's minions...to spew out the words they've been instructed to say...minions led off by an Obama puppet in the guise of Susan 'It Was A YouTube Video' Rice.

The day after Bergdahl's release, and once again making the rounds of the Sunday talk-show circuits...NOT learning a lesson after her Benghazi fiasco I guess...Rice was asked if Obama's deal of trading terrorists to get back one of own back meant that the U.S. could NO longer say that it does NOT negotiate with terrorists...and her response, "I wouldn't put it that way."

Excuse me, but how would you put it for that is exactly what was done...in fact, negotiating is NOT the right word...selling us out to the enemy's demands is more precise.

And in an official statement, muslim supporting Defense Secretary Chuck Hagel, in defense and in support of Rice's words...had the audacity to say, "We didn't negotiate with terrorists," totally ignoring the simple fact that this lopsided 5-for-1 exchange could start the ball rolling for future kidnappings of American soldiers... future kidnappings and beheadings of American soldiers if we do NOT acquiesce to their demands is more like it.

Continuing on with the words, "In war, things are always dangerous and there are vulnerabilities... but our record, the United States of America, in dealing with terrorists and hunting down and finding terrorists, is pretty good," Chuck Hagel refuses to accept the simple fact that when our troops lives are at stake 'pretty good' just does NOT cut it.

And just two days ago, in a heated discussion with a Fox News reporter, U.S. State Department spokesperson Marie Harf had the unmitigated gall to claim that Bergdahl's fellow soldiers...those who were in his unit and who knew him and his mind-set well...were NOT reliable sources in their accusations that Bergdahl deserted his post of his own free will.

When directly asked, “Does the State Department consider Sergeant Bergdahl to be a deserter?” Harf's answer was an unequivocal "NO." Saying that, "... we are going to learn the facts about what happened here,” Harf's regurgitating of the very set-in-stone 'party loyal' words set in motion...yet again...the act of diverting and deflecting attention off Obama...on whose shoulders this very act of acquiescing to the enemy's demands truly lies.

And treason is what Barack HUSSEIN Obama must be charged with as this man... this President of the United States...committed treason by the act of knowingly and willfully releasing known terrorists...known killers of American troops...as treason encompasses sedition as per 18 U.S.C. § 2388 : US Code - Section 2388: Activities affecting armed forces during war...as per (a) "Whoever, when the United States is at war, willfully makes or conveys false reports or false statements with intent to interfere with the operation or success of the military or naval forces of the United States or to promote the success of its enemies..." And that is exactly what this man has done...he has promoted the success of America's enemies by releasing their leaders back into the fold to kill Americans again.

Sedition as per 18 U.S.C. § 2381 : US Code - Section 2381: Treason. "Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

And while we know Barack HUSSEIN Obama's allegiance is NOT to the United States, he did take an oath of office to “...faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

But how can one protect and defend the Constitution when one has given 'aid and comfort' to the enemy...when one has 'aided and abetted' the enemy...one simply cannot, therefore, one is in direct violation of the very oath one took in full public view.

So those in this administration and those who are helping to circle the wagons around this most miserable of presidents...those folks need to take a step back, take a deep breath, and accept the fact that this president...one Barack HUSSEIN Obama...is guilty of acts of treason against the United States of America...most specifically concerning acts 'aiding and abetting' the enemy in a time of war.

And that is something 'We the People' must demand that he be charged with... demand he be tried for...and demand when found guilty that he be punished for...period.

****************************************************************

As many of you know my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOT partner and friend, Craig Andresen, is in face book jail until June 26th, so I have been posting his articles for him.  To read his Friday Fume...and rest assured this one will have you LOL...please click this link: http://www.thenationalpatriot.com/2014/06/05/friday-fume-125/ to go directly to his blog The National Patriot.

Op-ed: 

From hostage taker to U.N. ambassador  

By: Diane Sori  

 

“Willfully, deliberately, insulting, and contemptuous..."  

- Senator Ted Cruz 

 

The Iran Hostage Crisis of the late 1970's was a page directly from the devil's playbook. On November 4, 1979, a crowd of about 500 students seized the U.S. Embassy in Tehran, and of the approximately 90 people inside the embassy at the time, 52 American diplomats and eight private citizens were taken hostage and tortured off and on for 444 days. Showing their support for anti-American cleric Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini and the Iranian Revolution...a revolution to break with Iran’s past and end American interference in Iran's affairs...the hostage takers finally set their captives free on January 20, 1981, mere hours after Ronald Reagan delivered his inaugural address. And why now and NOT on Jimmy Carter's watch...it was simply because they feared retaliation from a Republican president if they did NOT. And our relations with Iran have gone downhill since then.

And now the ghosts of the hostage crisis have come back to haunt as Iranian career diplomat Hamid Aboutalebi, a member of the very muslim students group who took the hostages...a man with close ties to Iran's new president Hassan Rouhani and to Mohammad Khatami, a reformist former president....and a man who has held key postings in the past including serving as Iran's ambassador to Italy, Belgium, and Australia...has been tapped by Iran to be their next envoy to the United Nations...or what I call the U(seless) N(ations).

But there is a caveat...a big caveat...to this appointment as Hamid Aboutalbi appears to have taken an active part in the hostage taking. Claiming he did NOT take part in the torture of the hostages, but just had been "summoned" when needed to serve as a translator, Aboutalebi’s even remote connection to the hostage crisis has elicited anger...and rightly so...from former U.S. hostages.

Even though Aboutalebi played down his role during the hostage crisis, former hostage John Limbert said he has questions about Aboutalebi's stated role as a 'supposed' translator. "I'm not sure exactly what he means by 'translator'"..."For whom and where?" he said.

"It's a disgrace if the USG (U.S. government) accepts Abutalebi's visa as Iranian Ambassador to the U.N.," said former hostage Barry Rosen. Adding, "It may be a precedent but if the President and the Congress don't condemn this act by the Islamic Republic, then our captivity and suffering for 444 days at the hands of Iran was for nothing."

"He can never set foot on American soil," Rosen continued and how right he is, and I believe it is both morally and inherently wrong for him to do so. This appointment makes a mockery out of what the hostages faced for 444 long days and nights...the fear they faced...the torture they faced...and the U.S. must NEVER allow anyone who took part in hostage taking to be welcomed into this country in any capacity whatsoever.

And while Marie Harf, a State Department deputy spokeswoman, called the appointment of Aboutalebi “extremely troubling,” and while the U.S. has a veto in the United Nations Security Council by virtue of being one of the council’s five permanent members, the Obama administration knows that it has NO legal right per se to intervene for we are bound by a 1947 protocol that grants almost total immunity to the diplomats of national missions serving at the U.N. So while we severed diplomatic ties with Iran in 1980, the U.S. is still required to allow U.N. diplomats to come to New York under its host country agreement with the U.N. However, we still have the right to refuse visas to those seeking to work as diplomats in the United States.

And even if Aboutalebi receives a visa to represent Iran at the U.N., thankfully he will NOT be free to come and go as he pleases. Iranian diplomats, like the envoys of North Korea and Syria, are confined to a radius of 25 miles from Columbus Circle in Midtown Manhattan. So while this case is quite different than most others, Harf still said,“...we do take our obligations as host nation for the United Nations very seriously.”

Translation: the Obama administration and Barack HUSSEIN Obama himself will most assuredly give Aboutalebi his needed visa...first because he's an islamic brethren, and second because Iran's U.N. mission...the only diplomatic operation in the U.S...has played a role of sorts for unofficial exchanges of messages between Washington and Tehran...messages concerning nuclear issues and the release of any U.S. citizens held in Iran.

Little good this has done our ally Israel or Iranian held American Pastor Saeed Abedini.

So now some members of Congress have stepped into the fray demanding that Aboutalebi be barred from living and working in the U.S. And Senator Ted Cruz (R-TX) said, "This person is an acknowledged terrorist," and added that he will introduce legislation that would require Obama to deny a visa to any UN applicant... including Aboutalebi...determined to have engaged in terrorist activity.

“It is unconscionable that, in the name of international diplomatic protocol, the United States would be forced to host a foreign national who showed a brutal disregard for the status of our diplomats when they were stationed in his country,” Cruz said.

Bottom line...as Iran remains an enemy NOT a negotiating partner with whom we have minor differences with...the Obama administration could simply deny giving Aboutalebi a visa on national security grounds. But like I said he shows NO signs of doing so. And yet another slap in the face to America has been done by this most miserable of presidents and has been done as well to the surviving hostages taken all those years ago.

And that is the saddest thing of all.