Two words...cover-up
By: Diane Sori
A big blow has sucker punched Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s re-election
campaign now that his failed national security policies have been exposed for
all to see...and it’s all because of the siege, murders, and cover-up regarding
the deaths of Ambassador Christopher Stevens, Information Officer Sean Smith,
and the two ex-Navy SEALS in Benghazi, Libya.
Obama’s lead over Mitt Romney in the foreign
policy area has seriously lost steam and rightly so. Obama’s once self-gratifying bloviating’s
about how he took down Osama Bin Laden (sorry SEALS but he did it NOT
you...insert sarcasm here) and how wonderful he is on the world stage have been
shot to hell as more and more information is surfacing that he knew trouble
was on the horizon in Libya and did NOTHING about it.
After the siege and murders of Ambassador Stevens and the
others, Obama told a story (with a straight face I might add) of spur of the
moment demonstrations run amok over a YouTube video mocking the ‘prophet’ mohammad. Then his story changed and morphed into
describing it as a coordinated attack with possible involvement by Al-Qaeda extremists
because it happened on this September 11th, the eleven year anniversary
of the 9/11 attacks. But then he morphed
back again before the UN saying it was indeed the video that started the domino
effect with Ambassador Stevens the first to fall in his so-called, ‘bumps in
the road.’
Interesting though that nowhere did the actual words ‘terrorist
attack' ever cross Obama’s lying lips until just recently when leaks about the
truth started surfacing, but then again this is the man that called the Fort
Hood Massacre nothing but workplace violence.
As more and more Republicans, and even some Democrats in a
sign of bi-partisan unity, are raising questions and demanding answers, Obama continues
to deliberately and calculatingly play down the attack, saying his public account
changes as a result of our intelligence agencies gathered more details about
the attack.
The only problem is that the FBI has NOT even started
investigating yet.
So where is he getting these supposed ‘new’ details
from...from the very governments of those out to kill us.
Now enter center stage Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. After Obama, she’s in this up to her eyeballs for her lies and direct involvement in hiding the truth as to why the
State Department did not do more (hell, they did NOTHING) to protect Ambassador
Stevens and the others is now public knowledge.
And what of UN Ambassador Susan Rice...was she deliberately sacrificed
to cover for Obama and Clinton when she said, "What happened initially was that it was
a spontaneous reaction . . . as a consequence of the video, that people
gathered outside the embassy and then it grew very violent."
Did Rice really believe her own words or was she taking the
fall for Obama and Clinton, who, unabashedly continued to blame the video for
the violence just to divert attention away from their unconscionable failure to
secure the consulate against a forewarned jihadist attack.
I believe Obama and Clinton knowingly, and with intended
malice, deliberately sacrificed Rice to save their own butts from being held
accountable. And we all know that Barack
HUSSEIN Obama will cavalierly use any and every one to obtain his
objective of a second term. But no
matter as Susan Rice should now resign her position, because she had NO right
spouting Obama’s or anybody’s rhetoric, or putting herself in the middle of an
affair of this magnitude. What she did
was NOT part of her duties and she clearly and knowingly overstepped her bounds
as our ambassador to the UN. A
statement should have been made by Barack HUSSEIN Obama in his capacity as
president, but obviously he couldn’t do that for he didn’t have his lies
straight at that point.
And even when his lies were in place, the problem for him
this time though is that four innocent American lives were lost when loud and clear
calls for help were ignored, as witnessed by the recently found seven-page
notebook/diary belonging to Ambassador Stevens with entries stating that he was
seriously concerned about the ‘never-ending’ security threats in Benghazi, and that
he was on an al-Qaeda hit list.
But instead of accepting responsibility for not taking
Ambassador Stevens’ pleas for help seriously, as any honorable
Commander-in-Chief would have done, Barack HUSSEIN Obama continues to
stonewall, blame others, and cover-up for his complete and total failure to
protect our diplomats in countries that hate us...they might NOT hate him their
muslim brother, but they sure as hell hate America.
And with that, the deaths of Ambassador Stevens’ and the
three other American’s remain on Barack HUSSEIN Obama’s hands with their blood
dripping onto Hillary’s also.
Can you say cover-up, unaccountability, and sacrificial
scapegoats...I sure can.

Kind of like all the information that was right in bush administrations face before 9/11? I'll take my chances with Obama considering the worst attack ever on American soil happened under the last republican we had in office.
ReplyDeleteWrong assumption as it was Bill Clinton's failure to truly retaliate for the Cole and the first WTC bombing that led to 9/11 NOT due to any Republican. A series of terrorist attacks targeting American interests was met with tough talk from Clinton but little action, according to terrorism experts asked to analyze the U.S. response to attacks between 1993 and 2000. This is where the blame lies...with Bill Clinton.
ReplyDeleteDiane...you are so right! GW takes the blame for the mess Clinton left him and the gavels of Pelousi and Reid...and of course Obama too! At least you are not anonymous!
ReplyDeleteYes, it was Clinton that caused this mess and people need to realize and understand this. As for posting anonymously...that is something I will NEVER do, because if you do not have the guts and courage to stand by your convictions then you are a coward and a hypocrite...both something I will NEVER be.
DeleteSo you are blaming clinton for the debacle we called the bush administration but when but it is ridiculous to blame bush for the state of our economy? LOL such hypocrites. Yea the lack of security and lack of initiative to do anything when everyone was telling the bush administration what was about to happen can be blamed on an attack in 1993? LOL
ReplyDeleteUntil you stop hiding behind the moniker of 'anonymous' all I have to say to you is, 'whatever'...And BTW, GWB did a hell of a job in the aftermath of 9/11 during very trying times. Billy-Boy would have just bloviated and done NOTHING!
Delete