By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor /
Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
"As to those who reject faith,
I will punish them with terrible agony in this world and in the
Hereafter, nor will they have anyone to help."
- qur'an (3:56)
As we come to the end of
Ramadan...islam's holy month of “fasting” from dawn to
dusk...the acts of terrorism committed during this supposed time of
reflection and piousness increases as each day passes proving once
again that islam is anything but a religion of peace....proving once
again that islam seriously needs to undergo a reformation.
And while we civilized folks surely
know this as truth, what many don't understand is that for any sort
of religious reformation to take place islam also needs a societal
reformation even more so for without changing its societal norms
islam will remain mired down in antiquated beliefs, taboos, and
mindsets straight out of the the 7th century. And this goes way
beyond just learning how to set aside the idea that islam will conqueror the world...it won't...but actually might make it easier
for muslims to not only be accepted into 21st century society, but to
live in it as productive members of what we call the civilized world.
"Fighting
is prescribed for you, and ye dislike it. But it is
possible that ye dislike a thing which is good for you, and that ye
love a thing which is bad for you. But Allah knoweth, and ye know
not." - qur'an (2:216)
A reformation is surely needed for what
is islam but a pseudo-religion replete with a set of rules and
dictates its followers must live by or die by...rules and dictates masquerading as religious tenets based more upon violence than upon
what is considered pious and holy... just look to the actions of
today's jihadis to give testament to that...just look to islam's
violent history itself where violence is more times than not deemed
virtuous. And yet not all of the ongoing violence is motivated by the
qur'an alone...the individual quest for wealth, unbridled power, and
of course unquestioning control must be added into the mix. But
any violent acts committed in the name of islam...in the name of
allah...must not be divorced, if you will, from the qur'an itself for
the call to violence and the justification for said violence is
clearly stated time and again in this, what we infidels consider to
be the most unholy of books.
But for islam to be reformed muslims
must first acknowledge that islam has an inherent “personality
flaw”...a flaw that makes it even more dangerous than the
actual passages written down in the qur'an for muslims in general
feel that they alone are the perpetual “victims” of what
the modern western world considers today's “correct”
societal norms... societal norms that go against the very tenets of
islam as well as the teachings and the life of Mohammad...the very
7th barbarian today's islamists pattern themselves after. And
“victimhood” plays well
into the islamist agenda of violence.
“If you fear highhandedness from
your wives, remind them [of the teaching of God], then ignore them
when you go to bed, then
hit them.
If they obey you, you have no right to act against them. God is most
high and great.“
- qur'an (4:34)
And nowhere is that violence and
victimhood better seen than within some of the verses of the qur'an
itself...verses that force today's muslim women to relive the nuances
of a barbaric and brutal past where their basic human rights barely
existed and where they were but the property of men to be obeyed
without question. Violence in the form of a society where women were
but slaves to men...women suffering and beaten into submission until
the very spark of life...the essence of life itself...was
extinguished from within them.
So while their violent past cannot be
changed, today we see muslim women who no longer want to be victims
daring to defy and speak out against the brutality and mindset that bore witness to their maternal ancestors sorry lot in life. And yet that
violence is still being visiting upon them...violence in the form of
rape, torture, stoning, flogging, and even death as such things
remain embedded within the qur'an as not only acceptable behavior for
muslim men but mandated behavior to be used against muslim women who
have no tangible way of fighting back.
And only through true reformation can
the violent mindset of muslim men towards muslim women be changed.
So as the muslim invasion of the West
in the name of diversity remains ongoing, and does so without even a
hint of any reformation to come, islam's violent and barbaric
behavior towards women...all women whether they be muslim or not...continues on. Lacking the know-how of critical
thinking, reasoning, and the all-out courage needed to break free
from a past whose mindset is the antithesis of today's mindset,
muslim men still see women not as their equal but as their beasts of
burden to be done with as they so choose.
But it gets worse as the need for
societal reformation grows even stronger for as bad as it is for
muslim women, muslim girl children see their
childhood being lost to depravity of the very worst kind. How so...as
per the qu'ran muslim men are allowed up to four wives each, and
those wives need not be at the “age of consent.” In islam
a girl child can be married and see the marriage consummated at
basically any age, thus the qur'an not only invokes
pedophilia...child rape...as an accepted norm as much today as it did
over 1400 years ago, but it actually is a guidebook into the ways of
pedophilia. A major societal “abnormal” surely in need of
immediate reforming.
An
example of such depravity can be seen in qur'an: (65:1, 4), “O
Prophet, when you [and the believers] divorce women, divorce them for
their prescribed waiting—period and count the waiting—period
accurately...(4)And if you are in doubt about those of your women who
have despaired of menstruation, (you should know that) their waiting
period is three months, and the
same applies to those who have not menstruated as yet.As for pregnant women, their period ends when they have
delivered their burden.”
“Not menstrated
yet”...pedophilia thy name is islam for even in muslim
countries today a young girl child can be given by her father to an
old man in marriage with the
husband being legally able to consummate said marriage when the girl
reaches nine years of age. Fifty-year old Mohammad married Aisha when
she was but six years old and consummated the marriage when she was
nine... seems like what was good for Mohammad remains good for all
muslim men today no matter that societal norms have thankfully
evolved and greatly changed since the 7th century, most especially in regards
to pedophilia.
But sadly, the “age of consent”
in countries like Sudan, for example,
still allows child marriage of girls as young as ten while South
Sudan, Saudi Arabia, Equatorial Guinea, Gambia, Somalia and
Yemen...muslim countries all...have no legal restrictions whatsoever
on a minimum age for marriage thus allowing child marriage and
pedophilia to continue on...Mohammad would be so proud.
And this nightmare of stolen
childhoods...one of the major touchpoints regarding the need for
islam's reformation...is but one abomination now slowly making inroads
into the very countries who are allowing muslim immigration, or
should I say invasion, to continue on unchecked. And while islam
itself does not allow for assimilation instead dictating that its
host countries bend to islam's ways, what's even sadder is that
reformation of islam is not what muslims in general think is needed
in order for islam to thrive in today's world.
And why don't muslims want islam
reformed...because unlike Martin Luther's Protestant reformation which helped to
dissolve the Catholic hierarchy's hold over Europe, islam has
no hierarchy per se...no central authority at which to rebel
against...so why fix what they see as not being broken even though
militant nationalism and religious
fundamentalism has overwhelmingly deemed muslims to be morally
superior to we infidels, and thus we must either be absorbed into the
islamic fold or simply be destroyed.
Figuring we in the West would
deem it better to bend to islam than be destroyed by islam, we have
allowed the subjugating mindset of the sharia...islamic law...to not
only creep into our halls of government but also into our daily
lives...examples of which can be seen by the very fact that burkas
and hajibs have become more accepted and commonplace; that the muslim
call to prayer can indeed shut down our busy streets with no
questions asked; and that mosques and sharia courts are now sprouting
up like weeds throughout Western lands...sadly even here in America.
And this leaves muslims to feel
why the need for reformation, whether it be societal reformation or
religious reformation, when we infidels are already blindly and
unknowingly bending to islam's ways.
Why indeed...because if islam
does not willingly reform it will be islam that goes like a "lamb to
the slaughter" for no religion...even a pseudo-religion...can or will survive indefinitely by the ways of the sword alone. Eventually an uprising
will evolve from within islam itself as violence, intolerance, and subjugation can only be sustainable in both dollars and blood for just
so long, thereby leaving reformation itself as the naturally occurring
outcome. One just has to look to Judaism and Christianity to see that
as the ultimate truth.
"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and
His messenger and strive to make mischief in the land is only this,
that they should be murdered or crucified or their hands and their
feet should be cut off on opposite sides or they should be
imprisoned; this shall be as a disgrace for them in this world, and
in the hereafter they shall have a grievous chastisement."
- qur'an (5:33)
Simply, islam without reformation best not look in the mirror for the evil
and vile reflection staring back will see islam in the end as the recipient of God's punishment not we of allah's even if it means we
pick up the sword again.
Copyright @ 2019 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.
****************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest
article,Politburo Rising.
******************************************************************************************************* RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Friday, May 31st, from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio,
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig
Andresen and Diane Sori discuss '7th Century Norms in a 21st Century World'; 'Politburo Rising'; and important news of the day.
Investigative Report Notre Dame Burns...Conspiracy Debunked By: Diane Sori and Craig Andresen / Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio Author's Note: This article is solely about the man in the video and NOT about who did or did not start the Notre Dame fire. The opinions and conclusions expressed within are ours alone. “Paris is beheaded,” so said Pierre-Eric Trimovillas as he watched the spire come crashing down, and yet the white cross remained unscathed...a beacon of hope against the cathedral's ruins...God's hand perhaps.
And so it stood the test of time and bore witness to some of history's most monumental moments. Joan of Arc was beatified there; French kings were crowned within its majestic hall; Napoleon declared himself emperor there in 1804; the French revolution did it little harm; and neither World War I nor World War II would see to its demise. It was restored, renovated, and repaired over the centuries many times over as one would expect a now 850-year old building to be, and done so with little to no problems arising.
But that all changed last Monday when around 6:43 p.m. local French time fire alarms sounded at the Cathedral of Notre Dame...a testament to both French Gothic architecture and more importantly to the Holy Roman Catholic Church itself. The cathedral is a Paris landmark situated on an island within the city's center, an island called the Île de la Cité, an island surrounded by the River Seine. Completed around 1260 A.D., the Cathedral of Notre Dame (the Cathedral of Our Lady) is a landmark from which all destination points in Paris emanate..."Point Zero” the Parisians call it.
And a structure as majestic as this cathedral...a structure honoring the years Roman Catholicism has been a French mainstay...deserves better treatment than she is getting now for the conspiracies concerning the fire are doing more harm to Christianity itself than even that which the Crusaders tried to undue. And while the media and the French government can do little to debunk the conspiracy nonsense...at least not right now...maybe RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS can.
But first the good news...as per France's junior Interior Minister Laurent Nunez, the outer stone structure of Notre Dame itself has been both “saved and preserved” despite the spire and roof being consumed by flames and collapsing, and despite the massive interior damage to the main sanctuary hall.
So let's start with what we know, as in the Cathedral of Notre Dame...now owned by the French State and not the Catholic Church as many assume...has been undergoing restorations for some time...age does take its toll on all things after all. And it's a $6.8 million restoration with part of the work being clearly visible around the cathedral's central 750 ton spire...ground zero from which many believe the fire emanated from. In fact, local Paris TV network BFM-TV was the first to report that the fire was “possibly linked” to the oak “covered in lead” spire's renovation, and thus began within the wooden rafters surrounding it. But the fact is that no actual work was being done, renovations wise, at that time the fire broke out as the scaffolding was still in the process of being assembled...nor were there any workers on the roof itself or on the scaffolding in the hour leading up to the fire. And besides, no sources of electricity or any construction equipment that could start a fire were allowed on or even near the roof for fear of starting a fire due to the roof's ancient wood composition.
But with no workers or construction equipment being anywhere near the fire's supposed point of origin how exactly did the fire start? But before we get into that let's go over want we do know. First, unbeknownst to many is that actually two fire alarms had gone off...the first being at 6:23 p.m...20 minutes before the second alarm when smoke and flames were actually seen. And while those worshiping inside the main sanctuary had been ushered out along with sightseers and most of the staff, a church official is reported to having gone up into the attic after the first alarm was sounded out of fear that the “lattice of ancient wooden beams” known as “the forest”*...actually a crisscrossed grid of timber trusses that add structural integrity to the cathedral and its roof...no evidence of fire or of a fire being eminent was found...evidence such as the attic being unusually hot or the wood beams being hot to the touch. And yet just a mere 23 minutes later the entire attic was ablaze along with much of the roof itself and the spire was engulfed in flames.
And of note here is the fact that no significant show of firefighters were stationed at the historic cathedral after the first alarm went off...just to be on the safe side if you will as the Cathedral of Notre Dame is a French historical treasure. And yet 500 firefighters assembled on scene after the second alarm was sounded as fire was now visibly noted. That bad call in judgment the French government and corresponding fire departments must surely answer for, for if there had been more firefighters on scene as soon as the first alarm was sounded, the damage done to “Our Lady” might not have been as extensive as it is now.
So how exactly did the refereed to as an “accidental” fire start? Did the fire start near the rafters surrounding the spire and spread outward from there as was first reported or somehow did the fire start within the attic itself working its way outward to the rafters and spire with the barrel roof acting as a funnel of sorts...sucking and drawing the flames to the small opening in the roof where the work was being done on the spire? Or could the fire have been linked to a computer glitch or to a malfunction in the temporary elevators used in the renovation work as some seem to suggest? But maybe it was just a simple electrical fire caused by a short circuit, the very theory that as we write this is now believed to be the most likely cause.
Theories abound, and while it will take time to find the definitive cause of the fire, maybe Jean-Michel Leniaud, the president of the scientific council at the National Heritage Institute, said it best when he stated that, “What happened was bound to happen. The lack of real upkeep and daily attention to such a major building is the cause of this catastrophe.” And why...because Notre Dame and many other historical buildings of antiquity are nowhere near up to current fire code, as are the more modern historical buildings.
So now before we take on the widely disseminated video that seems to be ground zero of all the conspiracy theories that are now making the rounds...theories as to the fire's origin....lets first visit France's recent past for a bit and see how that adds fuel to the conspiracy fire.
Fact: the Cathedral of Notre Dame is but the latest in a series of attacks on France's Roman Catholic churches...attacks that for the most part went under reported or not reported on at all. Within the past four years literally hundreds of French churches have been vandalized many with fires started, in fact, this past February alone saw ten incidents of vandalism and desecration occurring. On February 5th an alter cloth was set on fire with crosses and statues being torn down and disfigured at Saint-Alain Cathedral in Lavaur. And then just a day later on February 6th vandals at a Catholic church in Nimes entered the sanctuary, throwing the consecrated hosts on the ground and drew a cross on the wall in human excrement. And on February 9th acts of vandalism was reported at the Church of Notre-Dame de Dijon in Côte-d’Or.
Then just a few weeks ago in late March, the St. Nicholas Catholic Church in Houilles, in north-central France, saw a statue of the Virgin Mary being smashed almost to the point of being beheaded while the altar cross was heavily damaged after having been thrown on the ground and obviously stomped on.
And not to be forgotten is that during this year's Lent, a major incident occurred when Paris' second most famous church, Saint-Sulpice church...a church built in the 17th century upon foundations dating back to the Middle Ages...suddenly caught fire after mid-day mass while four parishioners were still inside. And while no one was hurt and with firefighters able to bring the blaze under control fairly quickly, there remained some serious damage done to the church's stained glass windows and to a stairway leading up to the second floor.
And it was that particular fire that some see Saint-Sulpice as being a forerunner...a test if you will... leading up to the Holy Week destruction at Notre Dame. And why...because the a fore mentioned past coupled with the here-and now-video has led many people to believe what we feel is the wrong truth.
Now as for the original video in question, and before we get into the critical details, there are a few things we need to make clear regarding said video. First, the video was shot near dusk so it was made in lower light conditions. Second, there is a blue haze to it resulting from the fire's smoke. Third, the video, recorded by a bystander, was shot from a distance thus limiting the extent of clarity, sharpness, and detail that would normally be available. And lastly, the video was most likely taken with a cell phone which means it was done without the use of any high definition professional piece of equipment.
Due to those just stated factors along with the fact that there are some things we cannot discern from the video, there are most certainly some things that we can definitively tell you regarding this video.
And so we began the process of doing a “forensic” autopsy of not just the original video but a newly found close-up video that came to our attention. First, we developed a list of possibilities for who that person walking along the exterior balcony of the right bell tower could be, so let’s take those possibilities one at a time.
Could it be a firefighter? We can see, and so too can you see, that the person is wearing what appears to be light colored clothing, and the sleeves appear to be dark…most likely black, The person’s head has a light, possibly white covering, and the lower part of the person’s face appears to have either a dark beard, or some sort of dark covering that extends down to about the mid-chest.
After poring through literally hundreds upon hundreds of photos of firefighters from both Paris specifically and from France in general, we found absolutely no firefighters whose gear even remotely came close to what is seen as the garb on the person in this video. Also, firefighters are geared up, and any firefighter on or near a burning structure would be geared up, and they have a certain gait when they walk. Their movements always appear bulky and somewhat restricted. As can plainly be seen in the video, even with the video’s limitations, the person walking across that balcony has an unencumbered gait, and moves both swiftly and fluidly across the balcony and through the door.
Also bearing note...standard practice in any emergency situation for any firefighter when on or in a burning structure, is that they are never alone. The person in the video is very much alone. Given the garb, the gate, and the solitary presence of the person in the video we have been able to rule out it being a fire fighter.
Is it a Notre Dame priest? We pored through literally hundreds upon hundreds of images of Notre Dame priests, as well as Catholic priests from France and around the world, and found absolutely no Catholic vestments worn by priests anywhere which even remotely match what the person in the video is wearing. Also, at the time this video was made the Cathedral had been completely evacuated, thus we have ruled out the notion that the person in the video is a priest.
Could it be a police officer? Once again, hundreds upon hundreds of Parisian and French police photos reveal no match or even a close match to what the person in the video was wearing, and police would not be inside any part of that structure while the fire was blazing.
Could this have been anyone trying to remove artifacts? Again, the building had been evacuated hours before this video was taken, and we know this because in the raw video we can see water being poured into the burning part of the structure behind the bell tower. We know that it took two hours from the time the fire was initially reported before water began to flow through the fire hoses, and we know that the building was empty save for the few who were getting artifacts out of the main part of the structure.
Further negating the notion that this could have been someone retrieving artifacts is the fact that the person in the video is on an upper balcony of the right bell tower, and there were never any artifacts other than the bells themselves, weighing several tons each, in the bell towers.
For the next phase of our analysis of both videos, we asked ourselves...what good reason would someone have to be on that bell tower balcony during the fire. And there were good reasons as in to look for "hot spots"... examine the bell tower structure...assess the support system for the bells themselves, to name but a few.
However, there also were bad reasons to be in that place at that time, and we couldn’t discount either of those two possibilities.
At this point, everything seemed to be pointing toward nefarious actions, and as we said before, with all the churches in France over the past four years that have been vandalized or destroyed by today’s most infamous of bad actors, we were almost ready to make our determination, especially since we like so many others at first glance questioned the clothing worn by the man in the video.
So let's talk about that clothing for a bit and what it seemed to be, as in the common garb worn by muslim men, a garb called a “thobe” replete with long sleeves, and such a black garment could clearly be seen in the video close-up. Also, commonly worn by muslim men is an outer garment over said "thobe," a sleeveless vest or shawl if you will...again seemingly clearly visible in the video. And then there's the white head covering, what appears to be either a “taqiyah” hat or a “kufi” skull cap along with a shadow indicating a backpack or pouch of some sort strapped onto the man's back. And dare we forget the shadow running from his face to mid-chest...a beard perhaps or even a coward's mask both the calling card of a certain group of folks that have no love for we whom they call “infidels.”
But before we would even consider jumping on the conspiracy bandwagon there was one possibility that had to be investigated...a possibility most refused to even consider, as in could the man in the video have been a construction worker or an engineer of some sort?
Remember, as we previously stated there were no construction workers reported to have been working on the structure when the fire broke out, and besides there was no construction or renovation taking place in the bell towers themselves. Philippe Villeneuve, the architect-in-chief of the “Monuments Historiques,” the administration that maintains and repairs monuments in France, and the man in charge of the Notre Dame project, made it quite clear that, “Work had not started yet, scaffoldings were still being built.”
Furthermore, Julien Le Bras, the head of the company that was building the actual scaffolding (Europe Echafaudage) said, “All I can say for the time being is that at the moment of the fire, absolutely none of the employees of my company was present on site.”
And that’s a key thing...“at the moment of the fire…” none of his employees was present…but the video that kick-started the conspiracy was shot well into the fire. Did anyone from a construction company go up onto that bell tower walkway to check on the bell towers or on the supports that held the multi-ton bells, and if so would that person’s garb be a match for what we can see in the hazy video?
After a lot of research, we discovered that the answer to that question is...yes.
The next day, as construction workers (and engineers) began to ascend the bell tower to assess the damage to the structure and to the bell supports themselves, a lone photograph caught our eye. The image, crisp and clear in the light of a new day, clearly showed several men making the necessary assessments, and a couple of them were wearing orange vests. Remember, while the original video is very hazy and was taken both in lower light conditions as well as from a greater distance presumably on a cell phone, certain things are what they are.
First, let’s look more closely at the man in the orange vest at the bottom right of the image. Orange vest, white hat, black shirt. It seems like two out of the three criteria for the garb worn by the man in the video.
Now the man in the video is surely facing to the right, while the construction worker in the orange vest is facing more to the left, so we flipped the image. Notice now the very similar shape of the hat and the very similar shape and size of what many saw in the video as being either a black beard or black cloth covering the face. But the orange vest on the construction worker is really what sticks out and it should because it’s a safety vest...but...that video is both low in contrast, and low in color saturation due to both the distance and the smoke. So our next step in the investigation was to remove a good deal of the contrast and remove nearly all the color saturation from the construction worker's image, and all of a sudden that orange vest turned very light indeed.
Resizing the video still and placing it next to the flipped and color altered construction worker image revealed that both men were the same height, same width, same build and wearing what is absolutely the same garb...thus making both men one and the same person.
But even now yet another video is making the rounds helping to fan the
flames of conspiracy. That video, from a webcam overlooking Notre Dame,
shows someone walking near the spire and a flash. The conspiracy is
that whoever that person was lit a device that started the fire. Given
what we have been able to discern regarding the original video, and
given that in the closer version of the “flash” video, the flash is square and there is no fire at the time that person is on camera. Our belief is that the person in the “flash”
video is part of the renovation team taking photographs to be used as
reference during the renovation project and is using professional equipment which would
account for the square nature of the flash itself.
So the bottom line is this, after having extensively examined all the videos in question, after having sorted through all the possibilities one by one, including putting what happened at Notre Dame into the proper context of similar occurrences happening in France within the past week, the past few months, and over the past four years, while discerning every bit we could regarding the person seen in that hazy, fuzzy video, we have arrived at the most probable conclusion, and we did so no matter that all French officials rushed to judgment that the fire at Notre Dame was an accident.
And it was their rush to judgment that led many people to rush to a very different conclusion...a conclusion based upon a video combined with a history of church arson in France...a conclusion reached in error that it was a muslim "supposedly" seen on the balcony who did it.
The official line remains that the fire at Notre Dame was a terrible accident, and while a thorough investigation into the exact cause will take a good deal of time, and we may well never know the exact cause, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS, after an exhaustive investigation, can say with confidence that the man in the hazy video had nothing whatsoever to do with the fire...propaganda be damned.
And that is at least one conspiracy theory we hope is finally debunked.
___________________________________________________________________ *Each beam of the cathedral attic’s wooden frame was made from 1300 individual trees thus giving it the nickname "the forest."
Tuesday, April 23rd from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio,RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori present their Investigative Report: Notre Dame Burns...Conspiracy Debunked; and important news of the day.
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor /
Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
The
Day is Coming
(Lebanese song in support of
Palestine)
“O occupiers, leave my land… Leave, leave, leave
The day is coming, the day is coming when you will leave And
Palestine will return to being the bride of the Arabs… I’m
prepared to sacrifice my blood for [Palestine], This is my
land, and the land of my forefathers, We own the cause.”
Such a lovely sentiment it most certainly is not yet a sentiment that has become the Palestinians battle cry.
“Israel will not be able to live in peace and security as
long as we do not achieve our legal rights...our people will not
accept any deal other than the deal of return to its land”
- Fatah Spokesman in Al-Hayat Al-Jadida, the Official PA daily
(April 6, 2018)
Both the wishes of islamists...not of all Arabs nor of all
muslims...but surely the wishes of each and every true Israel-hating
islamist. The Levant and return of the final Caliphate (the Mahdi) is
their goal and nothing else will do as they work daily on pushing forward
their propaganda that Israel must be removed from the map...that Israel must be forever pushed into the sea.
Removed from the map indeed. In fact, just a few years ago an
atlas specifically designed for schools in the Middle East actually
omitted the Jewish State of Israel from the map. The map, part of a
HarperCollins atlas that was to be used by grade schoolers...nothing
like starting the hate Jews indoctrination young...showed Jordan and
Syria extending all the way to the Mediterranean Sea with Gaza and
the West Bank clearly labelled, but showing no Israel at all. In
trying to defend their map HarperCollins claimed that the decision to
exclude Israel reflected “local preferences,” meaning that
if they had included Israel it would have been “unacceptable”
to their Gulf (muslim) customers. And while worldwide criticism was
intense with the publisher being forced to totally scrap this
particular map, a dangerous foreboding came to fruition as what
Israel fears most easily happened with just a “sign-off stroke”
of the company chairman's business pen.
Wiping Israel off the map most definitely remains the islamists and their
anti-Semitic, anti-Zionist, condoners goal. A lofty goal indeed what
with Israel having 350+ 'little friends' at their disposal that they
will rightfully use if need be...just as we would if faced with the
possibility of total annihilation. And that's a possibility Israel
faces daily...or does it...as new relationships with more moderate
Arab states are now being forged...as new relationships are growing
between Israel, Russia, and China as well. And dare we forget that America
once again has Israel's back thanks to President Donald Trump and
that Israel has our back thanks to Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
So while the harbingers of all-out war can be witnessed in
certain areas of the Middle East...especially in regards to Israel
and with the now in Syria both proxy and extremist Iranian fighters...an army of fighters 80,000 strong...a new
region-wide war appears as a very likely possibility. And while Iran does think
they can win such a war...the truth is they cannot especially when
America will come riding in on the proverbial "white horse" to help
Israel win said war. But again if truth be told...as it always must be...it's Iran alone who remains the
region's true destabilizing force for it's Iran alone who is actively
pushing for Israel's demise...good little islamists the ruling
mullahs are...and it's the Iranian regime alone who really needs to be gone.
But wishing Israel gone is not something new as can be witnessed
by history itself, for hating the Jewish people is hating the land of
Israel as well...the very land that truly belongs to the Jewish
people's history alone. All other people's claims to that land came
after God Our Father gave said land to the Jews.
And while over the centuries Jews both thrived and lost claim to
the land given to them by God, it all came to a head in 1948 when
from the rubble of the Holocaust the modern day Jewish State of Israel
was born...born via a U.N. mandate they now wish they could take back
but legally simply cannot.
But let's play devil's advocate for a minute and say that against
all odds what if modern Israel courtesy of a war with Iran truly is
no more...what would Middle East reality look like today with Israel
not on the map?
Simply, Israel's now developed and tended to lush green and
fertile lands would become desert again...as muslim men, for the
most part, are a lazy lot so not willing to do the hard work needed
to keep the lands fertile and green. After all, terrorism alone is
what most muslim men do...being skilled in the fields of education,
business, trade, agriculture, medicine, and technology are as foreign
to them and as is their “it's all about killing infidels”
mindset being their daily norm. And with their all-consuming hatred
and scapegoating of Israel giving self-perceived meaning to their
miserable lives, this would translate into what was once thriving
Israel becoming nothing but additional acreage they willingly turned
back into a cesspool...a 7th century cesspool not unlike that from
which islam was born...albeit a cesspool with even more 21st century
weapons than the islamists already have now.
Democracy and freedom would now obviously not exist anywhere in the
Middle East what with Israel gone while even more of our taxpayer
dollars would still be funneled to Arab countries that don't like us
very much...this time being used as out-and-out bribe monies to help
keep 'them' over there instead of 'them' coming over here. And the
mullahs in Iran would most probably now be sitting as lord and master over all the region's
muslim lands; and the still ongoing muslim invasion of Europe would
finally reach its completion as the five-times-a-day so very annoying muslim
call to prayer would not just ring from mosque spires but would now
ring from Christian church bells as well.
So while some continue to insist that with Israel...the "Little Satan"...gone there would be regional peace as all the Middle Eastern
lands would now be muslim, nothing could be farther from the truth as
Shi'ite and Sunni muslims simply do not get along and never will.
Bloody muslim on muslim killings would surely continue on; the sharia
would become the singular and total rule of law; and with the Jews
finally gone the islamists would come for any and all Christians that
happen to be left in the lands they once called home.
And in addition to all this Arab economies would most likely
collapse as trading with the West would likely come to a screeching
halt if Israel was gone; and the goats, donkeys, camels and sheep would
be cowering in their stalls. The left hand would still be used for
the toilet, the right for preparing and eating food; while young girl
children with swollen pregnant bellies would now be so proudly paraded
around by vile old men as their self-perceived rightful marriage prize won. And older burka
'garbage bag' clad women confined to their homes would most likely be
relegated to being nothing but sex slaves alone... forever remaining the chattel they
were before Israel was gone.
And most importantly of all there would still be no Palestinian
state for without Israel as a point of contention and with Arab
leaders never really caring about their own brethren's sorry lot in life, the
'so-called' Palestinians would be forced to filter back into the
general Arab population and simply with time being absorbed and finally
just fading away until they were all but gone.
So when all is said and done, the fact remains that lacking the
common enemy once known as Israel, Shi'ite v. Sunni tensions would
become heightened even more than they already are leaving muslim
government corruption, lack of economic progress, and islamic
fundamentalism remaining exactly as it was before Israel's demise.
And that in turn leaves the Middle East region remaining in an ongoing state of
perpetual war...just as it has been in since mohammad invented islam
way back in 632 AD.
Still remaining trapped under the weight of both greedy despots
and perverted tyrants, welcome to the muslim world with Israel finally becoming part of the sea.
And yet even with Israel gone the muslim world would then have to
find someone else to blame for their own, their leaders, and their
countries ever so miserable failures. And while they surely will continue to act out like a
spoiled 2-year old child in the throws of an all-consuming temper tantrum,
muslims would happily go on killing each other and any and all who they
perceive to be in their fundamentalist way. And they'd do so in the
name of allah...their made-up god who commands them via the unholy
qur'an to play army while the countries of the civilized world cower in fear of being
next on Iran's annihilation hit list.
But with the above stated scenario being only a 'what if' in the
earlier mentioned game of devil's advocate, what it all boils down to
is this...can Iran finish off what Hitler started and come for
us...the "Great Satan"...next...with the answer being only if we and the
world continue to look away to the true threat Iran possess while refusing
to act until it's too late.
Copyright @ 2018 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved. ********************************************************************************************************************************* For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article Liberals Defending the Indefensible
******************************************************************************************************* RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Tuesday, May 22nd from 7 to 9pm EST on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS
Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'What If There Was No Israel'; 'Liberals Defending the Indefensible'; and important news of the day.
Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history
Friday, December 1, 2017
Op-ed: The Reality of Reformation vs. Jihad By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor /
Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
Last week islamic terrorism...as in jihad...visited Egypt and by now
the 305 victims of the North Sinai Al-Rawdah mosque massacre have
been laid to rest...laid to rest as Egypt continues to mourn their
husbands and wives, mothers and fathers, sisters and brothers, and 27
of the youngest of the young...all murdered at the hands of some of
their own.
“We’re in shock,” were the words of Cairo resident Mahmoud Ali...shock indeed.
The deadliest islamist attack of jihad in Egypt’s modern history
comes replete with questions as to why and in whose name such carnage
was committed. Reports out of Egypt have some saying that the attack was
carried out because most of the worshipers at Friday's prayers were
Sufi muslims and also because the mosque itself is believed by many to be
the birthplace of Sheikh Eid al-Jariri, a Sufi cleric considered the
founder of Sufism in the Sinai Peninsula. And with Sufism being a
sub-group of islam that ISIS specifically targets for death because
of their belief in islamic mysticism coupled with their belief in
saints...saints in this case being someone 'marked' by special divine
favor...and with saints equaling idolatry in the eyes of
islamists...this has afforded ISIS their believed right to tag Sufis
as being followers of the wrong type of islam and thus worthy of
death.
Sadly, this sounds a bit like a certain group of the world's
Christians who while in no way eschew violence still sees them
vocally condemning or worse...ignoring the plight of their fellow
Christians for not believing exactly as they or their church do. Just something to ponder over a bit I think.
And yet others are saying that the reason for the gun and grenade
attack...where the words “allahu-akbar” were repeated over
and over again...has more to do with the mosque's North Sinai
location than with exactly who worshiped there. In fact, a local affiliate
of ISIS...whose flag bearing the words “There is no God but
Allah and Muhammad is his prophet” the 25 or so attackers
carried and who surrounding the mosque blocking any possible escape
from windows and doors...has been using this specific area for quite
some time as a prime base for insurgency...for acts of jihad...that spread from the Suez Canal eastwards to the Gaza Strip and on to
Israel proper...with Sinai being a security nightmare for Egypt ever
since Egypt and Israel became 'partners in peace' if you will.
So while Egyptian warplanes carried out air strikes on targets
believed linked to the attack...air strikes ordered by President Abdel
Fattah al-Sisi himself...other Arab leaders are trying to play down
or simply ignore the root cause of the jihadi's attack. And one such
individual is Saudi Crown Prince Mohmmed bin Salman Abdulaziz Al
Saud, who while vehemently condemning the physical aspects of the
attack also said that, “The biggest threat from terrorism and
extremism is not only killing innocent people and spreading hate, but
tarnishing the reputation of our religion and distorting our
belief...” as in the misplaced
belief that islam is a religion of peace...a misplaced belief that
ignores the fact that the islamists are using the very words
of the qur'an and the teachings of islam itself to not just justify
violence and terrorism but to execute and then excuse said actions as
well.
And while the media downplays these acts of terrorism... these acts of jihad...as they
occur more and more often... almost to the point of becoming
routine...two questions remain as to how and even if these attacks can
ever be stopped. And know that the answer to both questions is really quite simple
for unless islam undergoes a true reformation these attacks will
surely continue and the bodies...bodies of both we infidels and muslims
alike...will keep piling up.
But how can islam be reformed if islam's religious leaders do not
want reform...it would take away their choke hold over the muslim
populace after all...and how can islam leave 7th century ideologies
in the past and enter the 21st century present when it's muslims
themselves who are afraid to speak up...let alone afraid to speak out.
And really how can islam be reformed when reformation means changing
the actual core doctrine of islam from within not just toning down or
prettying up the words in the qur'an, the Sira, and the Haddith,
which the faithful would never allow what with qur'an 3:7
stating that, “No one knows the true interpretation except
Allah...but those firm in knowledge say “we believe in it, all of
it is from our Lord.” Changing those key words would be like
asking Christians and Jews to change their core belief in the one
true living God of us all.
So can you reform islam when islam as an entity is neither
flexible nor open to reform...especially in the way Christianity and
Judaism were reformed...simply you cannot...not in the classic sense
of both rejection and modification of doctrine and practices. And why
not... because while both Christianity and Judaism started out as a
religion and then became a political force with reformation returning
them to their religious roots, islam never was a religion per se, so
reforming islam means islam must shed all its political ideologies and
for the first time become a true religion...a religion where the
truly devout retreat into personal piety...if islam is to survive in
today's more secular world.
In other words, islam cannot be islam as
it exists today. And besides, being that there is no central body of control in
islam...no central religious hierarchy or authority to speak of that
can issue such a dictate...like the Pope in Roman Catholicism can
do...true reformation as we in the West consider reformation becomes highly
unlikely.
And why is it unlikely...because while Christianity's reformation, as
per religious scholars, led directly to the age of Enlightenment
which then in turn morphed into secularism and eventually into
Western-style democracy, reformation of islam's core tenets have
almost no chance of happening because chaos and especially jihad is
at the root of islam itself. Remember, Muhammad the nomad only became
Muhammad the prophet after he introduced and entwined both jihad and
politics into the basic tenets and doctrine of his creation called
islam...violent tenets and doctrine which in and of themselves prove
islam is not a religion but is the political ideology of a mad,
greedy, and perverted man who hid his desire for wealth, power, and
young girl children behind the guise of calling his personal wants a
religion.
So even if Muhammad's violence encrusted ideology that is islam
can be 'tempered down' so to speak, and the concept of religion as we
know and accept it is removed from the equation, only then can the
world's 1.8 billion muslims coexist with the civilized Western world,
albeit with certain major changes being made...changes as opposed to
reformation...changes that modify actions... changes that must take
place post-haste so that islam is no longer perceived as it is
rightfully perceived today...rightfully perceived as being nothing
but a breeding ground for angry, perverted, and violent men whose
goal is conquest through jihad, and who view women as chattel and who
use children in the most vile of ways.
And that change...if it is ever to occur...must start with a united,
cohesive, and oh so loud collective muslim voice demanding that
extremist mullahs no longer hold sway over muslim countries...no
longer hold sway over muslim peoples...even if that means some
muslims must die in the process of seeking freedom from mullahs who
think themselves a god. And know that with islam this change will not
be easy nor will it be clean...as in sometimes blood must be shed by
some to free the whole from the qur'an mandated call to jihad for
what is what we call islamic terrorism but jihad in action...and what
is jihad but the root cause of islam's woes. And if muslims do not
condemn jihad then muslims condone jihad...if muslims do not fight
back against jihad then muslims are but obedient slaves to the call
for jihad.
And after condemnation those collective muslim voices must also
publicly denounce, confront, and eliminate... yes eliminate by their
own hand...jihad focused groups... groups like ISIS, al-Qaeda, Boko
Haram, the February 17th Martyrs
Brigade, Hamas, Hezbollah, the Muslim Brotherhood,
etc...who are the main cause of their and islam's problems today.
Remember, successful acts off jihad afford islamic
terrorists...affords jihadis...the opportunity to commit such acts
time and time again as terrorism in the name of jihad feeds upon the
very conflict of conscience within the general non-violent muslim
population itself. And while angry words of condemnation alone spoken
against those committing such acts will not now or ever stop said
acts of jihad...nor will sanctions or American intervention...muslims
must accept as fact that only muslims fighting back against their own
kind will...that is if islam in any form is to survive at all.
And sadly, even if some limited change does touch the ideology
that is islam...does rebuke the concept of jihad... the bottom line is
that acts of jihad will indeed continue to happen simply because the
doctrine and tenets that define islam as it exists today continues to
afford all muslims this common ground of jihad by which they can
resist change. And this means that islam really cannot ever be
reformed...not in the way we in the Western world see and rightfully
demand islam be reformed...and without true reform...without even
simple change...islam has no place nor any right to exist in the civilized world. Copyright @ 2017 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Friday, December 1st from 7 to 9pm on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss possible islamic reformation; the rise of common core values; and the Kate Steinle murder verdict.
Hope you can tune in at: http://listen.samcloud.com/w/73891/American-Political-Radio#history
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
