Showing posts with label politicians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politicians. Show all posts

Monday, September 21, 2026

Just a Thought

This thought below is my (Diane Sori), thought  alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.or google.com   
[[[ This is the message I got from Trump and his people/organization this morning, and I quote: " I AM PRESI8DENT DONALD J. TRUMP. YOU'RE THE ONLY REASON WHY WE SAVED AMERICA. NOW I AM ASKING YOU TO CONSIDER MAKING A SMALL SUSTAINING CONTRIBUTION, SO WE CAN COMPLETE THE MAGA AGENDA. CAN I COUNT ON YOUR SUPPORT?'
 
As usual, Trump's support always seems to mean money, this time in yet another monthly donation, and of course I said NO and trashed the message, but NOT for the reason you might think. Why so then...because I truly believe America does NOT need money, Trump, or any one particular person or party to be made great again. We who are true American patriots have always believed that America was, is, and will always remain great NO matter the particular person or party in power. Why so...because we know well that America's greatness lies within the hearts, minds, and fortitude of "We the American People," and NOT within the ever changing "body politics" nor within politicians who constantly beg for money for this, that, or  the other thing.. 
 
Money does NOT and never will buy America's greatness, but positive actions surely will...actions NOT instituted solely for one's political or one's party's gain, but actions that serve the sum total of  "We the American People" well. But as long as the mindset of many remains solely focused on Trump's MAGA vision alone nothing will change, for how can you change something...as in America's greatness...that technically was never lost. Simply, you cannot...no need to say anything more. ]]]
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved.

Monday, May 25, 2026

Op-ed: 
Ignoring 'Separation of Church and State' 
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor                                                                                                      This an opinion piece, my opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com. 

“I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.”                                                                  - These were the words of America's original “Pledge of Allegiance” written on August 1892.* In it there was no mention of the word “God.”

Earlier this month, on Sunday May 17th, at the National Mall, our nation's capital hosted an event for folks to come together in “prayer, worship, and the reading of scripture” ahead of our nation’s “250th Birthday,” to “Rededicate our Nation to God.” And while there is nothing wrong with the saying of prayers for our nation, there surely is something wrong when the “rededicating” seems to be focused on but one particular religion's view of who and/or what“God” is.

Why so...because, in my opinion, a “rededication” of this type tries to put religion not just above what is our Constitutional rule of law, but also has a possibly dangerous undertone of trying to combine a given religious ideology with power...power manifesting in some folks wishing that our nation would become a modern day version of a Christian based theocracy.

And when the “Pledge of Allegiance” is thrown into this “rededication” mix we find religion itself actually encroaching upon “separation of church and state”...a founding principal of our nation...the very principal that defines who we are as both Americans and as a nation. Religious embellishments are not needed to define us for embellishments are not tangible nor proven facts, but instead, in this case, are but words of bravado masquerading behind a facade of pretending to be facts...a dangerous and at times divisive religious based “good vs. evil” scenario indeed.

And this is why I find it odd that certain “of name” politicians today... politicians who relish in wearing religion on their sleeve only when pandering for votes at or near election time...have suddenly embraced the “God rededication,” and hooked it into our nation's upcoming “250th Birthday” celebration. Simply, we as a nation do not need to “rededicate” ourselves to “God” for to “rededicate” means we were already “dedicated to God” which, in actuality, we as a nation never were.

And that, dear reader, is indeed a fact as witnessed by proven cause and effect scenarios that have played out in our nation's history itself. So here let's start with the fact that no matter what some say...no matter what some want to believe...the United States of America is not...I repeat not...a Christian nation nor was she ever intended to be a Christian nation. And while, in part, Christianity did help shape early American culture and ensuing morality, what was to become the actual legal framework for our nation was most decidedly secular in nature, and rightfully so as “separation of church and state,” was indeed a key factor in our nation's founding.

How so? Folks tend to forget, or simply chose to ignore the fact that a number of our great “Founders and Framers”...including Thomas Jefferson and James Madison...saw “separation of church and state” as actually being necessary to protect religious freedom, while at the same time helping to prevent government overreach into ones personal and/or religious life.

I do tend to think that both Jefferson and Madison believed then, as I have always believed, that when an individual’s private beliefs...religious or otherwise...invades what is to be civil governance that its intention is to be` divisive, and thus work to destroy instead of uniting “We the People” together.

And so these very wise men...and some modern day presidents as well (like JFK and Reagan) ...did deem
“separation” to be the means by which to help ensure a stable and more diverse “Republic”...a “Republic” for “all the people” free from the confines of what are truly overly religious zealots, rhetoric, dogma, and of course drama. And it's drama that today tends to see certain branches of the Evangelical movement entwining itself not only into partisan politics, but calling those who do not share their faith or their political beliefs “heretics, infidels, and evil,” while at the same time damning them to hell, of which I myself have been a target of.

And so the truth is that these men...these patriots...understood at the time of our nation's founding what we all should understand today, but foolishly many do not. And that is by keeping religion out of “secular” government it in turn should mean keeping government out of religion, Remember, our “Founders and Framers” hoped to assure that the new “Republic” being formed would never fall into the trap of, or morphing into, a theocracy...the very form of government that did not serve the “Old World” well...the very form of government some not so silently hope America would turn into today.

And it is this not understanding the logic behind the “separation” concept itself...coupled today with an unhealthy dose, for some, of what is but an indoctrinated fear of “hell and damnation”...that has led a multitude to want religion...in this case their particular version of only the Christian faith... brought openly back into both the public and political discourse, as well as into America's public schools.

And this is also one of the reasons why our “Founders and Framers” were so adamant in their “separation” convictions, so adamant that when the Constitution was being drafted these same men made sure that no one religion...Christianity included...was ever to become or even hope to become the official religion of our nation. And this is witnessed by the fact...yes fact...that the words “Christian,” “Jesus,” or “ God” appears nowhere in either the“Declaration of Independence” or in the “United States Constitution.” In fact, the only time an official document used the word “Christian” in relation to our new nation, was in the text of the 1797 “Treaty of Tripoli,” signed by then President John Adams which stated these exact words, “the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion.”

Don't believe me...go read those very documents for yourself...go research the actual religious beliefs and practices of those men who put pen to our founding papers for it will surely surprise you...apologies accepted...as will the fact that many of our “Founders and Framers” were actually “Deists,” and not Christians in what we today consider to be the classical sense. In fact, some famous “Deists” at the time of our nation's founding included the aforementioned Thomas Jefferson and James Madison, as well as Benjamin Franklin, Thomas Paine, John Adams (who outwardly rejected orthodox Christian doctrines like the “Trinity” and “original sin”), Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, and even George Washington himself who, while attending church is said to have avoided the key element of “communion.”

These men...again these patriots...did indeed have a more what was at the time called a “rationalist” approach to faith itself for they jointly rejected the so called “supernatural elements” of traditional Christianity while at the same time affirming a belief in what they deemed to be but a benevolent “Creator.” And said “Creator” remained unnamed...no words to the effect of “God” let alone “Jesus”...just the word “Creator” who they and their fellow “Deists” believed revealed himself through “acts of nature” solely driven by logic and simple reasoning alone. Sounds to me like our “Founders and Framers” were quite science driven in their thought processes...which again is why the words “Christian, Jesus, or God” appears nowhere in any of our founding documents.

And so here let me say that I personally do not believe or feel we need to “rededicate” our nation to “God”...to what is now being deemed by most to be only the Christian version of “God” meaning in the sense of “Jesus”...for I am not a Christian nor do I want to be one, but know I am not an atheist either. My personal religious beliefs are mine alone, I find no need to make them public for I believe one's religious beliefs, or lack thereof, should be between them, their “God,” and their conscience.

But I will say that as a Constitutional Republican I firmly believe in the “separation of church and state,” after all we as a nation never were officially dedicated to “God” in the first place, Constitutionally or otherwise. And the words “In God we Trust”...which appears on our paper currency...is in no way a “dedication,” but merely hope and wishes for divine protection...whatever protection that might be.

However, the words “a nation under God“ as stated in our in our current “Pledge of Allegiance” is not an issue, for it is not a “dedication” nor a “rededication” per se, for I see it as a “reaffirmation” to return our nation to the Constitution...the true law of our land...the very document whose words have been ignored and corrupted by too many for far too long. Word semantics I know, but sometimes word semantics do need both a semblance of justification and hence “reaffirmation.” Case closed.
__________________________________________ 
 
Footnote
 
* The Pledge of Allegiance was written in August 1892 by Baptist minister Francis Bellamy (1855-1931) who understood the importance and need for a separation between church and state, and was originally published in The Youth's Companion on September 8, 1892. 
 
Copyright @ 2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All Rights Reserved. 

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Op-ed:

The Business of Cancer...Political and Otherwise
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio
The article posted here is this authors opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com or Google. 

...With cancer being a “big business” in its own right, a cure would not only lead to a decline in what's called the “cancer treatment industry...which includes some major hospitals...but it would lead to substantial losses in both the pharmaceutical and the high priced healthcare industries in general. How so...since the need for cancer drugs and related services would no longer be needed, countless thousands of jobs would be lost which in turn would automatically put a strain on not just our economy but on our Social Security system as well. And why...because people would automatically live longer without the fear of cancer hanging over their heads, thus leading to more benefits having to be paid out to beneficiaries, no matter that less monies would now be paid into the the “Social Security Trust Fund” what with thousands of jobs having been lost.


But the biggest money maker from cancer remains, in my opinion, “Big Pharma” itself. And while they have poured billions of their own dollars into developing new cancer drugs and related treatments, the fact remains that...Read entire article here.

Monday, March 17, 2025

Op-ed:

The Business of Cancer...Political and Otherwise
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / Right Side Patriots / Right Side Patriots Radio
The article posted here is this authors opinion alone, and does not necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com or Google. 

Cancer...the “Big C”...is probably the most dreaded and feared word any of us ever want to hear. Cancer, once again brought to the forefront of both the medical and public discourse after both King Charles and Princess Kate were diagnosed as having cancer, thus joining the ranks of the millions whose lives are forever changed by cancer...the very disease we had hoped would have been cured by now after the officially declared “War on Cancer” was begun.

A war we are still fighting with no seeming end in sight as we find ourselves 54 years into former President Richard M. Nixon's having signed into law on December 23, 1971, the “National Cancer Act,” and with it his hope that cancer would be “conquered” within five years time, but obviously it was not nor has it been to date. And while cancer research and treatment options have increased the survival rate of those afflicted with cancer, so too has the budget of the “National Cancer Institute (NCI)” increased over the years. And yet it's sad to say that it seems we are no closer to a true“cure” than when Nixon was in office.

Why so...because the word “cancer” itself actually encompasses over 200 diseases making it highly unlikely that what I call a “silver bullet” will ever be found to cure all cancers in one fell swoop, that is unless we can find a way to actually “turn off” what is the true common denominator in all cancers...as in the “switch,” that takes healthy cells and mutates them into cells run amok in what is now their “abnormal” state. In other words, what must be developed is a viable way to disrupt the flow of a cell's now corrupted DNA and prevent it from replicating itself and “interrupting” what was a normal cell's genetically programmed “behavior,” with “behavior” being the response of a cell to a specific stimulus or group of stimuli, which ever the case might be.

So until that's possible what we most likely will now see is even more of the standardized types of treatments being developed, but hopefully with less negative and way less sickening side effects, thus making it possible for even more folks to achieve “remission” for much longer periods of time. And while treatments themselves are still not and probably will never be a cure per se...treatments such as chemotherapy, radiation, and immunotherapy...naming but a few...still do play an important part in helping to turn cancer into a chronic but controllable disease...like diabetes and high blood pressure for example...instead of it being what many still consider to be an outright death sentence.

And so while progress has been made in slowing down the progression of certain types of cancer, one must remember that the hoped to hear word “remission” itself is not an actual cure. Why so...because too many times ones cancer will return in one form or another even decades after one has been deemed as having reached “remission.” So if not a cure then exactly is “remission?” Simply, it's the stage where no cancer cells are found in what will most likely be lifelong blood testing...testing that looks for increases in what are “carcinoembryonic antigens”...meaning “bio-markers” as they're more commonly known... which would indicate the presence of recurring cancer cells now again circulating in what was the former cancer patient's body and blood stream.

So with cancer basics having been said, this article is not about the intricate medical logistics of cancer itself, that's best left for the doctors and researchers to explain. But this article is about why, after all these decades of cancer research and promises made, has no cure been found for what is still the “number two” cause of death here in the United States, as well as it being the “number two” cause of death worldwide...with cardiovascular diseases being “number one” in both cases. In fact, as per the “American Cancer Society,” in 2024 alone there were are about 1,680 deaths per day from cancer here in the U.S. even with all the cutting edge technology and treatments available...a very sad commentary indeed.

Sad for sure, but the answer as to why is really quite simple...in my opinion it's because a powerful triad of politics, economics, and ”Big Pharma” simply won't allow an all around cure to found...that is if a true “one size fits all” cure is even possible. But why won't the triad of three allow it...because cancer itself, unfortunately, translates into “big money.” And while some of said monies probably are well deserved, I'm sure some of what are “kickbacks” might even border on the criminal. But the bottom line is that cancer is “big money” no matter how one looks at it.

Unfortunately, at least for the foreseeable future, cancer will equate into “big money” for the oncology doctors who treat cancer...”big money” for the pharmaceutical companies who manufacture the drugs used in cancer treatments (drugs which at times can be just as toxic to the body, if not more so, than ones cancer itself)...and of course “big money” for those elected officials who not only love to spout off about how they cared so much about cancer that they helped to garner contracts and monetary grants for cancer research, while in reality they were helping to line their own pockets. How so...by their helping “Big Pharma” circumnavigate the numerous regulatory requirements in getting a given company's newest cancer drugs to market at “warp speed.” In other words, by allowing them to sidestep the long processes needed to study both a new drug's side effects and its effectiveness.

And dare we forget those elected officials who further lined their pockets by turning what is truly a racially unbiased and colorblind disease into yet another DEI sounding board by spouting off what is their own self-perceived “inequity of cancer treatments” in regards to minorities. And this includes what these folks deem to be “disparities” in “unequal access” to screening, diagnosis, and quality treatment, which might be true in a limited number of cases, but most assuredly has not been proven to be the case overall.

And then there's certain economic aspects as to why a “one size fits all” cancer cure surely will not be on the near horizon, Why so...because the economics of cancer itself feeds directly into the economics of our country. How so? With cancer being a “big business” in its own right, a cure would not only lead to a decline in what's called the “cancer treatment industry...which includes some major hospitals...but it would lead to substantial losses in both the pharmaceutical and the high priced healthcare industries in general. How so...since the need for cancer drugs and related services would no longer be needed, countless thousands of jobs would be lost which in turn would automatically put a strain on not just our economy but on our Social Security system as well. And why...because people would automatically live longer without the fear of cancer hanging over their heads, thus leading to more benefits having to be paid out to beneficiaries, no matter that less monies would now be paid into the the “Social Security Trust Fund” what with thousands of jobs having been lost.

But the biggest money maker from cancer remains, in my opinion, “Big Pharma” itself. And while they have poured billions of their own dollars into developing new cancer drugs and related treatments, the fact remains that today “Big Pharma” has roughly about 860 new cancer drugs being tested or in line to be tested in all-important clinical trials even as I write this. And while some might think that number to be outrageous, that figure comes directly from the pharmaceutical industry’s main trade group, as in the “Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA)” who also just happens to be the industry's main lobbying group.

Now to break the money making side down even further, as per “PhRMA,“ we see the developing of new cancer drugs being more than twice the number of experimental drugs for heart disease and stroke combined; nearly twice the number of drugs being developed for AIDS and all other so called “infectious diseases” combined; and nearly twice as many for Alzheimer’s and other neurological diseases again combined. And why...simply because not only are said cancer drugs way more profitable when reaching market, but courtesy of their and other of political lobbyists in D.C., “PhRMA” gets to engage not only in lobbying for their own new drugs, but they are an actual key player in advocacy efforts regarding cancer and other drug pricing, the logistics of drug access itself, and their asking for even more across the board research funding as well. 

And dare not forget the previously mentioned politicians who aid “Big Pharma” in their efforts are usually, albeit silently, being “rewarded” for their efforts...most under the “proverbial table” so to speak, or with their being given a heads up to future pharmaceutical stock market activity.

So the bottom line is this...while a cure for cancer is desperately needed, what's needed might not be possible in the classic medical sense what with cancer's ability to morph, spread, and take over ones body. And besides, if cancer is literally eliminated from the discourse, “Big Pharma” not only looses its biggest money maker, but its political clout as well. But what is possible and way more likely is to see the dreaded “C” word being turned into a manageable, albeit chronic, disease...a disease that if handled properly will not affect what is ones genetically programmed “life span,” And “Big Pharma” will still rake in the profits with the trade off being that cancer patients will be able to live much longer and have a better quality of life. And this might be the best and the only option for now, in fact, maybe it's been the only option all along. 

And while Richard Nixon's dream of 54 years ago was but a jump off point in the “War on Cancer,” the fact remains that maybe Elon Musk and DOGE still need to look into exactly where all our countless billions of taxpayer dollars supposedly used to fund cancer research actually did go. Case closed.

Copyright © 2025 / Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.

  ***************************************************************************************************

For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, The Danger of the Liberal Psyche Exposed, Part Two.

****************************************************************************************************

RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!                                           
Tomorrow, Tuesday, March 11th  from 7pm to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'The Business of Cancer...Political and Otherwise', 'The Danger of the Liberal Psyche Exposed, Part Two'; and important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50pm EST, show begins at 7pm EST.