Op-ed:
The Solution to a Subversive Problem
By: Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor /
Right Side Patriots on American Political Radio
Fact: in today's America we have a
muslim problem no matter what the left says. And while some muslims do try to at
least attempt to fit into the fabric of our American society, a very
vocal and ever expanding number of their populace view America as an
infidel land...an infidel land that must be brought to its knees, repent, and bend to the will
of allah...assimilation be damned. Thinking that America is
rightfully theirs for the taking by any means possible, whether
through violence or by using our own laws against us, muslims
cite the qur'an's commands as their obligation to do so for the
spreading of islam must be accomplished no matter the amount of blood
shed.
And muslims have not been, contrary to
what Barack HUSSEIN Obama wants us to believe, an “integral part
of America's founding,” but have been a problem since the days
of Thomas Jefferson and the Barbary pirates. Jefferson knew this well
for when referencing the islamic slave trade of Americans and
Europeans by the Barbary states, Jefferson asked Tripoli's envoy to
London, Ambassador Sidi Haji Abdrahaman, by what right did he extort
money and take slaves in this way. And as per Jefferson's own words
Abdrahaman answered him, “that [the right] was founded on the
Laws of the Prophet, that it was written in their Koran, that all
nations who should not have answered their authority were sinners,
that it was their right and duty to make war upon them wherever they
could be found, and to make slaves of all they could take as
prisoners, and that every Mussulman who should be slain in battle was
sure to go to Paradise."
Words that are
still believed today by the true practitioners and unholy warriors of
islam.
And
while in the 15th century a few muslims did set foot on what eventually became American soil when they accompanied Spanish
explorers on their trips to the New World; and while horses exported
from Algeria did help replenish the American cavalry during the
Revolutionary War; and while Morocco became, via the 1787 Treaty of
Friendship, the first country to officially recognize our
new country's independence; the fact remains that muslims did not start
coming as immigrants to this country until the late 19th century, so
how pray tell were they part of our country's founding...simply...
they were not.
So
while not part of our founding, muslims instead have become a serious
part of the problem facing our country today and not just for their
refusal to assimilate but because their very presence in our country
is a criminal act just as it is with the illegal aliens crossing our
southern border.
Let me
explain...
H.R. 5678, The Immigration
and Nationality Act of 1952, also known as the McCarran–Walter
Act...vetoed by Democratic President Harry Truman but
overridden by both the House and Senate...was codified under Title 8
of the United States Code (8 U.S.C. ch. 12). And while this Act has
been amended and modified by the Immigration and Nationality Services
Act of 1965, key
provisions that govern immigration to and citizenship
of these United States thankfully remain in place today.
And while abolishing the hold-over racial restrictions that were part
of the Naturalization Act of 1790...which limited naturalized
citizenship to
“free white persons of good character”...the
1952 Act kept in place quotas established by the Immigration Act of
1924, the very Act that set the quota system regarding those
nationalities and regions who could lawfully gain entry into this
country while at the same time defining the three types of immigrants
that would be allowed said entry...as in those with special skills or
being relatives of U.S. citizens who were exempt from quotas and
restrictions; so-called 'average immigrants' whose numbers were not
to exceed 270,000 per year; and refugees. And this part is
critical...this Act allowed the government to both not let into our
country and to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in
what was called 'subversive activities.'
And subversive activities
becomes key in ridding our country of those out to do us harm in the
name of a religion that is anything but a religion.
But what legally constitutes a subversive activity as per our
immigration laws and how does it apply to the muslim problem we face
today? To answer that one must first understand that a subversive
activity is any activity where a certain group of people band
together with the intention to disrupt, inflame, or seek rebellion
against, in this case, our established system of government. And
in today's America it is muslims... remember ever vile muslima Linda Sarsour's
public call to jihad...who seek to not only violently overthrow our
government and kill our duly-elected president via jihad but who want
to implement sharia law as the law of our land...with the
Constitution relegated to second place at best...and who demand that
'We the People' follow their said law. And the consequence for those
who do not...as per islam's teachings their religion gives them the
right to kill us. And when all this is tied up with a neat little
bow, that is subversive activity personified.
So even while knowing that legally our
president has every right to ban muslim immigration into our country
under the still in effect subversive activity clause in our
immigration laws, the liberal kumbaya sorts, the islamic condoners,
the activist liberal judges, and the muslims themselves will fight
this clause dragging it through the courts for years to come. And in
the meantime the muslim population in this country (currently
estimated at 3.3+ million) will continue to grow until its now
current level of less than 2 percent of the population reaches the
critical number of 10 percent...a percentage where their voting
numbers alone will eventually give them game changing political
clout.
But there is another way besides
immigration laws to remove those wishing us harm from our country and
to do so legally using their currently held 501(c)(3) status against
them.
Fact: many states in addition to
the federal government give tax exemptions to certain recognized
organizations, like ‘churches’ (under which falls synagogues and
mosques) and charities, but all applying for exemption must serve
public purposes, but what purpose does an entity that calls for and
relishes in jihad possibly serve...the answer is none. So with the
entity in question being islam...a political system masquerading as a
religion...along with its economic, social, and legal system known as
sharia law...means islam should not be afforded tax exempt status under
our current on-the-book laws.
To show why islam itself along with its muslim
supposedly religious gathering places known as mosques do not meet the criteria for tax
exempt status we must start at the legal beginning with the fact that
many people make the interpretative mistake that the First Amendment
to the Constitution grants us as individuals or as a group certain
rights. As written, “
Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for
a redress of grievances,” in
no way grants any specific rights to anybody. All this
amendment does is prohibit Congress from making laws about religion,
speech, the press, or assembly. This means that muslims do not have a
First Amendment right to build mosques, proselytize, or implement
sharia anywhere in our country; therefore, islam itself is not
protected under the First Amendment.
This leads into the
actual rules that a religious entity or its places of worship have to
follow in order to become a tax exempt entity under our laws, thus
gaining a 501(c)(3) status. To qualify, a church, synagogue, or
mosque, must be in operation for a specific purpose. This is where
the problem with mosques and therefore with islam comes into
play.
As of now, to qualify for tax-exempt status a mosque
must meet the following requirements:
1. a mosque must be
organized and operated exclusively for religious, educational,
scientific, or other charitable purposes
2. net earnings may not
inure to the benefit of any private individual or shareholder
3.
no substantial part of the mosque’s activity may be attempting to
influence legislation
4. a mosque may not intervene in political
campaigns
5. a mosque’s purposes and activities may not be
illegal or violate fundamental public policy
Simply stated,
all mosques are in violation of our tax laws, and actually violate
the public policy of our country that assures 'We the People' that “
We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal,
that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness.”
Let's go over this point by point to
see how this comes into play.
1. a mosque must be organized and
operated exclusively for religious, educational, scientific, or other
charitable purposes. Muslims,
while inside mosques, engage in both recruiting terrorists and jihad
training within their confines, and none of this is for religious
purposes or for charity but is for the singular purpose of killing or
hurting those they consider infidels.
2. net earnings may not
inure to the benefit of any private individual or shareholder.
Muslims, while inside
mosques, raise monies to bail terrorists out of jail and to send
monies overseas to support recognized terrorist organizations like
The Muslim Brotherhood and Hamas.
3. no substantial part of the
mosque’s activity may be attempting to influence legislation.
Muslims, while inside
mosques, hold meetings to organize, push for, and write papers and
such to prepare their case for sharia law to be implemented in this
country.
4. a mosque may not intervene in political campaigns.
Muslims, while inside
mosques, actively work and campaign for muslim or pro-muslim leaning
candidates so they win their elections and thus can infiltrate our
government and influence legislation in their favor. And
5. a
mosque’s purposes and activities may not be illegal or violate
fundamental public policy. And here in number 5 is the hoped for
sticking point, for a mosque or its leaders to openly speak out or
organize in opposition to anything that our government declares
‘legal’ has that mosque jeopardizing its tax exempt status.
Once
again, American mosques are actively preaching jihad in violation of
their tax-exempt status and is a direct violation of public policy
that guarantees 'We the People' our right to
“Life, Liberty,
and the pursuit of Happiness.”
Fact: to date there are
roughly 3000 mosques in American with each being granted tax exempt status.
Since islam is not a religion as we civilized persons know religion
to be, how is this being allowed and what are our rights as Americans
that the intrusion of islam into our society is not allowing us to
have? We all know that our
“unalienable” rights come from
the living God of the Holy Bible and from the Constitution not from
the made-up god named allah, and surely not from the vile book known
as the qur’an. And our rights spelled out in our Declaration of
Independence are indeed
“Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness,” the very things islam goes against.
Islam in its guise of religion is but a
cult of oppression and death instead of being a religion of life, as
noted in its oppression of women, its condoning of jihad, and its
honor killings for even the slightest of transgressions. In fact, the
qur’an actually instructs muslims in the ways of torture
(Sura
4:56: Surely, those who disbelieve in our revelations, we will
condemn them to the hellfire. Whenever their skins are burnt, we will
give them new skins. Thus, they will suffer continuously. GOD is
Almighty, Most Wise.), and commands the killing of non-believers.
Islam, which actually means submission, allows no liberty for its
followers, and in islam no one submits more than women. Women are
forced to cover their faces and bodies
(qur’an: 24:31 And tell
the believing women to subdue their eyes, and maintain their
chastity. They shall not reveal any parts of their bodies, except
that which is necessary...”) and are at the total command and
will of their husbands. Little girls are often sold as child brides
to old men, and conversion to another religion, if caught, ends in
death. Islam allows no happiness for it is an all-consuming way of
life minus any individuality or free will. You either follow its
tenets to the letter, you never question or speak out against islam
or you will die. So how can anyone be truly happy under islam...they
cannot.
So, with islam itself going against 'We the People's'
guaranteed
"unalienable rights" to
“Life,
Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” which the Declaration of
Independence affords all human beings by their Creator and which
governments are created to protect, then islam most assuredly is not
what our Founding Fathers meant by religion. And if islam is not a
religion it cannot be given religious tax exemption status, and when
coupled with immigration laws against those calling for, planning, or committing subversive activities we have
every legal right to stop muslim entry into our country and to remove
both muslims and the stain that is islam from our country.
Now all we need is political leaders
and a judiciary with enough love for this country to do what legally
needs to be done...our future as America depends on it.
Copyright
© 2017 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
*********************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE!
Today, Tuesday July 18th from 7 to 9pm on American Political Radio, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss the solution to a subversive problem, liberals pointing their fingers in the wrong direction, and the day's important news.
And sometimes buzz words, especially
when coupled with actions, do come back to haunt as 'diversity' in
the name of 'political correctness' can and does have dire
consequences. Take one recent example involving the murder of Justine
Ruszczyk Damond, the Australian bride-to-be who was fatally shot by
Minneapolis Police Officer Mohamed Noor, after she called 911 to
report a sexual assault behind her home. Clad in a bathrobe. Damond
approached the driver’s side of the squad car to talk to the officers, but instead Noor opened fire on
the unarmed woman from the passenger side, killing her instantly with one bullet to the abdomen.
But what is most grievous in all this
is that an innocent woman is dead while a muslim officer is being
protected so as not to upset the diversity applecart for this
incident is being portrayed in the name of political correctness by
the media as nothing but “one individual's actions” no
matter that the body cameras of both the officers on scene which
should have been turned on were not...I mean how convenient is that.
Remember, political correctness calls for
silence...for specific designated things to remain unspoken. And if the
political powers that be dictate that you cannot speak of the enemy,
of race, of religion, of cultural differences, or even of political
differences themselves, then the entire premise of diversity simply cannot exist
for diversity needs...no it demands...conversation if it is to
succeed otherwise diversity forced upon us becomes what amounts to
both a tangible here-and-now physical invasion as well as an invasion
of our thoughts...for politically 'correct-speak' regarding the
invaders will eventually become the rule of the day.
And that is the point we are at today
for in the name of diversity we are forced to tolerate those invading
our shores...we are forced to accept those whose culture goes against
everything our Judeo-Christian society believes in and holds
dear...from religious beliefs to our societal norms as our country is
turned upside down as political correctness itself, driven by a media
out of control, becomes the consummate 'Big Brother' to watch over us all.
And while abolishing the hold-over racial restrictions that were part
of the Naturalization Act of 1790...which limited naturalized
citizenship to “free white persons of good character”...the
1952 Act kept in place quotas established by the Immigration Act of
1924, the very Act that set the quota system regarding those
nationalities and regions who could lawfully gain entry into this
country while at the same time defining the three types of immigrants
that would be allowed said entry...as in those with special skills or
being relatives of U.S. citizens who were exempt from quotas and
restrictions; so-called 'average immigrants' whose numbers were not
to exceed 270,000 per year; and refugees. And this part is
critical...this Act allowed the government to both not let into our
country and to deport immigrants or naturalized citizens engaged in
what was called 'subversive activities.'
But what legally constitutes a subversive activity as per our
immigration laws and how does it apply to the muslim problem we face
today? To answer that one must first understand that a subversive
activity is any activity where a certain group of people band
together with the intention to disrupt, inflame, or seek rebellion
against, in this case, our established system of government. And
in today's America it is muslims... remember ever vile muslima Linda Sarsour's
public call to jihad...who seek to not only violently overthrow our
government and kill our duly-elected president via jihad but who want
to implement sharia law as the law of our land...with the
Constitution relegated to second place at best...and who demand that
'We the People' follow their said law. And the consequence for those
who do not...as per islam's teachings their religion gives them the
right to kill us. And when all this is tied up with a neat little
bow, that is subversive activity personified.
But there is another way besides
immigration laws to remove those wishing us harm from our country and
to do so legally using their currently held 501(c)(3) status against
them.
To show why islam itself along with its muslim
supposedly religious gathering places known as mosques do not meet the criteria for tax
exempt status we must start at the legal beginning with the fact that
many people make the interpretative mistake that the First Amendment
to the Constitution grants us as individuals or as a group certain
rights. As written, “Congress shall make no law respecting an
establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;
or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for
a redress of grievances,” in
no way grants any specific rights to anybody. All this
amendment does is prohibit Congress from making laws about religion,
speech, the press, or assembly. This means that muslims do not have a
First Amendment right to build mosques, proselytize, or implement
sharia anywhere in our country; therefore, islam itself is not
protected under the First Amendment.
This leads into the
actual rules that a religious entity or its places of worship have to
follow in order to become a tax exempt entity under our laws, thus
gaining a 501(c)(3) status. To qualify, a church, synagogue, or
mosque, must be in operation for a specific purpose. This is where
the problem with mosques and therefore with islam comes into
play.
Fact: to date there are
roughly 3000 mosques in American with each being granted tax exempt status.
Since islam is not a religion as we civilized persons know religion
to be, how is this being allowed and what are our rights as Americans
that the intrusion of islam into our society is not allowing us to
have? We all know that our “unalienable” rights come from
the living God of the Holy Bible and from the Constitution not from
the made-up god named allah, and surely not from the vile book known
as the qur’an. And our rights spelled out in our Declaration of
Independence are indeed “Life, Liberty and the pursuit of
Happiness,” the very things islam goes against.
So, with islam itself going against 'We the People's'
guaranteed "unalienable rights" to “Life,
Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness” which the Declaration of
Independence affords all human beings by their Creator and which
governments are created to protect, then islam most assuredly is not
what our Founding Fathers meant by religion. And if islam is not a
religion it cannot be given religious tax exemption status, and when
coupled with immigration laws against those calling for, planning, or committing subversive activities we have
every legal right to stop muslim entry into our country and to remove
both muslims and the stain that is islam from our country.
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! 
This past Saturday an American Patriot...my friend Bill Finlay...aka Wild Bill for America...was arrested in
Calgary, Alberta, Canada for 'supposed' hate speech on his iPad. Bill was an invited guest asked to speak at the Worldwide Coalition Against Islam.
It all started with this comment and poster he put on his facebook page: "Heading out to
Calgary, Alberta, Canada to speak at the Worldwide Coalition Against
Islam! Have info that the govt is busing in agitators to make things difficult for us. So please put me and the others on your prayer lists as we take a stand
against the most dangerous false religion on earth......and the flaming
liberals who love it."
Here now is the very speech Wild Bill was to give in
Canada...a speech he gave a few weeks ago in Jacksonville, FL. The cops after confiscating his iPad having read the script immediately arrested him for hate speech. Watch
the video and you decide if this is hate speech...I sure do NOT think
it is...I think it is truth...a truth that must be told:.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZUmYQYDaw8&feature=youtu.be 
Thankfully, Bill is now safely home in Florida and is OK...mad but OK...and last night "foreign national" Bill put up this video on his facebook page where in his own words he tells his story of Canadian border police out of control: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TwaMpTLUmX0&feature=youtu.be
Personally I believe there are, and those are in addition to
what we already know to be his ‘aiding and abetting’ the enemy. And here I will
list but four lesser known but still questionable actions, two of which many have
been forgotten to some degree and two of whose ramifications might not yet be fully
understood. And one of those actions goes back to February 2016...an action I
find a deliberate slap in the face to our beloved America...and that is when Barack
HUSSEIN Obama signed yet another one of his infamous executive orders...a most
grievous order that allows any muslim elected to public office in our America to
take their oath of office on a qur’an instead of on the traditionally used Bible,
and also to do so when and if they have to testify in court.
And dare we forget Obama’s infamous czars...his 35+ personal
army of one world government lobbyists of sorts having no Constitutional basis for their existence at
all...35+ czars appointed that not only circumvented the Constitution’s appointment
provisions but also people who could enable unauthorized executive actions...35+
czars appointed without the advice and consent of the Senate and without congressional
oversight whose mere presence was a threat to our system of checks and balances
as their very being is in a violation of the separation of powers clause...35+
persons with overreaching regulatory powers who oversaw statutory government
positions and who answered directly to Obama alone...35+ persons that neither
Congress nor ‘We the People’ had any idea what they were doing or even how they
did what they were doing...35+ persons picked from the party loyal to help
Obama lay the groundwork for a ‘so-called’ shadow government to aid him once he
was out of office.
Remember, Obama said he will be keeping his eye on now President
Trump...the man he said he will call to task if he does not like how Trump is
handling the reins of power...as in Obama must ‘save face’ now that America has
someone leading from the front instead of from behind like he did for eight
long years. And the reality is that Obama still sees himself as president and thinks any and
all he has to say still has credence and credibility... but guess what...it does not. But
by appointing said czars in the way he did, Obama deliberately
and with malice violated both the Constitution and his oath of office... as in
to protect and defend the Constitution of these United States...laying out the
perfect case for treason courtesy of the czars.
Claiming that he was sending the money to support humanitarian
aid, political and security reforms, and the "rule of law"...whatever that means to the lawless ‘so-called’
Palestinians...and doing so right after the Palestinian Authority whined that
they were hurting for cash needed for "salaries
unpaid and debts that are owed”...Obama released said monies claiming that
Congress’ opposition was “not legally binding,”
no matter that past presidents have traditionally respected and honored
congressional holds. Par for the course for the man whose action further
stabbed Israel in the back and follows right on the heels of his deciding
against using our veto at the U.N. Security Council...a veto that would have ‘killed’
the resolution condemning Israel’s building of settlements on land that is
rightfully theirs, including the giving of East Jerusalem to the ‘so-called’
Palestinians.
Treasonous intent by first, deliberately
and with malice again turning America’s back on one of our staunchest allies in
favor of his brethren. Second, the Department of State has announced that they
will be reviewing this last-minute decision of Obama’s as it was deliberately done
over the objections of congressional Republicans. And third, the West Bank and
Gaza are basically under the control not of the Palestinian Authority per se
but of HAMAS...the very HAMAS on the Department of State’s terror
list...meaning Barack HUSSEIN Obama once again was giving money to terrorists continuing
to perpetrate actions that ‘aid and abet’...’aid and comfort’...the enemy...an
act of treason personified no matter it did not go through.
And what are the above actions cited but Obama being and
showing his true self...a traitor to the very country he swore his allegiance to. And he must be called to task...to be
made an example of...for when one’s true loyalties lie with the enemy American
lives as well as America herself is in danger...in danger of losing who she is...as in a
Constitutional Republic...that one vile man has shown by his actions that he
never had any intention of honoring or protecting her.
