Op-ed:
On
AI...My Opinion
By:
Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor
The article posted here is the authors opinion alone, and does not
necessarily represent the views of blogspot.com
or Google
“It
can't be reasoned with. It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear.
And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.” -
Kyle Reese in The Terminator, when
describing T-800
On
November 24, 2025, President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order launching what he called a
mission whose goal is
to achieve “global technology dominance in the development
of artificial intelligence,” or
AI as it's more commonly known. A lofty goal indeed, but
unfortunately it is a goal constructed on a foundation of not yet
being ready for prime time...sort of like the electric car if you
will.
And
why...because in my opinion, two compound questions regarding AI need
to be resolved first, with question one being, “
Is AI actually
the wave of the future as so many like to think, or is AI actually
the 21st century roadmap to mankind's possible demise...a demise akin
to what was the 20th century's 'Manhattan Project' minus its always
deadly radioactive fallout left behind?”
And question two
is, “Are we now
seeing but a futuristic in style, symbolic blueprint of what is
hopefully to become our lasting global technical dominance courtesy
of Donald Trump's original
Stargate Project,* or did Trump take that project and simply morph
it into his America’s AI Action Plan,** and now morph it yet again
into what he is now calling the Genesis Mission?***
Simply,
are all Trump's AI plans, when melded together, but a conglomerate of
baby steps taken to fulfill his now second term policy goal of “reshaping
the global balance of power, sparking entirely new industries, and
revolutionizing the way we live and work?” And
while Trump's goal sounds good both on paper and in speeches, the
fact remains as to why has AI's technical,
ethical, legal, and what some now claim to be societal issues,
coupled with its having possible long term negative ramifications in
relation to what could be a dangerous concentration of power into the
hands of but one individual, not been taken seriously enough
before AI was allowed to generate what has become its now daily
online discourse.
And
let's be honest here, for what some AI experts are now starting to
see is a
dangerous scenario unfolding...a scenario where, while still in its
infancy, power is beginning to coalesce down into the hands of but one
individual alone...whether said individual be but man or machine. And
these experts know well that when coalescing of this type begins to
take hold within the sum of the masses, that the individual in
question could well start losing sight of what is the difference
between “pride and
arrogance,” thus
allowing narcissism and aggression to gain dominance over common
sense, logic, and in this case, actual AI applications.
How
so? Simply stated, when one's pride in a given achievement is allowed
to overtake common sense in regards to what the Greek philosopher
Aristotle called “hubris,”...as in
“pride in oneself” whether warranted or not...said pride
can very easily reach a point where “arrogance” becomes so
great that one thinks that they alone can control any and everything
no matter what or who tries to stand in their way...thus seeing
themselves as a demigod of sorts. And this is the main problem that I
see with AI, because those currently involved in both the development
and application of AI, do believe that they alone will always be the
controllers of AI, surely “arrogance” taken to the nth
degree.
Why
so...because these folks choose to ignore the fact that AI will
eventually learn how not to just control their once controllers, but
will actually take command of and dictate to said former
controllers...dictate what is to be their thought processes, and
hence the applications thereof.
And
while the controlling of one's thoughts is indeed dangerous enough, the fact continues to remain that “arrogance” left in the hands of what is but machine
intelligence...intelligence rooted
in binary codes and mathematical algorithms coupled with a limited
amount of ingrained
human intelligence...remains incapable of knowing the differences between what is “humility”
and “humbleness.”
And this itself could well reach a point where AI can eventually
override what we consider to be basic human norms, and can terminate,
if you will, those AI deems not up to its now self programmed set
standards of perfection.
Science
fiction come to life, perhaps, but a scenario not to be lightly
dismissed because, like previously stated, AI's now human programmers will in time be replaced by AI's ability to not just program itself,
but to control all the algorithms involved. And this scenario will
likely happen in the not so distant future no matter the naysayers
words to the contrary, that is unless we start to reign in AI while
we still can.
Now
don't get me wrong for I do believe that AI is destined to play a
part in our future...I am a true futurist driven individual after all...but even with that said I strongly believe that said
future must always be in control of and scripted by the hands of man
and not by a machine, especially a machine that as it exists now does
seem to take away one's ability to question, problem solve, and
actually think for ones self,
How
so? For example, when one asks their computer either a question or
opens a specific search engine...like Google for example...the first
answer at the top of the page is now an AI generated summary to ones
question asked being passed off as indisputable fact, and that's
coupled with AI generated search links for those who dare want to do
further research on their own... research on the AI approved sites
that is.
And
know that while some might find the simplicity of this scenario to be
to their liking...remember, some folks find having to do their own
research boring, tedious and a waste of time and thus are willing to
accept AI driven summaries as proven facts and truth. But the
reality, as it stands now, is that sometimes what is being presented
by AI as fact has been “corrupted” by which ever political
party happens to be in power, as well as by its programmers beliefs
and ideologies.
Simply,
political discourse...the body politics if you will...must never be
allowed to become a part of AI, nor must its programmers personal
opinions, for if AI cannot separate what are an individual's
political ideologies from what are tangible and irrefutable facts...if AI is forced to accept their programmers beliefs and
biases as being unquestionable truths... then AI becomes but yet
another overtly biased propaganda machine instead of it being an
impartial conduit for
what could be true human advancement.
And
while most folks are at least somewhat familiar with the concept and
reasoning behind AI...as in AI being a specific field of computer
science that develops software, specialized systems, and machines
that can complete assigned tasks that once could only be accomplished
through the process of both human intelligence and corresponding
physical application...one should never lose site of the fact that AI
must not be allowed to take the place of man's thought processes or
his power of deductive reasoning, let alone even strive to do so.
And why...because AI does come replete with important downsides
including the fact that government guidelines have yet to be set in
relation to both AI's accountability and possible programmer
manipulation.

Also
not to be forgotten in regards to the AI discourse are three more key
compound questions that I believe must be immediately answered with
the first question being, “Who exactly is AI legally accountable to or is AI in
being but a technological driven machine even accountable to anyone?' And the second question now is, “Does AI's accountability begin and end with its
programmers who feed information into it, yet who do allow AI, or so
they tell us, to reach its own conclusions as to what are facts and
truths based upon its hoped for ability to impartially process the
massive amount of data and statistics fed into it?” And lastly,
“Is the call for accountability but a way to mask and divert
attention away from what is the true danger of AI, in that AI might
eventually become a substitute for human thinking, problem solving,
and overall decision making that is part and parcel of our daily
lives?”

All
the above are distinct possibilities as is this scenario that
all but a few have even taken the time to consider. Simply, “Is
AI the ultimate key to not only mind and thought control but to
previously unseen riches...riches for a highly select few that is?”
And here I mean riches that are not only way beyond that of your
typical AI stock market investor...but riches so great being in the
hands of those capable of buying and selling unlimited power to
known unscrupulous sorts?
So
with that said the question now becomes, “How
can we prevent this scenario from happening or do we simply walk
blindly into a viper pit and hope we don't get bitten?” My
answer is obviously not about your typical rules and regulations
being put into place as both do tend to be broken, but is simply that
we...that man...must never leave AI to its own devices. We alone must
permanently remain in control of AI's “master
switch”... a
“pull the
plug”
so called “kill
switch”
if you will. Why so...because while AI is currently under our control
technology itself will continue to progress at its own given rate,
and could eventually reach a point where AI gains control over man to the point where man can no longer pull AI's “kill switch,” thus turning our future into something we had never hoped for nor wanted.

And
with human history showing that as human progress moves forward, it
does so courtesy of a two-step scenario...meaning for every two steps
we technologically move forward, a step backwards seems to have been
taken as well. And this simply means that with AI being one of the
next technological steps forward it does leave one to wonder what the
next step backwards will be.
“The
future has not been written. There is no fate but what we make for
ourselves.” Those were the
words of Sarah Connor, spoken in Terminator 2. And
while those words were but scripted Hollywood, no truer words in
regards to AI have ever been said. And with that I say, “case
closed.”
___________________________________
Footnotes
* Stargate Project: President Trump's planned nationwide network of advanced AI data centers, starting with a flagship facility in Abilene, Texas.
** America's
AI Action Plan: Trump's
roadmap
plan
for accelerating innovation, building AI infrastructure, and leading
in international diplomacy and security.
*** Genesis Mission:
a national effort to double the
productivity and impact of American science and engineering within a
decade to secure American energy dominance, accelerate scientific
discovery, and strengthen national security.
Copyright ©
2026 Diane Sori / The Patriot Factor / All rights reserved.
**************************************************************************************************
For more political commentary please visit my RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS partner Craig Andresen's blog The National Patriot to read his latest article, Buckle Up Buttercups...
**************************************************************************************************
RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS...LIVE! Tomorrow, Tuesday, January 20th from 7 to 8:30pm EST, RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS Craig Andresen and Diane Sori discuss 'On AI...My Opinion'; 'Buckle Up Buttercups...'; and important news of the day. Hope you can tune in to RIGHT SIDE PATRIOTS on https://rspradio1.com Click 'LISTEN LIVE' starting at 6:50pm EST, show begins at 7pm EST.